IRIS registry

IRIS 注册表
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项回顾性队列研究描述了IRIS注册(2013年1月1日至2019年9月30日智能研究)中对667,987只疑似或确诊青光眼的独立超声乳化术后有临床意义的眼内压(IOP)降低(“反应”)的真实世界发生率和维持情况。连续两次术后就诊时,眼压反应者的每日平均眼压比基线降低≥20%。如果响应者不再保持≥20%的IOP降低,我们宣布失败。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,估计的IOP应答率为41.3%。多变量分析表明眼压反应和基线眼压之间的关系(风险比(HR)(95%置信区间))1.48(1.48-1.49),每3mmHg,P<0.0001),年龄(HR1.14(1.13-1.14),每10年,P<0.0001),男性(HR1.13(1.12-1.15),P<0.0001),前列腺素类似物(HR0.88(0.87-0.90),P<0.0001),和Rho激酶抑制剂的使用(HR1.50(1.32-1.70),P=0.01)。50%的IOP应答者在14.3个月的中位时间内失败。多变量分析表明失败与基线眼压之间的关系(HR0.75(0.75-0.76),每3mmHg,P<0.0001),一氧化氮提供前列腺素(HR1.78(1.46-2.18),P<0.0001)和Rho激酶抑制剂的使用(HR1.73(1.43-2.09),P<0.0001)。临床医生可能会建议有危险因素的青光眼患者在独立超声乳化术后是否预期IOP反应及其预期持续时间。
    This retrospective cohort study describes the real-world incidence and maintenance of clinically meaningful intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (\"response\") following stand-alone phacoemulsification for 667,987 eyes with suspected or confirmed glaucoma in the IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) from 1/1/2013-9/30/2019. Intraocular pressure responders had ≥ 20% IOP reduction in daily mean IOP from baseline on two consecutive postoperative visits. We declared failure if a responder no longer maintained ≥ 20% IOP reduction. The estimated IOP responder rate was 41.3% by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated relationships between IOP response and baseline IOP (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval)) 1.48 (1.48-1.49), per 3 mmHg, P < 0.0001), age (HR 1.14 (1.13-1.14), per 10 years, P < 0.0001), male sex (HR 1.13 (1.12-1.15), P < 0.0001), prostaglandin analogue (HR 0.88 (0.87-0.90), P < 0.0001), and Rho-kinase inhibitor use (HR 1.50 (1.32-1.70), P = 0.01). Fifty percent of IOP responders failed at a median time of 14.3 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated relationships between failure and baseline IOP (HR 0.75 (0.75-0.76), per 3 mmHg, P < 0.0001), nitric oxide donating prostaglandin (HR 1.78 (1.46-2.18), P < 0.0001) and Rho-kinase inhibitor use (HR 1.73 (1.43-2.09), P < 0.0001). Clinicians may counsel glaucoma patients with risk factors on whether to anticipate an IOP response and its expected duration after stand-alone phacoemulsification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的全国队列中,确定随访失败(LTFU)的患病率和危险因素。
    这项回顾性队列研究分析了2014年至2019年IRIS®Registry(IntelligentResearchinSight)数据库的数据,以评估POAG成年患者的LTFU。纳入了2014年至少有一次临床发作的POAG患者。LTFU被定义为在研究期间超过一年没有临床接触。
    在553,663名青光眼患者中,277,019(50%)成为LTFU,其中184,548人(67%)从未返回护理,92,471人(33%)在失效后重新建立随访。与60岁相比,60岁以下(RR=1.38;95%CI:1.36-1.39)或80岁以上(RR=1.39;95%CI:1.38-1.40)的LTFU风险最大。与白人种族相比,LTFU的风险在夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民中最高(RR=1.24;95%CI:1.17-1.31),西班牙裔种族(RR=1.19;95%CI:1.18-1.20),和黑人种族(RR=1.10;95%CI:1.09-1.11)。医疗保险与LTFU风险较低相关(RR=0.79;95%CI:0.78-0.79),而未知/缺失/无保险与更大的风险相关(RR=1.33;95%CI:1.32-1.34),与私人保险相比。与轻度POAG相比,中度(RR=1.10;95%CI:1.08-1.13)和重度(RR=1.35;95%CI:1.32-1.38)的LTFU风险较高.
    我们发现,在6年的研究期间,在IRIS注册中心的POAG患者中,LTFU的患病率为50%。在少数群体和疾病更晚期的人群中风险更大。
    UNASSIGNED: To identify prevalence of and risk factors for loss to follow up (LTFU) among a national cohort of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) database from 2014 through 2019 to assess LTFU among adult patients with POAG. POAG patients with at least one clinical encounter in 2014 were included. LTFU was defined as exceeding one year without a clinical encounter during the study period.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 553,663 glaucoma patients, 277,019 (50%) became LTFU, of whom 184,548 (67%) never returned to care and 92,471 (33%) re-established follow-up after a lapse. Risk of LTFU was greatest among those younger than 60 years (RR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.36-1.39) or older than 80 years (RR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.38-1.40) compared to those in their 60s. Compared to White race, risk for LTFU was highest among Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (RR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.17-1.31), Hispanic ethnicity (RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.18-1.20), and Black race (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.09-1.11). Medicare insurance was associated with lower risk of LTFU (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.78-0.79), whereas unknown/missing/no insurance was associated with greater risk (RR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.32-1.34), compared to private insurance. Compared to mild-stage POAG, risk of LTFU was higher for moderate-stage (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.08-1.13) and severe-stage disease (RR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.32-1.38).
    UNASSIGNED: We found a 50% prevalence of LTFU among POAG patients in the IRIS Registry over a 6-year study period, with greater risk among minority groups and those with more advanced disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述IRIS®(视觉智能研究)注册表中缺失的社会人口统计数据的患病率,并确定与缺失的社会人口统计数据相关的实践水平特征。
    横断面研究。
    在2020年12月31日之前参加IRIS注册的实践中遇到临床问题的所有患者。
    我们描述了每个社会人口统计学变量(年龄,性别,种族,种族,地理位置,保险类型,和吸烟状况)。每个为注册提供数据的实践都根据患者数量进行分类,医生的数量,地理位置,患者就诊频率,和患者人口统计。
    多变量线性回归用于描述实践水平特征与缺失患者水平社会人口统计学数据的关联。
    这项研究包括了66名477.365患者的电子健康记录,这些患者在参与IRIS注册的3306诊所接受护理。每次练习的患者人数中位数为11.415(四分位距:5849-24148),每次练习的医生人数中位数为3(四分位距:1-7)。出生年份患者社会人口统计学数据缺失的患病率为0.1%,0.4%的性别,种族占24.8%,种族占30.2%,3位数邮政编码为2.3%,国家占14.8%,吸烟状况为5.5%,险种为17.0%。缺失数据的患病率随着时间的推移而增加,并且在州一级有所不同。缺少种族数据与每位患者就诊次数较少的实践相关(P<0.001),照顾更大的非私人保险患者群体(P=0.001),位于城市地区(P<0.001)。频繁的患者就诊与较低的种族缺失患病率相关(P<0.001)。种族(P<0.001),和保险(P<0.001),但缺失吸烟状况的患病率较高(P<0.001)。
    缺少种族存在地理和时间趋势,种族,和IRIS注册表中的保险类型数据。几个实践层面的特点,包括练习尺寸,地理位置,和患者群体,与缺失的社会人口统计数据有关。虽然丢失数据的普遍性和模式可能会在IRIS注册表的未来版本中发生变化,仍然需要开发标准化方法,以最大限度地减少潜在的偏倚来源,并确保整个研究的可重复性.
    专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the prevalence of missing sociodemographic data in the IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry and to identify practice-level characteristics associated with missing sociodemographic data.
    UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients with clinical encounters at practices participating in the IRIS Registry prior to December 31, 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: We describe geographic and temporal trends in the prevalence of missing data for each sociodemographic variable (age, sex, race, ethnicity, geographic location, insurance type, and smoking status). Each practice contributing data to the registry was categorized based on the number of patients, number of physicians, geographic location, patient visit frequency, and patient population demographics.
    UNASSIGNED: Multivariable linear regression was used to describe the association of practice-level characteristics with missing patient-level sociodemographic data.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included the electronic health records of 66 477 365 patients receiving care at 3306 practices participating in the IRIS Registry. The median number of patients per practice was 11 415 (interquartile range: 5849-24 148) and the median number of physicians per practice was 3 (interquartile range: 1-7). The prevalence of missing patient sociodemographic data were 0.1% for birth year, 0.4% for sex, 24.8% for race, 30.2% for ethnicity, 2.3% for 3-digit zip code, 14.8% for state, 5.5% for smoking status, and 17.0% for insurance type. The prevalence of missing data increased over time and varied at the state-level. Missing race data were associated with practices that had fewer visits per patient (P < 0.001), cared for a larger nonprivately insured patient population (P = 0.001), and were located in urban areas (P < 0.001). Frequent patient visits were associated with a lower prevalence of missing race (P < 0.001), ethnicity (P < 0.001), and insurance (P < 0.001), but a higher prevalence of missing smoking status (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: There are geographic and temporal trends in missing race, ethnicity, and insurance type data in the IRIS Registry. Several practice-level characteristics, including practice size, geographic location, and patient population, are associated with missing sociodemographic data. While the prevalence and patterns of missing data may change in future versions of the IRIS registry, there will remain a need to develop standardized approaches for minimizing potential sources of bias and ensure reproducibility across research studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在美国眼科学会(学院)IRIS®注册中心(IntelligentResearchinSight)中,研究新生血管性青光眼(NVG)患病率和治疗模式的种族和民族差异。
    方法:基于增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)病史的视网膜缺血的IRIS注册表中的眼睛,视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO),和/或眼缺血综合征(OIS)。
    方法:种族和民族被定义为亚洲人,黑色,西班牙裔/拉丁裔,非西班牙裔白人,其他/未知。在视网膜缺血的眼睛中,结果为新生血管性青光眼(NVG).在NVG的眼中,结果包括使用全视网膜光凝(PRP)治疗视网膜缺血,和手术降低眼压(IOP)与小梁切除术,分流管,和睫状体光凝(CPC)。协变量包括年龄,性别,居住地区,保险类型,吸烟状况,全身和眼部合并症。Cox比例风险回归用于检查种族和民族与NVG和每种NVG治疗类型之间的校正关联。
    方法:NVG发生率,PRP,小梁切除术,分流管,CPC,和任何降低眼压的手术结果:312,106眼视网膜缺血,有5,885人(1.9%)患有NVG。与被认定为非西班牙裔白人的人的眼睛相比,在校正分析中,黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔个体的眼睛有较高的NVG风险(对于黑人,风险比[HR]=1.28,95%置信区间[CI]=1.15,1.43;对于西班牙裔/拉丁裔,HR=1.32,95%CI=1.17,1.47).与非西班牙裔白人相比,在西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔患者的眼中,小梁切除术的风险较高(校正后的HR=1.91,95%CI=1.08,3.39),而在黑色患者的眼中,管分流术的风险较高(校正后的HR=1.35,95%CI=1.07,1.69)和任何降眼压手术的风险较高(校正后的HR=1.29,95%CI=1.53).PRP或CPC的危害差异无统计学意义。
    结论:IRIS注册中患有视网膜缺血的黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔个体的眼睛有更高的NVG和降低眼压手术的可能性。需要进一步的研究来检查排除糖尿病眼病最佳管理的医学和社会因素,以防止其致盲并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence and treatment patterns for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in at-risk individuals in the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Academy) IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).
    METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: Eyes in the IRIS Registry with a retinal ischemia based on a history of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and/or ocular ischemic syndrome.
    METHODS: Race and ethnicity was defined as Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic White, and other/unknown. In eyes with retinal ischemia, the outcome was NVG. In eyes with NVG, outcomes included treatment of retinal ischemia with pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP), and surgery to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) with trabeculectomy, tube shunt, and cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). Covariates included age, sex, region of residence, insurance type, smoking status, and systemic and ocular comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and NVG and each type of NVG treatment.
    METHODS: Incidence of NVG, PRP, trabeculectomy, tube shunt, CPC, and any IOP-lowering surgery.
    RESULTS: Of 312 106 eyes with retinal ischemia, there were 5885 (1.9%) with NVG. Compared to eyes of individuals who identified as non-Hispanic White, eyes of individuals who were Black and Hispanic/Latino had higher hazards of NVG in adjusted analyses (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.43 [for Black]; HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.17-1.47 [for Hispanic/Latino]). Compared with eyes of individuals who were non-Hispanic White, there was higher hazards of trabeculectomy in eyes of individuals who were Hispanic/Latino (adjusted HR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.08-3.39) and higher hazards of tube shunt (adjusted HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.07-1.69) and of any IOP-lowering surgery (adjusted HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09-1.53) in eyes of individuals who were Black. There were no statistically significant differences in the hazards of PRP or CPC.
    CONCLUSIONS: Eyes of Black and Hispanic/Latino individuals with retinal ischemia in the IRIS Registry had higher likelihood of NVG and of IOP-lowering surgery for NVG. Further study is needed to examine the medical and social factors that preclude optimal management of diabetic eye disease, in order to prevent its blinding complications.
    BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们使用来自美国眼科学会IRIS®注册中心(IntelligentResearchinSight)的真实世界数据(RWD)使用精确匹配和逆倾向评分加权(IPSW)来模仿AMD治疗比较试验(CATT)中的2个治疗组,并比较RWD组与临床试验中的2个月治疗组的结果。
    使用去识别的电子健康记录注册数据和患者水平去识别的临床试验数据进行回顾性队列研究。
    从CATT或IRIS登记处使用雷珠单抗或贝伐单抗仅治疗1年的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者眼睛。
    患者在2015年10月1日至2019年12月31日之间的IRIS注册中进行了鉴定。在应用CATT的所有基于非影像学的纳入和排除标准后,仅在基础上接受贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗的患者眼睛被确定为符合条件的队列.精确匹配和ISPW是根据年龄应用的,性别,和基线视力。
    视敏度的平均变化,在近似的ETDRS字母中,精确匹配和IPSW生成的IRIS注册prn治疗组的基线和1年之间。
    我们确定了用雷珠单抗治疗的427只眼和用贝伐单抗治疗的771只眼。使用精确匹配,在IRIS注册中,贝伐单抗每月治疗组中98%(n=281)的CATT患者眼睛和雷珠单抗每月治疗组中87%(n=261)的CATT患者眼睛与患者眼睛相匹配。对于雷珠单抗prn治疗组,使用精确匹配生成的患者眼睛获得1.9个字母,使用IPSW生成的患者眼睛获得2.8个字母(精确匹配:1.9个字母±14.0与IPSW:2.8字母±15.0字母,P=0.43)。对于贝伐单抗prn治疗组,使用精确匹配生成的患者眼睛获得2.4个字母,使用IPSW生成的患者眼睛获得2.1个字母(精确匹配:2.4个字母±15.4与IPSW:2.1字母±16.0字母,P=0.79)。
    使用IRIS注册数据和患者水平的临床试验数据,精确匹配和IPSW在模拟CATT的prn治疗方面产生了相似的结果。类似于之前的真实世界研究,与临床试验相比,IRIS注册治疗组的临床结局明显更差.
    专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
    UNASSIGNED: We used exact matching and inverse propensity score weighting (IPSW) using real-world data (RWD) from the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) to emulate the 2 pro re nata (prn) treatment arms from the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trial (CATT) and to compare the outcomes of the RWD arms to the 2 monthly treatment arms from the clinical trial.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort study utilizing deidentified electronic health record registry data and patient-level deidentified clinical trial data.
    UNASSIGNED: All treatment-naive patient eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with ranibizumab or bevacizumab only for 1 year from either the CATT or the IRIS Registry.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were identified in the IRIS Registry between October 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. After all nonimaging-based inclusion and exclusion criteria from the CATT were applied, patient eyes receiving bevacizumab or ranibizumab only on a prn basis were identified as the eligible cohort. Exact matching and ISPW was applied based on age, gender, and baseline visual acuity.
    UNASSIGNED: Mean change in visual acuity, in approximated ETDRS letters, between baseline and 1 year for the IRIS Registry prn treatment arms generated by exact matching and IPSW.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 427 eyes treated with ranibizumab prn and 771 eyes treated with bevacizumab prn. Using exact matching, 98% (n = 281) of CATT patient eyes in the bevacizumab monthly treatment arm and 87% (n = 261) of CATT patient eyes in the ranibizumab monthly treatment arm were matched to a patient eye in the IRIS Registry. For the ranibizumab prn treatment arm, patient eyes generated using exact matching gained 1.9 letters and those generated using IPSW gained 2.8 letters (exact matching: 1.9 letters ± 14.0 vs. IPSW: 2.8 letters ± 15.0 letters, P = 0.43). For the bevacizumab prn treatment arm, patient eyes generated using exact matching gained 2.4 letters and those generated using IPSW gained 2.1 letters (exact matching: 2.4 letters ± 15.4 vs. IPSW: 2.1 letters ± 16.0 letters, P = 0.79).
    UNASSIGNED: Both exact matching and IPSW produced similar results in emulating the prn treatment arms of the CATT using IRIS Registry data and patient-level clinical trial data. Similar to prior real-world studies, the clinical outcomes were significantly worse in the IRIS Registry treatment arms compared with the clinical trial.
    UNASSIGNED: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当前的研究向美国眼科学会(AAO)视觉智能研究(IRIS)注册表查询有关流行病学的数据,工作,和自身免疫性眼眶炎症的管理模式。
    分析和描述2013年至2019年IRIS注册中心的患者数据,使用基于国际疾病分类(ICD)和当前程序术语(CPT)代码的过滤器审查自身免疫性或特发性眼眶炎症患者。甲状腺眼病患者,眼眶蜂窝织炎,排除眼眶脓肿。
    人口统计学描述包括性别,年龄,地理区域,和治疗。通过评估成像率进行子分析,活检,实验室工作,和诊断类别。
    在最后一批20,584名患者中,眼眶炎症的平均发病年龄为51.7岁;67%为女性;63%为高加索人,21%未知,12%黑色,2.6%亚洲人,其他1.5%。只有49人有成像,78人进行了实验室检查,1411个有活检编码.治疗结果显示166名患者接受抗生素治疗,224名接受类固醇治疗的患者,和35名患者同时接受这两种治疗。
    这项研究评估了流行病学,诊断模式,以及通过AAOIRIS注册表对眼眶炎症的治疗模式。实践模式表明,与活检相比,成像和实验室研究的总体比率相对较低。尽管这肯定低估了成像和实验室研究的实际数量,并证明了使用大型数据库固有的不精确性。然而,本研究的方法提供了一个框架来接近眼可塑性研究的IRIS注册表.
    UNASSIGNED: The current study queries the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) registry for data on the epidemiology, work-up, and management patterns of autoimmune orbital inflammation.
    UNASSIGNED: Analysis and description of patient data from the IRIS registry between 2013 and 2019 reviewing patients with autoimmune or idiopathic orbital inflammation with filters based on International Classification of Disease (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patients with thyroid eye disease, orbital cellulitis, and orbital abscess were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: Demographic descriptions included gender, age, geographic region, and treatment. Sub-analysis was performed by assessing rates of imaging, biopsy, lab work-up, and diagnostic categories.
    UNASSIGNED: In a final cohort of 20,584 patients, the mean age of onset of orbital inflammation was 51.7 years; 67% female; and 63% Caucasian, 21% unknown, 12% Black, 2.6% Asian, and 1.5% other. Only 49 had imaging, 78 had laboratory work-up, and 1,411 had biopsy codes. Treatment results showed 166 patients receiving antibiotics, 224 patients receiving steroids, and 35 patients receiving both.
    UNASSIGNED: This study assessed the epidemiology, diagnostic patterns, and treatment patterns for orbital inflammation through the AAO IRIS registry. Practise patterns suggest a relatively low overall rate of imaging and laboratory studies compared to biopsies, although this certainly under-represents the actual number of imaging and laboratory studies and exemplifies the inherent imprecision of using a large database. However, the methodology of this study provides a framework of approaching the IRIS registry for oculoplastic research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:干眼症(DED)是一种慢性进行性眼表疾病,在儿科人群中的研究有限。眼科学院的IRIS®注册中心被用来调查DED在儿科人群中的患病率(PDED,患者<18岁)以及儿童和成人患者(ADED)之间DED的人口统计学差异。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。DED患者在1月1日之间,2013年12月31日,包括2019年(N=4,795,979)。描述性统计,进行了Pearson卡方检验和双样本比例检验,以比较ADED和PDED队列之间的关键人口统计学分布。
    结果:ADED患者的平均发病年龄为61.06(±14.75)岁,PDED患者的平均发病年龄为12.51(±3.86)岁。对于所有人口统计学特征,独立性的总体检验和每个类别比例的个体检验均具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。PDED患者与IRIS注册儿科患者池(PIRIS)之间差异最大的特征包括女性(58.08%vs.50.60%),男性(41.58%vs.48.78%)和亚洲种族(6.02%vs.3.11%)。在PDED队列中,女性患PDED的风险较高(58%vs.42%)。PDED在屈光不正(76%)和眼睑/结膜疾病(41%)的儿童中更为普遍。PDED和ADED患者之间差异最大的特征包括女性(58.08%vs.68.12%),男性(41.58%vs.31.55%)和高加索种族(50.24%vs.67.06%)分别。
    结论:本研究证实了PDED队列中的显著差异。与PIRIS相比,PDED在女性和高加索种族中更为普遍,并且更常见于屈光不正和眼睑/结膜疾病。
    OBJECTIVE: Dry-eye disease (DED) is a chronic progressive ocular surface disorder with limited studies in the pediatric population. The Academy of Ophthalmology\'s IRIS® Registry was leveraged to investigate the prevalence of DED in the pediatric population (PDED, patients <18 years old) and the demographic differences of DED between pediatric and adult patients (ADED).
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Patients with DED between January 1st, 2013 and December 31st, 2019 (N = 4,795,979) were included. Descriptive statistics, Pearson\'s chi-squared tests and two-sample proportions tests were conducted to compare key demographic distributions between the ADED and PDED cohorts.
    RESULTS: The average age at onset for ADED patients was 61.06 (±14.75) years and for PDED patients was 12.51 (±3.86). The overall tests for independence and the individual tests of proportions of each category were statistically significant for all demographic characteristics (p < 0.001). Characteristics with the largest discrepancies between patients of PDED and the IRIS Registry pediatric patient pool (PIRIS) included female sex (58.08 % vs. 50.60 %), male sex (41.58 % vs. 48.78 %) and Asian race (6.02 % vs. 3.11 %) respectively. Within the PDED cohort, females were at higher risk of PDED (58 % vs. 42 %). PDED was more prevalent in children with refractive errors (76 %) and eyelid/conjunctival disorders (41 %). Characteristics with the largest discrepancies between PDED and ADED patients included female sex (58.08 % vs. 68.12 %), male sex (41.58 % vs. 31.55 %) and Caucasian race (50.24 % vs. 67.06 %) respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in the PDED cohort are demonstrated in this study. PDED was more prevalent in the female sex and Caucasian race compared to PIRIS and was more commonly associated with refractive errors and eyelid/conjunctival disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用IRIS®Registry(智能视野研究)评估白内障手术后眼内压(IOP)峰值的危险因素。
    方法:回顾性临床队列研究。
    方法:从2013年1月1日至2019年9月30日接受独立超声乳化术的具有IRIS®注册资料的成年人。
    方法:IOP峰值定义为术后第一周内术后IOP>30mmHg和>10mmHg。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析计算人口统计学和临床特征的赔率比(OR)。
    方法:眼压尖峰的发生率和OR。
    结果:我们分析了1,191,034只眼的数据(平均年龄71.3岁,61.2%的女性和24.8%的青光眼)。3.7%的眼睛出现IOP峰值,有青光眼的眼睛占5.2%,无青光眼的眼睛占3.2%(P<0.0001)。所有眼睛的多变量分析表明,基线IOP较高(OR1.57每3mmHg),IOP峰值的风险更大。男性(OR1.79),青光眼(OR1.19),黑人种族(与亚洲人相比为1.39,与西班牙裔相比为1.21),年龄较大(每10年为1.07),和复杂的手术编码(OR1.22,所有P<0.0001)。手术后糖尿病(OR0.90)和无晶状体眼(OR0.60)似乎对IOP峰值具有保护作用(均P<0.0001)。与青光眼嫌疑人相比,眼压峰值与高眼压的风险更大(OR1.55),色素性青光眼(OR1.56),和假性剥脱性青光眼(OR1.52),正常眼压性青光眼的风险较低(OR0.55),初级闭角(PAC)可疑(OR0.67),和PAC青光眼(OR0.81,均P<0.0001)。更多的基线青光眼药物与IOP峰值(每药OR1.18)相关,而局部使用β受体阻滞剂(OR0.68)具有保护作用(均P<0.0001)。
    结论:较高的基线眼压,男性,青光眼,黑人种族,年龄较大,复杂的白内障编码与术后早期IOP峰值相关,而糖尿病和术后无晶状体眼对独立超声乳化术后的峰值具有保护作用。青光眼表现出不同的风险特征,取决于青光眼的亚型。这些发现可能有助于外科医生分层并降低白内障手术后IOP峰值的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors for intraocular pressure (IOP) spike after cataract surgery using the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).
    METHODS: Retrospective clinical cohort study.
    METHODS: Adults with IRIS Registry data who underwent stand-alone phacoemulsification from January 1, 2013, through September 30, 2019.
    METHODS: Intraocular pressure spike was defined as postoperative IOP of > 30 mmHg and > 10 mmHg from the baseline within the first postoperative week. Odds ratios (ORs) for demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.
    METHODS: Incidence and OR of IOP spike.
    RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1 191 034 eyes (patient mean age, 71.3 years; 61.2% female sex; and 24.8% with glaucoma). An IOP spike occurred in 3.7% of all eyes, 5.2% of eyes with glaucoma, and 3.2% of eyes without glaucoma (P < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses of all eyes indicated a greater risk of IOP spike with higher baseline IOP (OR, 1.57 per 3 mmHg), male sex (OR, 1.79), glaucoma (OR, 1.20), Black race (OR, 1.39 vs. Asian and 1.21 vs. Hispanic), older age (OR, 1.07 per 10 years), and complex surgery coding (OR, 1.22; all P < 0.0001). Diabetes (OR, 0.90) and aphakia after surgery (OR, 0.60) seemed to be protective against IOP spike (both P < 0.0001). Compared with glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertension (OR, 1.55), pigmentary glaucoma (OR, 1.56), and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (OR, 1.52) showed a greater risk of IOP spike and normal-tension glaucoma (OR, 0.55), suspected primary angle closure (PAC; OR, 0.67), and PAC glaucoma (OR, 0.81) showed less risk (all P < 0.0001). Using more baseline glaucoma medications was associated with IOP spike (OR, 1.18 per medication), whereas topical β-blocker use (OR, 0.68) was protective (both P < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline IOP, male sex, glaucoma, Black race, older age, and complex cataract coding were associated with early postoperative IOP spike, whereas diabetes and postoperative aphakia were protective against a spike after stand-alone phacoemulsification. Glaucomatous eyes demonstrated different risk profiles dependent on glaucoma subtype. The findings may help surgeons to stratify and mitigate the risk of IOP spike after cataract surgery.
    BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    IRIS®Registry对视网膜血管阻塞的分析,将大流行前(2017-2019年)观察到的患者数量与大流行期间(2020-2022年)观察到的患者数量进行比较,未显示病例增加。
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare bilateral granulomatous panuveitis that can follow surgical or nonsurgical ocular trauma in one eye. Because its diagnosis requires clinical-pathologic correlation, the true incidence of SO is unknown, and there is a need to understand the recent trends in risk factors and frequency of this condition.
    UNASSIGNED: Pathology records of all enucleated or eviscerated (ENEV) eyes at three pathology laboratories were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure indication, pathology diagnosis, and clinical history of trauma and uveitis. IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) was searched for all patients with SO, acquired absence of eye (AAE), and/or ENEV. Data obtained included patient demographics, ocular procedures, and preoperative diagnoses within 30 days of AAE/ENEV.
    UNASSIGNED: In the pathology laboratory setting, the incidence of SO over a 36-year period in patients who underwent ENEV was 0.2% (20/9,092); the 5-year incidence ranged from 0.0 to 0.3%. Among the 20 eyes with SO, the inciting event was surgical trauma in 50% (10/20), nonsurgical trauma in 45% (9/20), and missing/undetermined in 5% (1/20). SO was suspected preoperatively in 7/20 (35%) patients. Clinical concern for SO and ruptured globe were indications for ENEV in 50/9,092 (0.5%) and 872/9,092 (10%) patients, respectively. In the IRIS Registry, 0.7% (199/27,830) of patients with AAE/ENEV had diagnosis of SO. The frequency of SO between 2015 and 2020 was 0.01% (7,371/62,318,249); of these 7,371 cases, 199 (3%) had AAE/ENEV. In 25,975 patients with available data, injury and SO were listed as diagnoses less than 30 days prior to AAE/ENEV in 909 (4%) and 63 (0.2%) cases, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The frequency of SO in recent decades has been low. Most cases of SO are not managed with eye removal. In histopathology-confirmed SO, surgical trauma is as frequent as nonsurgical trauma as an inciting etiology of disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号