In-hospital cardiac arrest

院内心脏骤停
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用深度学习进行疾病结果预测是近年来取得重大进展的一种方法。尽管其优异的性能,临床医生也有兴趣了解输入如何影响预测。可解释的深度学习模型的临床验证也尚未探索。本研究旨在评估深沙普利加性扩张(D-SHAP)模型在准确识别与最高死亡风险相关的诊断代码方面的性能。
    从台湾的国家健康保险研究数据库中提取了168,693名患者的至少一次院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的发生率以及1,569,478份临床记录。我们提出了一个D-SHAP模型,以提供对深度学习模型预测的见解。我们训练了一个深度学习模型来预测IHCA患者的30天死亡可能性,并使用D-SHAP来查看诊断代码如何影响模型的预测。医生被要求注释心脏骤停数据集并提供专家意见,我们用它来验证我们提出的方法。使用每个记录(当前决策)以及四个先前记录(历史决策)的1到4点注释来验证当前和历史D-SHAP值。
    从IHCA队列中随机选择一个由402名至少有一次心脏骤停记录的患者组成的子集。中位年龄为72岁,平均值和标准差为69±17年。结果表明,D-SHAP可以根据诊断代码识别死亡原因。五大最重要的诊断代码,即呼吸衰竭,脓毒症,肺炎,震惊,和急性肾损伤与医生的意见一致。一些诊断,如尿路感染,由于疾病的发生频率较低,并且与其他合并症的发生相结合,D-SHAP与临床判断之间存在差异。
    发现D-SHAP框架是解释深度神经网络和确定预测患者30天死亡率的大多数重要诊断的有效工具。然而,医师应始终仔细考虑原始数据库的结构和潜在的病理生理学。
    UNASSIGNED: Using deep learning for disease outcome prediction is an approach that has made large advances in recent years. Notwithstanding its excellent performance, clinicians are also interested in learning how input affects prediction. Clinical validation of explainable deep learning models is also as yet unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the performance of Deep SHapley Additive exPlanations (D-SHAP) model in accurately identifying the diagnosis code associated with the highest mortality risk.
    UNASSIGNED: Incidences of at least one in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) for 168,693 patients as well as 1,569,478 clinical records were extracted from Taiwan\'s National Health Insurance Research Database. We propose a D-SHAP model to provide insights into deep learning model predictions. We trained a deep learning model to predict the 30-day mortality likelihoods of IHCA patients and used D-SHAP to see how the diagnosis codes affected the model\'s predictions. Physicians were asked to annotate a cardiac arrest dataset and provide expert opinions, which we used to validate our proposed method. A 1-to-4-point annotation of each record (current decision) along with four previous records (historical decision) was used to validate the current and historical D-SHAP values.
    UNASSIGNED: A subset consisting of 402 patients with at least one cardiac arrest record was randomly selected from the IHCA cohort. The median age was 72 years, with mean and standard deviation of 69 ± 17 years. Results indicated that D-SHAP can identify the cause of mortality based on the diagnosis codes. The top five most important diagnosis codes, namely respiratory failure, sepsis, pneumonia, shock, and acute kidney injury were consistent with the physician\'s opinion. Some diagnoses, such as urinary tract infection, showed a discrepancy between D-SHAP and clinical judgment due to the lower frequency of the disease and its occurrence in combination with other comorbidities.
    UNASSIGNED: The D-SHAP framework was found to be an effective tool to explain deep neural networks and identify most of the important diagnoses for predicting patients\' 30-day mortality. However, physicians should always carefully consider the structure of the original database and underlying pathophysiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行给心脏骤停患者的复苏实践带来了重大变化。
    目的:我们旨在比较在COVID-19大流行早期(2020年)和在COVID-19大流行晚期(2021年)期间发生院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的患者的特征和结局。
    方法:这是一项对在单一学术中心维持IHCA的成年患者的回顾性研究。我们比较了2020年5个月IHCA与2021年5个月IHCA的特征和结果。
    结果:在COVID-19大流行早期维持IHCA的患者延迟服用肾上腺素超过5分钟的比率更高(13.4%vs.1.9%;p<0.01),胸部按压开始时更频繁的延迟(55.6%vs.17.9%;p<0.01),插管频率较低(23.0%vs.59.3%;p<0.01)。在结果方面,自发循环均恢复(35.8%vs.51.2%;p<0.01)和出院生存率(13.9%vs.30.2%;p<0.01)在COVID-19大流行早期期间较低。
    结论:COVID-19大流行期的早期与IHCA的肾上腺素给药和胸部按压开始延迟有关。此外,在COVID-19大流行早期,自发循环恢复和出院生存率均较低.
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced major changes in the resuscitation practices of cardiac arrest victims.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who sustained in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (2020) with those during the late COVID-19 pandemic period (2021).
    METHODS: This was a retrospective review of adult patients sustaining IHCA at a single academic centre. We compared characteristics and outcomes of IHCA for 5 months in 2020 with those experiencing IHCA for 5 months in 2021.
    RESULTS: Patients sustaining IHCA during the early COVID-19 pandemic period had higher rates of delayed epinephrine administration of more than 5 min (13.4% vs. 1.9%; p < 0.01), more frequent delays in the initiation of chest compressions (55.6% vs. 17.9%; p < 0.01), and were intubated less often (23.0% vs. 59.3%; p < 0.01). In terms of outcomes, both return of spontaneous circulation (35.8% vs. 51.2%; p < 0.01) and survival to hospital discharge rates (13.9% vs. 30.2%; p < 0.01) were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.
    CONCLUSIONS: The early COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with delays in epinephrine administration and chest compression initiation for IHCA. Moreover, both return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有心脏病的儿童发生不稳定心律失常和院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的风险增加。临床医生坚持救生护理过程是改善患者预后的重要因素。这项研究评估了关键事件清单是否可以在不稳定型心律失常继发的模拟急性事件中提高对救生过程的依从性。在三级护理的心脏病房进行了一项随机对照试验,学术儿童医院。每周对患有基础心脏病的儿科患者进行涉及心律失常的意外模拟紧急情况。反应者是儿科和麻醉科住院医师,呼吸治疗师,和床边注册护士。六个团队被随机分为两组-三个接受了检查表(干预),三个没有(对照)。每个团队在为期4周的儿科心脏病学轮换中参加了四个模拟方案。参与者收到了简短的幻灯片演示,其中包括一个清单方向,在他们旋转的开始。模拟是视频和音频记录的,有三个或更多参与者的被纳入分析。主要结果是团队坚持拯救生命的过程,表示为已完成关键管理步骤的百分比。次要结果包括参与者对检查表在识别和管理心律失常方面的有用性的看法。我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)模型,这说明了组内的聚类,评估干预的效果。总共进行了24次模拟;由于参与者数量不足,24次模拟中的一次被排除在外。在我们的GEE分析中,81.21%(78.96%,83.47%)的关键步骤完成了清单,而68.06%(59.38%,76.74%)无检查表(p=0.004)。93%的研究参与者报告说,他们会在患有潜在心脏病的儿童的不稳定心律失常期间使用检查表。检查表与不稳定小儿心律失常的模拟复苏过程中对救生过程的依从性提高相关。这些发现支持在涉及潜在心脏病的儿科患者的模拟中,使用特定场景的检查表来管理不稳定的心律失常。未来的研究应该调查清单在实际儿科住院紧急情况中是否同样有效。
    Children with heart disease are at increased risk of unstable dysrhythmias and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Clinician adherence to lifesaving processes of care is an important contributor to improving patient outcomes. This study evaluated whether critical event checklists improve adherence to lifesaving processes during simulated acute events secondary to unstable dysrhythmias. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a cardiac ward in a tertiary care, academic children\'s hospital. Unannounced simulated emergencies involving dysrhythmias in pediatric patients with underlying cardiac disease were conducted weekly. Responders were pediatric and anesthesiology residents, respiratory therapists, and bedside registered nurses. Six teams were randomized into two groups-three received checklists (intervention) and three did not (control). Each team participated in four simulated scenarios over a 4-week pediatric cardiology rotation. Participants received a brief slideshow presentation, which included a checklist orientation, at the start of their rotation. Simulations were video and audio recorded and those with three or more participants were included for analysis. The primary outcome was team adherence to lifesaving processes, expressed as the percentage of completed critical management steps. Secondary outcomes included participant perceptions of the checklist usefulness in identifying and managing dysrhythmias. We used generalized estimating equations (GEE) models, which accounted for clustering within groups, to evaluate the effects of the intervention. A total of 24 simulations were conducted; one of the 24 simulations was excluded due to an insufficient number of participants. In our GEE analysis, 81.21% (78.96%, 83.47%) of critical steps were completed with checklists available versus 68.06% (59.38%, 76.74%) without checklists (p = 0.004). Ninety-three percent of study participants reported that they would use the checklists during an unstable dysrhythmia of a child with underlying cardiac disease. Checklists were associated with improved adherence to lifesaving processes during simulated resuscitations for unstable pediatric dysrhythmias. These findings support the use of scenario specific checklists for the management of unstable dysrhythmias in simulations involving pediatric patients with underlying cardiac disease. Future studies should investigate whether checklists are as effective in actual pediatric in-hospital emergencies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在比较进入手术室时经历心肺骤停的患者与进入手术室前成功接受术前心肺复苏的患者或进入手术室后在手术室桌子上出现心肺骤停的患者之间的急性A型主动脉夹层手术治疗的短期结果。在本研究中,我们专注于进入手术室时的循环状态,因为一旦患者进入手术室,停止干预在经济上和情感上都很困难,外科医生,麻醉师,护士,灌注者已经在场,所有必要的材料都被打包,心肺转流术已经准备好。
    在2016年1月至2022年3月期间接受急性A型主动脉夹层手术治疗的362例患者中有20例(5.5%)出现术前心肺骤停。为了比较早期手术结果,根据进入手术室后是否存在自发循环,将患者分为自发循环组(n=14,70.0%)和非自发循环组(n=6,30.0%)。主要终点是术后30天死亡率。次要终点包括院内并发症和持续性神经系统疾病。
    在整个队列中,30天死亡率为65%(n=13/20);自发循环组为50%(n=7/14),非自发循环组为100%(n=6/6)。心肺骤停的主要原因是主动脉破裂和心脏压塞(n=16;80.0%),其次是冠状动脉灌注不良(n=4;20.0%)。自主循环组存活7例(50.0%),在非自发循环组中没有存活(P=0.044)。五名幸存者在没有帮助的情况下行走并出院回家;其余两人昏迷和截瘫。
    急性A型主动脉夹层患者术前出现心肺骤停并在进入手术室时接受持续心肺复苏,结果极差。因此,此类患者可能有手术治疗禁忌。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection between patients undergoing cardiopulmonary arrest at the time of entry into the operating room and patients who received successful preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation before entering the operating room or patients who had cardiopulmonary arrest on the operating room table after entering the operating room without cardiopulmonary arrest. In the present study, we focused on the circulatory status at the time of entering the operating room because it is economically and emotionally difficult to cease intervention once the patient has entered the operating room, where surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and perfusionists are already present, all necessary materials are packed off and cardiopulmonary bypass have already been primed.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty (5.5%) of 362 patients who underwent surgical treatment for acute type A aortic dissection between January 2016 and March 2022 had preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest. To compare the early operative outcomes, the patients were divided into the spontaneous circulation group (n = 14, 70.0%) and the non-spontaneous circulation group (n = 6, 30.0%) based on the presence or absence of spontaneous circulation upon entering the operating room. The primary endpoint was postoperative 30-day mortality. The secondary endpoints included in-hospital complications and persistent neurological disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-day mortality was 65% (n = 13/20) in the entire cohort; 50% (n = 7/14) in the spontaneous circulation group and 100% (n = 6/6) in the non-spontaneous circulation group. The major cardiopulmonary arrest causes were aortic rupture and cardiac tamponade (n = 16; 80.0%), followed by coronary malperfusion (n = 4; 20.0%). Seven patients (50.0%) survived in the spontaneous circulation group, and none survived in the non-spontaneous circulation group (P = .044). Five survivors walked unaided and were discharged home; the remaining two were comatose and paraplegic.
    UNASSIGNED: The outcomes were extremely poor in patients with acute type A aortic dissection who had preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest and received ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at entry into the operating room. Therefore, surgical treatment might be contraindicated in such patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent medical care and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Given that in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is still poorly investigated, data on health-associated quality of life thereafter remains scarce. The available evidence is mostly transferred from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest studies, but the epidemiology and determinants of success might be different. The aim of the study was to investigate the change in the quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest and to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis of data and prospective evaluation of quality of life included all patients surviving an IHCA and being treated by the emergency medical team between 2010 and 2020. The primary endpoint of the study was the quality of life after IHCA at the reference date. Secondary endpoints covered determination of risk factors and predictors of poor outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    RESULTS: In total 604 patients were resuscitated within the period of 11 years and 61 (10%) patients survived until the interview took place. Finally, 48 (79%) patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 31 (65%) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of life before and after cardiac arrest (EQ-5D-5L utility 0.79 vs. 0.78, p = 0.567) and in the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) score.
    CONCLUSIONS: The quality of life before and after IHCA in survivors was good and comparable. The quality of life was mostly affected by reduced mobility and anxiety/depression. Future studies with larger patient samples should focus on potentially modifiable factors that could prevent, warn, and limit the consequences of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Moreover, research on outcomes of IHCA should include available tools for the quality of life assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Ein Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand (HKS) ist ein lebensbedrohlicher Zustand, der weltweit eine der häufigsten Todesursachen darstellt. Die Literatur bezüglich der Lebensqualität nach kardiopulmonaler Reanimation ist limitiert und beinhaltet hauptsächlich Daten von HKS außerhalb des Krankenhauses. Diese könnten sich bezüglich Epidemiologie und Outcome von innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillständen (IHCA) unterscheiden. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Lebensqualität mittels EQ-5D-5L-Fragebogen nach einem IHCA zu untersuchen und mögliche Risikofaktoren für ein schlechteres Outcome zu ermitteln.
    METHODS: Diese retrospektive Datenanalyse und prospektive Erhebung der Lebensqualität umfasste alle Patient:innen, die einen IHCA im Zeitraum von 2010 bis 2020 überlebten. Der primäre Endpunkt der Studie war die Lebensqualität am Stichtag nach einem IHCA. Sekundäre Endpunkte umfassten Prädiktoren für ein schlechteres Outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Insgesamt wurden innerhalb des Zeitraums von 11 Jahren 604 innerklinische Reanimationen durchgeführt, wobei 61 (10 %) der Patient:innen bis zum Zeitpunkt der Befragung überlebten. Achtundvierzig (79 %) Patient:innen erfüllten die Einschlusskriterien, und 31 (65 %) wurden in diese Studie eingeschlossen. Es gab keinen signifikanten Unterschied in der Lebensqualität vor und nach dem HKS (EQ-5D-5L Utilität 0,79 vs. 0,78; p = 0,567) und im EQ-5D-5L-VAS-Score. Eine chirurgische Indikation für die Krankenhausaufnahme war mit einer besseren Lebensqualität nach dem IHCA assoziiert, verglichen mit einer medizinischen Aufnahmeindikation (p = 0,009).
    UNASSIGNED: Patient:innen, die einen innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand überlebten, zeigten eine vergleichbare Lebensqualität vor und nach dem Ereignis. Dennoch berichteten die Patient:innen über eine Verschlechterung der Mobilität und der Angst/Depression. Künftige Studien sollten bei der Erhebung der Folgen eines Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstands die verfügbaren Instrumente zur Bewertung der Lebensqualität miteinbeziehen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然院外CA(OHCA)被广泛报道,关于院内CA(IHCA),尤其是急诊科(CAED)心脏骤停(CA)的数据很少.这项研究旨在确定频率,患病率,和意外CAED的临床特征,并将数据与预期CAED的数据进行比较。方法:我们将意外CAED定义为非危重ED护理区域患者中发生的CA;归类为不需要严格监测。该分类是改良的日本分诊和敏锐度量表和医师评估。对2016年至2018年的病例进行回顾性分析,与其他经历CAED的患者相比。结果:本研究中的38例意外CA占ED诊断的CA的34.5%,占ED治疗的所有CA的8.4%。该人群在人口统计学方面与其他CAED没有显着差异,合并症,和存活率。最常见的症状是呼吸困难,意识障碍,广义弱点,和胸痛。最常见的死亡原因是急性心肌梗死,恶性肿瘤转移,感染性休克,肺栓塞,和心力衰竭。结论:意外CAED代表一组潜在可避免的CA和死亡。应该对这些病人进行分析,ED管理应包括旨在减少其发病率的措施。
    Background: Though out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) is widely reported, data on in-hospital CA (IHCA) and especially cardiac arrest (CA) in the emergency department (CAED) are scarce. This study aimed to determine the frequency, prevalence, and clinical features of unexpected CAED and compare the data with those of expected CAED. Methods: We defined unexpected CAED as CA occurring in patients in non-critical ED-care areas; classified as not requiring strict monitoring. This classification was the modified Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale and physician assessment. A retrospective analysis of cases from 2016 to 2018 was performed, in comparison to other patients experiencing CAED. Results: The 38 cases of unexpected CA in this study constituted 34.5% of CA diagnosed in the ED and 8.4% of all CA treated in the ED. This population did not differ significantly from other CAED regarding demographics, comorbidities, and survival rates. The commonest symptoms were dyspnoea, disorders of consciousness, generalised weakness, and chest pain. The commonest causes of death were acute myocardial infarction, malignant neoplasms with metastases, septic shock, pulmonary embolism, and heart failure. Conclusions: Unexpected CAED represents a group of potentially avoidable CA and deaths. These patients should be analysed, and ED management should include measures aimed at reducing their incidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是调查近期组长模拟培训(<6个月)和多年临床经验(≥4年)与院内心脏骤停(IHCA)期间胸部按压质量的关系。
    方法:这项在丹麦四家医院进行的IHCA队列研究包括胸部按压质量和组长特征数据的病例。我们评估了最近的模拟训练和经验丰富的团队领导对最长胸部按压暂停持续时间(主要结果)的影响,胸部按压分数(CCF),和使用混合效应模型的指南建议内的胸部按压率。
    结果:157次包括复苏尝试,45%的团队负责人最近参加了模拟训练,66%的团队负责人经验丰富。团队领导经验的中位数为7年[Q1;Q3:4;11]。最长胸部按压暂停的中位持续时间为16秒[10;30]。最近进行模拟训练的团队负责人与最长暂停持续时间明显缩短相关(差异:-7.11秒(95%-CI:-12.0;-2.2),p=0.004),更高的CCF(差异:3%(95%-CI:2.0;4.0%),p<0.001),并且具有较低的指南依从性胸部按压率(比值比:0.4(95%-CI:0.19;0.84),p=0.02)。拥有经验丰富的团队领导与最长的暂停持续时间无关(差异:-1.57秒(95%-CI:-5.34;2.21),p=0.42),CCF(差异:0.72%(95%-CI:-0.3;1.73),p=0.17)或指南建议范围内的胸部按压率(比值比:1.55(95%-CI:0.91;2.66),p=0.11)。
    结论:最近对团队领导的模拟训练,但不是多年的团队领导经验,与IHCA期间较短的胸部按压暂停有关。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association of recent team leader simulation training (<6 months) and years of clinical experience (≥4 years) with chest compression quality during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).
    METHODS: This cohort study of IHCA in four Danish hospitals included cases with data on chest compression quality and team leader characteristics. We assessed the impact of recent simulation training and experienced team leaders on longest chest compression pause duration (primary outcome), chest compression fraction (CCF), and chest compression rates within guideline recommendations using mixed effects models.
    RESULTS: Of 157 included resuscitation attempts, 45% had a team leader who recently participated in simulation training and 66% had an experienced team leader. The median team leader experience was 7 years [Q1; Q3: 4; 11]. The median duration of the longest chest compression pause was 16 s [10; 30]. Having a team leader with recent simulation training was associated with significantly shorter longest pause durations (difference: -7.11 s (95%-CI: -12.0; -2.2), p = 0.004), a higher CCF (difference: 3% (95%-CI: 2.0; 4.0%), p < 0.001) and with less guideline compliant chest compression rates (odds ratio: 0.4 (95%-CI: 0.19; 0.84), p = 0.02). Having an experienced team leader was not associated with longest pause duration (difference: -1.57 s (95%-CI: -5.34; 2.21), p = 0.42), CCF (difference: 0.7% (95%-CI: -0.3; 1.7), p = 0.17) or chest compression rates within guideline recommendations (odds ratio: 1.55 (95%-CI: 0.91; 2.66), p = 0.11).
    CONCLUSIONS: Recent simulation training of team leaders, but not years of team leader experience, was associated with shorter chest compression pauses during IHCA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    德国复苏登记处于2007年开始,收集院外和院内心脏骤停和复苏的数据。直到今天,它已经收集了超过400.000个数据集。
    德国复苏登记处(GRR)是一种自愿的质量改进工具和研究工具,用于院外和院内复苏以及院内急诊治疗。它收集初始治疗的数据,在线数据库中的住院护理以及长期结果。对于风险分层,已经开发了两个分数,出版,并实施。除了标准化的在线报告外,参与者还将获得年度和月度或季度报告,24/7可用的分析选项。还发布了年度公开报告。我们正在报告2022年OHCA年度报告。
    2022年,EMS开始或持续的CPR发生率为77.6/100.000居民/年。平均年龄为70.2岁,66.7%的男性旁观者开始CPR,占51.3%。第一辆EMS车辆到达现场的平均响应时间为6:55分钟。在57.9%的病例中,他们有一个推测的心脏原因。主要结果,达到自发循环恢复(ROSC)的比例为42.1%.
    包含了超过450.000个数据集,GRR是德国和国际上公认的质量改进和研究工具。将OHCA的发病率和2022年的结果与欧洲三分之一国家的EuReCaTWO数据进行比较。此外,GRR通过开展和出版流行病学等研究,为增加OHCA的知识做出了贡献。气道管理,和OHCA的药物。
    UNASSIGNED: The German Resuscitation Registry was started in 2007 and collects data on out-of-hospital as well as in-hospital cardiac arrest and resuscitation. It has collected more than 400.000 datasets till today.
    UNASSIGNED: The German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) is a voluntary quality improvement tool and research tool for out-of-hospital and in-hospital resuscitation as well as in-hospital emergency treatment. It collects data for initial treatment, in-hospital care as well as long-term outcome in an online database. For risk stratification two scores have been developed, published, and implemented. The participants are getting annual and monthly or quarterly reports in addition to the standardized online, 24/7 available analyzing options. An annual public report is published as well. We are reporting on the OHCA annual report of 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: In 2022 the incidence of CPR started or continued by EMS was 77.6/100.000 inhabitants/year. The mean age was 70.2 years and 66.7% were male bystanders who started CPR in 51.3%. The average response time for the first EMS vehicle to arrive on scene was 6:55 min.In 57.9% of the cases, they had a presumed cardiac cause. The primary outcome, return-of-spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 42.1%.
    UNASSIGNED: With its more than 450.000 included datasets, the GRR is an established tool for quality improvement and research in Germany and internationally. The results for the incidence of OHCA and outcome from 2022 are compared to EuReCa TWO data ranging in the upper third of European countries. Furthermore, the GRR has contributed to increasing knowledge of OHCA by conducting and publishing research e.g. on epidemiology, airway management, and medication of OHCA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号