Hematopoietic cell transplantation

造血细胞移植
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的15年中,诊断流式细胞术服务的活动已经从监测HIV-1感染中的CD4T细胞亚群发展到筛查原发性和继发性免疫缺陷综合征以及评估B细胞消耗治疗和移植后的免疫构成。高收入国家实验室活动的变化是由HIV-1开始抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)驱动的,无论CD4T细胞计数如何,增加对原发性免疫缺陷综合征的认识以及B细胞消耗治疗和移植在临床实践中的广泛应用。实验室应利用其在HIV-1感染中CD4T细胞计数标准化和质量保证方面的经验,为原发性和继发性免疫缺陷患者提供免疫监测服务。B细胞消耗剂和移植后免疫重建的评估也可以利用流式细胞术实验室获得的专业知识来检测CD34干细胞和评估血液恶性肿瘤中的MRD。本指南为临床实验室提供流式细胞术服务,筛查免疫缺陷及其在B细胞靶向治疗和移植后免疫重建的新作用提供建议。
    Over the last 15 years activity of diagnostic flow cytometry services have evolved from monitoring of CD4 T cell subsets in HIV-1 infection to screening for primary and secondary immune deficiencies syndromes and assessment of immune constitution following B cell depleting therapy and transplantation. Changes in laboratory activity in high income countries have been driven by initiation of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-1 regardless of CD4 T cell counts, increasing recognition of primary immune deficiency syndromes and the wider application of B cell depleting therapy and transplantation in clinical practice. Laboratories should use their experience in standardization and quality assurance of CD4 T cell counting in HIV-1 infection to provide immune monitoring services to patients with primary and secondary immune deficiencies. Assessment of immune reconstitution post B cell depleting agents and transplantation can also draw on the expertise acquired by flow cytometry laboratories for detection of CD34 stem cell and assessment of MRD in hematological malignancies. This guideline provides recommendations for clinical laboratories on providing flow cytometry services in screening for immune deficiencies and its emerging role immune reconstitution after B cell targeting therapies and transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景/目标:复发性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)仍然是一个尚未解决的不良结局问题。本案例研究旨在评估blinatumomab的有效性,有或没有门淋巴细胞输注(DLI),用于治疗可测量的残留病(MRD)阳性B-ALL。方法:本研究包括所有接受blinatumomab抢救治疗的患者。研究中包括11名患者。对所有患者进行MRD阴性评估。结果:在开始blinatumomab治疗之前,7名患者MRD检测呈阳性,三个测试为阴性,其中一人患有难治性疾病。造血细胞移植(HCT)保留给5例持续性MRD患者。6例患者MRD阴性,随后未进行HCT。只有两名患者复发;一名患者死于复发,另一例接受卡非佐米治疗,此后MRD阴性.9例患者在中位随访28个月(15-52个月)时MRD阴性。在最后一次随访日期,抢先DLI后,三名MRD阳性移植后患者中有两名仍处于分子完全缓解状态。在第一次打捞中,在诱导末期MRD阳性B细胞前体ALL的儿科患者中,blinatumomab可能实现完全缓解并桥接至HCT.结论:关于如何治疗移植后复发的决定继续影响生存结果。Blinatumomab联合DLI可能会延长高危儿科患者的释放选择范围。这种方法对于移植后MRD阳性的高风险ALL患者是令人鼓舞的。
    Background/Objectives: Relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) remains an unresolved matter of concern regarding adverse outcomes. This case study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of blinatumomab, with or without door lymphocyte infusion (DLI), in treating measurable residual disease (MRD)-positive B-ALL. Methods: All patients who received blinatumomab salvage therapy were included in this study. Eleven patients were included in the study. All patients were evaluated for MRD-negativity. Results: Before starting blinatumomab therapy, seven patients tested positive for MRD, three tested negative, and one had refractory disease. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was reserved for five patients with persistent MRD. Six patients became MRD-negative and subsequent HCT was not performed. Only two patients relapsed; one patient died of relapse, and the other one received carfilzomib-based therapy and was MRD-negative thereafter. Nine patients were MRD-negative at a median follow-up of 28 months (15-52 months). Two of three MRD-positive post-transplant patients remained in complete molecular remission after preemptive DLI at the last follow-up date. In the first salvage, blinatumomab may achieve complete remission and bridging to HCT in pediatric patients with end-of-induction MRD-positive B-cell precursor ALL. Conclusions: The decision on how to treat post-transplant relapse continues to affect survival outcomes. Blinatumomab combined with DLI may extend the armamentarium of release options for high-risk pediatric patients. This approach is encouraging for high-risk ALL patients who are MRD-positive post-transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Congress
    代表加拿大细胞治疗移植(CTTC),我们很高兴介绍CTTC2023年年会摘要。会议亲自召开,2023年5月31日至6月2日,在哈利法克斯,新斯科舍省威斯汀酒店的新斯科舍省。海报作者在周四热闹而引人入胜的欢迎招待会上展示了他们的作品,6月1日,在周五下午的口头摘要会议上,口头摘要作者被介绍,2023年6月2日。选择了二十三(23)份摘要作为海报进行演示,并选择了四(4)份作为口头演示。摘要在四个类别中提交:(1)基础/转化科学,(2)临床试验/观察,(3)实验室/质量,和(4)药房/护理/其他移植支持。排名前四(4)的口头摘要和排名前四(4)的海报摘要被选为获奖。所有这些都在相关类别中标记为“获奖者”。我们祝贺所有主持人对该领域的研究和贡献。
    On behalf of Cell Therapy Transplant Canada (CTTC), we are pleased to present the Abstracts of the CTTC 2023 Annual Conference. The conference was held in-person, 31 May-2 June 2023, in Halifax, Nova Scotia at the Westin Nova Scotian hotel. Poster authors presented their work during a lively and engaging welcome reception on Thursday, 1 June, and oral abstract authors were featured during the oral abstract session in the afternoon of Friday, 2 June 2023. Twenty-three (23) abstracts were selected for presentation as posters and four (4) as oral presentations. Abstracts were submitted within four categories: (1) Basic/Translational Sciences, (2) Clinical Trials/Observations, (3) Laboratory/Quality, and (4) Pharmacy/Nursing/Other Transplant Support. The top four (4) oral abstracts and top four (4) poster abstracts were selected to receive an award. All of these were marked as \"Award Recipient\" within the relevant category. We congratulate all the presenters on their research and contributions to the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:造血细胞移植(HCT)是一种对血液肿瘤和某些类型的癌症的高度侵入性和危及生命的治疗方法,这些癌症可以挑战患者的意义结构。恢复含义(即,通过接受和承诺疗法(ACT)干预来增强心理灵活性,可以帮助建立对疾病和治疗负担的更灵活和重要的解释)。因此,本试验旨在研究与最低限度强化常规护理(mEUC)对照组相比,ACT干预对HCT后患者意义形成过程的影响以及改变的潜在机制.该试验将通过单例实验设计(SCED)得到加强,其中ACT干预措施将在具有各种干预前间隔的个体之间进行比较。
    方法:总共,将招募192名符合首次自体或同种异体HCT的患者进行双臂平行随机对照试验,将在线自助14天ACT培训与教育课程进行比较(HCT后的建议)。在这两种情况下,参与者将在门诊期间每天接受一次短期调查和干预建议(每天约5-10分钟).双盲评估将在基线进行,在干预期间,立即,1个月,干预后3个月。此外,6-9名参与者将被邀请参加SCED,并在完成ACT干预之前随机分配到干预前测量长度(1-3周)。随后在第2次和第3次干预后测量进行7天观察.主要结果是意义相关的痛苦。次要结果包括心理灵活性,有意义的应对,意义,和福祉以及全球和情境意义。
    结论:这项试验是第一项整合ACT和意义制定框架以减少意义相关困扰的研究,刺激意义的创造过程,并提高HCT接受者的福祉。通过统计上严格的具体方法来查看对谁以及何时有效,将加强对干预措施的测试,以解决接受HCT的患者特有的生存问题。由于HCT人群获得干预措施的机会有限,基于网络的ACT自助计划可能会填补这一空白。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govID:NCT06266182。2024年2月20日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a highly invasive and life-threatening treatment for hematological neoplasms and some types of cancer that can challenge the patient\'s meaning structures. Restoring meaning (i.e., building more flexible and significant explanations of the disease and treatment burden) can be aided by strengthening psychological flexibility by means of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention. Thus, this trial aims to examine the effect of the ACT intervention on the meaning-making process and the underlying mechanisms of change in patients following HCT compared to a minimally enhanced usual care (mEUC) control group. The trial will be enhanced with a single-case experimental design (SCED), where ACT interventions will be compared between individuals with various pre-intervention intervals.
    METHODS: In total, 192 patients who qualify for the first autologous or allogeneic HCT will be recruited for a two-armed parallel randomized controlled trial comparing an online self-help 14-day ACT training to education sessions (recommendations following HCT). In both conditions, participants will receive once a day a short survey and intervention proposal (about 5-10 min a day) in the outpatient period. Double-blinded assessment will be conducted at baseline, during the intervention, immediately, 1 month, and 3 months after the intervention. In addition, 6-9 participants will be invited to SCED and randomly assigned to pre-intervention measurement length (1-3 weeks) before completing ACT intervention, followed by 7-day observations at the 2nd and 3rd post-intervention measure. The primary outcome is meaning-related distress. Secondary outcomes include psychological flexibility, meaning-making coping, meanings made, and well-being as well as global and situational meaning.
    CONCLUSIONS: This trial represents the first study that integrates the ACT and meaning-making frameworks to reduce meaning-related distress, stimulate the meaning-making process, and enhance the well-being of HCT recipients. Testing of an intervention to address existential concerns unique to patients undergoing HCT will be reinforced by a statistically rigorous idiographic approach to see what works for whom and when. Since access to interventions in the HCT population is limited, the web-based ACT self-help program could potentially fill this gap.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06266182. Registered on February 20, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染仍然是异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HCT)后最常见的临床显著感染,并且与相当高的发病率和死亡率相关。
    本研究旨在描述和比较未经处理的CMV再激活(uCMVr)的发生率,临床显著感染(cs-CMVi)和疾病(CMVd),以及CMV相关的住院和allo-HCT患者的结果,要么接受Letermovir(LET)一级预防治疗,要么接受抢先治疗(PET)。
    这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,针对成人CMV血清阳性allo-HCT患者,这些患者在HCT后的前100天内接受了LET的初级预防或接受了PET治疗。
    研究人群包括105名患者(LET组28名,PET组77名)。与PET组相比,LET组的患者接受了更多来自替代供体的allo-HCT(54.5%vs.82.14%,P=0.012)。两组中超过一半的患者被归类为CMVd的高风险。在LETvs.PET组,cs-CMVi和CMVd分别在0与50(64.94%),P=<0.0001,0vs.6(7.79%),P=0.18。在LET组中,uCMVr出现在5例(17.8%)中,并且都被认为是小的。PET组中与cs-CMVi或CMVd相关的住院患者与LET组为47(61.04%)。0,分别P=<0.0001。在100天死亡率中没有观察到差异。
    LET一级预防被证明可有效预防cs-CMVi和CMVd并减少allo-HCT成人住院。预防过程中可能会出现乳头,不需要LET停药。
    UNASSIGNED: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study was designed to describe and compare the incidence of untreated CMV reactivation (uCMVr), clinically significant infection (cs-CMVi) and disease (CMVd), as well as CMV-related hospitalization and outcome of allo-HCT patients, either treated with letermovir (LET) primary prophylaxis or managed with preemptive therapy (PET).
    UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult CMV seropositive allo-HCT patients who either received primary prophylaxis with LET within the first 100 days after HCT or were managed with PET.
    UNASSIGNED: The study population comprised 105 patients (28 in the LET group and 77 in the PET group). Compared to the PET group, patients in the LET group received more allo-HCT from alternative donors (54.5% vs. 82.14%, P=0.012). More than half of the patients in both groups were classified as high risk for CMVd. In the LET vs. PET group, cs-CMVi and CMVd developed respectively in 0 vs. 50 (64.94%), P=<0.0001, and 0 vs. 6 (7.79%), P=0.18. In the LET group, uCMVr occurred in 5 (17.8%) and were all considered blips. Hospital admissions related to cs-CMVi or CMVd in the PET group vs. LET group were 47 (61.04%) vs. 0, respectively, P=<0.0001. No differences were observed in 100-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: LET primary prophylaxis proved effective in preventing cs-CMVi and CMVd and reducing hospitalizations in allo-HCT adults. Blips can occur during prophylaxis and do not require LET discontinuation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自1980年以来,急性髓系白血病(AML)的既定/标准治疗方法是阿糖胞苷联合蒽环类药物输注(7+3方案).我们比较了一项临床试验中的老年继发性/高危AML患者的7+3方案与来自瑞典AML注册中心的匹配人群,这些人群在诱导和巩固过程中按照瑞典国家指南的建议增加阿糖胞苷剂量。成功匹配倾向评分后,每组包括104名患者。主要结果是总生存期(OS),和标准剂量患者的中位OS为6.4和10.7个月,剂量强度增加(风险比:0.69,p=0.012),5年OS分别为8.7%和18.1%,缓解率为36%和60%,分别(p<0.001)。异基因造血细胞移植后的中位OS(每组27.9%)分别为10.4个月和20.7个月,分别。我们得出的结论是,在接受调查的AML患者组中,更密集的阿糖胞苷方案似乎可以改善预后。
    Since 1980\'s, the established/standard treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is cytarabine infusion with anthracycline (7 + 3 regimen). We compared the 7 + 3 regimen in older secondary/high-risk AML patientsfrom a clinical trial with a matched population from the Swedish AML Registrytreated withan increased cytarabine dose in induction and consolidation as recommended in the Swedish National Guidelines since 2005. After successfulpropensity score matching, 104 patients per group were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and standard dosed patients had a median OS of 6.4 versus 10.7 months with increased dose intensity (hazard ratio:0.69, p = 0.012), with 5-year OS of 8.7% and 18.1%, andremission rates of 36% and 60%, respectively (p < 0.001). Median OS after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (in 27.9% per group) was 10.4 and 20.7 months, respectively. We conclude that the more intensive cytarabine schedule seems to provide improved outcomes inthe investigated AML patient group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虚弱是一种与造血细胞移植(HCT)受者的毒性和非复发死亡率(NRM)风险增加相关的生理储备减少的表型。发病率,预测因子,HCT前虚弱的不利影响尚不为人所知。
    方法:我们评估了HCT前虚弱的关联,使用Fried\的标准定义,接受自体(自体)或同种异体(allo)HCT治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤的≥18y患者的年龄和基线特征。评估作为常规HCT前评估的一部分进行,然后进行回顾性分析。我们还调查了心理健康困扰指标与虚弱之间的关联,以及虚弱与移植结果之间的关联,包括NRM和总体生存率(OS)以及医疗保健利用率。
    结果:分析了接受HCT治疗恶性血液病的患者(总计n=300;162auto,138所有)。虚弱的总体患病率为18%,alloHCT接受者为21.7%,autoHCT接受者为14.8%,具有相似的脆弱域分布。总体队列的Logistic回归分析显示,年龄增长与虚弱风险增加相关(赔率比[OR]1.37,95%CI[1.02-1.82];p=0.04)。AlloHCT(OR2.03CI[1.07-3.84];p=0.03),PHQ-9(健康抑郁)评分≥10(OR6.28,CI1.93-20.43;p<0.01)均与HCT前虚弱独立相关。在alloHCT患者中,年龄(OR1.44,CI[1.00-2.06];p=0.05)是HCT前虚弱的唯一重要危险因素,而对于自体HCT患者,只有较高的PHQ-9评分与虚弱相关(OR6.43,CI[1.34-30.82];p=0.02).在1年的整个队列中,脆弱的接受者的OS较低,为83%(95%CI,70-91%)。92%(95CI,88-95%)的非虚弱组(p=0.04);多变量分析显示脆弱组的死亡风险更高(风险比[HR]2.31,CI0.97-5.46;p=0.06)。在alloHCT队列中,多变量分析显示体弱受者的1年死亡率更高(HR2.55,CI[0.99-6.56];p=0.053)。在alloHCT接受者中,我们观察到虚弱患者的1年NRM为20%9%的人不虚弱,和多变量分析显示,虚弱组的NRM风险略高(HR2.70,CI0.90-8.10;p=0.08)。在alloHCT或autoHCT接受者中,虚弱与较高的复发风险无关。与不虚弱的接受者相比,虚弱的alloHCT患者在HCT后的初始住院时间更长(p<0.01)。
    结论:我们观察到在所有年龄组中,HCT前虚弱的患病率很高,并确定年龄是虚弱的风险因素,特别是在alloHCT接受者中。虚弱与更大的NRM风险和更低的生存率相关,需要在更大的队列中进行调查。脆弱与更大的HCT复杂性相关,这表明需要对这一弱势群体进行早期评估和有针对性的干预措施。我们的发现表明,在HCT之前,虚弱和精神困扰筛查以及多学科干预措施可以限制HCT的发病率。
    Frailty is a phenotype of decreased physiologic reserve associated with increased risk of toxicities and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. The incidence, predictors, and adverse effects of pre-HCT frailty are not well known. We evaluated the association of pre-HCT frailty, defined using Fried\'s criteria, with age and baseline characteristics in patients ≥18 years undergoing autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) HCT for hematological malignancies. Assessments were performed as part of routine pre-HCT evaluations and then retrospectively analyzed. We additionally investigated the association of mental health distress indicators with frailty and the association between frailty and transplant outcomes including NRM and overall survival (OS) plus healthcare utilization. Patients undergoing HCT for hematological malignancies were analyzed (total n = 300; 162 auto, 138 allo). The overall prevalence of frailty was 18%, 21.7% among alloHCT, and 14.8% among autoHCT recipients, with similar distributions of frailty domains. Logistic regression analysis of the overall cohort revealed that older age was associated with an increased risk of frailty (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.02-1.82]; P = 0.04). AlloHCT (OR 2.03, CI [1.07-3.84]; P = .03), and patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (health depression) score ≥10 (OR 6.28, CI 1.93-20.43; P < .01) were each independently associated with pre-HCT frailty. In alloHCT patients, older age (OR 1.44, CI [1.00-2.06]; P = .05) was the only significant risk factor for pre-HCT frailty, while for autoHCT patients, only a higher PHQ-9 score was associated with frailty (OR 6.43, CI [1.34-30.82]; P = .02). For the whole cohort OS at 1 year was lower in frail recipients at 83% (95% CI, 70-91%) versus 92% (95% CI, 88-95%) in nonfrail (P = .04); with multivariate analysis showing higher risk of death in the frail group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.31, CI 0.97-5.46; P = .06). In the alloHCT cohort, multivariate analysis showed greater 1-year mortality in frail recipients (HR 2.55, CI [0.99-6.56]; P = .053). In the alloHCT recipients, we observed a 1-year NRM of 20% in frail patients versus 9% in nonfrail, and multivariate analysis showed a marginally higher risk of NRM in the frail group (HR 2.70, CI 0.90-8.10; P = .08). Frailty was not associated with higher risk of relapse in alloHCT or autoHCT recipients. Frail alloHCT patients experienced a longer initial hospital stay following HCT compared to nonfrail recipients (P < .01). We observed a high prevalence of pre-HCT frailty across all age groups, and identify older age is a risk factor for frailty, particularly in alloHCT recipients. Frailty is associated with a greater risk of NRM and lower survival which needs investigation in a larger cohort. Frailty associates with greater HCT complexity suggesting a need for early assessments and targeted interventions for this vulnerable population. Our findings suggest the utility of frailty and mental distress screening along with multidisciplinary interventions in pre-HCT to limit the morbidity of HCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:接受造血细胞移植(HCT)或嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗的血液恶性肿瘤患者在出院后有发生严重临床并发症的风险。
    目的:TEL-HEMATO研究的目的是改善我们的远程医疗平台,以便在出院后的前3个月内对接受HCT或CAR-T细胞治疗的患者进行随访。
    方法:从2022年11月至2023年7月,筛选了11例接受自体(n=2)或同种异体(n=5)HCT或CAR-T细胞治疗(n=4)的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。两名患者在入组后停止研究。远程医疗平台包括每天收集生命体征,身体症状,出院后3个月的生活质量评估。每位患者都接受了经过临床验证的智能手表(ScanWatch)和数字温度计,一个专门的智能手机应用程序被用来收集这些数据。血液学家或专业从事HCT和CAR-T细胞治疗的护士通过基于网络的平台对数据进行每日修订。
    结果:成功收集了通过ScanWatch测量的生命体征,并具有中/高依从性:记录了8/9(89%)患者的心率,记录9/9(100%)患者的氧饱和度和每日步数,并记录了7/9(78%)患者的睡眠时间。然而,患者手动记录的体温与较低的依从性有关,在5/9(55%)患者中记录。总的来说,5/9(55%)患者在应用程序中报告了临床症状。8/9(89%)的患者在纳入研究时完成了生活质量评估,在第三个月末下降到3/9(33%)。通过系统可用性量表上提供的评级,可用性被认为是可以接受的。然而,患者报告了技术问题。
    结论:虽然将可穿戴设备添加到远程医疗临床平台可能对HCT和CAR-T细胞治疗患者监测具有潜在的协同益处,平台的非完全自动化和缺乏专门的远程医疗团队仍然是需要克服的主要限制.在我们的现实生活中尤其如此,目标人群通常包括数字教育水平较低的老年患者。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are at risk of developing serious clinical complications after discharge.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the TEL-HEMATO study was to improve our telehealth platform for the follow-up of patients undergoing HCT or CAR T-cell therapy during the first 3 months after discharge with the addition of wearable devices.
    METHODS: Eleven patients who received autologous (n=2) or allogeneic (n=5) HCT or CAR T-cell therapy (n=4) for hematological malignancies were screened from November 2022 to July 2023. Two patients discontinued the study after enrollment. The telehealth platform consisted of the daily collection of vital signs, physical symptoms, and quality of life assessment up to 3 months after hospital discharge. Each patient received a clinically validated smartwatch (ScanWatch) and a digital thermometer, and a dedicated smartphone app was used to collect these data. Daily revision of the data was performed through a web-based platform by a hematologist or a nurse specialized in HCT and CAR T-cell therapy.
    RESULTS: Vital signs measured through ScanWatch were successfully collected with medium/high adherence: heart rate was recorded in 8/9 (89%) patients, oxygen saturation and daily steps were recorded in 9/9 (100%) patients, and sleeping hours were recorded in 7/9 (78%) patients. However, temperature recorded manually by the patients was associated with lower compliance, which was recorded in 5/9 (55%) patients. Overall, 5/9 (55%) patients reported clinical symptoms in the app. Quality of life assessment was completed by 8/9 (89%) patients at study enrollment, which decreased to 3/9 (33%) at the end of the third month. Usability was considered acceptable through ratings provided on the System Usability Scale. However, technological issues were reported by the patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: While the addition of wearable devices to a telehealth clinical platform could have potentially synergic benefits for HCT and CAR T-cell therapy patient monitoring, noncomplete automation of the platform and the absence of a dedicated telemedicine team still represent major limitations to be overcome. This is especially true in our real-life setting where the target population generally comprises patients of older age with a low digital education level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议对重度再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者进行生殖系基因检测以指导治疗,包括使用免疫抑制治疗和/或调整造血细胞移植(HCT)方式。噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增多症(HLH)是一种威胁生命的高炎症状态,通常与常染色体隐性(AR)或X连锁隐性(XLR)遗传的血细胞减少有关。HLH是SAA鉴别诊断的一部分,基因检测可以识别SAA患者HLH基因的变异。HLH基因中致病性/可能致病性(P/LP)变异对SAA中HCT结果的影响尚不清楚。
    目的:我们的目的是确定大量的获得性SAA患者中HLH基因变异的频率,并评估其与HCT结局的相关性。
    方法:再生障碍性贫血项目的移植结果,国家癌症研究所和国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心之间的合作,由1989年至2015年间接受SAAHCT的824例患者的基因组和临床数据组成。我们排除了140例遗传性骨髓衰竭综合征患者,并使用其余684例获得性SAA患者的外显子组测序数据来鉴定14个HLH相关基因中的P/LP变异(11个AR,3XLR)使用ACMG/AMP标准进行了策划。不确定意义的有害变体(del-VUS)被定义为不符合ACMG/AMPP/LP标准,但在≥3/5元预测因子中具有破坏性预测(BayesDel,REVEL,CADD,MetaSVM和/或EIGEN)。Kaplan-Meier估计用于计算HCT后的总生存期(OS)概率,累积发生率计算器用于考虑相关竞争风险的其他HCT结局.
    结果:49例患者中有46例HLH变异(7.2%;N总计=684)。19例患者中有17个变异(2.8%)是P/LP;其中8个是功能变异的丧失。在19例P/LPHLH变异患者中,16个(84%)在AR遗传基因中具有单等位基因变异,三个在XLR基因中有变异。PRF1是最经常受影响的基因(8/19患者)。我们发现有和没有P/LPHLH变异的患者在移植相关因素方面没有统计学上的显著差异。5年生存概率为89%(95%CI=72-99),在P/LP和del-VUSHLH变异的患者中,有70%(95%CI=53-85%),分别,与没有变异体的66%(95%CI=62-70)相比(p-log-rank=0.16)。对于P/LPHLH变异的患者,中性粒细胞植入的中位时间为16天,而对于有del-VUS或无变异的患者为18天。合并(p-Gray检验=0.01)。P/LPHLH变异与急性或慢性移植物抗宿主病风险之间无统计学意义的关联。
    结论:在这一庞大的获得性SAA队列中,我们发现2.8%的患者在HLH基因中存在P/LP变异.HLH基因变体对HCT后存活没有负面影响。具有P/LPHLH变异的患者数量少,限制了研究能力,无法提供确凿的证据。然而,我们的数据表明,对于携带P/LP变异体的SAA患者,无需特别考虑移植.
    Germline genetic testing for patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is recommended to guide treatment, including the use of immunosuppressive therapy and/or adjustment of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) modalities. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory condition often associated with cytopenias with autosomal recessive (AR) or X-linked recessive (XLR) inheritance. HLH is part of the SAA differential diagnosis, and genetic testing may identify variants in HLH genes in patients with SAA. The impact of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in HLH genes on HCT outcomes in SAA is unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of HLH gene variants in a large cohort of patients with acquired SAA and to evaluate their association(s) with HCT outcomes. The Transplant Outcomes in Aplastic Anemia project, a collaboration between the National Cancer Institute and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, collected genomic and clinical data from 824 patients who underwent HCT for SAA between 1989 and 2015. We excluded 140 patients with inherited bone marrow failure syndromes and used exome sequencing data from the remaining 684 patients with acquired SAA to identify P/LP variants in 14 HLH-associated genes (11 AR, 3 XLR) curated using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) criteria. Deleterious variants of uncertain significance (del-VUS) were defined as those not meeting the ACMG/AMP P/LP criteria but with damaging predictions in ≥3 of 5 meta-predictors (BayesDel, REVEL, CADD, MetaSVM, and/or EIGEN). The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to calculate the probability of overall survival (OS) after HCT, and the cumulative incidence calculator was used for other HCT outcomes, accounting for relevant competing risks. There were 46 HLH variants in 49 of the 684 patients (7.2%). Seventeen variants in 19 patients (2.8%) were P/LP; 8 of these were loss-of-function variants. Among the 19 patients with P/LP HLH variants, 16 (84%) had monoallelic variants in genes with AR inheritance, and 3 had variants in XLR genes. PRF1 was the most frequently affected gene (in 8 of the 19 patients). We found no statistically significant differences in transplantation-related factors between patients with and those without P/LP HLH variants. The 5-year survival probability was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72% to 99%) in patients with P/LP HLH variants and 70% (95% CI, 53% to 85%) in those with del-VUS HLH variants, compared to 66% (95% CI, 62% to 70%) in those without variants (P = .16, log-rank test). The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16 days for patients with P/LP HLH variants and 18 days in those with del-VUS HLH variants or without variants combined (P = .01, Gray\'s test). No statistically significant associations between P/LP HLH variants and the risk of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease were noted. In this large cohort of patients with acquired SAA, we found that 2.8% of patients harbored a P/LP variant in an HLH gene. No negative effects of HLH gene variants on post-HCT survival were noted. The small number of patients with P/LP HLH variants limits the study\'s ability to provide conclusive evidence; nonetheless, our data suggest that there is no need for special transplantation considerations for patients with SAA carrying P/LP variants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的二十年中,间充质基质细胞(MSC)已在世界各地用于类固醇难治性中度-重度(II-IV级)急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)的多项临床试验中。尽管在各种试验中取得了非常有希望的结果,它未能获得美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局等监管机构的广泛批准。我们可以从这中学到什么教训,将来对MSCs和其他细胞治疗产品的研究?在aGVHD中使用MSCs的已发表试验中的广泛异质性可能是核心问题。我们提出了一个关于捐助者相关因素的标准化方法,MSCs相关特性,以及临床试验设计,限制aGVHD试验的异质性,并满足监管机构的要求。这种方法可以扩展到MSC之外的其他细胞和基因治疗产品以及其他疾病的试验。
    Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used in multiple clinical trials for steroid-refractory moderate-severe (grade II-IV) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) across the world over the last two decades. Despite very promising results in a variety of trials, it failed to get widespread approval by regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. What lessons can we learn from this for future studies on MSCs and other cell therapy products? Broad heterogeneity among published trials using MSCs in aGVHD was likely the core problem. We propose a standardized approach in regards to donor-related factors, MSCs-related characteristics, as well as clinical trial design, to limit heterogeneity in trials for aGVHD and to fulfill the requirements of regulatory agencies. This approach may be expanded beyond MSCs to other Cell and Gene therapy products and trials in other diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号