Background Obese patients are at an increased risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Bariatric surgery or weight loss surgery is an important therapeutic measure in obese patients for the management of weight and comorbidities. Data are scarce in inner-city Hispanic and Black patients who undergo bariatric surgery, which eventually leads to health disparity in this minority population. Differences between patients with and without OSA have not been assessed in this population. This study aims to answer these questions. Methodology The study was conducted in a high-volume hospital in the Bronx, New York. Before bariatric surgery, patients underwent a preoperative evaluation that included a variety of blood tests, a sleep study, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and echocardiography. They also underwent basic anthropometric measurements, such as weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), before surgery and 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Additional calculations were made using these anthropometric measures, namely, total weight loss, excess weight loss, and delta BMI. Results Most patients were Hispanic (85.2%), with a mean age of 41.9 ± 10.8 years. We found that of the 108 patients included in the study, 69.4% (70/108) had OSA. Preoperative BMI in the study was 43.9 ± 13 kg/m2. Postoperatively, the mean decrease in BMI was 12.3 ± 14.5 kg/m2. Total weight loss and excess weight loss were 30.2 ± 14.3 and 52.6 ± 16.6, respectively. Conclusions In this study, no significant difference was noted in patients with or without OSA in either the laboratory or anthropometric parameters.

Background and objective The incidence of hypertension is growing at an alarming rate globally. In the United States, nearly half of the adult population suffers from hypertension, a disease potentially associated with long-term dire consequences and comorbidities. While Internet access has proliferated, and free Internet-based education resources for healthy lifestyles have exponentially increased over the past two decades, little is known about whether Internet-based information can be or is used as a self-learning tool for hypertension management in a community setting. With almost no published data, if and to what degree Internet-based, self-directed learning tools are used for hypertension management needs to be assessed. In light of this, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of Internet use as a source of information in patients with known diagnoses of hypertension who presented to our Internal Medicine clinic at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso. Materials and methods We conducted a single-center, cohort-based observational study at our teaching hospital\'s internal medicine clinic. A survey questionnaire was distributed to all adults aged more than 18 years with a known diagnosis of hypertension. Consent for participation was obtained from all participants. Of the total studied population, 93.6% (190/203) were of Hispanic descent. Moreover, 67.5% (137/203) identified as female. Of note, 22.7% (46/203) reported using the Internet to learn about hypertension. Internet users were younger, with a mean age of 61.4 years compared to 68.7 (p=0.02) years for non-Internet users, attended institutions of a higher grade of education, and mostly received information regarding hypertension from their families (91.3% vs 2.5%, p<0.001). While most patients used the Internet for making treatment decisions and were satisfied with their choices, more than a quarter felt confused and anxious after using Internet-based resources. Results Most patients in the study were found to not use the Internet as a resource tool for hypertension management (157/203; 77.3%). Among the 22.7% of patients who used the Internet for hypertension management, the most commonly utilized resource was Google.com, as an initial step to hypertension research (26/46, 58.6%, p<0.001), followed by multiple resources within a predetermined list on the provided survey (14/46, 30.4%). The survey also assessed the reasons for using Internet-based resources, with the primary reason being evaluating treatment options (19/46, 41.5%), followed by developing coping skills (13/46, 28.2%), and lastly aiding in decision-making (10/46, 21.5%). Conclusions Internet-based educational tools are mushrooming as the Internet is becoming more pervasive. This study shows that within this predominant Hispanic population, nearly one-quarter of patients with hypertension are using Internet-based, self-learning tools. This highlights a slow shift in medical education which providers have to be prepared for as patients will be using these tools as secondary information sources for medical decision-making more frequently going forward. Further studies need to be conducted to evaluate the current and longitudinal impact of these new information sources.

BACKGROUND: Hispanics make up 19% of the U.S. population and are experiencing rising rates of cancer, primarily due to an increase in infection-related cancers (gastric, hepatic, cervical) and advanced cancers secondary to delayed screening (colorectal, cervical, breast). There is an increased incidence of gastric cancer (associated with infection, obesity, alcohol, and tobacco use) in Hispanics, especially at a young age, highlighting the need to consider ethnicity as a risk factor.
METHODS: This study utilized the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database to examine all patients admitted with gastric cancer. Individuals were stratified by race, age, and comorbidities, including modifiable risk factors that are associated with gastric cancer.
RESULTS: There were 5,785 (7.44%) patients aged 18-44, 28,370 (36.49%) aged 45-64, and 43,590 (56.07%) over 65 years of age. Notably, 34.3% of the youngest group were Hispanic, contrasted with 19.7% and 12.9% in the older groups, respectively. Younger Hispanic patients showed a higher prevalence of H. pylori infection (8.6%) compared with older Hispanics (3.6% in the middle age group and 2.1% in the oldest, p<0.01). There was a high prevalence of obesity, tobacco use, and gastric ulcers in this cohort. Other risk factors such as alcohol use and gastric polyps were present at a lesser prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that Hispanic patients tend to have a younger age of onset of gastric cancer, coupled with an increased incidence of H. pylori infection at a younger age. This finding underscores the potential benefit of H. pylori screening among asymptomatic young Hispanics with the aim of reducing gastric cancer morbidity and mortality in this population.

Among the many social determinants linked to adolescent alcohol use and depression, racial and ethnic discrimination is a prevalent determinant among Latinx adolescents and adults that is largely overlooked in preventive interventions. This study explored the influence of perceived racial and ethnic discrimination on depressive symptoms and alcohol use intentions among Latinx adolescents. Additionally, the study explored the cross-generational effects of how mothers\' perceived discrimination impacts the depressive symptoms and alcohol use of the adolescent. The study used a sample of 800 inner-city Dominican and Puerto Rican adolescent-mother dyads (adolescent mean age = 12.42 years, SD = 0.81; mother mean age = 40.55 years, SD = 8.70). Employing a five-wave panel design that followed adolescents from 8th grade to 10th grade, the study found statistically significant mediation pathways which showed that adolescents\' self-reported racial and ethnic discrimination experiences were associated with increases in their immediate and long-term depressive symptoms, which in turn were associated with stronger intentions to use alcohol in the future. Further, perceived racial and ethnic discrimination experienced by Latinx mothers was associated with increases in adolescents\' intentions to drink alcohol in the future, mediated by the mothers\' depressive symptoms and subsequently the adolescents\' depressive symptoms. As discussed, these findings have wide-ranging implications for alcohol use prevention programs targeting inner-city Latinx adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors that might limit Hispanic patients from participating in dermatological clinical trials.
METHODS: From January 2022 to July 2022, we administered a 31-item, in-person questionnaire to patients recruited in the waiting area of the Caridad Center, one of the largest free clinics in the United States with a predominately Hispanic population, and a nearby private primary care clinic.
RESULTS: Overall, Hispanic patients agreed significantly more with statements in the domain of attitude and behavioral beliefs compared to non-Hispanic survey respondents. The Hispanic ethnicity was associated with increased odds of agreeing with the following statements: \"My community would really benefit from skin cancer clinical trials\" (OR=0.52; 95% CI 0.30, 0.92), \"My participation in a skin cancer study would be very good\" (OR=0.59; 95% CI 0.35, 0.99), and \"I like to do good for others\" (OR=0.41; 95% CI 0.22, 0.77).
CONCLUSIONS: While the United States population is composed of 18.5% Hispanics, they only account for 1% of patients enrolled in clinical trials. This study helps identify potential motivational factors for Hispanic patients to participate in skin cancer clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination is vital for ending the pandemic, yet safety concerns persist among pregnant and postpartum women, especially those who are Black and Hispanic. This study aims to explore factors that influence postpartum women\'s vaccination decision-making during pregnancy and postpartum through women\'s lived experiences and maternal care providers\' (MCPs) observations.
METHODS: From January to August 2022, we conducted semi-structured interviews with postpartum women who are Black and Hispanic and with MCPs. Participants were recruited from obstetric and pediatric clinics in South Carolina and had given birth in 2021. Thematic analysis was employed for data analysis.
RESULTS: The study involved 19 Black and 20 Hispanic women, along with 9 MCPs, and revealed both barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination. The factors that influence pregnant and postpartum women\'s decision about COVID-19 vaccine uptake included: 1) awareness of health threats associated with COVID-19 vaccines, 2) vaccine availability and accessibility, 3) vaccine-related knowledge and exposure to misinformation, 4) concerns regarding pre-existing health conditions and potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccines, 5) emotional factors associated with vaccination decision-making processes, 6) concerns about the well-being of infants, 7) cultural perspectives, and 8) encouragement by trusted supporters.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that reliable information, social support, and trusted MCPs\' advice can motivate COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant and postpartum women who are Black and Hispanic. However, barriers such as misinformation, mistrust in the health care system, and fears of potential side effects impede vaccination uptake. Future interventions should address these barriers, consider health disparities, involve trusted MCPs, and initiate conversations about vaccines to promote vaccination among these populations.

Low health literacy (LHL) significantly impacts patients\' ability to participate actively in their healthcare. Registered nurses (RNs) play a crucial role in identifying LHL and addressing patient knowledge gaps and skill deficits. This correlational study examined the relationship between RNs\' predictions of patients\' health literacy levels (HLL) and the actual HLL of a predominately Hispanic patient population. In addition, personal factors (i.e., demographics) were analyzed to determine their influence on the nurse\'s predictions and patients\' HLL. Data were collected from 84 participant patient-nurse couplets admitted to a medical-surgical unit in a rural setting located on the United States-Mexico border. In addition to demographic information collected via survey, RNs were asked to predict their patient\'s health literacy abilities while the Newest Vital Sign, a health literacy assessment tool, was deployed to determine the actual HLL of patients participating in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests while a Spearman correlational model was used to examine the relationship between predicted HLL and actual HLL. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between personal factors and HL data for RNs and patients. Analysis of the data revealed that RNs consistently overestimated patients\' abilities, as evidenced by the disparity between patients\' actual HLL (mean 1.71) and predicted HLL (mean 4.26) by RNs, with a moderately strong positive relationship (rs = .418). Notably, higher academic preparation and years of experience did not enhance the RNs\' ability to identify LHL while the highest level of education completed was the only statistically significant predictor of adequate health literacy in the patient population sampled. These findings emphasize the need to prioritize effective health literacy education in RN academic preparation and clinical practice to support the detection of LHL when a standardized health literacy assessment tool is not utilized in the clinical setting. By recognizing the presence of LHL, healthcare professionals can better support patients\' needs and bridge the knowledge gap, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Background While the prevalence of mental health conditions is similar in rural areas and non-rural areas, access to mental health care is more limited in rural areas. Patient attitudes toward specific mental health treatment options in rural populations have been understudied. Some previous studies indicate potential positive outcomes using osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) as an adjunct for mental health care. Physicians using OMT are more heavily represented in rural areas. Hence, understanding the mental health treatment needs and option preferences of the rural could inform policies that increase underserved population\'s access to various mental health treatment modalities including OMT. This study aims to characterize patient attitudes toward, beliefs regarding, and perceived barriers to treatment options for mental health treatment, access, and care in a rural, underserved clinical setting. Methods Adult patients attending a single outpatient rural clinic over a four-month period in 2022 were screened for participation. The survey consisted of Likert scale graded questions about mental health treatment options, access, knowledge, and perceived barriers including qualitative questions about OMTs. Versions of the survey were created in English and Spanish languages. Results Out of 46 respondents, 25 were English-speaking and 21 were Spanish-speaking. The most popular mental health treatments by respondents were indicated as therapy, spiritual guidance, and modifying diet and exercise. Considering barriers to care, 61% of respondents indicated cost of treatment as a logistical barrier. Finally, 80.5% of respondents did not have a good understanding of OMT. Conclusions The knowledge and understanding of patients\' perceived attitudes and barriers toward mental health care, inclusive of OMT, can provide insight to clinicians to improve patient outcomes and guide efforts in overcoming barriers to increase and expand mental health treatment availability and utilization by patients.

Testicular cancer (TCa) is a rare malignancy affecting young men worldwide. Sociodemographic factors, especially socioeconomic level (SEL) and healthcare access, seem to impact TCa incidence and outcomes, particularly among Hispanic populations. However, limited research has explored these variables in Hispanic groups. This study aimed to investigate sociodemographic and clinical factors in Mexico and their role in health disparities among Hispanic TCa patients. We retrospectively analyzed 244 Mexican TCa cases between 2007 and 2020 of a representative cohort with diverse social backgrounds from a national reference cancer center. Logistic regression identified risk factors for fatality: non-seminoma histology, advanced stage, and lower education levels. Age showed a significant trend as a risk factor. Patient delay and healthcare distance lacked significant associations. Inadequate treatment response and chemotherapy resistance were more likely in advanced stages, while higher education positively impacted treatment response. Cox regression highlighted non-seminoma histology, below-median SEL, higher education, and advanced-stage survival rates. Survival disparities emerged based on tumor histology and patient SEL. This research underscores the importance of comprehensive approaches that integrate sociodemographic, biological, and environmental factors to address health disparities improving outcomes through personalized interventions in Hispanic individuals with TCa.

Objectives Our objectives were to (1) determine the association between ethnicity and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) survival and (2) determine whether this association is modified by insurance status. Methods We performed a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2017 of non-Hispanic White (NHW), Hispanic White (HW), or Black men with high-risk PCa. A multivariate Cox regression model was built to test the association between overall survival (OS) and race/ethnicity, insurance status, and their interaction, controlling for various socioeconomic and disease-specific variables. Results A total of 94,708 men with high-risk PCa were included in the analysis. Both HW and Black men had lower socioeconomic status characteristics and lower rates of private insurance. Race/ethnicity was significantly associated with OS in the adjusted analysis. Only Medicare demonstrated significantly worse OS. NHW (covariate-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.83, 95% CI: 1.45-2.32) and Black (aHR: 1.71, 05% CI: 1.34-2.19) men demonstrated significantly worse survival when compared to HW men. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant differences occurring among HW men with private insurance/managed care when compared to those not insured, Medicaid, Medicare, and other government insurance types. Conclusion Despite socioeconomic and demographic disadvantages, HW men demonstrate improved OS compared to NHW men. Furthermore, HW men demonstrated improved OS compared to NHW men within nearly each insurance status type. This finding is likely the result of a complex multifactorial web and as such serves as an interesting hypothesis-generating study.