Health care

卫生保健
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大多数生物医学,健康和护理研究没有充分考虑健康和疾病的性别和性别层面。在研究中忽视和忽视性别和性别的影响会降低科学的严谨性和可重复性,这导致所有人的治疗效果较差,健康结果更糟,特别是女性和性别和性别不同的人。历史上,在英国医学研究中,性别和性别政策创新很少。为了解决这个问题,自2023年春季以来,来自英国研究部门的利益相关者一直在合作,共同设计一个性别和性别政策框架,由研究资助者实施。作为MESSAGE(医学科学性别和性别平等)项目的一部分。在第一个政策实验室中,2023年5月在伦敦举行,50名与会者,包括来自资助组织的代表,医学期刊,监管者,临床医生,学者和有生活经验的人,确定了未来行动的两个关键优先事项:1)整个系统的政策变化方法,和2)技术能力建设和更广泛的文化变革努力。在追求这些优先事项和跨部门合作时,英国利益相关者正在采取国际创新方法,旨在实现可持续和有影响力的性别和性别政策变革。借鉴MESSAGE政策实验室的讨论,我们提出了英国研究部门需要采取的关键行动,以将性别和性别的有意义的会计作为研究实践的新规范。
    Most biomedical, health and care research does not adequately account for sex and gender dimensions of health and illness. Overlooking and disregarding the influence of sex and gender in research reduces scientific rigour and reproducibility, which leads to less effective treatments and worse health outcomes for all, particularly women and sex and gender diverse people. Historically, there has been minimal sex and gender policy innovation in UK medical research. To address this, stakeholders from across the UK research sector have been collaborating since spring 2023 to co-design a sex and gender policy framework to be implemented by research funders, as part of the MESSAGE (Medical Science Sex and Gender Equity) project. In the first Policy Lab, held in London in May 2023, 50 participants, including representatives from funding organisations, medical journals, regulators, clinicians, academics and people with lived experience, identified two key priorities for future action: 1) A whole system approach to policy change, and 2) Technical capacity-building and wider culture change efforts. In pursuing these priorities and collaborating cross-sectorally, UK stakeholders are engaged in an internationally innovative approach aimed at realising sustainable and impactful sex and gender policy change. Drawing on MESSAGE Policy Lab discussions, we set out key actions needed for the UK research sector to embed meaningful accounting for sex and gender as a new norm for research practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人权为追求公共卫生正义以实现所有人的尊严提供了普遍的基础。尽管国际社会试图在健康方面促进人权,相当一部分印度土著居民对这些权利的理解仍然有限。
    本研究旨在分析部落居民对卫生保健中人权的态度。人口由西孟加拉邦Puruliya区Manbazar-I和PunchaBlocks的部落居民组成,印度。年龄在18至35岁之间的部落年轻人是横断面研究的主题。
    使用预先测试的问卷收集数据。使用MSExcel和SPSS27进行分析。进行了描述性分析。
    参与者的意识平均得分,可访问性和通信,自主性和生殖健康以及性和生殖健康权利(SRHR)分别为8.06、15.76、7.35和32.52,表明选定地区的年轻成年部落人口的感知水平中等。
    需要政府和其他非政府组织对部落的整体关注。在教育课程中引入医疗保健中人权的各个方面以及社区外联,很可能会改善对“人权”的认识,从而有助于更好地利用各种服务,包括印度部落人口的健康。
    UNASSIGNED: Human rights provide a universal foundation for pursuing justice in public health in order to achieve the dignity of all individuals. In spite of international attempts to promote human rights in the context of health, a significant portion of India\'s indigenous population continues to have a limited understanding of these rights.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to analyze tribal people\'s attitudes towards human rights in health care. The population consists of tribal residents from Manbazar - I and Puncha Blocks in the Puruliya district of West Bengal, India. Tribal young adults between the ages of 18 and 35 were the subject of a cross-sectional study.
    UNASSIGNED: A pretested questionnaire was used to collect data. MS Excel and SPSS 27 were used for analysis. A descriptive analysis was carried out.
    UNASSIGNED: The participants\' mean scores for awareness, accessibility and communication, autonomy and sexual and reproductive health and sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR) were 8.06, 15.76, 7.35 and 32.52 revealing a moderate perception level among the young adult tribal population in the selected blocks.
    UNASSIGNED: A holistic focus of the governmental and other non-governmental organizations towards the tribals is required. Introducing various aspects of human rights in healthcare in the education curriculum along with community outreach would by all likelihood improve the perception of \'Human Rights\' and thus help in better utilization of various services including health among tribal populations in India.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,作为改善成人血压(BP)管理的潜在手段,移动健康(m-Health)干预措施的整合日益受到关注.这项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析旨在确定基于m-Health的干预措施对成人BP的影响,并根据受试者的特征评估m-Health对BP的影响。干预措施,和国家。方法:在PubMed中进行搜索,Embase,ResearchGate,以及2022年1月的Cochrane数据库。研究选择和数据提取由两名独立的审阅者进行。为了进行分析,使用随机效应模型,置信区间(CI)为95%,p<0.05.结果:本综述和荟萃分析纳入了50项研究。与常规护理相比,m-Health干预可使收缩压降低3.5mmHg(95%CI-4.3;-2.7;p<0.001;I2=85.8%),舒张压降低1.8mmHg(95%CI-2.3;-1.4;p<0.001;I2=78.9%)。m-Health干预对BP的影响在男性和老年人中更为明显,在持续6-8周的干预措施中,用药物提醒,具有插入BP值的可能性(p<0.05)。结论:与标准护理相比,本研究的结果支持m-Health降低BP的有效性。然而,这些影响取决于受试者的特征和干预措施。鉴于本系统综述与荟萃分析的结果之间存在巨大的异质性,它的解释应该谨慎。未来对这一主题的研究是有必要的。
    Background: In recent years, the integration of mobile health (m-Health) interventions has garnered increasing attention as a potential means to improve blood pressure (BP) management in adults. This updated systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to identify the effect of m-Health-based interventions on BP in adults and to evaluate the effect of m-Health on BP according to the characteristics of subjects, interventions, and countries. Methods: The search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, ResearchGate, and Cochrane databases in January 2022. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. For analysis, random effects models were used with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and p < 0.05. Results: Fifty studies were included in this review and in the meta-analysis. Interventions with m-Health reduced systolic BP in 3.5 mmHg (95% CI -4.3; -2.7; p < 0.001; I2 = 85.8%) and diastolic BP in 1.8 mmHg (95% CI -2.3; -1.4; p < 0.001; I2 = 78.9%) compared to usual care. The effects of m-Health interventions on BP were more evident in men and in older adults, in interventions lasting 6-8 weeks, with medication reminders, with the possibility of insertion of BP values (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study support the effectiveness of m-Health in reducing BP when compared to standard care. However, these effects are dependent on the characteristics of the subjects and interventions. Given the substantial heterogeneity among the results of this systematic review with meta-analysis, its interpretation should be cautious. Future research on this topic is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏手术后的血管停搏液与不良结局相关。然而,血管停搏液的临床效果及其持续左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)植入后持续时间的意义尚不清楚.
    本研究旨在确定CF-LVAD植入后短暂性和延长性血管停搏的预测因素和结果。
    该研究是对2005年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间接受CF-LVAD植入的连续患者的回顾性研究。血管停搏被定义为存在以下所有情况:平均动脉压≤65mmHg,血管加压药(肾上腺素,去甲肾上腺素,血管加压素,或多巴胺)术后前24小时内使用>6小时,心脏指数≥2.2L/min/m2,全身血管阻力<800达因/s/cm5,血管舒张性休克不可归因于其他原因。长时间的血管停搏被定义为持续12至24小时;短暂性血管停搏是持续6至<12小时。患者特征,结果,并对危险因素进行分析。
    在研究期间接受CF-LVAD植入的600名患者中,182例(30.3%)出现血管停搏液。血管停搏组和无血管停搏组的平均患者年龄相似。延长血管停搏液(n=78;13.0%),与短暂性血管麻痹相比(n=104;17.3%),与更高的30天死亡率相关(16.7%vs5.8%;P=0.02)。长时间血管停搏的危险因素包括术前透析和体重指数升高。
    与整体血管停搏液相比,长时间的血管停搏液与CF-LVAD植入后的生存率降低相关.可能需要进行治疗以避免或最大程度地减少长期血管停搏液的进展。
    UNASSIGNED: Vasoplegia after cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcomes. However, the clinical effects of vasoplegia and the significance of its duration after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation are less known.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to identify predictors of and outcomes from transient vs prolonged vasoplegia after CF-LVAD implantation.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017. Vasoplegia was defined as the presence of all of the following: mean arterial pressure ≤65 mm Hg, vasopressor (epinephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, or dopamine) use for >6 hours within the first 24 hours postoperatively, cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min/m2 and systemic vascular resistance <800 dyne/s/cm5, and vasodilatory shock not attributable to other causes. Prolonged vasoplegia was defined as that lasting 12 to 24 hours; transient vasoplegia was that lasting 6 to <12 hours. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 600 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation during the study period, 182 (30.3%) developed vasoplegia. Mean patient age was similar between the vasoplegia and no-vasoplegia groups. Prolonged vasoplegia (n = 78; 13.0%), compared with transient vasoplegia (n = 104; 17.3%), was associated with greater 30-day mortality (16.7% vs 5.8%; P = 0.02). Risk factors for prolonged vasoplegia included preoperative dialysis and elevated body mass index.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with vasoplegia overall, prolonged vasoplegia was associated with worse survival after CF-LVAD implantation. Treatment to avoid or minimize progression to prolonged vasoplegia may be warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,ChatGPT的出现,OpenAI开发的人工智能聊天机器人,由于其卓越的语言理解能力和内容生成能力,引起了极大的关注,突出了大型语言模型(LLM)的巨大潜力。LLM已经成为许多领域的新兴热点,包括医疗保健。在医疗保健中,LLM可以基于用于预训练的语料库被分类为生物医学领域的LLM和临床领域的LLM。在过去的3年里,这些特定领域的LLM在多个自然语言处理任务上表现出卓越的性能,也超越了一般LLM的性能。这不仅强调了为特定领域开发专用LLM的重要性,但也提高了人们对它们在医疗保健中应用的期望。我们认为,LLM可以广泛用于咨询前,诊断,和管理,有适当的发展和监督。此外,LLM在协助医学教育方面有着巨大的希望,医学写作和其他相关应用。同样,医疗保健系统必须认识到并解决LLM带来的挑战。
    Recently, the emergence of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI, has attracted significant attention due to its exceptional language comprehension and content generation capabilities, highlighting the immense potential of large language models (LLMs). LLMs have become a burgeoning hotspot across many fields, including health care. Within health care, LLMs may be classified into LLMs for the biomedical domain and LLMs for the clinical domain based on the corpora used for pre-training. In the last 3 years, these domain-specific LLMs have demonstrated exceptional performance on multiple natural language processing tasks, surpassing the performance of general LLMs as well. This not only emphasizes the significance of developing dedicated LLMs for the specific domains, but also raises expectations for their applications in health care. We believe that LLMs may be used widely in preconsultation, diagnosis, and management, with appropriate development and supervision. Additionally, LLMs hold tremendous promise in assisting with medical education, medical writing and other related applications. Likewise, health care systems must recognize and address the challenges posed by LLMs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    北欧国家是,与美国一起,在线记录访问(ORA)的先行者,现在已经变得普遍了。国际上的决策者也强调了可获取和结构化健康数据的重要性。为了确保在短期和长期内充分实现ORA的潜力,迫切需要从跨学科的角度研究ORA,临床,人文,和社会科学的观点,超越严格的技术方面。在这篇观点论文中,我们探讨了欧洲健康数据空间(EHDS)提案中的政策变化,以在整个欧盟推进ORA,我们在一个由北欧领导的项目中进行了首次此类研究,对患者\'ORA-NORDeHEALTH(北欧患者健康:未来的基准和发展)的大规模国际调查。我们认为,EHDS提案将为患者访问和控制第三方访问其电子健康记录铺平道路。在我们对提案的分析中,我们已经确定了ORA的五个关键原则:(1)访问权,(2)代理访问,(3)病人输入自己的数据,(4)错误和遗漏纠正,(5)访问控制。今天的ORA实施在整个欧洲都是分散的,EHDS提案旨在确保所有欧洲公民都能平等地在线访问其健康数据。然而,我们认为,为了实施EHDS,我们需要更多关于我们在分析中确定的关键ORA原则的研究证据.NORDeHEALTH项目的结果提供了一些证据,但我们也发现了仍需要进一步探索的重要知识差距。
    The Nordic countries are, together with the United States, forerunners in online record access (ORA), which has now become widespread. The importance of accessible and structured health data has also been highlighted by policy makers internationally. To ensure the full realization of ORA\'s potential in the short and long term, there is a pressing need to study ORA from a cross-disciplinary, clinical, humanistic, and social sciences perspective that looks beyond strictly technical aspects. In this viewpoint paper, we explore the policy changes in the European Health Data Space (EHDS) proposal to advance ORA across the European Union, informed by our research in a Nordic-led project that carries out the first of its kind, large-scale international investigation of patients\' ORA-NORDeHEALTH (Nordic eHealth for Patients: Benchmarking and Developing for the Future). We argue that the EHDS proposal will pave the way for patients to access and control third-party access to their electronic health records. In our analysis of the proposal, we have identified five key principles for ORA: (1) the right to access, (2) proxy access, (3) patient input of their own data, (4) error and omission rectification, and (5) access control. ORA implementation today is fragmented throughout Europe, and the EHDS proposal aims to ensure all European citizens have equal online access to their health data. However, we argue that in order to implement the EHDS, we need more research evidence on the key ORA principles we have identified in our analysis. Results from the NORDeHEALTH project provide some of that evidence, but we have also identified important knowledge gaps that still need further exploration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器学习算法中表示的人工智能模型是用于风险评估的有前途的工具,用于指导临床和其他医疗保健决策。机器学习算法,然而,可以容纳传播刻板印象的偏见,不平等,以及导致社会经济医疗保健差距的歧视。偏见包括与一些社会人口统计学特征相关的偏见,如种族,种族,性别,年龄,保险,使用错误的电子健康记录数据和社会经济地位。此外,人们担心大型语言模型中的训练数据和算法偏差会带来潜在的缺陷。这些偏见影响了美国和全球很大一部分人口的生活和生计。相关反弹的社会和经济后果不可低估。这里,我们概述了一些社会人口统计学,训练数据,和算法偏差,破坏健康护理风险评估和医疗决策,应在卫生保健系统中解决。我们按性别对这些偏见进行了透视和概述,种族,种族,年龄,历史上被边缘化的社区,算法偏差,有偏见的评价,隐性偏见,选择/采样偏差,社会经济地位偏见,有偏差的数据分布,文化偏见和保险地位偏见,构象偏向,信息偏差和锚定偏差,并提出改进大型语言模型训练数据的建议,包括去偏见技术,例如知识蒸馏过程中的反事实角色颠倒句子,微调,培训时的前缀附件,使用毒性分类器,检索增强生成和算法修改,以减轻前进的偏见。
    Artificial intelligence models represented in machine learning algorithms are promising tools for risk assessment used to guide clinical and other health care decisions. Machine learning algorithms, however, may house biases that propagate stereotypes, inequities, and discrimination that contribute to socioeconomic health care disparities. The biases include those related to some sociodemographic characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender, age, insurance, and socioeconomic status from the use of erroneous electronic health record data. Additionally, there is concern that training data and algorithmic biases in large language models pose potential drawbacks. These biases affect the lives and livelihoods of a significant percentage of the population in the United States and globally. The social and economic consequences of the associated backlash cannot be underestimated. Here, we outline some of the sociodemographic, training data, and algorithmic biases that undermine sound health care risk assessment and medical decision-making that should be addressed in the health care system. We present a perspective and overview of these biases by gender, race, ethnicity, age, historically marginalized communities, algorithmic bias, biased evaluations, implicit bias, selection/sampling bias, socioeconomic status biases, biased data distributions, cultural biases and insurance status bias, conformation bias, information bias and anchoring biases and make recommendations to improve large language model training data, including de-biasing techniques such as counterfactual role-reversed sentences during knowledge distillation, fine-tuning, prefix attachment at training time, the use of toxicity classifiers, retrieval augmented generation and algorithmic modification to mitigate the biases moving forward.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号