Intermittent catheterization (IC) utilizing conventional eyelets catheters (CECs) for bladder drainage has long been the standard of care. However, when the tissue of the lower urinary tract comes in close proximity to the eyelets, mucosal suction often occurs, resulting in microtrauma. This study investigates the impact of replacing conventional eyelets with a drainage zone featuring multiple micro-holes, distributing pressure over a larger area. Lower pressures limit the suction of surrounding tissue into these micro-holes, significantly reducing tissue microtrauma. Using an ex vivo model replicating the intra-abdominal pressure conditions of the bladder, the intra-catheter pressure was measured during drainage. When mucosal suction occurred, intra-catheter images were recorded. Subsequently affected tissue samples were investigated histologically. The negative pressure peaks caused by mucosal suction were found to be very high for the CECs, leading to exfoliation of the bladder urothelium and breakage of the urothelial barrier. However, a micro-hole zone catheter (MHZC) with a multi-eyelet drainage zone showed significantly lower pressure peaks, with over 4 times lower peak intensity, thus inducing far less extensive microtraumas. Limiting or even eliminating mucosal suction and resulting tissue microtrauma may contribute to safer catheterizations in vivo and increased patient comfort and compliance.

UNASSIGNED: Systematic reviews have highlighted the lack of evidence on choosing the type of intermittent urinary catheter (IUC) with regard to the occurrence of urinary tract infections (UTIs).
UNASSIGNED: To describe the incidence and frequency of symptoms suggestive of UTIs (ssUTIs) for prelubricated versus hydrophilic IUCs.
UNASSIGNED: An observational study of a patient database compiled by UK general practitioners was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients with at least one ssUTI (prescription of a nonspecific antibiotic with a UTI-related diagnosis, or prescription of a UTI-specific antibiotic) and the mean number of ssUTIs per affected patient in the 12 mo following the index IUC prescription. Comparable prelubricated (\"PRELUBE\") and hydrophilic (\"HYDRO\") catheter groups were obtained with 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 5296 patients were included (prelubricated: n = 458; hydrophilic: n = 4838). After PSM, the two groups had similar proportions of patients with ssUTIs at baseline. The proportion of patients with ssUTIs during exposure was similar in the PRELUBE (36.9%) and HYDRO groups (41.5%; p = 0.155). However, among patients having used the same type of catheter throughout the exposure period, the proportion with ssUTIs was significantly lower in the PRELUBE group (44.6%, vs 55.0% for HYDRO; p = 0.015), as was the number of ssUTIs per patient (1.3 vs 1.8; p = 0.036).
UNASSIGNED: When choosing a coated IUC, physicians and patients should not rule out PRELUBE IUCs for safety reasons alone.
UNASSIGNED: Using real-world data compiled by UK general practitioners, we described the incidence and frequency of symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infection in people who were using various types of intermittent urinary catheters. When the same type of prelubricated catheter was used throughout the study period, the incidence of these symptoms was lower than for hydrophilic catheters.

The standard method of evaluating the lubricity of intermittent urinary catheters with coefficient of friction (CoF) testing is not physiologically relevant, while there is also a dearth of published research on catheter-associated urethral micro-trauma. We developed a novel human urethral epithelial cell-seeded model of the urethra to replace the rubber counter-surface used in standard CoF testing. This cell-seeded model, in conjunction with a novel testing device, allows an investigation of catheter-associated epithelial micro-trauma in vitro for the first time. The CoF of four brands of commercially-available hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters was measured using both the rubber and urethral model counter-surfaces. Post-catheterisation of the urethral model, the damage to the epithelial layer was analysed using standard cell imaging. The rubber counter-surface was shown to over-estimate the CoF of gel-coated catheters compared to our urethral model due to stick-slip behaviour caused by polymer-on-polymer interaction of the catheter base material on the rubber counter-surface. We identified no deleterious effect due to the presence or design of catheter eyelets to either the CoF measurements or the degree of epithelium damage in our model. Furthermore, the epithelial damage did not correlate with the measured CoF of the low friction catheters, suggesting a more nuanced pathogenesis of urethral irritation and casting doubt on the translatability of a solely mechanical assessment of lubricity of urinary catheters to a clinical effect.