Inferior alveolar nerve block

下牙槽神经阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是一个潜在的,块随机化,失明,多臂和平行组优势临床试验。
    78名符合招募标准的患者,随机分为以下三组:I组(n=26)-无芳香疗法(AT)的下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB);II组(n=26)-IANB与薰衣草AT和III组-IANB与玫瑰AT(n=26)在超声芳香扩散器(与各自的油)的帮助下,分别在手术室和3中进行20分钟/2小时。对于AT,从含有100mg这些药用植物的100ml溶液中加入3-4滴薰衣草和玫瑰调理的油。分别采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和改良牙科焦虑量表(MDAS)记录患者术前(PRO)和开口(AO)疼痛及焦虑情况。将由此获得的数据输入到Excel表中并进行统计检验(方差分析和配对t检验)。小于0.05的p值被认为是统计学上显著的。
    对于VAS和MDAS,第一组显示PRO和AO之间的差异不显著(p=0.62,p=0.71)。然而,II组(p=0.04,p=0.02)和III组(p=0.03,p=0.01)显示PO-AOVAS和MDAS之间存在显着差异。MDAS和VAS组间比较显示I组和II组之间存在显着差异(p=0.03,p=0.04),以及I组和III组(p=0.02,p=0.03)。然而,在组II和组III之间观察到非显著差异(p=0.85,0.34)。此外,在AT上升后,与男性相比,女性的焦虑水平有统计学上的显著降低(p=0.02).然而,I组和II组没有显示任何性别倾向于焦虑和疼痛。
    使用薰衣草和玫瑰AT可以减轻SIP牙齿在AO期间的牙齿焦虑和疼痛减轻。在女性患者中,玫瑰AT可以优先于薰衣草AT。
    UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective, block-randomized, blinded, multiple arm and parallel-group superiority clinical trial.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-eight patients satisfying the recruitment standards, were randomly allocated into three groups as follows: Group I (n = 26) - Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) devoid of aromatherapy (AT); Group II (n = 26) - IANB with lavender AT and Group III - IANB with rose AT (n = 26) with the help of the ultrasonic aroma diffuser (with respective oils)for 20 min/2 h in operatories 1,2 and 3 respectively. For AT, 3-4 drops of lavender and rose-conditioned oils were added from a 100 ml solution containing 100 mg of these medicinal plants. The pre-operative (PRO) and access opening (AO) pain as well as the anxiety of patients were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) respectively. Data thus obtained was entered into the Excel sheet and subjected to statistical tests (analysis of variance and paired t-test). The p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Group I showed non-significant disparity between PRO and AO for both VAS as well as MDAS (p = 0.62, p = 0.71). However, group II (p = 0.04, p = 0.02) and group III (p = 0.03, p = 0.01) revealed significant differences between PO - AO VAS and MDAS. MDAS and VAS intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference among groups I and II (p = 0.03, p = 0.04), and groups I and III (p = 0.02, p = 0.03). However non-significant disparity was observed among groups II and III (p = 0.85, 0.34). Moreover, there was a statistically significant reduction in anxiety levels in females compared to males after rose AT (p = 0.02). Nevertheless, groups I and II did not show any gender predilection for anxiety as well as pain.
    UNASSIGNED: Alleviation of dental anxiety as well as reduction in pain during AO of teeth with SIP can be achieved using Lavender and rose AT. In female patients, rose AT can be preferred over lavender AT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙(IMTM)在口腔外科中很常见,但术后疼痛严重。超声引导下牙槽神经阻滞(UGIANB)是下颌神经区域的一种镇痛技术。我们使用开嘴器描述UGIANB,并报告术后病程良好的病例。6例患者在全身麻醉下进行了双侧IMTM的提取。手术后,我们进行了UGIANB,并分别给药5mL左旋布比卡因0.375%.术后疼痛数字评分量表评分分别为1(0-2)和2.5(0-5)(平均值(范围)),术后第一天和第七天,分别。术后恢复质量-40评分分别为188.5(8.1)和191.7(7.6)(平均值(SD)),术后第一天和第七天,分别。没有遇到手术并发症。我们用开嘴器对IMTM提取的患者进行了UGIANB,并能够提供安全和良好的镇痛效果。
    Extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) is common in oral surgery, but its postoperative pain is severe. Ultrasound-guided inferior alveolar nerve block (UGIANB) is an analgesic technique in the mandibular nerve region. We describe UGIANB using a mouth opener and report the cases with a good postoperative course. Six patients underwent the extraction of bilateral IMTMs under general anesthesia. After surgery, we performed UGIANB and administered 5 mL of 0.375% levobupivacaine on each side. The postoperative numerical rating scale pain scores were 1 (0-2) and 2.5 (0-5) (mean (range)), postoperative day one and seven, respectively. The postoperative quality of recovery-40 scores were 188.5 (8.1) and 191.7 (7.6) (mean (SD)), postoperative day one and seven, respectively. No procedural complications were encountered. We performed UGIANB with a mouth opener on a patient with IMTM extraction and were able to provide safe and good analgesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估有和没有颞下颌关节强直的患者下颌孔和下颌管位置的变化。
    评估了100个颞下颌关节,其中50个关节为强直关节(A组),其余50个为正常关节(B组),无强直。这些组进一步分为具有增长潜力的组(少于18岁)和没有增长潜力的组(超过18岁)。从下颌孔的中心到关节盂窝测量下颌孔的位置,乙状缺口,冠状缺口,CBCT扫描上的gonion和后边界。从下颌管的外侧到下颌下缘测量下颌管的位置,颊和舌皮质板和1区的肺泡,第二和第三磨牙。
    A组孔距颅底的平均距离为19.01mm,而B组为31.26mm。与B组报告的平均距离6.21mm相比,A组的下颌孔更靠近咬合平面(5.43mm)。两组之间的gonion和乙状结肠缺口。在A组中,精神孔更常见于第二前磨牙的后方,更靠近第一磨牙区域,而在B组中,可以看到第二前磨牙的前方或附近。A组,在第一和第二磨牙区,根管到颊皮质板的平均距离为3.65mm和5.76mm,分别,而B组为6.09毫米和6.59毫米。强直病例(8.79mm)的根管比对照组(7.41mm)更远离下边界。在比较单侧病例的未患侧与正常下颌骨时,管和孔的位置与正常下颌骨的位置相似,值在正常下颌骨中通常可见的较低范围内。
    下颌骨强直是一种使人衰弱的状况,尤其是当它在生长完成之前在个体中发展时,因为它会影响下颌骨的解剖结构。了解伴随下颌骨紊乱的变化可以帮助外科医生以限制手术引起的可能并发症的方式规划外科手术。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the variation in the position of the mandibular foramen and mandibular canal in patients with and without temporomandibular joint ankylosis.
    UNASSIGNED: 100 temporomandibular joints were evaluated of which 50 joints were ankylosed joints (Group A) and the rest 50 were normal joints (Group B) without ankylosis. These groups were further divided into those with growing potential (less than 18 years) and those without growing potential (above 18 years). The position of the mandibular foramen was measured from its center to the glenoid fossa, sigmoid notch, coronoid notch, gonion and posterior border on CBCT scans. The position of the mandibular canal was measured from the outer aspect of the canal to the lower border of the mandible, buccal and lingual cortical plates and the alveolus in the region of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd molars.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean distance of the foramen from the base of the skull in Group A was 19.01 mm while the same for Group B was 31.26 mm. The mandibular foramen was found to be closer to the occlusal plane (5.43 mm) in Group A as compared to the mean distance of 6.21 mm reported in Group B. There was no significant difference in the position of the foramen from the posterior border, gonion and sigmoid notch between the groups. The mental foramen was seen more commonly posterior to the 2nd premolar and closer to the first molar region in Group A while in Group B it was seen anterior or near the 2nd premolar. In Group A, the mean distance of the canal to the buccal cortical plate in the 1st and 2nd molar regions was 3.65 mm and 5.76 mm, respectively, while in Group B it was 6.09 mm and 6.59 mm. The canal was further away from the lower border in ankylosis cases (8.79 mm) than the control group (7.41 mm). On comparing the unaffected side in unilateral cases with the normal mandible, the canal and the foramen location were similar to that of a normal mandible with the values in the lower range that is usually seen in normal mandibles.
    UNASSIGNED: Ankylosis of the mandible is a debilitating condition especially when it develops in an individual prior completion of growth as it can affect the mandibular anatomy. Understanding the variations that accompany a deranged mandible can assist the surgeon in planning of surgical procedures in a manner that limits the possible complications resulting from surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究评估了两种不同的基于背压的辅助麻醉对接受牙髓治疗的下颌磨牙伴症状性不可逆牙髓炎患者术后疼痛的影响。
    方法:150名成年患者,在下颌第一磨牙或第二磨牙有症状的不可逆髓窝,最初接受下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)注射2%利多卡因和1:80,000肾上腺素。注射后十分钟,进入腔准备开始。嘴唇麻木是所有患者都必须的。Heft-Parker视觉模拟量表(HP-VAS)用于测量牙髓治疗期间的疼痛。初次注射的成功定义为在通路准备期间没有或轻度疼痛(在HP-VAS上小于55mm)。最初麻醉成功的患者作为对照,并接受牙髓治疗。95例初次麻醉失败的患者随机接受2%利多卡因和1:80,000肾上腺素的消化道内注射或类似麻醉溶液的足底内注射。重新开始牙髓治疗,并在大量灌溉下对运河进行仪器安装直至工作长度。放置氢氧化钙的肛门内药物,牙齿接受了临时修复。术后2小时测量疼痛,4小时,6小时,24小时,和3天。数据分析采用皮尔逊卡方检验,单向方差分析,和单向重复测量方差分析。
    结果:40例(共135例)初始IANB成功。47例中有33例(70%)成功进行了骨内注射,所有病例(45/45)都成功进行了骨内注射。直到24小时,接受消化道内注射的患者在所有时间间隔都报告了明显更高的疼痛评分。三天后,所有组的疼痛均显着减轻,两组之间没有显着差异。
    结论:在牙髓治疗后24小时内接受补充消化道注射的患者术后疼痛会增加。3天后疼痛评分降低至对照组的水平。
    BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the effect of 2 different back pressure-based supplemental anesthesia on postoperative pain in patients receiving endodontic treatment for a mandibular molar with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
    METHODS: One-hundred-thirty-five adult patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpits in a mandibular first or second molar, received an initial inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection with 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Ten minutes following the injection, access to cavity preparation began. Lip numbness was a must for all patients. The Heft-Parker visual analogue scale (HP-VAS) was used to measure pain during endodontic therapy. Success of primary injections was defined as no or mild pain (less than 55 mm on HP-VAS) during access preparation. The patients with initial successful anesthesia served as control and received endodontic treatment. Ninety-five patients with unsuccessful primary anesthesia randomly received either intraligamentary injections of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine or intrapulpal injections with similar anesthetic solution. Endodontic treatment was re-initiated and canals were instrumented till working length under copious irrigation. Intracanal medicament of calcium hydroxide was placed and teeth received a temporary restoration. Postoperative pain was measured at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 3 days. Data were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, and one-way repeated measures analysis of variance.
    RESULTS: The initial initial inferior alveolar nerve block was successful in 40 cases (out of 135). The intraligamentary injections were successful in 33 out of 47 cases (70%), and intrapulpal injections were successful in all cases (45/45). The patients receiving intraligamentary injections reported significantly higher pain scores at all intervals till 24 hours. After 3 days, the pain significantly reduced in all the groups with no significant difference between them.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving supplementary intraligamentary injections can experience increased postoperative pain till 24 hours after the endodontic treatment. The pain scores reduced to the level of the control group after 3 days.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    局部麻醉(LA)培训是牙科教育中必不可少的临床技能。然而,传统的学生对学生注射教学方法存在伦理问题。这项研究调查了带有教学视频的翻转课堂(FC)教学模式是否可以提高学生管理LA的技能。
    2017年四年级牙科学生(传统教学,n=70)和2018(FC模型,n=79)评估其执行下牙槽神经阻滞和舌神经阻滞的能力。FC小组在进行动手培训之前观看了预先录制的视频。使用转换为字母等级的24项清单评估技能。还调查了对FC方法的看法。
    FC组的最终成绩明显高于传统教学组(P<0.05)。大多数FC学生都认为这些视频提高了清晰度和学习目标。
    具有程序视频指导的FC教学模式比传统教学方法提高了管理LA的技能和信心。视频可以是临床前牙科培训的有益补充。
    UNASSIGNED: Local anesthesia (LA) training is an essential clinical skill in dental education. However, the traditional teaching method of student-to-student injection has ethical concerns. This study investigated whether a flipped classroom (FC) teaching model with instructional videos improves students\' skills in administering LA.
    UNASSIGNED: Fourth-year dental students in 2017 (traditional teaching, n = 70) and 2018 (FC model, n = 79) were assessed for their ability to perform an inferior alveolar nerve block and lingual nerve block. The FC group watched pre-recorded videos prior to a hands-on training session. Skills were evaluated using a 24-item checklist converted to letter grades. Perceptions of the FC approach were also surveyed.
    UNASSIGNED: The FC group showed statistically significantly higher final grades than the traditional teaching group (P < 0.05). Most FC students agreed that the videos improved clarity and learning objectives.
    UNASSIGNED: The FC teaching model with procedural video instruction improved skills and confidence in administering LA over traditional teaching methods. Videos can be a beneficial supplement in pre-clinical dental training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    准确了解下颌孔的位置对于临床和外科手术至关重要,尤其是下牙槽神经阻滞。关于不同骨标志的位置变化可以显着影响临床结果。
    这项研究检查了30个成人干燥的人类下颌骨,以确定下颌孔相对于特定骨性标志的位置:咬合平面,ramus的后边界,还有lingula.测量是使用校准的数字卡尺获得的,并进行统计学分析。
    该研究揭示了下颌孔位置的显着变化。关于咬合平面,下颌孔的平均高度约为15.2mm(±2.1mm)。关于ramus的后边界,它的平均距离约为18.5毫米(±3.4毫米)。关于lingula,平均距离约为21.8mm(±4.0mm)。这些结果强调了研究标本中下颌孔位置的相当大的个体差异和解剖学差异。
    观察到的下颌孔位置的变化强调,在进行涉及下牙槽神经阻滞的手术时,临床医生和外科医生需要认识到这些差异。了解这些解剖变异对于提高临床精度至关重要。减少并发症,并确保最佳结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Precise knowledge of the mandibular foramen\'s location is essential for clinical and surgical procedures, especially the inferior alveolar nerve block. Variability in its position concerning different bony landmarks can significantly impact clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: This study examined 30 Adult dry human mandibles to determine the mandibular foramen\'s positions in relation to specific bony landmarks: the occlusal plane, posterior border of the ramus, and lingula. Measurements were obtained using a calibrated digital caliper, and statistical analysis was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: The study revealed significant variations in the position of the mandibular foramen. In relation to the occlusal plane, the mandibular foramen was found at an average height of approximately 15.2 mm (±2.1 mm). Regarding the posterior border of the ramus, it was situated at an average distance of about 18.5 mm (±3.4 mm). In relation to the lingula, the average distance was approximately 21.8 mm (±4.0 mm). These results underscore the considerable individual differences and anatomical variations in the mandibular foramen\'s location among the studied specimens.
    UNASSIGNED: The observed variations in the position of the mandibular foramen emphasize the need for clinicians and surgeons to be cognizant of these differences when performing procedures involving the inferior alveolar nerve block. Understanding these anatomical variations is crucial for enhancing clinical precision, reducing complications, and ensuring optimal outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在形成年中对有症状的牙髓炎的最佳疼痛管理在发展积极的牙科态度方面大有帮助。应努力提高麻醉的成功率,从而减少负面的牙科体验。该研究的目的是评估超前镇痛对有症状的不可逆牙髓炎患儿下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)后牙髓麻醉成功和减轻牙髓后疼痛的疗效。
    研究设计是在体内,三组,平行,四重盲研究.共有75名患者被随机分配到三组中的一组-第一组:布洛芬,第二组:布洛芬和扑热息痛的组合,和组III:复合维生素(安慰剂)。在治疗前45分钟给药,患者以标准化方式接受IANB。使用面部记录牙髓切除术期间的疼痛,腿,活动,哭泣,在4、12和24小时使用Wong-Baker疼痛评定量表(WBPRS)进行的可控制性(FLACC)量表和术后。如果感觉到的疼痛是无或轻度的,则测量成功。
    布洛芬的IANB成功率为64%,组合组为72%,安慰剂组为40%,在FLACC量表上,各组之间无统计学差异(p=0.06)。术后4小时,在I组和II组中,出现无痛或轻度疼痛的儿童较多,而安慰剂组的抢救药物数量最多,组间差异显著(p=0.02).
    布洛芬和布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚的组合作为先发制人的镇痛药对IANB的成功率没有显着影响,尽管它在术后4小时有效减轻疼痛。
    GoriNA,PatelMC,BhattRK,etal.预防性镇痛对不可逆牙髓炎患儿牙髓麻醉成功和牙髓后疼痛的临床评估:一项随机比较研究。IntJClinPediatrDent2024;17(1):72-78。
    UNASSIGNED: Optimal pain management of symptomatic pulpitis in formative years goes a long way in developing a positive dental attitude. Efforts should be made to increase the success of anesthesia, thus diminishing negative dental experiences. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of preemptive analgesia on the success of pulpal anesthesia following inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in children with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and on reducing postendodontic pain.
    UNASSIGNED: The research design was an in vivo, three-group, parallel, quadruple-blind study. A total of 75 patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups-group I: ibuprofen, group II: combination of ibuprofen and paracetamol, and group III: multivitamin (placebo). Premedication was given 45 minutes before treatment, and patients received IANB in a standardized manner. Pain during pulpectomy was recorded using the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scale and postoperatively using Wong-Baker\'s pain rating scale (WBPRS) at 4, 12, and 24 hours. Success was measured if the pain felt was of no or mild intensity.
    UNASSIGNED: Success of IANB was 64% for ibuprofen, 72% for the combination group, and 40% for the placebo group, with no statistically significant difference between all groups (p = 0.06) on the FLACC scale. At 4 hours postoperatively, a significant difference (p = 0.02) was found among groups with more children experiencing no or mild pain in groups I and II and the highest number of rescue medications taken by the placebo group.
    UNASSIGNED: Ibuprofen and a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen as preemptive analgesics had no significant effect on the success rate of IANB, although it was effective in reducing pain at 4 hours postoperatively.
    UNASSIGNED: Gori NA, Patel MC, Bhatt RK, et al. Clinical Assessment of Preemptive Analgesia on Success of Pulpal Anesthesia and Postendodontic Pain in Children with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(1):72-78.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不可逆牙髓炎的慢性炎症导致伤害性受体的敏感性升高,导致持续的痛觉过敏。这对实现不可逆牙髓炎患者的有效麻醉提出了重大挑战。已经采用各种麻醉技术和药理学方法来提高局部麻醉的成功率。最近,先发制人使用抗炎药,特别是皮质类固醇,在随机对照试验中获得了关注并显示了有希望的结果。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估全身使用皮质类固醇对提高牙髓治疗患者麻醉成功率的影响。
    方法:对包括PubMed在内的多个数据库进行了全面搜索,科克伦图书馆,Embase,Scopus,牙科与口腔科学,和ProQuest。此外,我们在主要研究和相关系统综述的参考文献中手动搜索更多相关出版物.评估的主要结果是麻醉的成功,效果测度为风险比(RR),采用随机效应逆方差法。统计学显著性设定为p<0.05。采用GRADE方法对证据的确定性进行评估。
    结果:分析了12项涉及917名参与者的研究,以确定成功麻醉的频率。皮质类固醇组麻醉成功的患者数量明显更高(RR=1.66;95%CI,1.34至2.06;p<.00001)。然而,在汇总数据分析中观察到异质性(I2=57%,p=0.007)。
    结论:中度确定性证据表明,预先使用全身皮质类固醇可提高局部麻醉的成功率,特别是下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB),在不可逆性牙髓炎的情况下。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation in irreversible pulpitis leads to heightened sensitivity of nociceptive receptors, resulting in persistent hyperalgesia. This poses significant challenges in achieving effective anesthesia for patients with irreversible pulpitis. Various anesthetic techniques and pharmacological approaches have been employed to enhance the success of local anesthesia. Recently, the preemptive use of anti-inflammatory agents, specifically corticosteroids, has gained attention and shown promising results in randomized controlled trials. This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of systemically administered corticosteroids on enhancing anesthetic success in patients undergoing endodontic treatment.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Dentistry & Oral Science, and ProQuest. Additionally, the references of primary studies and related systematic reviews were manually searched for additional relevant publications. The primary outcome assessed was the success of anesthesia, and the effect measure was risk ratio using the random-effects inverse variance method. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies involving 917 participants were analyzed to determine the frequency of successful anesthesia. The corticosteroid group demonstrated a significantly higher number of patients achieving successful anesthesia (risk ratio = 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-2.06;P < .00001). However, heterogeneity within the pooled data analysis was observed (I2 = 57%, P = .007).
    CONCLUSIONS: Moderate certainty evidence indicates that preemptive use of systemic corticosteroids enhances the success of local anesthesia, specifically inferior alveolar nerve block, in cases of irreversible pulpitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)是口腔外科中常用的技术,用于在下颌牙齿和相关结构中实现深度麻醉。已经开发了几种技术来提高IANB期间的成功率和患者舒适度。这项研究的目的是比较和评估不同IANB技术用于下颌麻醉的疗效。材料和方法研究中包括的参与者是需要手术拔除受影响的下颌第三磨牙的成年人。共有100名参与者被随机分配到五个不同的组,代表IANB的各种技术,即,传统的Halsted技术,Vazirani-Akinosi技术,Gow-Gates技术,Fischer1-2-3和口外Kurt-Thoma技术,每组20人。使用主观和客观方法评估参与者的麻醉开始,使用10点视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行局部麻醉期间的疼痛感知,以及术后三联肌的发生率。使用IBMSPSSStatisticsforwindows分析数据,版本23.0(2015年发布;IBM公司Armonk,美国),p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。描述性统计,Kruskal-Wallis,和事后检验包括在组间比较的数据分析中.结果评估的主要结果是麻醉开始,患者在局部麻醉期间对疼痛的感知,次要结局包括在三联肌的发生率中。在这项研究中,发现Kurt-Thoma技术麻醉起效最快(2.25分钟),三端子的发病率较高(25%),和更高的疼痛感知(VAS评分为6.5分)。传统的Halstead技术(3.55分钟),Fischer1-2-3技术(3.5分钟),和Vazirani-Akinosi技术(3.1分钟)的平均麻醉持续时间几乎相似。Gow-Gates技术延迟了麻醉的开始(5.1分钟)。在Kurt-Thoma(6.5)和Gow-Gates技术(4.95)中,患者在局部麻醉期间对疼痛的感知更高,在费舍尔1-2-3技术(0.75)中,VAS评分最低。Kurt-Thoma技术的三端子发生率最高(25%),然后是Gow-Gates技术(20%),其次是传统的Halstead技术(5%)。结论在本研究中,发现传统的Halsted技术是IANB不同技术中最好的,并且仍然是金标准。
    Background The inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is a commonly employed technique in oral surgery for achieving profound anesthesia in the mandibular teeth and associated structures. Several techniques have been developed to enhance the success rate and patient comfort during the IANB. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of different IANB techniques for mandibular anesthesia.  Materials and methods The participants included in the study were adults requiring surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar teeth. A total of 100 participants were randomly assigned to five different groups representing various techniques of IANB, i.e., conventional Halsted technique, Vazirani-Akinosi technique, Gow-Gates technique, Fischer 1-2-3, and extraoral Kurt-Thoma technique, with 20 participants in each group. The participants were evaluated for the onset of anesthesia using subjective and objective methods, pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), and the incidence of trismus postoperatively. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for windows, version 23.0 (released 2015; IBM Corp Armonk, United States) with p-values less than 0.05 considered as statistically significant. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis, and post-hoc tests were included in the data analysis for intergroup comparisons. Results The primary outcomes evaluated were the onset of anesthesia, the patient\'s perception of pain during the administration of local anesthesia, and the secondary outcome included in the incidence of trismus. In this study, it was found that the Kurt-Thoma technique had the fastest onset of anesthesia (2.25 minutes), higher incidence of trismus (25%), and higher pain perception (6.5 score on VAS). The conventional Halstead technique (3.55 minutes), Fischer 1-2-3 technique (3.5 minutes), and Vazirani-Akinosi technique (3.1 minutes) had an almost similar mean duration of anesthesia. The onset of anesthesia was delayed in the Gow-Gates technique (5.1 minutes). Patient perception of pain during administration of local anesthesia was higher in the Kurt-Thoma (6.5) and Gow-Gates techniques (4.95), and it was least in the Fischer 1-2-3 technique (0.75) in the VAS scores. The incidence of trismus was highest with the Kurt-Thoma technique (25%), then the Gow-Gates technique (20%), followed by the conventional Halstead technique (5%).  Conclusion In this study, it was found that the conventional Halsted technique was the best among the different techniques of IANB and remains the gold standard.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:下颌磨牙伴不可逆症状性牙髓炎的下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)麻醉成功率可能较低,和术后疼痛控制牙齿与这种诊断可能是具有挑战性的。本研究旨在评估预先使用地塞米松和口服双氯芬酸钾对IANB成功的影响。这些药物对术后疼痛强度的影响被评估为次要结果。
    方法:84例诊断为不可逆症状性牙髓炎的下颌磨牙患者使用冷热测试和改良的数值评定量表(mNRS)记录术前疼痛强度。麻醉手术前60分钟,根据接受的药物,患者被随机分为三组:地塞米松(4mg),双氯芬酸钾(50毫克),或安慰剂。所有患者均接受了含4%阿替卡因的IANB(1:200000肾上腺素),15分钟后,使用冷热试验评估他们的疼痛强度.分析了麻醉成功。然后记录疼痛强度,牙髓治疗和牙齿的临时修复在一个疗程中进行。使用mNRS监测患者6、12、24、48和72h,以评估术后疼痛的强度。
    结果:与安慰剂组(3.6%)相比,使用4mg地塞米松(39.3%)或50mg双氯芬酸钾(21.4%)时,麻醉成功率有统计学上的显着提高(p<.001),两种药物之间没有显著差异。关于术后疼痛,地塞米松在6小时优于安慰剂(p<.001),双氯芬酸具有中间行为,地塞米松和安慰剂之间没有差异(p>0.05)。12h各组间无显著差异(p>.05)。在24、48和72小时,地塞米松和双氯芬酸的有效性相当,两者均优于安慰剂(p<.001)。
    结论:与使用安慰剂相比,使用地塞米松或双氯芬酸钾有利于提高下牙槽神经阻滞伴不可逆症状性牙髓炎的病例的成功率,并减少术后疼痛的发生。
    OBJECTIVE: The anaesthetic success rate of an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular molars with irreversible symptomatic pulpitis can be low, and postoperative pain control in teeth with this diagnosis can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of preemptive use of dexamethasone and oral potassium diclofenac on the success of IANB. The influence of these drugs on the intensity of postoperative pain was assessed as a secondary outcome.
    METHODS: Eighty-four patients with mandibular molars diagnosed with irreversible symptomatic pulpitis recorded preoperative pain intensity using a cold thermal test and a modified Numerical Rating Scale (mNRS). Sixty minutes before the anaesthetic procedure, patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the medication they received: dexamethasone (4 mg), diclofenac potassium (50 mg), or placebo. All patients received IANB with 4% articaine (1:200 000 epinephrine), and 15 min later, they were evaluated for pain intensity using the cold thermal test. Anaesthetic success was analysed. The pain intensity was then recorded, and endodontic treatment and provisional restoration of the tooth were executed in a single session. Patients were monitored for 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h using the mNRS to assess the intensity of postoperative pain.
    RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in anaesthetic success when 4 mg dexamethasone (39.3%) or 50 mg diclofenac potassium (21.4%) was used compared to the placebo group (3.6%) (p < .001), with no significant difference between the two drugs. Regarding postoperative pain, dexamethasone was superior to placebo at 6 h (p < .001), with diclofenac having an intermediate behaviour, not differing between dexamethasone and placebo (p > .05). There was no significant difference amongst the groups at 12 h (p > .05). At 24, 48 and 72 h, the effectiveness of dexamethasone and diclofenac were comparable, and both were superior to placebo (p < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of dexamethasone or diclofenac potassium was favourable in terms of increasing the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block in cases of mandibular molars with irreversible symptomatic pulpitis and decreased the occurrence of postoperative pain when compared to the use of a placebo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号