%0 Journal Article
%T Comparing characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest during the early and late COVID-19 pandemic at an academic institution in Saudi Arabia.
%A Bakhsh A
%A Binmahfooz S
%A Balubaid I
%A Aljedani H
%A Khared M
%A Alghamdi A
%A Alabdulwahab S
%A Alzahrani M
%A Abushosha A
%A Alharbi L
%A Baarma R
%A Babekir E
%J Aust Crit Care
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 9
%M 38987124
%F 3.265
%R 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.06.005
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced major changes in the resuscitation practices of cardiac arrest victims.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>We aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who sustained in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (2020) with those during the late COVID-19 pandemic period (2021).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This was a retrospective review of adult patients sustaining IHCA at a single academic centre. We compared characteristics and outcomes of IHCA for 5 months in 2020 with those experiencing IHCA for 5 months in 2021.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Patients sustaining IHCA during the early COVID-19 pandemic period had higher rates of delayed epinephrine administration of more than 5 min (13.4% vs. 1.9%; p < 0.01), more frequent delays in the initiation of chest compressions (55.6% vs. 17.9%; p < 0.01), and were intubated less often (23.0% vs. 59.3%; p < 0.01). In terms of outcomes, both return of spontaneous circulation (35.8% vs. 51.2%; p < 0.01) and survival to hospital discharge rates (13.9% vs. 30.2%; p < 0.01) were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The early COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with delays in epinephrine administration and chest compression initiation for IHCA. Moreover, both return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge were lower during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.