Objective. In current clinical practice for quality assurance (QA), intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) fields are verified by measuring planar dose distributions at one or a few selected depths in a phantom. A QA device that measures full 3D dose distributions at high spatiotemporal resolution would be highly beneficial for existing as well as emerging proton therapy techniques such as FLASH radiotherapy. Our objective is to demonstrate feasibility of 3D dose measurement for IMPT fields using a dedicated multi-layer strip ionization chamber (MLSIC) device.Approach.Our developed MLSIC comprises a total of 66 layers of strip ion chamber (IC) plates arranged, alternatively, in thexandydirection. The first two layers each has 128 channels in 2 mm spacing, and the following 64 layers each has 32/33 IC strips in 8 mm spacing which are interconnected every eight channels. A total of 768-channel IC signals are integrated and sampled at a speed of 6 kfps. The MLSIC has a total of 19.2 cm water equivalent thickness and is capable of measurement over a 25 × 25 cm2field size. A reconstruction algorithm is developed to reconstruct 3D dose distribution for each spot at all depths by considering a double-Gaussian-Cauchy-Lorentz model. The 3D dose distribution of each beam is obtained by summing all spots. The performance of our MLSIC is evaluated for a clinical pencil beam scanning (PBS) plan.Main results.The dose distributions for each proton spot can be successfully reconstructed from the ionization current measurement of the strip ICs at different depths, which can be further summed up to a 3D dose distribution for the beam. 3D Gamma Index analysis indicates acceptable agreement between the measured and expected dose distributions from simulation, Zebra and MatriXX.Significance.The dedicated MLSIC is the first pseudo-3D QA device that can measure 3D dose distribution in PBS proton fields spot-by-spot.

UNASSIGNED: In concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer, a 2-phase method consisting of initial irradiation of a wide elective nodal region and boost irradiation of the primary lesion is commonly employed. Although dose escalation to the primary lesion may be required to achieve higher local control rates, the radiation dose to critical organs must not exceed dose constraints. To achieve an optimum balance of dose prescription and dose reduction to surrounding organs, such as the lungs and heart, we compared hybrid dose distributions and investigated the best combination of the following recent irradiation techniques: volumetric modulation arc therapy (VMAT), proton broad-beam irradiation, and intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT).
UNASSIGNED: Forty-five patients with advanced esophageal cancer whose primary lesions were located in the middle- or lower-thoracic region were studied. Radiotherapy plans for the initial and boost irradiation in the 2-phase method were calculated using VMAT, proton broad-beam irradiation, and IMPT calculation codes, and the dose-volume histogram indices of the lungs and heart for the accumulated plans were compared.
UNASSIGNED: In plans using boost proton irradiation with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy(RBE), all dose-volume histogram indices were significantly below the tolerance limits. Initial and boost irradiation with VMAT resulted in the median dose of V30 Gy(RBE)(heart) of 27.4% and an achievement rate below the tolerance limit of 57.8% (26 cases). In simulations of dose escalation up to 70 Gy(RBE), initial and boost IMPT resulted in the highest achievement rate, satisfying all dose constraints in 95.6% (43 cases).
UNASSIGNED: Applying VMAT to both initial and boost irradiation is not recommended because of the increased risk of the cardiac dose exceeding the tolerance limit. IMPT may allow dose escalation of up to 70 Gy(RBE) without radiation risks to the lungs and heart in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

UNASSIGNED: The effectiveness of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy remains inadequately explored. We investigated long-term outcomes and toxicity experienced by patients who received IMPT as part of definitive esophageal cancer treatment.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively identified and analyzed 34 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received IMPT with concurrent chemotherapy as a definitive treatment regimen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2011 to 2021. The median IMPT dose was 50.4 GyRBE in 28 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy consisted of fluorouracil and/or taxane and/or platinum. Survival outcomes were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.
UNASSIGNED: The median age of all patients was 71.5 years. Most patients had stage III (cT3 cM0) adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 41.1%; progression-free survival, 34.6%; local regional recurrence-free survival, 78.1%; and distant metastasis-free survival, 65.0%. Common acute chemoradiation therapy-related toxicities included hematologic toxicity, esophagitis (and late-onset), fatigue, weight loss, and nausea (and late-onset); grade 3 toxicity rates were 26.0% for hematologic, 18.0% for esophagitis and 9.0% for nausea. No patient had grade ≥3 wt loss or radiation pneumonitis, and no patients had pulmonary fibrosis or esophageal fistula. No grade ≥4 events were observed except for hematologic toxicity (lymphopenia) in 2 patients.
UNASSIGNED: Long-term survival and toxicity were excellent after IMPT for locally advanced esophageal cancer treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. When available, IMPT should be offered to such patients to minimize treatment-related cardiopulmonary toxicity without sacrificing outcomes.

Objective.In Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT), the weights of individual pencil-beams or spots are optimized to fulfil dosimetric constraints. Theses spots are usually located on a regular lattice and their positions are fixed during optimization. In many cases, the range of spot weights may however be limited, leading sometimes to sub-optimal plan quality. An emblematic use case is the delivery of a plan at ultra-high dose rate (FLASH-RT), for which the spot weights are typically constrained to high values.Approach. To improve further the quality of IMPT FLASH plans, we propose here a novel algorithm to optimize both the spot weights and positions directly based on the objectives defined by the treatment planner.Main results. For all cases considered, optimizing the spot positions lead to an enhanced dosimetric score, while maintaining a high dose rate.Significance. Overall, this approach resulted in a substantial plan quality improvement compared to optimizing only the spot weights, and in a similar execution time.

Objective. Propose a highly automated treatment plan re-optimization strategy suitable for online adaptive proton therapy. The strategy includes a rapid re-optimization method that generates quality replans and a novel solution that efficiently addresses the planning constraint infeasibility issue that can significantly prolong the re-optimization process.Approach. We propose a systematic reference point method (RPM) model that minimizes the l-infinity norm from the initial treatment plan in the daily objective space for online re-optimization. This model minimizes the largest objective value deviation among the objectives of the daily replan from their reference values, leading to a daily replan similar to the initial plan. Whether a set of planning constraints is feasible with respect to the daily anatomy cannot be known before solving the corresponding optimization problem. The conventional trial-and-error-based relaxation process can cost a significant amount of time. To that end, we propose an optimization problem that first estimates the magnitude of daily violation of each planning constraint. Guided by the violation magnitude and clinical importance of the constraints, the constraints are then iteratively converted into objectives based on their priority until the infeasibility issue is solved.Main results.The proposed RPM-based strategy generated replans similar to the offline manual replans within the online time requirement for six head and neck and four breast patients. The average targetD95and relevant organ at risk sparing parameter differences between the RPM replans and clinical offline replans were -0.23, -1.62 Gy for head and neck cases and 0.29, -0.39 Gy for breast cases. The proposed constraint relaxation solution made the RPM problem feasible after one round of relaxation for all four patients who encountered the infeasibility issue.Significance. We proposed a novel RPM-based re-optimization strategy and demonstrated its effectiveness on complex cases, regardless of whether constraint infeasibility is encountered.

OBJECTIVE: Proton stereotactic radiosurgery (PSRS) has emerged as an innovative proton therapy modality aimed at achieving precise dose delivery with minimal impact on healthy tissues. This study explores the dosimetric outcomes of PSRS in comparison to traditional intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) by focusing on cases with small target volumes. A custom-made aperture system designed for proton therapy, specifically tailored to small target volumes, was developed and implemented for this investigation.
METHODS: A prerequisite mechanical validation through an isocentricity test precedes dosimetric assessments, ensuring the seamless integration of mechanical and dosimetry analyses. Five patients were enrolled in the study, including two with choroid melanoma and three with arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Two treatment plans were meticulously executed for each patient, one utilizing a collimated aperture and the other without. Both plans were subjected to robust optimization, maintaining identical beam arrangements and consistent optimization parameters to account for setup errors of 2 mm and range uncertainties of 3.5%. Plan evaluation metrics encompassing the Heterogeneity Index (HI), Paddick Conformity Index (CIPaddick), Gradient Index (GI), and the R50% index to evaluate alterations in low-dose volume distribution.
RESULTS: The comparative analysis between PSRS and traditional PBS treatment revealed no significant differences in plan outcomes, with both modalities demonstrating comparable target coverage. However, collimated apertures resulted in discernible improvements in dose conformity, dose fall-off, and reduced low-dose volume.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the advantageous impact of the aperture system on proton therapy, particularly in cases involving small target volumes.

Objective. Proton therapy reduces the integral dose to the patient compared to conventional photon treatments. However,in vivoproton range uncertainties remain a considerable hurdle. Range uncertainty reduction benefits depend on clinical practices. During intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), the target is irradiated from only a few directions, but proton arc therapy (PAT), for which the target is irradiated from dozens of angles, may see clinical implementation by the time considerable range uncertainty reductions are achieved. It is therefore crucial to determine the impact of PAT on range uncertainty reduction benefits.Approach. For twenty head-and-neck cancer patients, four different treatment plans were created: an IMPT and a PAT treatment plan assuming current clinical range uncertainties of 3.5% (IMPT3.5%and PAT3.5%), and an IMPT and a PAT treatment plan assuming that range uncertainties can be reduced to 1% (IMPT1%and PAT1%). Plans were evaluated with respect to target coverage and organ-at-risk doses as well as normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for parotid glands (endpoint: parotid gland flow <25%) and larynx (endpoint: larynx edema).Main results. Implementation of PAT (IMPT3.5%-PAT3.5%) reduced mean NTCPs in the nominal and worst-case scenario by 3.2 percentage points (pp) and 4.2 pp, respectively. Reducing range uncertainties from 3.5% to 1% during use of IMPT (IMPT3.5%-IMPT1%) reduced evaluated NTCPs by 0.9 pp and 2.0 pp. Benefits of range uncertainty reductions subsequently to PAT implementation (PAT3.5%-PAT1%) were 0.2 pp and 1.0 pp, with considerably higher benefits in bilateral compared to unilateral cases.Significance. The mean clinical benefit of implementing PAT was more than twice as high as the benefit of a 3.5%-1% range uncertainty reduction. Range uncertainty reductions are expected to remain beneficial even after PAT implementation, especially in cases with target positions allowing for full leveraging of the higher number of gantry angles during PAT.

BACKGROUND: To assess the feasibility of CBCT-based adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using automated planning for treatment of head and neck (HN) cancers.
METHODS: Twenty HN cancer patients who received radiotherapy and had pretreatment CBCTs were included in this study. Initial IMPT plans were created using automated planning software for all patients. Synthetic CTs (sCT) were then created by deforming the planning CT (pCT) to the pretreatment CBCTs. To assess dose calculation accuracy on sCTs, repeat CTs (rCTs) were deformed to the pretreatment CBCT obtained on the same day to create deformed rCT (rCTdef), serving as gold standard. The dose recalculated on sCT and on rCTdef were compared by using Gamma analysis. The accuracy of DIR generated contours was also assessed. To explore the potential benefits of adaptive IMPT, two sets of plans were created for each patient, a non-adapted IMPT plan and an adapted IMPT plan calculated on weekly sCT images. The weekly doses for non-adaptive and adaptive IMPT plans were accumulated on the pCT, and the accumulated dosimetric parameters of two sets were compared.
RESULTS: Gamma analysis of the dose recalculated on sCT and rCTdef resulted in a passing rate of 97.9% ± 1.7% using 3 mm/3% criteria. With the physician-corrected contours on the sCT, the dose deviation range of using sCT to estimate mean dose for the most organ at risk (OARs) can be reduced to (- 2.37%, 2.19%) as compared to rCTdef, while for V95 of primary or secondary CTVs, the deviation can be controlled within (- 1.09%, 0.29%). Comparison of the accumulated doses from the adaptive planning against the non-adaptive plans reduced mean dose to constrictors (- 1.42 Gy ± 2.79 Gy) and larynx (- 2.58 Gy ± 3.09 Gy). The reductions result in statistically significant reductions in the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of larynx edema by 7.52% ± 13.59%. 4.5% of primary CTVs, 4.1% of secondary CTVs, and 26.8% tertiary CTVs didn\'t meet the V95 > 95% constraint on non-adapted IMPT plans. All adaptive plans were able to meet the coverage constraint.
CONCLUSIONS: sCTs can be a useful tool for accurate proton dose calculation. Adaptive IMPT resulted in better CTV coverage, OAR sparing and lower NTCP for some OARs as compared with non-adaptive IMPT.

BACKGROUND: While the Bragg peak proton beam (BP) is capable of superior target conformity and organs-at-risk sparing than the transmission proton beam (TB), its efficacy in FLASH-RT is hindered by both a slow energy switching process and the beam current. A universal range shifter (URS) can pull back the high-energy proton beam while preserving the beam current. Meanwhile, a superconducting gantry with large momentum acceptance (LMA-SC gantry) enables fast energy switching.
OBJECTIVE: This study explores the feasibility of multiple-energy BP FLASH-RT on the LMA-SC gantry.
METHODS: A simultaneous dose and spot map optimization algorithm was developed for BP FLASH-RT treatment planning to improve the dose delivery efficiency. The URS was designed to be 0-27 cm thick, with 1 cm per step. BP plans using the URS were optimized using single-field optimization (SFO) and multiple-field optimization (MFO) for ten prostate cancer patients and ten lung cancer patients. The plan delivery parameters, dose, and dose rate metrics of BP plans were compared to those of TB plans using the parameters of the LMA-SC gantry.
RESULTS: Compared to TB plans, BP plans significantly reduced MUs by 42.7% (P < 0.001) with SFO and 33.3% (P < 0.001) with MFO for prostate cases. For lung cases, the reduction in MUs was 56.8% (P < 0.001) with SFO and 36.4% (P < 0.001) with MFO. BP plans also outperformed TB plans by reducing mean normal tissue doses. BP-SFO plans achieved a reduction of 56.7% (P < 0.001) for prostate cases and 57.7% (P < 0.001) for lung cases, while BP-MFO plans achieved a reduction of 54.2% (P < 0.001) for the prostate case and 40.0% (P < 0.001) for lung cases. For both TB and BP plans, normal tissues in prostate and lung cases received 100.0% FLASH dose rate coverage (>40 Gy/s).
CONCLUSIONS: By utilizing the URS and the LMA-SC gantry, it is possible to perform multiple-energy BP FLASH-RT, resulting in better normal tissue sparing, as compared to TB plans.

BACKGROUND: This study compared outcomes in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).
METHODS: The study encompassed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with inoperable ESCC who underwent curative-intent CCRT from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, with data sourced from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. In this study, both IMRT and IMPT delivered a total equivalent effective dose of approximately 5040 cGy in 28 fractions, accompanied by platinum-based chemotherapy administered as per established protocols. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess oncologic outcomes, and statistical analyses were conducted, including inverse probability of treatment-weighted and Fine and Gray method for competing risks.
RESULTS: The observed risks of ESCC-specific and all-cause mortality were lower in patients treated with IMPT compared with those treated with IMRT, with adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.70) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), respectively. IMPT also reduced grade 2 radiation-induced side effects, such as pneumonitis, fatigue, and major adverse cardiovascular events, with aHRs (95% CI) of 0.76 (0.66-0.82), 0.10 (0.07-0.14), and 0.70 (0.67-0.73), respectively. However, IMPT was associated with an increased risk of grade 2 radiation dermatitis, with aHR (95% CI) of 1.48 (1.36-1.60). No substantial differences were found in the incidence of radiation esophagitis between IMPT and IMRT when adjusting for covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: IMPT seems to be associated with superiority over IMRT in managing patients with inoperable ESCC undergoing curative-intent CCRT, suggesting improved survival outcomes and reduced toxicity. These findings have significant implications for the treatment of ESCC, particularly when surgery is not an option.