UNASSIGNED: To describe a case of intraocular lens (IOL) tilt following transscleral IOL fixation with the Yamane technique and subsequent correction of tilt using 810-nm endoscopic diode laser.
UNASSIGNED: Our patient required lens exchange and secondary IOL implantation due to a dislocated 1-piece IOL in the bag causing iris chafe. After routine IOL fixation with the Yamane technique and a Zeiss CT Lucia 602 lens, the IOL tilted significantly in the immediate postoperative period. The lens tilt was subsequently corrected in the operating room using endolaser to melt and reshape (cure) the optic-haptic junction.
UNASSIGNED: IOL tilt is a known complication associated with the Yamane technique, which has seen increasing reports with the Zeiss CT Lucia 602 lens. Using endolaser to reconfigure the tilted optic into the desired orientation is a more novel procedure that can correct the lens tilt without the need for IOL exchange.

BACKGROUND: Intraocular lenses (IOLs) require proper positioning in the eye to provide good imaging performance. This is especially important for premium IOLs. The purpose of this study was to develop prediction models for estimating IOL decentration, tilt and the axial IOL equator position (IOLEQ) based on preoperative biometric and tomographic measures.
METHODS: Based on a dataset (N = 250) containing preoperative IOLMaster 700 and pre-/postoperative Casia2 measurements from a cataractous population, we implemented shallow feedforward neural networks and multilinear regression models to predict the IOL decentration, tilt and IOLEQ from the preoperative biometric and tomography measures. After identifying the relevant predictors using a stepwise linear regression approach and training of the models (150 training and 50 validation data points), the performance was evaluated using an N = 50 subset of test data.
RESULTS: In general, all models performed well. Prediction of IOL decentration shows the lowest performance, whereas prediction of IOL tilt and especially IOLEQ showed superior performance. According to the 95% confidence intervals, decentration/tilt/IOLEQ could be predicted within 0.3 mm/1.5°/0.3 mm. The neural network performed slightly better compared to the regression, but without significance for decentration and tilt.
CONCLUSIONS: Neural network or linear regression-based prediction models for IOL decentration, tilt and axial lens position could be used for modern IOL power calculation schemes dealing with \'real\' IOL positions and for indications for premium lenses, for which misplacement is known to induce photic effects and image distortion.

Purpose: To compare the refractive results between sutureless scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOLs) (Carlevale, Soleko) and suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOLs (Sensar AR40, Johnson & Johnson) for secondary implantation in patients with IOL dislocation or aphakia. Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study on 28 patients (28 eyes) with sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale IOL and 25 patients (25 eyes) with suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOL. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) evaluation, refractive measures and IOL tilt evaluation with anterior segment optical coherence tomography were conducted at one, three, six and twelve months after surgery. Point Spread Function (PSF) was measured using a total ocular aberrometer. Results: BCVA in both groups improved since the postoperative visit at 1 month and reached a stable value at 3 months At month 12, mean BCVA was 0.23 logMAR in group one and 0.32 logMAR in group two. Mean IOL tilt angle at 12 months was 2.76° ± 1.87 in group one and 2.51° ± 1.80 in group two. PSF at 12 months was 0.18 ± 0.09 in group one and 0.15 ± 0.05 in group two. There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) for all comparisons. The post-operative complications were similar within the two groups. Conclusions: Our results show that secondary IOL implantation has similar visual and surgical outcomes when a sutureless Carlevale lens scleral fixation and a suture-free scleral fixation three-piece IOL are used.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the spherical shift of intraocular lens (IOL) tilt after intrascleral fixation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent flanged intrascleral IOL fixation with transconjunctival 25- or 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Jikei University Hospital. The minimum follow-up duration was 3 months. Second-generation anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA2; TOMEY) was used to obtain the values of tilt and decentration of the intrasclerally fixated IOL and postoperative anterior chamber depth. We investigated the relationship between refractive error and various parameters, such as IOL tilt and decentration, axial length, and keratometry. In addition to our clinical investigation, we conducted optical simulations using Zemax to evaluate the spherical shift of the IOL tilt by means of the through-focus response and change in spherical equivalent power.
RESULTS: The study involved 72 eyes of 67 patients. The degree of IOL tilt was correlated with the amount of refractive error (Spearman\'s rank correlation coefficient [CC] = - 0.32; P = 0.006). In particular, a tilt angle greater than 10° strongly affected the refractive error. The postoperative anterior chamber depth also correlated with the refractive error (CC = 0.50; P < 0.001), as opposed to decentration (CC = - 0.17; P = 0.15), axial length (CC = - 0.08; P = 0.49), and keratometry (CC = - 0.06; P = 0.64). Optical simulations also revealed a myopic shift that exponentially increased as the tilt became greater.
CONCLUSIONS: IOL tilts that are greater than 10° induce refractive error.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate at six months the intraocular lens (IOL) decentration, tilt and lenticular astigmatism between foldable sutured and sutureless scleral fixation IOLs compared to conventional phacoemulsification surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records for 22 eyes with sutureless scleral fixation, 16 eyes with sutured scleral fixation and 23 eyes with conventional phacoemulsification. IOL decentration and angle of IOL tilt were compared on Scheimpflug images 6 months after surgery. Lenticular astigmatism is described as the difference between refractive and net corneal astigmatism.
RESULTS: The angle of tilt in both meridians was significantly lower in the sutureless group than in the sutured group (P=0.008 horizontally and P=0.002 vertically). IOL decentration did not show a significant difference between the three groups in either horizontal or vertical meridians (P˃0.05). Lenticular astigmatism was significantly lower in the sutureless and control groups than in the sutured group (P=0.003 and P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to being relatively quick and easy to perform, the sutureless scleral fixation technique showed superior results in terms of IOL tilt and lenticular astigmatism at the six-month follow-up compared to the sutured technique.