Impulsive decision-making

冲动决策
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脉冲控制平衡的改变,在它的神经基础上,已经报道了肥胖和饮食失调(ED)。神经影像学研究表明,额-顶网络在冲动行为中的作用,通过评估和预期过程,还招募了中观边缘区域。然而,认知和运动冲动的不同方面是否涉及共同与具体的神经相关性仍不清楚.我们通过对延迟折扣(DD)和进行/不进行(GNG)任务的fMRI研究的激活似然估计(ALE)荟萃分析解决了这个问题,除了连词和减法分析。我们还对肥胖或ED患者使用相同任务的神经影像学研究进行了系统评价。ALE结果显示纹状体持续激活,前/后扣带皮质,内侧/左额上回和左踝上回用于DD的冲动性选择,而GNG任务主要引起右偏侧顶叶激活。结合和减法分析显示:i)尾状核中常见的双侧反应;ii)腹侧纹状体中的DD特异性反应,前/后扣带皮质,左颌上和内侧额叶回;iii)右下顶叶皮层的GNG特异性激活。对这两种任务的正面-侧面反应改变表明肥胖和ED的皮质-纹状体平衡功能失调,但由于直接比较患者和对照组的研究数量有限,这些发现存在争议.总的来说,我们发现了冲动运动和认知方面的独特神经相关性的证据:右下顶叶支持动作抑制,而额纹状体区和左脑上回与冲动性决策有关。虽然表明需要对临床样本进行进一步研究以更好地表征其行为变化的神经基础,这些发现有助于完善冲动性的神经认知模型,并突出了ED和肥胖治疗的潜在翻译意义.
    Alterations in the impulse-control balance, and in its neural bases, have been reported in obesity and eating disorders (EDs). Neuroimaging studies suggest a role of fronto-parietal networks in impulsive behaviour, with evaluation and anticipatory processes additionally recruiting meso-limbic regions. However, whether distinct facets of cognitive and motor impulsivity involve common vs. specific neural correlates remains unclear. We addressed this issue through Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses of fMRI studies on delay discounting (DD) and go/no-go (GNG) tasks, alongside conjunction and subtraction analyses. We also performed systematic reviews of neuroimaging studies using the same tasks in individuals with obesity or EDs. ALE results showed consistent activations in the striatum, anterior/posterior cingulate cortex, medial/left superior frontal gyrus and left supramarginal gyrus for impulsive choices in DD, while GNG tasks elicited mainly right-lateralized fronto-parietal activations. Conjunction and subtraction analyses showed: i) common bilateral responses in the caudate nucleus; ii) DD-specific responses in the ventral striatum, anterior/posterior cingulate cortex, left supramarginal and medial frontal gyri; iii) GNG-specific activations in the right inferior parietal cortex. Altered fronto-lateral responses to both tasks are suggestive of dysfunctional cortico-striatal balance in obesity and EDs, but these findings are controversial due to the limited number of studies directly comparing patients and controls. Overall, we found evidence for distinctive neural correlates of the motor and cognitive facets of impulsivity: the right inferior parietal lobe underpins action inhibition, whereas fronto-striatal regions and the left supramarginal gyrus are related to impulsive decision-making. While showing that further research on clinical samples is required to better characterize the neural bases of their behavioural changes, these findings help refining neurocognitive model of impulsivity and highlight potential translational implications for EDs and obesity treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:5-HT2A受体是经典致幻剂的主要靶标。DOI(2,5-二甲氧基-4-碘苯丙胺)和石脲内酯均作用于5-HT2A受体,和利苏利德与DOI具有相当的亲和力,并充当5-HT2A受体的部分激动剂。然而,不像DOI,利苏利特缺乏致幻特性。冲动性决策是指对直接的小型增强剂(SR)比对延迟的大型增强剂(LR)的偏好。
    目的:本研究旨在比较DOI和利苏利特对冲动性决策的影响,并进一步研究负责这两种药物作用的可能受体机制。
    方法:通过延迟贴现任务(DDT)中LR的选择百分比来评估雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠的冲动性决策。LR的延迟在一个会话中以升序(0、4、8、16和32s)改变。
    结果:DOI(0.5和1.0mg/kg)增加了冲动性决策,DOI(1.0mg/kg)的作用被5-HT2A受体拮抗剂ketanserin(1.0mg/kg)而不是5-HT2C受体拮抗剂SB-242084(1.0mg/kg)阻断。相反,利苏利特(0.1、0.3和0.5mg/kg)减少了冲动性决策。利苏利特(0.3mg/kg)的作用未被酮色林(1.0mg/kg)拮抗,选择性5-HT1A拮抗剂WAY-100635(1.0mg/kg),或选择性多巴胺D4受体拮抗剂L-745870(1.0mg/kg),但被选择性多巴胺D2/D3受体拮抗剂tiapride(40mg/kg)减毒。
    结论:DOI和利苏利特通过不同的受体对冲动决策有对比作用。DOI诱导的冲动增加是由5-HT2A受体介导的,而利脲诱导的冲动抑制受多巴胺D2/D3受体调节。
    BACKGROUND: The 5-HT2A receptor is the major target of classic hallucinogens. Both DOI (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine) and lisuride act at 5-HT2A receptors, and lisuride shares comparable affinity with DOI and acts as a partial agonist at 5-HT2A receptors. However, not like DOI, lisuride lacks hallucinogenic properties. Impulsive decision-making refers to the preference for an immediate small reinforcer (SR) over a delayed large reinforcer (LR).
    OBJECTIVE: The current study aims to compare the effects of DOI and lisuride on impulsive decision-making and further to investigate the possible receptor mechanisms responsible for the actions of the two drugs.
    METHODS: Impulsive decision-making was evaluated in male Sprague-Dawley rats by the percentage of choice for the LR in delay discounting task (DDT). Delay to the LR changed in an ascending order (0, 4, 8, 16, and 32 s) across one session.
    RESULTS: DOI (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) increased impulsive decision-making, and the effects of DOI (1.0 mg/kg) were blocked by the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin (1.0 mg/kg) rather than the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB-242084 (1.0 mg/kg). Contrarily, lisuride (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg/kg) decreased impulsive decision-making. The effects of lisuride (0.3 mg/kg) were not antagonized by ketanserin (1.0 mg/kg), selective 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100635 (1.0 mg/kg), or selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist L-745870 (1.0 mg/kg) but were attenuated by the selective dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist tiapride (40 mg/kg).
    CONCLUSIONS: DOI and lisuride have contrasting effects on impulsive decision-making via distinct receptors. DOI-induced increase of impulsivity is mediated by the 5-HT2A receptor, while lisuride-induced inhibition of impulsivity is regulated by the dopamine D2/D3 receptor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号