背景:可诱导的喉部阻塞响应于外部触发而导致喉孔变窄。在可诱导的喉阻塞中测量结果以监测健康状况随时间的变化。
方法:本研究是基于系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)方法的首选报告项目的范围审查。审查将以以下研究问题为指导:“在包括可诱导喉阻塞患者在内的研究中测量了哪些健康结果?”根据JoannaBriggs机构范围审查的方法,使用人口概念背景框架对研究问题进行了验证。在过去40年中进行的相关同行评审研究和灰色文献将从电子数据库中识别,包括AMED,CINAHL,Embase,EMCARE,MEDLINE,OVID,PubMed和PsycINFO。搜索字符串\“可诱导的喉阻塞\”,\'ILO\',\'声带功能障碍\',\'VCD\',\'矛盾的声带运动\',\'PVFM\',\'结果\',\'度量\',\'测量仪器\',\'评估\',\'比例\',将使用布尔逻辑组合“问卷”。一名独立审稿人将进行标题筛选;两名独立审稿人将进行摘要和全文筛选,然后由两名审阅者提取数据。将根据调查结果进行分析。
结论:该综述将记录在可诱导喉阻塞中测量的健康结果的证据,确定测量特征和潜在效用。整理研究可能会发现覆盖范围的差距,需要新颖的工具,并用于临床和研究目的的标准化。
结论:在本主题中已知的是,诱导性喉阻塞会导致喉开口变窄,以响应外部触发。在可诱导的喉阻塞中测量结果以监测健康状况随时间的变化。目前,没有标准化的结局指标来衡量诱导型喉梗阻(ILO)干预措施的效果.本文对现有知识的补充可以通过多种方式来衡量健康评估。生理学,放射学和生化测量损伤是更常见的历史,但有很多其他因素的结果,现在包括主观测量的功能状态和健康相关的生活质量,直接从患者那里收集数据。这项研究将使我们能够对文献进行分类,以查看国际劳工组织正在测量的健康结果,以尝试标准化和发展未来的健康结果。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?该综述将记录在可诱导喉阻塞中测量的健康结果的证据,确定测量特征和潜在效用。整理研究可能会发现覆盖范围的差距,需要新的工具和临床和研究目的的标准化。
BACKGROUND: Inducible laryngeal obstruction causes narrowing of the laryngeal aperture in response to external triggers. Outcomes are measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction to monitor changes in health status over time.
METHODS: This study is a scoping review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. The review will be guided by the following research question: \'What health outcomes are measured in studies including people with inducible laryngeal obstruction?\' The research question was validated using the Population-Concept-Context framework according to the methodology for Joanna Briggs Institution Scoping Reviews. Relevant peer-reviewed studies and grey literature conducted over the last 40 years will be identified from electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, Embase, EMCARE, MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed and PsycINFO. The search strings \'inducible laryngeal obstruction\', \'ILO\', \'vocal cord dysfunction\', \'VCD\', \'paradoxical vocal fold motion\', \'PVFM\', \'outcome\', \'measure\', \'measurement instrument\', \'assessment\', \'scale\', \'questionnaire\' will be combined using Boolean logic. An independent reviewer will conduct title screening; two independent reviewers will conduct abstract and full article screening, followed by data extraction by two reviewers. Analyses will be conducted appropriate to the findings.
CONCLUSIONS: The review will document evidence of health outcomes measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction, identifying measurement characteristics and potential utility. Collating studies may identify gaps in coverage, the need for novel tools, and for standardisation for clinical and research purposes.
CONCLUSIONS: What is already known on the subject Inducible laryngeal obstruction causes narrowing of the laryngeal aperture in response to external triggers. Outcomes are measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction to monitor changes in health status over time. Currently, there are no standardised outcome measures for measuring the effects of interventions in inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO). What this paper adds to existing knowledge Assessment of health can be measured in a variety of ways. Physiological, radiological and biochemical measurements of impairment are more common historically but there are a lot of outcomes of other factors now including subjective measures of functional status and health-related quality of life, with data collected directly from patients. This study will allow us to scope the literature to see the health outcomes being measured in ILO to attempt to standardise and develop future health outcomes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The review will document evidence of health outcomes measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction, identifying measurement characteristics and potential utility. Collating studies may identify gaps in coverage, the need for novel tools and for standardisation for clinical and research purposes.