OBJECTIVE: Until March 2018, patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer had been administered high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) without additional hormone therapy (HT) at our institution. In this study, we aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of this treatment.
METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer who received HDR-BT and EBRT between April 1997 and March 2021 and who were followed up for at least 6 months were included in the study. High-risk groups were classified into five levels according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The EBRT and HDR-BT doses were 39-45 Gy/13-25 fractions. and 16.5-22 Gy/2-4 fractions, respectively. None of the patients received HT during initial treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates. Biochemical failure was also determined.
RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study, with a median follow-up of 91.9 months. The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) level were 71 years and 10.95 ng/mL, respectively. The median biologically effective dose for HDR-BT plus EBRT was 270.3 Gy. The 5- and 7-year bFFF, CSS, and OS rates were 85.2 and 74.2%, 100 and 100%, and 95.7 and 91.9%, respectively. Only the iPSA ≤ 20 group was associated with the higher bFFF rate. The 7-year bFFF rates in the groups with iPSA ≤ 20 and iPSA > 20 were 86.6 and 48.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: HDR-BT plus EBRT without HT might be an alternative treatment option for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer and iPSA levels ≤ 20. Further studies are required to validate the efficacy of this treatment strategy.

UNASSIGNED: We report outcomes of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients, initially classified according to a 3-tier NCCN classification system, treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BT). Patients were analyzed based on a re-stratification of their risk grouping using CAPRA score and a newer 5-tier NCCN classification.
UNASSIGNED: 471 high-risk PCa patients treated with EBRT, HDR-BT, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 1999 and 2018 were included. Competing risk survival analyses to compare individuals with CAPRA scores < 6 vs. ≥ 6 for biochemical relapse (BCR) and metastasis incidence were conducted. Also, overall survival (OS) for both groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis was assessed. The same analyses were repeated using a 5-tier NCCN stratification comparing those classified as high-risk vs. very high-risk patients.
UNASSIGNED: The median age was 71 years, and the median follow-up period was 72 months. The whole cohort received an EQD2 of 74 Gy or greater, with a median EQD2 of 106.89 Gy. Both a CAPRA score ≥ 6 and belonging to the NCCN very high-risk group were associated with BCR, with subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) of 3.04 (p = 0.015) and 2.53 (p = 0.013), respectively. For metastasis incidence, both the CAPRA and NCCN groups had similar sHRs of 2.60 (p = 0.094) and 2.71 (p = 0.037), respectively. For 10-year OS, patients with CAPRA score ≥ 6 and belonging to the NCCN very high-risk group presented similar HRs of 2.11 (p = 0.005) and 2.10 (p = 0.002).
UNASSIGNED: We showed that high-risk PCa patients classified according to the 3-tier NCCN system benefit from further stratification using the CAPRA score or the 5-tier NCCN stratification method. Patients with a CAPRA score ≥ 6 or classified as very high-risk demonstrate a higher hazard of BCR, metastasis, and death. These patients might benefit from further intensification of their investigations and treatment, based on ongoing research.

Patients with primary tumor progression after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a second chance at complete tumor eradication with salvage local therapies, including lung resection, repeat course of SBRT, and percutaneous ablative therapies. In this paper, we presented our institution\'s initial experience with percutaneous high-dose-rate (HDR) brachyablation for a relapsed stage I NSCLC that had been treated with SBRT 4.3 years earlier. Lung tumor measuring approximately 5 cm in maximum tumor dimension at the time of relapse was histopathologically confirmed to be persistent squamous cell carcinoma, and successfully treated with a single fraction of 24 Gy with HDR brachyablation. Treatment was delivered via two percutaneous catheters inserted under CT-guidance, and treated in less than 20 minutes. The patient was discharged home later the same day without the need for a chest tube, and has been monitored with serial surveillance scans every 3 to 6 months without evidence of further lung cancer progression or complications at 2.8 years post-HDR brachyablation procedure and 7.8 years after initial SBRT.

We aimed to retrospectively review outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≤ 6 following modern radiotherapy. We analyzed the outcomes of 1374 patients who had undergone modern radiotherapy, comprising a high-risk low grade [HRLG] group (Gleason score ≤ 6; n = 94) and a high-risk high grade [HRHG] group (Gleason score ≥ 7, n = 1125). We included 955 patients who received brachytherapy with or without external beam radio-therapy (EBRT) and 264 who received modern EBRT (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]). At a median follow-up of 60 (2-177) months, actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 97.8 and 91.8% (p = 0.017), respectively. The frequency of clinical failure in the HRLG group was less than that in the HRHG group (0% vs 5.4%, p = 0.012). The HRLG group had a better 5-year distant metastasis-free survival than the HRHG group (100% vs 96.0%, p = 0.035). As the HRLG group exhibited no clinical failure and better outcomes than the HRHG group, the HRLG group might potentially be classified as a lower-risk group.

OBJECTIVE: To Demonstrate the clinical validation of a machine learning (ML) model for applicator and interstitial needle prediction in gynecologic brachytherapy through a prospective clinical study in a single institution.
METHODS: The study included cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate brachytherapy using intracavitary (IC) or hybrid interstitial (IC/IS) applicators. For each patient, the primary radiation oncologist contoured the high-risk clinical target volume on a pre-brachytherapy MRI, indicated the approximate applicator location, and made a clinical determination of the first fraction applicator. A pre-trained ML model predicted the applicator and IC/IS needle arrangement using tumor geometry. Following the first fraction, ML and radiation oncologist predictions were compared and a replanning study determined the applicator providing optimal organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry. The ML-predicted applicator and needle arrangement and the clinical determination were compared to this dosimetric ground truth.
RESULTS: Ten patients were accrued from December 2020 to October 2022. Compared to the dosimetrically optimal applicator, both the radiation oncologist and ML had an accuracy of 70%. ML demonstrated better identification of patients requiring IC/IS applicators and provided balanced IC and IC/IS predictions. The needle selection model achieved an average accuracy of 82.5%. ML-predicted needle arrangements matched or improved plan quality when compared to clinically selected arrangements. Overall, ML predictions led to an average total improvement of 2.0 Gy to OAR doses over three treatment fractions when compared to clinical predictions.
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a single institution study, the presented ML model demonstrates valuable decision-support for the applicator and needle selection process with the potential to provide improved dosimetry. Future work will include a multi-center study to assess generalizability.

Objective To report the outcomes with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) treatment in patients with lower eyelid basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and to evaluate the relationship between dosimetric parameters and acute and late toxicities. Material and methods A retrospective unicentric study with patients diagnosed with lower eyelid biopsy-proven BCC treated with HDR BT between January 2012 and December 2019. The prescribed dose was 36 Gy to 40 Gy in 9 to 10 fractions, twice daily, over five days. The primary endpoint was local control, and the secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities, registered according to CTCAE v4.0. The cosmetic result was evaluated on a qualitative scale (the CAIB scale). Local control was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier test. Two sample T-tests and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to determine the association between dosimetric parameters and side effects. Results Fifty-eight patients with a median age of 76 years were included. Among these patients, 55.2% received adjuvant HDR BT and 44.8% received radical HDR BT. At a median follow-up of 44 months, there were four local relapses, achieving a probability of local control at four years of 95% and 100% in the adjuvant and radical groups, respectively. Acute toxicity occurred in 76% of patients with only one grade 3 event (radiation dermatitis). Late toxicity was present in 56%. Eight patients underwent treatment for grade 3 cataracts during follow-up. Cosmetic results were excellent or very good in 93% of patients. Acute conjunctival hyperemia is strongly associated with the dose received by the ocular globe (volumes of 0.1cc, 1cc, and 2 cc) (p<0.05). Conclusion Lower eyelid BCC treatment with interstitial HDR BT is associated with excellent local control, acceptable long-term side effects, and good cosmetic results.

BACKGROUND: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) delivers high-dose radiation to local lesions within a short treatment period. There are no reports of salvage transurethral HDR-BT for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of salvage transurethral HDR-BT with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for anastomotic prostate cancer recurrence.
METHODS: Patients with postoperative prostate cancer who underwent salvage transurethral HDR-BT with EBRT for anastomotic recurrence at our hospital between January 2002 and July 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates.
RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period and age were 13.1 (range 4.3-18.4) years and 67 (range 63-78) years, respectively. The dose of HDR-BT ranged from 13 to 24 Gy per 2 to 5 fractions, while that of EBRT ranged from 30 to 44 Gy per 15 to 22 fractions. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year bFFF rates were 77.8%, 41.7%, and 13.9%, respectively. The 10-year and 15-year CSS rates were 100% each. The 10-year and 15-year OS rates were 100% and 64.3%, respectively. Six patients were diagnosed with BCR. Two patients experienced Grade 3 hematuria as a late adverse event. There was no exacerbation of urinary incontinence.
CONCLUSIONS: No prostate cancer-related deaths were observed, even after a long-term follow-up. Salvage transurethral HDR-BT after radical prostatectomy is safe and feasible and may be a useful treatment option.

Previous work has reported the design of a novel thermobrachytherapy (TBT) balloon implant to deliver magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) hyperthermia and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy simultaneously after brain tumor resection, thereby maximizing their synergistic effect. This paper presents an evaluation of the robustness of the balloon device, compatibility of its heat and radiation delivery components, as well as thermal and radiation dosimetry of the TBT balloon. TBT balloon devices with 1 and 3 cm diameter were evaluated when placed in an external magnetic field with a maximal strength of 8.1 kA/m at 133 kHz. The MNP solution (nanofluid) in the balloon absorbs energy, thereby generating heat, while an HDR source travels to the center of the balloon via a catheter to deliver the radiation dose. A 3D-printed human skull model was filled with brain-tissue-equivalent gel for in-phantom heating and radiation measurements around four 3 cm balloons. For the in vivo experiments, a 1 cm diameter balloon was surgically implanted in the brains of three living pigs (40-50 kg). The durability and robustness of TBT balloon implants, as well as the compatibility of their heat and radiation delivery components, were demonstrated in laboratory studies. The presence of the nanofluid, magnetic field, and heating up to 77 °C did not affect the radiation dose significantly. Thermal mapping and 2D infrared images demonstrated spherically symmetric heating in phantom as well as in brain tissue. In vivo pig experiments showed the ability to heat well-perfused brain tissue to hyperthermic levels (≥40 °C) at a 5 mm distance from the 60 °C balloon surface.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a treatment modality for recurrent or residual neck metastatic lymph nodes following external radiotherapy.
METHODS: 38 patients with 52 metastatic lymph nodes recurring or residual after previous external radiotherapy was completed to metastatic lymph nodes in the neck were collected from January 2019 to February 2022. High-dose-rate brachytherapy with 192Ir was performed with a prescribed dose of 20-30 Gy/1f (effective biological dose of 60-120 Gy), and imaging was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment to assess the local control rate and adverse effects of treatment.
RESULTS: All 38 patients received completed treatment, and they were followed up for 6 months. 52 patients with neck lymph node metastases had an objective response rate. (Complete response, CR + Partial response, PR) of 76.9%, which comprised 89.5% (34/38) for lymph nodes ≤ 3 cm and 42.9% (4/14) for > 3 cm, P = 0.028. P > 0.05 for CR + PR versus stable disease, SD + progressive disease, PD for lymph nodes between different subdivisions of the neck. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Acute Toxicity Scoring System, there were 6 cases of acute radioskin injuries of degree I and 4 cases of degree II with a 60% symptomatic relief rate.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose-rate brachytherapy serves as a safe and effective method in treating recurrent residual neck metastatic lymph nodes in the field after external radiotherapy, exerting tolerable adverse effects.

We compared oncological outcomes between prostate cancer (PCa) patients with and without intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).
We performed a retrospective analysis of 138 patients with clinically high-risk, very high-risk, or locally advanced PCa who received HDR-BT with EBRT. Of these, 70 (50.7 %) patients were diagnosed with IDC-P; 68 (49.3 %) patients with acinar adenocarcinoma of prostate. The oncological outcomes, including biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and clinical progression-free survival (CPFS), were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Additionally, Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant prognostic indicators or biochemical recurrence (BCR). Meta-analysis of existing literatures was performed to evaluate the risk of BCR in patients with IDC-P after radiation therapy, compared to those without IDC-P.
Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly inferior BCRFS and CPFS in patients with IDC-P. Multivariate analysis revealed that IDC-P and Grade Group 5 status were associated with increased BCR risk. in our meta-analysis, IDC-P was associated with BCR (HR = 2.13, P = .003).
Amongst the patients who received HDR-BT, patients with IDC-P displayed significantly more rapid disease progression, compared with patients who did not have IDC-P.