目的:比较两种用于测量三级牙本质(TD)体积的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)分析技术,密度,和根长增加,在使用常规根尖周X光片对年轻恒牙进行间接牙髓治疗(IPT)后。
方法:比较研究设计:首次(T1)和IPT1年(T2)后进行了69次CBCT扫描。新的CBCT分析技术A,标准化,分割,使用ITK-SNAP和3D切片器CMF进行T1和T2扫描的配准,以测量TD体积(mm3),密度(灰度级强度),根长增加(mm)。在传统的CBCT分析技术B,使用In-Vivo软件进行分析以计算TD厚度(mm),辐射密度(HU%),根长增加(mm)。计算配对t检验和组内相关系数以比较和评估所有技术的可靠性。
结果:两种技术在测量TD矿物密度方面没有显着差异(平均值[SD]:A=22.4[15.4];B=24.4[15.4];p=.47)。技术A导致显著更高的根长增加值(平均值[SD]:A=1.3[0.6];B=1.1[0.5];p=.03)。这两种技术显示出可接受的可靠性水平(0.76-0.99)。
结论:CBCT分析技术在矿物密度方面产生了类似的结果。新的CBCT容积分析技术,虽然更费力,产生了更高的根长增加值,并允许测量牙本质体积。
OBJECTIVE: To compare two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis techniques for measuring tertiary dentin (TD) volume, density, and root length increase, after indirect pulp therapy (IPT) in young permanent teeth with conventional periapical radiographs.
METHODS: Comparative study design: Sixty-nine CBCT scans were taken initially (T1) and after 1 year (T2) of IPT. New CBCT analysis technique A, standardization, segmentation, and registration of T1 and T2 scans were performed using ITK-SNAP and 3D Slicer CMF to measure TD volume (mm3), density (gray-level intensity), and root length increase (mm). In the traditional CBCT analysis technique B, analyses were conducted using the In-Vivo software to calculate TD thickness (mm), radiodensity (HU%), and root length increase (mm). Paired t-test and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to compare and assess the reliability of all techniques.
RESULTS: No significant difference between the two techniques existed in the measurement of TD mineral density (Mean [SD]:A = 22.4 [15.4]; B = 24.4 [15.4]; p = .47). Technique A resulted in significantly higher root length increase values (Mean [SD]: A = 1.3 [0.6]; B = 1.1 [0.5]; p = .03). The two techniques showed acceptable reliability levels (0.76-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: CBCT analysis techniques yielded similar findings for mineral density. The new CBCT volumetric analysis technique, although more laborious, produced higher values for root length increase, and allowed for measurement of dentin volume.