UNASSIGNED: Whether complete revascularization (CR) or incomplete revascularization (IR) may affect long-term outcomes after PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is unclear.
UNASSIGNED: The authors sought to assess the impact of CR or IR on 10-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for LMCA disease.
UNASSIGNED: In the PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) 10-year extended study, the authors evaluated the effect of PCI and CABG on long-term outcomes according to completeness of revascularization. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (composite of mortality from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization).
UNASSIGNED: Among 600 randomized patients (PCI, n = 300 and CABG, n = 300), 416 patients (69.3%) had CR and 184 (30.7%) had IR; 68.3% of PCI patients and 70.3% of CABG patients underwent CR, respectively. The 10-year MACCE rates were not significantly different between PCI and CABG among patients with CR (27.8% vs 25.1%, respectively; adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.81-1.73) and among those with IR (31.6% vs 21.3%, respectively; adjusted HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.92-2.92) (P for interaction = 0.35). There was also no significant interaction between the status of CR and the relative effect of PCI and CABG on all-cause mortality, serious composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and repeat revascularization.
UNASSIGNED: In this 10-year follow-up of PRECOMBAT, the authors found no significant difference between PCI and CABG in the rates of MACCE and all-cause mortality according to CR or IR status. (Ten-Year Outcomes of PRE-COMBAT Trial [PRECOMBAT], NCT03871127; PREmier of Randomized COMparison of Bypass Surgery Versus AngioplasTy Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease [PRECOMBAT], NCT00422968).

UNASSIGNED: The benefit of revascularizing chronically occluded coronary arteries remains debatable, and available long-term outcome reports are sparse. Current guidelines recommend revascularization of chronically occluded arteries only in patients with myocardial ischemia and/or symptoms associated with angina. We investigated outcome of patients with total chronic occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) receiving coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with and without revascularization of the RCA.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with chronically occluded RCAs receiving CABG with (group 1 = RCA-CABG; n = 487) and without (group 2 = No-RCA-CABG; n = 100) revascularization of the RCA. In total, 587 patients with complete follow-up of a minimum of 6 years were included (92%).
UNASSIGNED: In total, 82% in group 1 versus 86% in group 2 were male (P = .38). European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II was comparable between both groups (4.35 ± 7.09% vs 4.80 ± 5.77%, P = .56) with no major differences regarding preoperative characteristics between groups. Patients in group 1 received 3.24 ± 0.79 distal anastomoses, whereas group 2 received 2.45 ± 0.83 distal anastomoses (P < .001). Although in-hospital mortality was comparable (2.9% in group 1 vs 5.0% in group 2, P = .27), long-term survival was significantly better in group 1 (P = .002). No difference in the incidence of further major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was found.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with a chronically occluded RCA undergoing CABG who did not receive an RCA graft showed a significantly reduced long-term survival. Given the herein presented data, revascularization of chronically occluded right arteries during CABG should be recommended whenever technically feasible.