Home-dwelling

家庭住宅
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针对早期痴呆症患者的教育健康促进干预措施已显示出可喜的效果,包括赋予痴呆症患者良好的生活和应对他们的病情。
    这项研究的目的是探索群体互动是如何,课程结构,在为期12周的教育健康促进课程中,由医疗保健专业人员提供便利,以促进应对,健康的行为,以及早期痴呆症患者的赋权。
    采用了集中的人种学方法,通过参加健康促进课程的早期痴呆症患者的中度参与者观察以及与主持人的现场对话来收集数据。此外,在参与者完成课程之前和之后,参与者及其护理伙伴分别接受了访谈.
    调查结果表明,小组讨论为主持人提供了确定知识差距的机会,纠正对症状的误解,并根据参与者的特定需求定制信息,从而促进健康的行为并赋予参与者权力。课程的一致和结构化格式似乎减轻了压力并促进了学习。第一手了解痴呆症,回忆,用幽默,从面临类似挑战的其他人那里获得支持,得到主持人的支持和验证,都有助于参与者应对他们的病情,处理负面情绪,减少内化的污名。
    这项研究强调了为患有早期痴呆症的人提供结合第一手信息的教育机会的重要性,同行和促进者支持,回忆,幽默,认可,和验证。这些干预措施有助于促进应对,健康的行为,以及早期痴呆症患者的赋权。
    UNASSIGNED: Educational health promotion interventions for people with early-stage dementia have shown promising results, including empowering the person with dementia to live well and cope with their condition.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to explore how group interactions, course structure, and facilitation by healthcare professionals in a 12-week educational health promotion course promote coping, healthy behaviors, and empowerment in people with early-stage dementia.
    UNASSIGNED: A focused ethnographic approach was employed, collecting data through moderate participant observations of people with early-stage dementia who attended the health promotion course and field conversations with the facilitators. Additionally, before and after the participants had completed the course, the participants and their care partners were interviewed individually.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings showed that group discussions provided an opportunity for the facilitators to identify knowledge gaps, correct misinterpretations of symptoms, and tailor the information to the participants\' specific needs, thereby promoting healthy behaviors and empowering the participants. The consistent and structured format of the course appeared to reduce stress and promote learning. Learning about dementia first-hand, reminiscing, using humor, receiving support from others facing similar challenges, and receiving support and validation from facilitators all contributed to participants coping with their condition, processing negative emotions, and reducing internalized stigma.
    UNASSIGNED: This study emphasized the importance of providing people living with early-stage dementia educational opportunities that combine first-hand information, peer and facilitator support, reminiscing, humor, recognition, and validation. These interventions can contribute to promote coping, healthy behaviors, and empowerment in people living with early-stage dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虚弱与炎症和身体成分的变化有关,但是调查结果不一致。为了探索这个,我们使用衰弱指数(FI)定义为(1)研究炎症标志物水平(基线)与随访8年后FI评分变化之间的关联;(2)研究炎症标志物之间的纵向关联,身体成分,和脆弱。家庭老年人(≥70岁)被邀请参加研究,并在8年后再次被邀请进行随访。这项研究共包括133名参与者。炎性标志物包括高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP),白细胞介素6(IL-6),肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α),和糖蛋白乙酰基(Gp-乙酰基)。我们用身体成分标记脂肪量,无脂质量,和腰围。FI评分由38个变量组成。其他临床评估,如血压和体重指数(BMI),以及关于日常药物的信息,在两次访问中都被收集。采用线性回归模型和Spearman秩相关研究。我们发现8年后FI得分增加,基线时hs-CRP水平较高的参与者的FI评分变化最大.脂肪量的变化与hs-CRP、IL-6的变化显著相关,腰围的变化与TNF-α的变化显著相关。在随访的8年中,药物的使用有所增加,这可能减弱了炎症和虚弱之间的关联。然而,老年人hs-CRP浓度升高可能与随后几年的虚弱风险增加相关.
    Frailty has been linked to inflammation and changes in body composition, but the findings are inconsistent. To explore this, we used the Frailty Index (FI) definition to (1) investigate the association between levels of inflammatory markers (baseline) and change in FI score after 8 years of follow-up and (2) investigate the longitudinal associations between inflammatory markers, body composition, and frailty. Home-dwelling elderly (≥ 70 years) were invited to participate in the study and re-invited to a follow-up visit 8 years later. This study includes a total of 133 participants. The inflammatory markers included were high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and glycoprotein acetyls (Gp-acetyls). We used the body composition markers fat mass, fat-free mass, and waist circumference. The FI score consisted of 38 variables. Additional clinical assessments such as blood pressure and body mass index (BMI), as well as information about daily medications, were collected at both visits. Linear regression model and Spearman\'s rank correlation were used to investigate associations. We showed that the FI score increased after 8 years, and participants with higher hs-CRP levels at baseline had the largest change in the FI score. Changes in fat mass were significantly correlated with changes in hs-CRP and IL-6, and changes in waist circumference were significantly correlated with changes in TNF-α. The use of drugs increased during the 8 years of follow-up, which may have attenuated the associations between inflammation and frailty. However, elevated concentrations of hs-CRP in the elderly may be associated with an increased risk of frailty in subsequent years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:低等级,衰老过程中的慢性炎症,(“发炎”),建议参与老年衰弱的发展。然而,关于脆弱之间关联的研究,使用脆弱索引定义,和炎症标志物是有限的。这项研究的目的是调查炎症标志物和衰弱指数(FI)之间的关系,家庭居住的成年人。
    方法:家庭男女年龄≥70岁,我们招募了居住在挪威东南部的人,并纳入了一项横断面研究.当前研究中使用的FI是根据Rockwood的脆弱指数开发的,包括38个变量,导致每个参与者的FI得分在0到1之间。循环炎症标志物(IL-6,CRP,IGF-1,胱抑素C,组织蛋白酶S,和糖蛋白乙酰)使用ELISA分析非空腹血液样品。使用全基因组PBMC转录组学研究FI评分与炎症之间的关联。
    结果:研究人群包括403名老年人(52%为女性),年龄中位数为74岁,平均BMI为26.2kg/m2。全组的平均FI评分为0.15(范围0.005-0.56)。将其分为虚弱组(FI评分≥0.25)和非虚弱组。调整BMI后,年龄,性别,在整个小组中吸烟,IL-6,组织蛋白酶S,胱抑素C,和Gp-乙酰基仍然与FI评分显着相关(IL-6:0.002,95%CI:0.001,0.002,组织蛋白酶S:6.7e-06,95%CI2.44e-06,0.00001,胱抑素C:0.004,95%CI:0.002,0.006,Gp-乙酰基:0.09,95%CI:0.05,0.13,所有p<0.01),而CRP和IGF-1则没有(0.0003,95%CI:-00001,0.0007,p=0.13,(-1.27e-06),95%CI:(-0.0003),0.0003,p=0.99)。FI评分和炎症标志物之间存在显著关联,和FI评分和单核细胞特异性基因表达。
    结论:我们发现FI评分与炎症标志物之间存在关联,以及70岁以上老年受试者的FI评分和单核细胞特异性基因表达之间的差异。炎症是否是虚弱的原因或结果,以及虚弱的进展是否可以通过减少炎症而减弱,还有待澄清。
    BACKGROUND: Low-grade, chronic inflammation during ageing, (\"inflammageing\"), is suggested to be involved in the development of frailty in older age. However, studies on the association between frailty, using the frailty index definition, and inflammatory markers are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between inflammatory markers and frailty index (FI) in older, home-dwelling adults.
    METHODS: Home-dwelling men and women aged ≥ 70 years old, living in South-East Norway were recruited and included in a cross-sectional study. The FI used in the current study was developed according to Rockwood\'s frailty index and included 38 variables, resulting in an FI score between 0 and 1 for each participant. Circulating inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP, IGF-1, cystatin C, cathepsin S, and glycoprotein Acetyls) were analyzed from non-fasting blood samples using ELISA. Whole-genome PBMC transcriptomics was used to study the association between FI score and inflammation.
    RESULTS: The study population comprised 403 elderly (52% women), with a median age of 74 years and a mean BMI of 26.2 kg/m2. The mean FI score for the total group was 0.15 (range 0.005-0.56). The group was divided into a frail group (FI score ≥ 0.25) and non-frail group. After adjusting for BMI, age, sex, and smoking in the whole group, IL-6, cathepsin S, cystatin C, and Gp-acetyls remained significant associated to FI score (IL-6: 0.002, 95% CI: 0.001, 0.002, cathepsin S: 6.7e-06, 95% CI 2.44e-06, 0.00001, cystatin C: 0.004, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.006, Gp- Acetyls: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.13, p < 0.01 for all), while CRP and IGF-1 were not (0.0003, 95% CI: -00001, 0.0007, p = 0.13, (-1.27e-06), 95% CI: (-0.0003), 0.0003, p = 0.99). There was a significant association between FI score and inflammatory markers, and FI score and monocyte-specific gene expression.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between FI score and inflammatory markers, and between FI score and monocyte-specific gene expression among elderly subjects above 70 years of age. Whether inflammation is a cause or consequence of frailty and whether the progression of frailty can be attenuated by reducing inflammation remains to be clarified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在芬兰关于老年人预防活动的政策中,保持功能能力和独立生活,强调。图尔库高级健康诊所,旨在保持对图尔库市所有75岁居民的独立应对,成立于2020年初。本文的目的是描述图尔库高级健康诊所研究(TSHeC)的设计和协议,并提供无反应分析的结果。
    方法:无反应分析使用了来自1296名参与者(符合条件的参与者的71%)和164名非研究参与者的数据。社会人口统计学,健康状况,心理社会和身体功能能力指标被纳入分析。还比较了参与者和非参与者的社区社会经济劣势。参与者和非参与者之间的差异使用卡方或Fisher精确检验对分类变量进行检验,t检验对连续变量进行检验。
    结果:女性的比例(43%vs.61%)和那些只有令人满意的人,自评财务状况差或非常差(38%与49%)在非参与者中显著低于参与者。非参与者和参与者在社区社会经济劣势方面的比较没有差异。高血压的患病率(66%vs.54%),慢性肺病(20%vs.11%),和肾衰竭(6%vs.3%)在非参与者中高于参与者。与参与者(32%)相比,非参与者(14%)的孤独感较少。使用辅助移动设备的比例(18%与8%)以及之前下跌的人(12%与5%)高于非参与者。
    结论:TSHeC的参与率较高。没有发现社区参与差异。非参与者的健康状况和身体机能似乎比参与者稍差,女性参与人数多于男性。这些差异可能会削弱研究结果的普遍性。在建议芬兰初级卫生保健中预防性护士管理的卫生诊所的内容和实施时,必须考虑到差异。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05634239;注册日期;2022年12月1日。追溯登记。
    BACKGROUND: In the Finnish policy on older people preventive activities, which maintain functional capacity and independent living, are emphasized. The Turku Senior Health Clinic, aimed at maintaining independent coping of all home-dwelling 75-year-old citizens in the city of Turku, was founded in the beginning of 2020. The aim of this paper is to describe design and protocol of the Turku Senior Health Clinic Study (TSHeC) and provide results of the non-response analysis.
    METHODS: The non-response analysis used data from 1296 participants (71% of those eligible) and 164 non-participants of the study. Sociodemographic, health status, psychosocial and physical functional ability indicators were included in the analysis. Participants and non-participants were also compared in respect to their neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage. Differences between participants and non-participants were tested using the Chi squared or Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variable.
    RESULTS: The proportions of women (43% vs. 61%) and of those with only satisfying, poor or very poor self-rated financial status (38% vs. 49%) were significantly lower in non-participants than in participants. Comparison of the non-participants and participants in respect to their neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage showed no differences. The prevalence of hypertension (66% vs. 54%), chronic lung disease (20% vs. 11%), and kidney failure (6% vs. 3%) were higher among non-participants compared to participants. Feelings of loneliness were less frequent among non-participants (14%) compared to participants (32%). The proportions of those using assistive mobility devices (18% vs. 8%) as well as those having previous falls (12% vs. 5%) were higher in non-participants than in participants.
    CONCLUSIONS: The participation rate of TSHeC was high. No neighborhood differences in participation were found. Health status and physical functioning of non-participants seemed to be slightly worse than those of the participants, and more women than men participated. These differences may weaken the generalizability of the findings of the study. The differences have to be taken into account when recommendation for the content and implementation of preventive nurse-managed health clinic in primary health care in Finland is going to be given.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05634239; registration date; 1st of December 2022. Retrospectively registered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    衰老通常与多发病率和多药房有关。本研究旨在确定当前的药物管理模式和家庭居住老年人的概况,并找到与他们的状况的任何关联,包括虚弱和认知障碍。在这项横断面研究的范围内,通过面对面的结构化访谈对居住在社区中的112名老年人进行了评估。虚弱,认知状态,评估了药物管理以及临床和社会人口统计学变量.计算了描述性和推断性统计数据。参与者平均年龄为76.6±7.1岁,53.6%的参与者是女性,40.2%的参与者独自生活。超过一半的人被归类为虚弱(58.9%),几乎五分之一(19.6%)的中度认知障碍患者有一种以上的疾病,60.7%是多药治疗。在多药物治疗和药物自我管理之间没有发现关联,使用非处方药,独自生活,对药物治疗和/或病理学了解不足,或者有一个以上的开药者。自我管理与年龄有关,药物的数量,虚弱和认知状态。二元Logistic回归分析显示,认知功能损害与用药管理差异有统计学意义,对药物治疗和/或病理学了解不足,有一个处方者和使用不是医生开的药物。建议采取干预措施,以防止居家老年人的药物相关问题。
    Ageing is frequently associated with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The present study aimed to identify the current medication management patterns and the profiles of home-dwelling older adults and to find any association with their conditions, including frailty and cognitive impairment. Within the scope of this cross-sectional study, 112 older adults living in the community were assessed via face-to-face structured interviews. Frailty, cognitive status, medication management and clinical and sociodemographic variables were evaluated. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. The mean participant age was 76.6 ± 7.1 years, 53.6% of participants were women, and 40.2% of participants lived alone. More than half were classified as having frailty (58.9%), almost one-fifth (19.6%) presented with a moderate cognitive impairment had more than one disease, and 60.7% were polymedicated. No associations were found between polymedication and medication self-management, the use of over-the-counter medications, living alone, having a poor understanding of pharmacological therapy and/or pathology, or having more than one prescriber. Self-management was associated with age, the number of medications, frailty and cognitive status. Binary logistic regressions showed that cognitive impairment had statistically significant differences with medication management, having a poor understanding of pharmacological therapy and/or pathology, having one prescriber and the use of medications not prescribed by physicians. Interventions to prevent medication-related problems in home-dwelling older adults are recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多患有癌症的老年人更喜欢住在家里,建议此类患者接受家庭治疗和门诊治疗。为了改善他们的心理健康,重要的是要确定居住在家中的患有癌症的老年人所面临的挑战。这项研究旨在研究家庭对正在接受治疗和后续护理的晚期癌症老年人的影响。在基于标准的采样的横截面设计中,八次定性访谈被转录和主题解释。我们确定了家庭安全管理的三个主题:良好的家庭安全管理,不确定的家庭安全管理,家庭安全管理崩溃。此外,我们揭示了对参与者的家庭安全体验很重要的八个子主题。确保老年人在家中感到安全将使他们有机会享受在家中的生活,这反过来可以减轻他们的症状负担,增强他们的心理健康。
    Many older adults with cancer prefer to live at home, and home treatment and outpatient care have been recommended for such patients. To improve their mental health, it is important to identify the challenges that are faced by home-dwelling older adults with cancer. This study aimed to examine the impact of the home on older adults with advanced cancer who were receiving treatment and follow-up care. In a cross-sectional design with criterion-based sampling, eight qualitative interviews were transcribed and interpreted thematically. We identified three themes of home-safety management: good home-safety management, uncertain home-safety management, and home-safety management collapse. Moreover, we revealed eight sub-themes important to the participants\' home-safety experience. Ensuring that older adults feel safe at home will afford them the opportunity to enjoy living at home, which in turn may alleviate their symptom burden and enhance their mental health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:出院后老年人的安全用药管理需要协调,跨专业,以患者为中心的方法。这项研究旨在描述出院后在家中服用几种不同药物的老年人对协作药物管理的感知需求。
    方法:使用半结构化访谈对老年人(n=28)进行了定性描述性研究,非正式(n=17),和专业护理人员(n=13)。
    结果:研究结果揭示了四个主要需求:老年人和非正式照顾者\“对更多参与出院计划的感知需求;老年人\”感知需求被告知,听,并积极参与决策;非正式护理人员“认为需要帮助支持和协调药物管理”;老年人“以及非正式和专业护理人员”认为需要专业护理人员之间更好的沟通和协调。
    结论:这项研究揭示了改善协作用药管理的两个未被充分利用的途径:药物随访,涉及社区医疗保健专业人员承担总体责任,并授权老年人及其非正式护理人员在出院后进行药物管理。
    BACKGROUND: Safe medication management for older adults after hospital discharge requires a well-coordinated, interprofessional, patient-centered approach. This study aimed to describe the perceived needs for collaborative medication management for older adults taking several different medications at home after hospital discharge.
    METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with older adults (n = 28), informal (n = 17), and professional caregivers (n = 13).
    RESULTS: Findings revealed four main needs: older adults and informal caregivers\' perceived needs for greater involvement in discharge planning; older adults\' perceived needs to be informed, listened to, and to be actively involved in decision-making; informal caregivers\' perceived needs for help in supporting and coordinating medication management; and older adults\' and informal and professional caregivers\' perceived needs for better communication and coordination between professional caregivers.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed two underutilized pathways towards improving collaborative medication management: medication follow-up involving a community healthcare professional taking an overarching responsibility and empowering older adults and their informal caregivers in medication management after hospital discharge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:对痴呆症患者的音乐干预可以改善健康状况和与护理人员的互动,然而,这种影响往往仅限于机构。我们描述了老年精神病医院附属患者的原型音乐应用程序的参与式设计过程,并评估了可接受性,收养,以及用于家庭居住的痴呆症患者及其非正式护理人员的可行性。
    UNASSIGNED:应用程序\"Alight\"是在迭代之后开发的,专家驱动的参与式设计方法,其中包括一个需求激发阶段和两轮原型设计和在现实世界中的测试。最终用户和利益相关者参与了所有步骤,也就是说,工作坊,采访,现场观测,人种学查询,和音乐治疗师的beta测试课程,病人,和护理人员与一家商业音乐和技术公司合作。最后的原型设计和测试是在LIVE@Home中进行的。路径试验,一项阶梯式楔形多成分随机对照试验,旨在改善2019-2021年市政痴呆症护理的资源利用率和照顾者负担.
    未经证实:在LIVE@Home中患有痴呆症的人的平均年龄。路径审判是82年,62%是女性,和大多数患有轻度(71%)的阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆(44%)。在多组分干预中提供了63个二元组,其中13%(n=8)接受使用。与不感兴趣的人相比,接受Alight的二元组在人口统计学和临床特征上没有差异。那些接受Alight的人的可行性很高,75%(n=6)报告对情绪有积极影响,50%(n=4)对活动有积极影响,和50%(n=4)良好的用户友好性。采用率很高,每天使用或每周使用几次,占63%(n=5)。在没有无线Wi-Fi的家庭中更新应用程序时出现障碍,和一些参与者不熟悉使用触摸屏。
    UNASSIGNED:该申请的可行性和采用率很高,接受二元组在人口统计学和临床变量方面与未达到的变量没有差异。这表明在痴呆症护理中具有很高的利用潜力。本研究通过展示一种特定的设计方法,在整个过程中成功地参与研究人员,从而在方法上为参与式设计和移动健康干预领域做出了贡献。行业合作伙伴,卫生保健从业人员,和最终用户。
    未经评估:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04043364。
    UNASSIGNED: Music interventions for persons with dementia can improve health and interaction with caregivers, yet the reach is often restricted to institutions. We describe the participatory design process of a prototype music application for patients affiliated with a gerontopsychiatric hospital and evaluate the acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of use for dyads of home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: The application \"Alight\" was developed following an iterative, expert-driven participatory design approach, which includes a requirement elicitation phase and two rounds of prototyping and testing in real-world settings. End users and stakeholders were involved in all steps, that is, workshops, interviews, field observation, ethnographic inquiries, and beta testing sessions with music therapists, patients, and caregivers in collaboration with a commercial music and technology company. The last prototyping and testing took place in the LIVE@Home.Path trial, a stepped-wedge multicomponent randomized controlled trial to improve resource utilization and caregiver burden in municipal dementia care during 2019-2021.
    UNASSIGNED: Mean age of the person with dementia in the LIVE@Home.Path trial was 82 years, 62% were female, and the majority had Alzheimer\'s dementia (44%) of mild severity (71%). Sixty-three dyads were offered Alight in the multicomponent intervention, of which 13% (n = 8) accepted use. The dyads accepting Alight did not differ in demographic and clinical characteristics compared to those not interested. The feasibility was high among those accepting Alight, 75% (n = 6) reported a positive impact on mood, 50% (n = 4) experienced a positive impact on activity, and 50% (n = 4) gooduser-friendliness. The adoption was high with daily use or use several times a week reported by 63% (n = 5). Obstacles emerged when updating the application in homes without wireless Wi-Fi, and some participants were unfamiliar with using touchscreens.
    UNASSIGNED: The feasibility and adoption of the application were high and accepting dyads did not differ on demographic and clinical variables from those not reached. This suggests a high potential for utilization in dementia care. This study contributes methodologically to the field of participatory design and mHealth interventions by demonstrating a specific design approach that throughout the process successfully involved researchers, industry partners, health care practitioners, and end users.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04043364.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经授权:虽然职业治疗师(OT)和物理治疗师(PT)在康复中起着核心作用,瑞典没有描述这些职业的结构化方法。
    UNASSIGNED:目的是探索在瑞典城市背景下为指导OTS和PT而开发的重新启用计划的可行性。
    UNASSIGNED:符合条件的参与者是从事康复工作的OT和PT。根据OTs(n=16)和PT(n=15)如何经历该程序的应用来评估可行性。数据是在为期四个月的试点研究中通过网络调查收集的。
    UNASSIGNED:该程序已针对62个客户实施。97%的病例进行了基线评估,77%的病例进行了随访。该计划的平均持续时间为8周,包括5次家访和3次电话联系。在15个案例中,随访后确定了一个新的目标.89%和35%的病例包括与其他专业人士和亲属的合作,分别。该方案在34个案例中被归类为在一定程度上可行,在21个案例中被归类为不可行。
    UNASSIGNED:该方案在一定程度上是可行的。为了增强可行性,为了根据客户的健康状况定制评估,可能需要灵活性。
    UNASSIGNED: While occupational therapists (OT) and physiotherapists (PT) have a central role in reablement, no structured approach for these professions has been described in Sweden.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim was to explore the feasibility of a reablement program developed to guide OTs and PTs in a Swedish municipality context.
    UNASSIGNED: Eligible participants were OTs and PTs working with reablement. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of how OTs (n = 16) and PTs (n = 15) experienced the application of the program. Data were collected through web surveys during a pilot study over four months.
    UNASSIGNED: The program was implemented for 62 clients. Baseline assessments were conducted in 97% of all cases and follow-ups in 77%. The average duration of the program was 8 weeks and includeed 5 home visits and 3 contacts by phone. In 15 cases, a new goal was identified after follow-up. Collaboration was included with other professionals and relatives in 89% and 35% of the cases, respectively. The program was categorized as feasible to some extent in 34 cases and not feasible in 21 cases.
    UNASSIGNED: The program was feasible to some extent. To enhance feasibility, flexibility may be needed in order to tailor assessments according to the client\'s health status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于由全科医生(GP)向痴呆症患者(PwD)开具精神药物处方的过程的知识有限。我们调查了多组分干预的影响,强调药物审查,家庭居住PwD中的精神药物和行为和心理症状(BPSD),以及非正式护理人员评估的患者与GP沟通的量化变化。
    住在家里。Path是一项针对挪威65岁以上轻度至中度痴呆患者及其非正式照顾者(dyads)的阶梯式楔形封闭队列群集随机对照试验。照常补充医疗保健(控制条件),市政协调员实施了多部分现场干预:学习,创新,志愿者支持,和授权(包括PwD常规全科医生的药物审查)。分组随机化用于在持续6个月的时间段内依次接受干预的三组中分配二组。报告了第一阶段的大流行前数据,导致1:2的干预与控制比率。主要结果是精神药物使用的变化。次要结果是通过神经精神病学量表和康奈尔痴呆抑郁量表的BPSD变化,以及通过适应临床总体变化印象的患者与GP沟通。
    筛选了四百三十八对,280包括在内,在6个月时有237人参加(干预组n=67;对照条件n=170)。在基线,63%定期使用精神药物:抗痴呆药物(47%),抗抑郁药(13%),催眠药/镇静剂(13%),抗精神病药(5%),抗焦虑药(2%)。6个月时,与对照组相比,干预组的药物评价更频繁(66%vs42%,P=0.001)。我们发现药物使用和BPSD的变化没有差异。干预组患者与GP的沟通得到加强(平均得分为0.95[标准差1.68]vs0.41[1.34],P=0.022)。在干预组中,对照组,和整体样本,接受药物审查的患者的非正式护理人员报告,与未接受药物审查的患者相比,患者-GP沟通有所改善.
    精神药物使用和BPSD的变化没有差异,即使患者与GP的沟通随着药物审查而改善。PwD中限制使用精神药物可能反映了近年来更明智的处方做法。然而,可以培养药物评价,以优化这种复杂人群的药物治疗。
    ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04043364;注册于2019年3月15日。
    There is limited knowledge regarding the process of deprescribing psychotropic drugs to people with dementia (PwD) conducted by general practitioners (GP). We investigated the impact of a multicomponent intervention, emphasizing medication reviews, on psychotropic drugs and behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD) in home-dwelling PwD and quantified change in patient-GP communication evaluated by their informal caregivers.
    LIVE@Home.Path is a stepped-wedge closed-cohort cluster randomized controlled trial for people with mild to moderate dementia aged ≥65 and their informal caregivers (dyads) in Norway. Complementary to health care as usual (control condition), municipal coordinators implemented the multicomponent LIVE intervention: Learning, Innovation, Volunteer support, and Empowerment (including medication review by the PwD\'s regular GPs). Block-randomization was used to allocate dyads in three groups receiving the intervention sequentially in periods of 6 months duration. Prepandemic data from the first period is reported, resulting in a 1:2 intervention-to-control ratio. Primary outcome was change in psychotropic drug use. Secondary outcomes were changes in BPSD by Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Cornell Scale of Depression in Dementia and patient-GP communication by an adaption of the Clinical Global Impression of Change.
    Four hundred thirty-eight dyads were screened, 280 included, and 237 participated at 6 months (intervention group n=67; control condition n=170). At baseline, 63% used psychotropic medication regularly: antidementia drugs (47%), antidepressants (13%), hypnotics/sedatives (13%), antipsychotics (5%), and anxiolytics (2%). At 6 months, medication reviews were more frequently conducted in the intervention group compared to control (66% vs 42%, P=0.001). We found no differences regarding a change in drug use and BPSD. Patient-GP communication enhanced in the intervention group (mean score 0.95 [standard deviation 1.68] vs 0.41 [1.34], P=0.022). In the intervention group, control group, and overall sample, the informal caregivers of those who had their medications reviewed reported improved patient-GP communication compared to those who did not.
    Change in psychotropic drug use and BPSD did not differ, even though patient-GP communication improved with medication reviews. Restricted psychotropic drug use among PwD likely reflects more judicious prescribing practices in recent years. Nevertheless, medication reviews could be cultivated to optimize pharmacologic treatment for this complex population.
    ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04043364 ; registered 15/03/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号