Group Homes

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在员工支持下,为智障成年人提供共享住房,是国际上常见的住房模式。我们探索了集体住宅的一个被忽视的方面,即他们在多大程度上使居民有“宾至如归的感觉”。
    方法:由19个室友组成的多元化小组参加了一项photovoice研究。参与者在家中拍照,并在个人访谈和小组讨论中进行讨论。使用反身性主题分析对数据进行了分析。
    结果:居民的家庭体验是多维的。“在家的感觉”与家庭相关,作为身份培养的场所(个人家庭);身体舒适或“不适应”(物理家庭)和家庭作为关键关系的场所(社交家庭)。
    结论:要想获得一种“宾至如归”的感觉,就需要参与家庭制作的实践。我们的许多参与者需要员工的支持才能参与这些实践。对于一些室友来说,他们的家庭经历是有条件的和不稳定的。
    BACKGROUND: Shared housing for adults with intellectual disabilities with staff support, is a common housing model internationally. We explored an overlooked aspect of group homes, namely the extent to which they enable a sense of \'feeling at home\' for residents.
    METHODS: A diverse group of 19 housemates participated in a photovoice study. Participants took photos in their homes and discussed them in individual interviews and in groups. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Residents\' experience of home was multi-dimensional. \'Feeling at home\' related to home as a site of identity cultivation (personal home); physical comfort or \'misfitting\' (physical home) and home as the locus of key relationships (social home).
    CONCLUSIONS: Achieving a sense of \'feeling at home\' requires engagement in practices of home-making. Many of our participants required support from staff to engage in these practices. For some housemates their experience of home was conditional and precarious.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的研究将组织文化确定为与具有智力和发育障碍的团体家庭居民的生活质量结果相关的许多因素之一。本研究旨在阐述英格兰地区群体家庭文化的维度。
    方法:参与者的观察和对工作人员的半结构化访谈在两组家庭中进行。字段注释,采访笔记和成绩单进行了分析,使用归纳主题分析的研究人员天真的项目和以前的文献。在对先前文献中的理论模型敏感后,重新检查了初始编码,以确定最简约的拟合。对于每个维度,使用五点李克特量表对两种设置进行评级和比较。
    结果:这些发现描述了七个维度的群体家庭文化。不同方面的评级好坏参半,反映了员工实践中反映的文化不一致。在团体住宅中分配全球文化评级的挑战,其中包括随着时间的推移,多名员工和多名居民之间的互动,被突出显示。
    结论:文化观察措施的发展被强调为有智力和发育障碍的个人服务中的理解和应对文化可能有帮助。
    BACKGROUND: Previous research identifies organisational culture as one of a number of factors associated with the quality of life outcomes of group home residents\' with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This study aims to elaborate on the dimensions of group home culture in settings in England.
    METHODS: Participant observations and semi-structured interviews with staff were carried out in two group homes. Field-notes, interview notes and transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis by a researcher naïve to the project and the previous literature. Initial coding was re-examined after sensitisation to theorised models in previous literature to identify the most parsimonious fit. The two settings were rated and compared using a five-point Likert scale for each of the dimensions.
    RESULTS: The findings describe group home culture across seven dimensions. There were mixed ratings across the different dimensions reflecting inconsistencies in culture that were reflected in staff practice. The challenge in assigning a global rating of culture in group homes, which includes interactions across multiple staff and multiple residents over time, was highlighted.
    CONCLUSIONS: The development of an observational measure of culture is highlighted as potentially helpful in understanding and responding to culture in services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有严重精神疾病(SMI)和智力障碍/发育障碍(ID/DD)的人发生COVID-19的风险更高,结果更严重。我们比较了针对马萨诸塞州(MA)患有SMI或ID/DD的人群的团体住宅(GHs)中量身定制的最佳实践COVID-19预防计划和一般最佳实践预防计划。
    方法:一项混合有效性实施整群随机对照试验,比较了四个组成部分的实施策略(量身定制的最佳实践:TBP)与标准预防指南(一般最佳实践:GBP)在六个MA行为卫生机构的GH中传播。英镑由预防COVID-19的标准最佳实践组成。TBP包括英镑以及四个组成部分,其中包括:(1)关于疫苗接种益处的可信赖信使同伴推荐;(2)动机性访谈;(3)关于预防实践的交互式教育;(4)GHs的保真度反馈仪表板。主要实施结果是完整的COVID-19疫苗接种率(基线:2021年1月1日至2021年3月31日)和保真度评分(基线:5/1/21-7/30/21),间隔3个月至15个月随访,直至2022年10月。主要有效性结果是COVID-19感染(基线:2021年1月1日至2021年3月31日),每3个月至15个月随访一次。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线估计疫苗接种的累积发生率。Cox脆弱模型评估疫苗接种摄取和次要结局的差异。线性混合模型(LMM)和泊松广义线性混合模型(GLMM)用于评估保真度评分和COVID-19感染发生率的差异。
    结果:GHs(n=415)随机分为TBP(n=208)和GBP(n=207),包括3,836名居民(1,041ID/DD;2,795SMI)和5,538名工作人员。TBP和GBP之间的保真度评分或COVID-19发病率没有差异,然而TBP有更大的可接受性,适当性,和可行性。TBP和GBP之间没有发现疫苗接种率的总体差异。然而,在未接种疫苗的智障家庭居民中,非白人居民在15个月时TBP(28.6%)比GBP(14.4%)高出一倍,达到完全疫苗接种状态.此外,与非西班牙裔白人居民相比,非白人居民TBP对疫苗接种的影响超过2倍(非白人和非西班牙裔白人TBP的HR比:2.28,p=0.03).
    结论:量身定做的COVID-19预防策略作为一种可行和可接受的实施策略是有益的,有可能减少非白人精神残疾患者亚组之间疫苗接受度的差异。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04726371,2021年1月27日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04726371.
    BACKGROUND: People with serious mental illness (SMI) and people with intellectual disabilities/developmental disabilities (ID/DD) are at higher risk for COVID-19 and more severe outcomes. We compare a tailored versus general best practice COVID-19 prevention program in group homes (GHs) for people with SMI or ID/DD in Massachusetts (MA).
    METHODS: A hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized control trial compared a four-component implementation strategy (Tailored Best Practices: TBP) to dissemination of standard prevention guidelines (General Best-Practices: GBP) in GHs across six MA behavioral health agencies. GBP consisted of standard best practices for preventing COVID-19. TBP included GBP plus four components including: (1) trusted-messenger peer testimonials on benefits of vaccination; (2) motivational interviewing; (3) interactive education on preventive practices; and (4) fidelity feedback dashboards for GHs. Primary implementation outcomes were full COVID-19 vaccination rates (baseline: 1/1/2021-3/31/2021) and fidelity scores (baseline: 5/1/21-7/30/21), at 3-month intervals to 15-month follow-up until October 2022. The primary effectiveness outcome was COVID-19 infection (baseline: 1/1/2021-3/31/2021), measured every 3 months to 15-month follow-up. Cumulative incidence of vaccinations were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox frailty models evaluate differences in vaccination uptake and secondary outcomes. Linear mixed models (LMMs) and Poisson generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to evaluate differences in fidelity scores and incidence of COVID-19 infections.
    RESULTS: GHs (n=415) were randomized to TBP (n=208) and GBP (n=207) including 3,836 residents (1,041 ID/DD; 2,795 SMI) and 5,538 staff. No differences were found in fidelity scores or COVID-19 incidence rates between TBP and GBP, however TBP had greater acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. No overall differences in vaccination rates were found between TBP and GBP. However, among unvaccinated group home residents with mental disabilities, non-White residents achieved full vaccination status at double the rate for TBP (28.6%) compared to GBP (14.4%) at 15 months. Additionally, the impact of TBP on vaccine uptake was over two-times greater for non-White residents compared to non-Hispanic White residents (ratio of HR for TBP between non-White and non-Hispanic White: 2.28, p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: Tailored COVID-19 prevention strategies are beneficial as a feasible and acceptable implementation strategy with the potential to reduce disparities in vaccine acceptance among the subgroup of non-White individuals with mental disabilities.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04726371, 27/01/2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04726371 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:限制热量摄入和日常体育锻炼的严格方案在Prader-Willi综合征(PWS)中可以挽救生命,但在家庭环境中极具挑战性。PWS专业宿舍(SH)成功预防病态肥胖和应对行为障碍;但是,有限的生活环境对生活质量(QOL)的影响尚未描述。QOL的证据对于参与安置决定的临床医生至关重要。方法:我们研究了生活在SH与在家或非专业宿舍(H和NSH)对生活质量的影响,行为,和健康参数。包括在国家PWS多学科诊所随访的所有58名成年人(26名男性):33名居住在SH,18住在家里7住在NSH。对主要护理人员进行问卷调查,以测量生活质量,和数据是从医疗记录中获得的。结果:H和NSH组与成年SH组比较。尽管严格的饮食和运动方案,两组的QOL相似。八年随访表明,SH的寻食行为减少,而H和NSH的寻食行为增加。BMI,胆固醇,SH的甘油三酯水平较低。结论:我们的结果表明,生活在SH中与身体健康和行为的益处相关,而不会对生活质量产生负面影响。
    Background: Strict regimens of restricted caloric intake and daily physical exercise are life-saving in Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) but are extremely challenging in home environments. PWS-specialized hostels (SH) succeed in preventing morbid obesity and in coping with behavioral disorders; however, effects of restricted living environments on quality of life (QOL) have not been described. Evidence on QOL is critical for clinicians involved in placement decisions. Methods: We examined the impact of living in SH versus at home or in non-specialized hostels (H and NSH) on QOL, behavior, and health parameters. All 58 adults (26 males) followed-up in the National Multidisciplinary Clinic for PWS were included: 33 resided in SH, 18 lived at home, and 7 lived in NSH. Questionnaires were administered to primary caregivers to measure QOL, and data were obtained from the medical records. Results: The H and NSH group were compared with those for adults in SH. Despite strict diet and exercise regimens, QOL was similar for both groups. Eight-year follow-up showed that food-seeking behavior decreased in SH but increased in H and NSH. BMI, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were lower in SH. Conclusion: Our results suggest that living in SH is associated with benefits for physical health and behavior without negatively affecting QOL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:超过700万智力和/或发育障碍(ID/DD)的人生活在美国,可能面临COVID-19的高风险。
    目的:确定马萨诸塞州团体家庭中ID/DD患者中COVID-19与相关住院的相关性。
    方法:我们从马萨诸塞州公共卫生部和六个组织收集了2020年3月1日至2020年6月30日(第1波)和2020年7月1日至2021年3月31日(第2波)的数据,为1035名ID/DD居民管理206个团体房屋。主要结果是COVID-19感染和相关住院。我们拟合了多级Cox比例风险模型,以估计与观察到的预测因子的关联,并评估上下文家庭和组织层面的影响。
    结果:与马萨诸塞州居民相比,家庭居民群体在第1波中的COVID-19年龄校正率较高(发病率比[IRR],12.06;95%置信区间[CI],10.51-13.84)和第2波(IRR,2.47;95%CI,2.12-2.88)和第1波中COVID-19住院的年龄调整率较高(IRR,17.64;95%CI,12.59-24.70)和第2波(IRR,4.95;95%CI,3.23-7.60)。在65岁以上的居民和有6张以上居民床位的集体住宅中,COVID-19感染和住院的可能性更大,工作人员和居民最近感染。
    结论:积极努力降低居民密度,工作人员与居民的比率,和工作人员通过疫苗接种等努力感染,除了不断获得个人防护装备和COVID-19测试之外,可能会减少住在集体住宅中的有ID/DD的人的COVID-19和相关的住院治疗。
    BACKGROUND: More than seven million people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (ID/DD) live in the US and may face an elevated risk for COVID-19.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify correlates of COVID-19 and related hospitalizations among people with ID/DD in group homes in Massachusetts.
    METHODS: We collected data during March 1, 2020-June 30, 2020 (wave 1) and July 1, 2020-March 31, 2021 (wave 2) from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and six organizations administering 206 group homes for 1035 residents with ID/DD. The main outcomes were COVID-19 infections and related hospitalizations. We fit multilevel Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations with observed predictors and assess contextual home- and organizational-level effects.
    RESULTS: Compared with Massachusetts residents, group home residents had a higher age-adjusted rate of COVID-19 in wave 1 (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 12.06; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 10.51-13.84) and wave 2 (IRR, 2.47; 95 % CI, 2.12-2.88) and a higher age-adjusted rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations in wave 1 (IRR, 17.64; 95 % CI, 12.59-24.70) and wave 2 (IRR, 4.95; 95 % CI, 3.23-7.60). COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations were more likely among residents aged 65+ and in group homes with 6+ resident beds and recent infection among staff and residents.
    CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive efforts to decrease resident density, staff-to-resident ratios, and staff infections through efforts such as vaccination, in addition to ongoing access to personal protective equipment and COVID-19 testing, may reduce COVID-19 and related hospitalizations in people with ID/DD living in group homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于气候变化,线性降水系统引起的严重暴雨在日本更频繁地发生,居民被要求更频繁地撤离。这项研究的目的是确定与集体家庭中的精神健康疾病(PMHI)患者在撤离时披露其病情的意愿相关的因素。参与者是住在日本集体住宅中的PMHI。我们在以往研究的基础上进行了原始的匿名自我管理问卷。分析了119人的有效数据。与撤离时愿意向支持者披露疾病相关的因素是“我可以想象住在公共庇护所”(赔率[OR]4.50,95%置信区间[CI]:1.78-11.43),和“我与邻居交往”(或5.63,95%CI:1.74-18.22)。集体住宅的管理者应鼓励PMHI通过增加灾难培训和与当地居民互动的机会来想象疏散区的生活。与邻居交往的可能性较小的人应该特别小心,因为他们可能无法透露自己的病情,那些支持撤离人员的人应该特别注意这些人。
    Severe heavy rains caused by linear precipitation systems are occurring more frequently in Japan owing to climate change, and residents are being asked to evacuate more often. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the willingness of people with mental health illness (PMHI) in group homes to disclose their illness when being evacuated. Participants were PMHI living in group homes in Japan. We conducted an original anonymous self-administered questionnaire based on previous research. Valid data from 119 people were analyzed. Factors associated with the willingness to disclose illness to supporters upon evacuation were \"I can imagine living in a public shelter\" (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.50, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.78-11.43), and \"I socialize with neighbors\" (OR 5.63, 95% CI: 1.74-18.22). Managers of group homes should encourage PMHI to imagine life in an evacuation zone by increasing opportunities for disaster training and for interaction with local residents. People who are less likely to socialize with neighbors should be especially careful, as they may not be able to disclose their illness, and those who support evacuees should pay special attention to these people.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支持性住房计划,例如社区机遇之家(CHO),提供正式(非现场医疗保健提供者)和非正式(现场支持可有效减少不稳定的住房和无家可归。这项研究探讨了社区精神卫生机构工作人员对CHO经验的看法以及相关变化,以进一步改进该计划。我们采用了集中的人种学技术,从安大略省西南部的28个团体家庭中招募了47名代理人员,加拿大。焦点小组讨论在两个时间点进行(基线-2018年春季和实施后-2019年冬季)。在Leininger的人种学定性分析技术指导下的数据分析产生了三个主要主题和11个子主题。主要主题包括CHO的主持人,CHO实施面临的挑战,以及改进CHO计划的策略。总的来说,支持性住房模式已被发现是减少不稳定住房和结束有需要的人长期无家可归的有效途径,同时加强他们的社会融合。
    Supportive housing programs such as the Community Homes for Opportunity (CHO) that provide combined formal (off-site healthcare providers) and informal (on-site supports are effective in reducing erratic housing and homelessness. This study explored the views of the Community Mental Health Agency staff on their experiences with the CHO and related changes for further improvement of the program. We applied focused ethnographic techniques to recruit 47 agency staff from 28 group homes in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Focus group discussions were conducted at two-time points (baseline-spring 2018 and post-implementation - winter 2019). Data analysis guided by Leininger\'s ethnographic qualitative analysis techniques produced three main themes and 11 subthemes themes. The main themes include facilitators of CHO, challenges to the CHO implementation, and strategies for improving the CHO program. Overall, supportive housing models have been found to constitute an effective pathway to reducing precarious housing and ending chronic homelessness for those in need while enhancing their social integration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国有智力和发育障碍(IDD)的人,尤其是那些住在集体住宅中的人,在大流行的第一年,新冠肺炎病例/病例死亡率高于普通人群。没有关于这段时间内病例/病例死亡率模式的信息。
    目的:这项研究比较了纽约州(NYS)大流行第一年居住在住宅中的IDD患者与普通人群的Covid-19病例/病例死亡率。
    方法:从纽约残疾人倡导者(NYDA)收集的Covid-19阳性病例和死亡病例,一个为患有IDD的个人服务的组织联盟,与纽约大流行第一年普通人群的数据进行了比较。计算研究期间的病例率/100,000和病死率。使用Joinpoint趋势分析软件分析每周病例/病例死亡率的模式。
    结果:在大流行的第一年,IDD患者的病死率高于整个州人群。今年大部分时间,IDD患者的病例率较高。尽管费率模式相似,在2020年秋季,从NYS普通人群开始的八周前,IDD患者的病例急剧增加,从2020年12月下旬到2021年1月,死亡人数显着下降。
    结论:居住在集体住宅中的IDD患者的病死率持续升高和病死率的显著差异需要进一步考虑。规划未来的紧急情况将需要加强联邦/州对患有IDD的人的需求的了解以及响应迅速的监视系统。
    BACKGROUND: People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in the US, especially those living in group homes, experienced comparatively higher Covid-19 case/case fatality rates than the general population during the first year of the pandemic. There is no information about the patterns of case/case fatality rates during this time.
    OBJECTIVE: This study compared Covid-19 case/case fatality rates among people with IDD living in residential group homes to the general population across the first year of the pandemic in New York State (NYS).
    METHODS: Covid-19 positive cases and deaths collected from New York Disability Advocates (NYDA), a coalition of organizations serving individuals with IDD, was compared to data for the NYS general population from the first pandemic year. Case rates/100,000 and case fatality rates were calculated for the study period. Joinpoint Trend Analysis Software was used to analyze patterns in weekly case/case fatality rates.
    RESULTS: Case fatality rates for people with IDD were higher than for the overall state population throughout the pandemic\'s first year. Case rates were higher among people with IDD across most of this year. Although the patterns in rates were similar, there was a sharp increase in cases for those with IDD during Fall 2020 beginning eight weeks before the general NYS population and a significant decrease in fatalities in late December 2020 into January 2021.
    CONCLUSIONS: Consistently higher case fatality rates and significant differences in case/case fatality rates for people with IDD living in group homes require further consideration. Planning for future emergencies will require an enhanced federal/state understanding of the needs of people with IDD and a responsive surveillance system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究考察了依恋故事完成之间的关联,如通过代表性依恋度量所评估的,和心理理论(ToM)中的204名4至6岁的社会经济弱势儿童生活在三种不同的土耳其环境中:季节性移民农业工人(SMAW)社区,住宅团体住宅(RGHs),和农村。发现依恋故事完成和ToM与儿童生活的不同环境有关。在SMAW社区,更多的儿童表现出不安全的显性依恋,只有四分之一的人具有牢固的优势依恋。RGHs中约有一半的孩子没有安全感。然而,大多数乡村儿童表现出安全的主导依恋。此外,无论上下文如何,安全显性依恋被发现对儿童的ToM有实质性的积极影响。研究结果表明,为解决情感需求和支持认知技能而量身定制的早期干预计划可能是在这些情况下帮助儿童的最有效方法。
    This study examines the association between attachment story-completions, as evaluated by a representational attachment measure, and theory of mind (ToM) among 204 socioeconomically disadvantaged children aged four to six years living in three distinct Turkish contexts: Seasonal migrant agricultural worker (SMAW) communities, residential group homes (RGHs), and rural villages. Attachment story-completions and ToM were found to be related to the distinct contexts children were living in. In the SMAW communities, higher number of children showed insecure dominant attachment, with only one in four having secure dominant attachment. About half of the children in the RGHs had insecure dominant attachment. However, the majority of village children exhibited secure dominant attachment. Furthermore, irrespective of the context, secure dominant attachment was found to have a substantial positive influence on children\'s ToM. Findings suggest that early intervention programs tailored to address emotional needs and support cognitive skills may be the most effective in helping children in these contexts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:睡眠-觉醒问题和抑郁症状在智障(ID)人群中很常见,并且被认为与该人群的不稳定睡眠-觉醒节律有关。以前,我们表明,在增加环境光线照射后,睡眠中期和睡眠发作提前,在有身份证的人的客厅安装环境动态灯装置后,情绪在14周内得到改善。我们邀请该短期研究的参与者参加当前关于睡眠-觉醒节律的研究,在六组房屋的公共客厅中安装环境动态灯装置1年后,有ID的老年人的情绪和行为。
    方法:2017年10月至2019年2月进行了一项研究。我们包括45名参与者(63.5±8.5年,67%的女性)来自六组家庭设施,他们在基线时(在安装照明装置之前的9、4和1周)提供数据,短期(安装照明装置后3、7和14周)和1年(安装照明装置后54周)。用动记法(GENEActiv)测量手腕活动,以得出睡眠-觉醒节律和睡眠估计的每日稳定性的主要结果。情绪是用焦虑来衡量的,抑郁和情绪量表。使用异常行为检查表测量行为。
    结果:安装动态照明一年后,我们没有发现日常稳定性的变化。总睡眠时间减少(β=-25.40分钟;置信区间:-10.99,-39.82),睡眠起效时间延迟(β=25.63min;置信区间:11.18,40.08)。没有发现对情绪或行为的影响。
    结论:我们没有发现睡眠-觉醒节律的变化,安装灯1年后,居住在护理设施中的有身份证的老年人的情绪或行为。我们确实找到了对睡眠时间和睡眠时间有长期影响的证据。由于目前的研究参与者数量有限,因此必须谨慎解释结果。显然,需要对ID设置中增强环境光的长期影响进行更多研究。
    BACKGROUND: Sleep-wake problems and depressive symptoms are common in people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) and are thought to be related to the unstable sleep-wake rhythm in this population. Previously, we showed that after increasing environmental light exposure, mid-sleep and sleep onset advanced, and mood improved over a period of 14 weeks after installing environmental dynamic light installations in the living room of people with IDs. We invited participants of that short-term study to take part in the current study on sleep-wake rhythm, mood and behaviour in older adults with IDs 1 year after installing environmental dynamic light installations in the common living rooms of six group homes.
    METHODS: A pre-post study was performed from October 2017 to February 2019. We included 45 participants (63.5 ± 8.5 years, 67% female) from six group home facilities who provided data at baseline (9, 4 and 1 weeks prior to installing light installations), short term (3, 7 and 14 weeks after installing light installations) and 1 year (54 weeks after installing light installations). Wrist activity was measured with actigraphy (GENEActiv) to derive the primary outcome of interdaily stability of sleep-wake rhythms as well as sleep estimates. Mood was measured with the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale. Behaviour was measured with the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist.
    RESULTS: One year after installing dynamic lighting, we did not find a change in interdaily stability. Total sleep time decreased (β = -25.40 min; confidence interval: -10.99, -39.82), and sleep onset time was delayed (β = 25.63 min; confidence interval: 11.18, 40.08). No effect on mood or behaviour was found.
    CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a change in sleep-wake rhythm, mood or behaviour in older persons with IDs living in care facilities 1 year after installing the light. We did find evidence for a long-term effect on sleep duration and sleep timing. The results have to be interpreted with care as the current study had a limited number of participants. The need for more research on the long-term effects of enhancing environmental light in ID settings is evident.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号