目的:在美国眼科学会(学院)IRIS®注册中心(IntelligentResearchinSight)中,研究新生血管性青光眼(NVG)患病率和治疗模式的种族和民族差异。
方法:基于增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)病史的视网膜缺血的IRIS注册表中的眼睛,视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO),和/或眼缺血综合征(OIS)。
方法:种族和民族被定义为亚洲人,黑色,西班牙裔/拉丁裔,非西班牙裔白人,其他/未知。在视网膜缺血的眼睛中,结果为新生血管性青光眼(NVG).在NVG的眼中,结果包括使用全视网膜光凝(PRP)治疗视网膜缺血,和手术降低眼压(IOP)与小梁切除术,分流管,和睫状体光凝(CPC)。协变量包括年龄,性别,居住地区,保险类型,吸烟状况,全身和眼部合并症。Cox比例风险回归用于检查种族和民族与NVG和每种NVG治疗类型之间的校正关联。
方法:NVG发生率,PRP,小梁切除术,分流管,CPC,和任何降低眼压的手术结果:312,106眼视网膜缺血,有5,885人(1.9%)患有NVG。与被认定为非西班牙裔白人的人的眼睛相比,在校正分析中,黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔个体的眼睛有较高的NVG风险(对于黑人,风险比[HR]=1.28,95%置信区间[CI]=1.15,1.43;对于西班牙裔/拉丁裔,HR=1.32,95%CI=1.17,1.47).与非西班牙裔白人相比,在西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔患者的眼中,小梁切除术的风险较高(校正后的HR=1.91,95%CI=1.08,3.39),而在黑色患者的眼中,管分流术的风险较高(校正后的HR=1.35,95%CI=1.07,1.69)和任何降眼压手术的风险较高(校正后的HR=1.29,95%CI=1.53).PRP或CPC的危害差异无统计学意义。
结论:IRIS注册中患有视网膜缺血的黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔个体的眼睛有更高的NVG和降低眼压手术的可能性。需要进一步的研究来检查排除糖尿病眼病最佳管理的医学和社会因素,以防止其致盲并发症。
OBJECTIVE: To examine racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence and treatment patterns for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in at-risk individuals in the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Academy) IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).
METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Eyes in the IRIS Registry with a retinal ischemia based on a history of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and/or ocular ischemic syndrome.
METHODS: Race and ethnicity was defined as Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic White, and other/unknown. In eyes with retinal ischemia, the outcome was NVG. In eyes with NVG, outcomes included treatment of retinal ischemia with pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP), and surgery to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) with trabeculectomy, tube shunt, and cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). Covariates included age, sex, region of residence, insurance type, smoking status, and systemic and ocular comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and NVG and each type of NVG treatment.
METHODS: Incidence of NVG, PRP, trabeculectomy, tube shunt, CPC, and any IOP-lowering surgery.
RESULTS: Of 312 106 eyes with retinal ischemia, there were 5885 (1.9%) with NVG. Compared to eyes of individuals who identified as non-Hispanic White, eyes of individuals who were Black and Hispanic/Latino had higher hazards of NVG in adjusted analyses (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.43 [for Black]; HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.17-1.47 [for Hispanic/Latino]). Compared with eyes of individuals who were non-Hispanic White, there was higher hazards of trabeculectomy in eyes of individuals who were Hispanic/Latino (adjusted HR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.08-3.39) and higher hazards of tube shunt (adjusted HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.07-1.69) and of any IOP-lowering surgery (adjusted HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09-1.53) in eyes of individuals who were Black. There were no statistically significant differences in the hazards of PRP or CPC.
CONCLUSIONS: Eyes of Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals with retinal ischemia in the IRIS Registry had higher likelihood of NVG and of IOP-lowering surgery for NVG. Further study is needed to examine the medical and social factors that preclude optimal management of diabetic eye disease, in order to prevent its blinding complications.
BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.