Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) are listed in the Stockholm Convention. Therefore, selecting suitable methods for their accurate quantification is essential. Nowadays, the quality of commercial reagents employed as quantification standards is not guaranteed. As a solution, we adopted an SCCP formulation reference material with known homolog composition ratios as the quantification standard to evaluate the appropriateness of the methods. By mixing the SCCP formulation and interferences, an analytical sample was independently prepared and used as the simulation environmental sample. The homolog compositional profiles of the SCCPs resembled those of the quantification standard and the analytical sample. The mass fractions and the homolog profiles, including the carbon chain length and chlorine homolog profiles, of the SCCPs were reported by 14 different laboratories. For the mass fraction, the results reported by participants were consistent, except for the participants that employed low-resolution gas chromatography (GC). The results generated from liquid chromatography (LC) and GC were slightly different, despite of the similar homolog composition ratios between the quantification standard and the analytical sample. Although there were discreet discrepancies in the overall chlorine homolog profiles, the carbon chain length profiles acquired from GC and LC were similar. The differences depended on the method employed. Additionally, compared with the low-resolution data, the high-resolution data displayed less fluctuation since the effect of the interferences on the analytical sample was reduced because of the mass accuracy of high-resolution instruments. Accordingly, the interlaboratory trial employing the similar homolog compositional profiles of the quantification standard and the analytical sample proved valuable in elucidating the differences among methods, considering equipment, resolution specification, and ionization.

Capillary zone electrophoresis ultraviolet (CZE-UV) has become increasingly popular for the charge heterogeneity determination of mAbs and vaccines. The ε-aminocaproic acid (eACA) CZE-UV method has been used as a rapid platform method. However, in the last years, several issues have been observed, for example, loss in electrophoretic resolution or baseline drifts. Evaluating the role of eACA on the reported issues, various laboratories were requested to provide their routinely used eACA CZE-UV methods, and background electrolyte compositions. Although every laboratory claimed to use the He et al. eACA CZE-UV method, most methods actually deviate from He\'s. Subsequently, a detailed interlaboratory study was designed wherein two commercially available mAbs (Waters\' Mass Check Standard mAb [pI 7] and NISTmAb [pI 9]) were provided to each laboratory, along with two detailed eACA CZE-UV protocols for a short-end, high-speed, and a long-end, high-resolution method. Ten laboratories participated each using their own instruments, and commodities, showing excellence method performance (relative standard deviations [RSDs] of percent time-corrected main peak areas from 0.2% to 1.9%, and RSDs of migration times from 0.7% to 1.8% [n = 50 per laboratory], analysis times in some cases as short as 2.5 min). This study clarified that eACA is not the main reason for the abovementioned variations.

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics is currently popular enough to attract both specialized and non-specialized NMR groups involving both analytical trained personnel and newcomers, including undergraduate students. Recent interlaboratory studies performed by established NMR metabolomics groups demonstrated high reproducibility of the state-of-the-art NMR equipment and SOPs. There is, however, no assessment of NMR reproducibility when mixing both analytical experts and newcomers. An interlaboratory assessment of NMR quantitation reproducibility was performed using two NMR instruments belonging to different laboratories and involving several operators with different backgrounds and metabolomics expertise for the purpose of assessing the limiting factors for data reproducibility in a multipurpose NMR environment. The variability induced by the operator, automatic pipettes, NMR tubes and NMR instruments was evaluated in order to assess the limiting factors for quantitation reproducibility. The results estimated the expected reproducibility data in a real-life multipurpose NMR laboratory to a maximum 4% variability, demonstrating that the current NMR equipment and SOPs may compensate some of the operator-induced variability.

Every laboratory test needs validation by quality controls. For biocide susceptibility testing (BST), neither quality control (QC) strains nor QC ranges applicable to these strains are currently available. As QC strains, four well-defined laboratory reference strains (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC® 6538, Enterococcus hirae ATCC® 10541, Escherichia coli ATCC® 10536 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC® 15442), which have been used previously for biocide efficacy testing, were selected. In an interlaboratory trial with eleven participating laboratories, BST QC ranges should be developed for the aforementioned four strains and the four biocides benzalkonium chloride, chlorhexidine, octenidine and polyhexanide. The performance of three different lots of tryptic soy broth was explored using the broth microdilution method and the data were subsequently evaluated using the RangeFinder software. As a result, QC ranges were defined for all reference strain-biocide combinations, except for P. aeruginosa ATCC® 15442 with the two biocides chlorhexidine and polyhexanide. The development of the latter two QC ranges was not possible, due to the limited solubility of the biocides in the test range required for P. aeruginosa ATCC® 15442. The newly developed QC ranges comprise three to five dilution steps. The establishment of QC ranges will contribute to the validation of BST in the future.

Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) are industrial chemicals that have been primarily used in applications involving metalworking fluids. Among CPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) are a well-known environmental pollutant and are listed under Annex A of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. CPs are alkanes substituted with chlorine atoms, and SCCPs are comprised of 10-13 carbon atoms. Reliable quantification of SCCPs is a critical issue because of the large number of SCCP isomers that are in use across multiple industries. Some interlaboratory comparisons of SCCP analyses have been conducted, and the reliability of these results was overwhelmingly determined as inferior to that of comparable PCB and dioxin analyses because of variations in the quality of commercial reagents that were employed as quantification standards. In order to address such inconsistencies, this study endeavored to prepare and evaluate a novel SCCP formulation as a candidate reference material for use as a reliable quantification standard. A subject trial study was hence performed to evaluate methods such as gas- and liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS and LC/MS) on sample matrices (without a clean-up process), and to subsequently elucidate the interpreted specifications for their candidacy as a reliable quantification standard. Results ultimately showed that the SCCP concentrations obtained from GC and LC were comparable. When the homologs reported by a subset of 14 separate laboratories were unified (excluding all results for Cl4 homologs), the carbon chain length profiles obtained from GC and LC were found to be similar; however, the overall chlorine homolog profiles did exhibit slight differences. Moreover, the results from high-resolution MS showed less variation than those from low-resolution MS. Thus, it was overarchingly determined that the deployment of this candidate reference material would serve as an effective mechanism for estimating the comparability of SCCP quantifications/evaluations of standard materials.

The performance of culture and PCR methods routinely used to diagnose contagious equine metritis (CEM) was evaluated and compared by two interlaboratory trials involving a total of 24 European laboratories, including 22 National Reference Laboratories for CEM. Samples were swab specimens artificially contaminated with bacteria present in the genital tract of Equidae, some with and some without Taylorella equigenitalis, the causative agent of CEM, and T asinigenitalis, responsible for possible misidentification as T equigenitalis Throughout both interlaboratory trials, PCR performed better in terms of specificity and sensitivity than the culture method, supporting the assertion that PCR should be accepted for CEM diagnosis. However, the culture performance during the second interlaboratory trial was better than during the first one, suggesting that the expertise of participants improved. This reveals the advantage of regular interlaboratory trials to constantly improve the expertise of laboratories. It also shows the need to develop new culture media that are more selective and/or better geared to the metabolism of T equigenitalis in order to improve the bacteriological diagnosis of CEM.

Endocrine-active substances can adversely impact the aquatic ecosystems. A special emphasis is laid, among others, on the effects of estrogens and estrogen mimicking compounds. Effect-based screening methods like in vitro bioassays are suitable tools to detect and quantify endocrine activities of known and unknown mixtures. This study describes the validation of the Arxula-Yeast Estrogen Screen (A-YES®) assay, an effect-based method for the detection of the estrogenic potential of water and waste water. This reporter gene assay, provided in ready to use format, is based on the activation of the human estrogen receptor alpha. The user-friendly A-YES® enables inexperienced operators to rapidly become competent with the assay. Fourteen laboratories from four countries with different training levels analyzed 17β-estradiol equivalent concentrations (EEQ) in spiked and unspiked waste water effluent and surface water samples, in waste water influent and spiked salt water samples and in a mixture of three bisphenols. The limit of detection (LOD) for untreated samples was 1.8ng/L 17β-estradiol (E2). Relative repeatability and reproducibility standard deviation for samples with EEQ above the LOD (mean EEQ values between 6.3 and 20.4ng/L) ranged from 7.5 to 21.4% and 16.6 to 28.0%, respectively. Precision results are comparable to other frequently used analytical methods for estrogens. The A-YES® has been demonstrated to be an accurate, precise and robust bioassay. The results have been included in the ISO draft standard. The assay was shown to be applicable for testing of typical waste water influent, effluent and saline water. Other studies have shown that the assay can be used with enriched samples, which lower the LOD to the pg/L range. The validation of the A-YES® and the development of a corresponding international standard constitute a step further towards harmonized and reliable bioassays for the effect-based analysis of estrogens and estrogen-like compounds in water samples.