背景:在法国,注射吸毒者(PWID)仍是感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的高危人群之一.药物消费室(DCR)已显示其在国外和法国的HCV危险行为的有效性,最近通过COSINUS研究对它们进行了评估。在法国,两个DCR于2016年开业,一个在巴黎,另一个在斯特拉斯堡。此子分析的目的是探索在居住在马赛的PWID中使用DCR的意愿,没有打开DCR的地方。
方法:COSINUS研究是一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,包括在波尔多招募的665名PWID,马赛,2016年至2019年之间的巴黎和斯特拉斯堡。调查人员在基线时定期面对面地进行问卷调查,3个月,6个月和12个月。在马赛,199名PWID被招募。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估该人群中与使用DCR意愿相关的因素。
结果:在545个观察中,对应于195个不同的参与者进行分析,57%的人表示他们愿意参加DCR。给出的主要原因是“更干净地消费”。领取津贴(OR=2.38;95%置信区间(CI)(95%CI)=1.17-4.81),没有医疗保险(OR=3.61;95%CI=1.49-8.75),每日注射(OR=1.97;95%CI=1.05-3.70)和公共场所注射(OR=2.66;95%CI=1.29-5.47)均与使用DCR的意愿呈正相关.
结论:DCR是针对暴露于高卫生或社会风险的PWID的设备,即生活在不稳定条件下的人们,他们必须在公共场所注射,在有害的卫生环境中,并以快速的手势以免被看见。这些分析强调,最想参加DCR的人意识到与他们的做法相关的危害,并表现出寻求保护免受街头毒品场景的愿望。
BACKGROUND: In France, people who inject drugs (PWID) are still one of the most at risk population for contracting hepatitis C virus (HCV). Drug consumption rooms (DCR) have shown their effectiveness on HCV risk behaviors abroad and in France, where they have been recently evaluated with the COSINUS study. In France, two DCRs opened in 2016, one in Paris and another in Strasbourg. The objective of this sub-analysis was to explore the willingness to use a DCR in PWID living in Marseille, where no DCR is opened.
METHODS: The COSINUS study is a prospective multicenter cohort that included 665 PWID recruited in Bordeaux, Marseille, Paris and Strasbourg between 2016 and 2019. Investigators administered questionnaires face-to-face at regular intervals at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. In Marseille, 199 PWID were recruited. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess factors associated with willingness to use DCR among this population.
RESULTS: Among 545 observations corresponding to 195 distinct participants selected for analyses, 57% declared they were willing to attend a DCR. The main reason given was \"to consume more cleanly\". Receiving allowances (OR = 2.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) (95% CI) = 1.17-4.81), not having health insurance (OR = 3.61; 95% CI = 1.49-8.75), injecting daily (OR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.05-3.70) and in a public space (OR = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.29-5.47) were all positively associated with willingness to use a DCR.
CONCLUSIONS: DCR are devices that target PWID exposed to high sanitary or social risks, i.e. people living in precarious conditions, who have to inject in public spaces, in deleterious sanitary environments and with rapid gestures in order not to be seen. These analyzes highlight that the people who most want to attend a DCR are aware of the harms associated with their practices and show a desire to seek protection from street-based drug scenes.