OBJECTIVE: Antiplatelet therapy is used for the primary and secondary prevention of thrombotic diseases such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These patients are more vulnerable to infections, as such, strategies are required to mitigate these risks.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a global federated health research network that includes both inpatient and outpatient electronic medical records from health care organizations worldwide. Patients ≥18 years old, after ACS, who were placed on aspirin and ticagrelor were compared with patients placed on aspirin and clopidogrel or prasugrel. Patients were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems terminology codes. After propensity score matching (1:1), a total of 239,358 patients were identified in each cohort. The primary outcomes of interest investigated were rates of (1) acute and subacute infective endocarditis, (2) sepsis of unknown origin, (3) staphylococcus arthritis, (4) cellulitis and acute lymphangitis, (5) Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, and (6) staphylococcal pneumonia after initiation of treatment. Outcomes were analyzed at 1, 3, and 5 years.
RESULTS: At 5 years, a combination of aspirin and ticagrelor, compared with a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel or prasugrel, was associated with significantly reduced rates of (1) acute and subacute endocarditis (hazard ratio [HR] plus 95% CI) (HR = 0.85; 0.77-0.945; P = 0.030), (2) sepsis of unknown origin (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.91; P < 0.0001), (3) cellulitis and acute lymphangitis (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92; P < 0.0001, and (4) Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (HR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; P = 0.0007). However, a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel was associated with a marinally lower risk of staphylococcal pneumonia (HR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.062; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of aspirin and ticagrelor is associated with a lower rate of a variety of bacterial infections. This combination warrants further investigation in in-vitro studies to tease out mechanisms and through clinical randomized trials in groups who have ACS and are at high infection risk.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but severe disease due to frequent and serious complications. Healthcare-associated cases often involve Staphylococcus aureus, while Gram-negative bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, though rare, pose severe challenges due to their resistance profiles. We report a case of a 68-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and mitral valve replacement 12 years ago, who was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for management of non-traumatic, afebrile altered mental status due to intracerebral hemorrhage from anticoagulant overdose. His stay in the ICU revealed septic shock with multi-organ failure caused by carbapenemase (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM))-producing K. pneumoniae complicated by IE on the prosthetic mitral valve. Despite treatment with meropenem, colistin, and tigecycline, the patient succumbed to septic shock after 15 days of therapy. This case highlights the importance of close surveillance of nosocomial infections and the need for prompt management strategies integrating medical and surgical approaches to reduce the high mortality associated with such infections.

Infective endocarditis, particularly after implanting valve prostheses, poses significant surgical challenges, often requiring complex interventions. We describe a case of a 37-year-old male with Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis, unsuccessfully treated with mechanical valve prostheses. Continued infection led to the destruction of the intervalvular fibrous body, necessitating a Commando procedure involving radical debridement and replacement of both aortic and mitral valves with complex patch reconstruction. Prosthesis selection remains contentious, considering recurrence risk and long-term prognosis. Our case underscores timely intervention and meticulous technique in managing such complex situations. It highlights successful strategies for treating infective endocarditis with destruction of aortomitral continuity, emphasizing the pivotal role of the Commando procedure.

暂无摘要。

Imaging is one of the cornerstones in diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis, underlined by recent guidelines. Echocardiography is the first-line imaging technique, however, computed tomography (CT) has a class I recommendation in native and prosthetic valve endocarditis to detect valvular lesions in case of possible endocarditis and to detect paravalvular and periprosthetic complications in case of inconclusive echocardiography. Echocardiography has a higher diagnostic accuracy than CT in detecting valvular lesions, but not for diagnosing paravalvular lesions where CT is superior. Additionally, CT is useful and recommended by guidelines to detect extracardiac manifestations of endocarditis and in planning surgical treatment including assessment of the coronary arteries. The advent of photon-counting CT and its improved spatial resolution and spectral imaging is expected to expand the role of CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. In this review, we provide an overview of the current role of CT in infective endocarditis focusing on image acquisition, image reconstruction, interpretation, and diagnostic accuracy.

We report a case of a 16-year-old male with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis caused by Aggregatibacter aphrophilus and complicated by pulmonary septic embolisms. Multiple antimicrobial therapy was unsuccessful and surgical management was required. In this report, the authors highlight the importance of a high index of suspicion regarding the diagnosis of endocarditis and its possible complications.

Background: Destructive aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis portends a high morbidity and mortality, and requires complex high-risk surgery. Homograft root replacement is the most radical and biocompatible operation and, thus, the preferred option. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 consecutive patients who underwent a cardiac reoperation comprising homograft aortic root replacement since 2010. The probabilities of survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, whereas multivariable regression served to outline the predictors of adverse events. The endpoints were operative/late death, perioperative low cardiac output and renal failure, and reoperations. Results: The operative (cumulative hospital and 30-day) mortality was 13%. The baseline aspartate transaminase (AST) and associated mitral procedures were predictive of operative death (p = 0.048, OR [95% CIs] = 1.03 [1-1.06]) and perioperative low cardiac output, respectively (p = 0.04, OR [95% CIs] = 21.3 [2.7-168.9] for valve replacement). The latter occurred in 12 (20%) patients, despite a normal ejection fraction. Survival estimates (±SE) at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after surgery were 86.3 ± 4.7%, 82.0 ± 4.9%, 75.2 ± 5.6, and 70.0 ± 6.3%, respectively. Survival was significantly lower in the case of AST ≥ 40 IU/L (p = 0.04) and aortic cross-clamp time ≥ 180 min (p = 0.01), but not when excluding operative survivors. Five patients required early (two out of the five, within 3 months) or late (three out of the five) reoperation. Conclusions: Homograft aortic root replacement for destructive prosthetic valve endocarditis can currently be performed with a near 90% operative survival and reasonable 3-year mortality and reoperation rate. AST might serve to additionally stratify the operative risk.

Background/Objectives: Infective endocarditis (IE) often requires surgical intervention, with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), posing a significant concern. This retrospective study aimed to investigate AKI incidence, its impact on short-term mortality, and identify modifiable factors in patients with IE scheduled for valve surgery. Methods: This single-center study enrolled 130 consecutive IE patients from 2013 to 2021 undergoing valve surgery. The creatinine levels were monitored pre- and postoperatively, and AKI was defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and complications were recorded. Primary outcomes included AKI incidence; the relevance of creatinine levels for AKI detection; and the association of AKI with 30-, 60-, and 180-day mortality. Modifiable factors contributing to AKI were explored as secondary outcomes. Results: Postoperatively, 35.4% developed AKI. The highest creatinine elevation occurred on the second postoperative day. Best predictive value for AKI was a creatinine level of 1.35 mg/dL on the second day (AUC: 0.901; sensitivity: 0.89, specificity: 0.79). Elevated creatinine levels on the second day were robust predictors for short-term mortality at 30, 60, and 180 days postoperatively (AUC ranging from 0.708 to 0.789). CK-MB levels at 24 h postoperatively and minimum hemoglobin during surgery were identified as independent predictors for AKI in logistic regression. Conclusions: This study highlights the crucial role of creatinine levels in predicting short-term mortality in surgical IE patients. A specific threshold (1.35 mg/dL) provides a practical marker for risk stratification, offering insights for refining perioperative strategies and optimizing outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Background: Infectious endocarditis (IE) remains a critical condition despite all the medical advances in recent decades. Reliable pathogen identification is indispensable for precise therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic benefit of additional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with microbiological culture alone based on intraoperative tissue sampling for patients operated on due to IE. Methods: A total of 224 patients diagnosed with acute or subacute IE were analyzed. Intraoperatively resected infectious tissue was analyzed using both PCR and microbiological culture. Subsequently, the results of the detection of bacteria obtained based on intraoperative measurements from tissue via culture and PCR were compared with preoperative blood culture results. Furthermore, we evaluated the therapeutic impact of the culture and/or PCR results obtained from cardiac tissue. Results: The 224 patients were 63 ± 17 years old, and 64 (29%) were female. In total, 149 (67%) suffered from aortic valve endocarditis, 45 (45%) had mitral valve endocarditis, and 39 (18%) were afflicted with double-valve endocarditis. Prosthetic valve endocarditis was present in 70 (31%) patients. Pathogens were detected in 70% of the cases analyzed via PCR using cardiac valve tissue and in 25% of those analyzed via a culture of cardiac valve tissue; this figure was only 64% for preoperative blood culture. Overall, a pathogen was identified in 197 patients (88%), leading to antibiotic therapy. Targeted antibiotic therapy, based on the PCR results, was carried out in 37 cases and was conducted based on a culture from cardiac valve tissue in three cases. Finally, in 12% of patients, the causative pathogen remained unclear. Conclusions: For patients suffering endocarditis, PCR analysis is indispensable and superior to preoperative blood culture and intraoperative culture in detecting bacteria. Based on PCR testing, antibiotic therapy can be individually adjusted. The high precision of pathogen identification may lead to a significant reduction in IE-associated morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) is usually medical, with surgery reserved for those failing medical management or developing complications. Currently, 25%-50% of patients undergo surgery for IE with a 70%-80% immediate survival rate. However, there is controversy over the timing of surgery following cerebrovascular events, which occur in 15%-30% of IE patients. This study aimed to investigate whether surgical management is superior to medical management in patients with IE and to determine the optimal timing for surgery following the development of neurological symptoms.
METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively between 2012 and 2018 from 436 patients diagnosed with IE and treated at our tertiary teaching hospital. The authors analysed the type of treatment, the timing of surgery, and the outcomes of these including mortality, IE recurrence, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: A total of 421 patients were included in the analysis. More than two-thirds (69.1%) of patients underwent surgical intervention. The survival rate of patients having surgery for IE was 77.2%, compared to 50.7% in patients who did not undergo surgical intervention. 6.8% of patients presented with neurological symptoms; 73.3% of these patients had surgery within 14 days with a 90.9% survival.
CONCLUSIONS: This study finds surgery to be safe with a seemingly higher survival rate compared to medical management alone, although this may be confounded by patients in the medical group being less likely to have surgery. Surgery in patients presenting with neurological symptoms is safe within 2 weeks from presentation with excellent outcomes.