Glycaemic control

血糖控制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估强化血糖控制对糖尿病患者牙周组织的直接影响。
    方法:29例2型糖尿病患者被纳入并住院接受为期2周的强化血糖控制方案。观察并分析治疗前后全身及口腔疾病指标,明确与牙周炎症相关的指标。
    结果:血糖和牙周参数显着降低,包括糖化白蛋白水平和牙周发炎表面积(PISA),治疗后观察。每颗牙齿的PISA变化,指示牙周愈合,表现出双峰分布;在此基础上将患者分为两组。观察到每颗牙齿的PISA变化与空腹血糖之间的相关性。乙酰乙酸,和β-羟丁酸水平在PISA改善组。显著降低C肽水平,R-R区间的变异系数,PISA未改善组治疗前观察踝臂压指数。
    结论:血糖控制治疗能有效改善2型糖尿病患者的牙周炎,即使没有特定的牙周治疗。然而,牙周对血糖控制治疗的反应性取决于患者的全身状况。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the direct effect of intensive glycaemic control on periodontal tissues in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled and hospitalized to receive a 2-week intensive glycaemic control regimen. We observed and analysed the systemic and oral disease indicators before and after treatment and clarified the indicators related to periodontal inflammation.
    RESULTS: A significant reduction in glycaemic and periodontal parameters, including glycated albumin levels and periodontal inflamed surface area (PISA), was observed after treatment. The changes in PISA per tooth, indicative of periodontal healing, exhibited a bimodal distribution; the patients were divided into two groups on this basis. Correlations were observed between the changes in PISA per tooth and fasting plasma glucose, acetoacetic acid, and beta-hydroxybutyrate levels in the PISA-improved group. Significantly lower levels of C-peptide, coefficient of variation of R-R interval, and ankle-brachial pressure index were observed before treatment in the PISA non-improved group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic control treatment can effectively improve periodontitis in patients with type 2 diabetes, even in the absence of specific periodontal treatments. However, the periodontal responsiveness to glycaemic control treatment depends on the systemic condition of the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:进行系统评价和荟萃分析,在医疗器械协调研究和证据(CORE-MD)项目中,评估CE标记的用于葡萄糖管理的高风险设备。
    方法:我们确定了评估八种自动胰岛素给药(AID)系统的有效性和安全性的介入和观察性研究。两个可植入的胰岛素泵,和三个植入式连续血糖监测(CGM)设备。我们荟萃分析了比较AID系统与其他治疗方法的随机对照试验(RCT)。
    结果:共纳入了2009年至2024年间发表的182项研究,包括166项关于AID系统的研究,胰岛素泵上有六个,在CGM设备上有10个;26%报告了行业资金;18%是上市前的;37%有比较组。在确定的研究中,29%是RCT,24%是非随机试验,47%是观察性研究。中位数(四分位数范围)样本量为48(28-102),年龄34.8(14-44.2)岁,和研究持续时间17.5(12-26)周。AID系统使糖化血红蛋白降低了0.5个百分点(绝对平均差[MD]=-0.5;21个RCT;I2=86%),并使传感器葡萄糖水平的目标范围内的时间增加了13.4个百分点(MD=13.4;14个RCT;I2=90%)。在71%的研究中评估了至少一个安全性结果。
    结论:用于血糖监测或胰岛素给药的高风险设备,特别是AID系统,安全地改善血糖控制,但由于研究时间较短,缺乏糖尿病相关终末器官损伤的证据.方法学异质性突出表明,需要为糖尿病特异性高风险医疗设备的未来上市前和上市后调查制定标准。
    OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, within the Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices (CORE-MD) project, evaluating CE-marked high-risk devices for glucose management.
    METHODS: We identified interventional and observational studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of eight automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, two implantable insulin pumps, and three implantable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices. We meta-analysed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID systems with other treatments.
    RESULTS: A total of 182 studies published between 2009 and 2024 were included, comprising 166 studies on AID systems, six on insulin pumps, and 10 on CGM devices; 26% reported industry funding; 18% were pre-market; 37% had a comparator group. Of the studies identified, 29% were RCTs, 24% were non-randomized trials, and 47% were observational studies. The median (interquartile range) sample size was 48 (28-102), age 34.8 (14-44.2) years, and study duration 17.5 (12-26) weeks. AID systems lowered glycated haemoglobin by 0.5 percentage points (absolute mean difference [MD] = -0.5; 21 RCTs; I2 = 86%) and increased time in target range for sensor glucose level by 13.4 percentage points (MD = 13.4; 14 RCTs; I2 = 90%). At least one safety outcome was assessed in 71% of studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: High-risk devices for glucose monitoring or insulin dosing, in particular AID systems, improve glucose control safely, but evidence on diabetes-related end-organ damage is lacking due to short study durations. Methodological heterogeneity highlights the need for developing standards for future pre- and post-market investigations of diabetes-specific high-risk medical devices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨自我管理教育结合短信支持(SME-TMS)对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。
    方法:随机,对照试验。
    方法:将来自两个社区的患者随机分为干预组(n=53)或对照组(n=52)。为期六个月的干预包括文化定制的糖尿病教育和行为改变的短信支持。对照组照常接受治疗。主要结果是6个月非干预随访时HbA1c和空腹血糖降低。次要结果是体重减轻,体重指数(BMI),血压,总胆固醇(TC),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,身体活动,和健康信仰。
    结果:干预措施导致每周体力活动天数大幅增加(42%vs.0%,P<0.001)和健康信念(系数=7.0,95%置信区间[CI]:4.4至9.6,P<0.001)。然而,在干预后6个月,HbA1c没有发现更大的下降,与对照组相比(0.13%,95%CI:-0.20至0.46,P=0.443)。血压的降低,TC,对照组和LDL-C均高于干预组(均P<0.050)。在干预组中,参与者的BMI显着降低,而对照组的TC和LDL-C降低幅度更大(均P<0.050)。
    结论:SME-TMS干预导致老年患者在6个月随访时每周体力活动和健康信念评分比常规护理有更大的增加。需要进一步的研究来确定这些益处如何转化为有利的中长期血糖控制。
    背景:本研究在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2300075112)注册。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of self-management education integrated with text-message support (SME-TMS) on glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
    METHODS: a randomized, controlled trial.
    METHODS: Patients from two communities were randomized into the intervention group (n = 53) or the control group (n = 52). The six-month intervention included the culturally tailored diabetes education and text-messaging support for behaviour changes. The control group received treatment as usual. The primary outcome was reductions in HbA1c and fasting blood glucose at six-month non-intervention follow-up. Secondary outcomes were reductions in body weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, physical activity, and health beliefs.
    RESULTS: The intervention led to substantially increase days of weekly physical activity (42% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) and health beliefs (coefficient = 7.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.4 to 9.6, P < 0.001). However, no greater reduction was found in HbA1c at six months after the intervention, compared with the control group (0.13%, 95% CI: -0.20 to 0.46, P = 0.443). The reductions of blood pressure, TC, and LDL-C were greater in the control group than in the intervention group (all P < 0.050). Within the intervention group, participants had significant reduction in BMI, whereas the control group had greater reductions in TC and LDL-C (all P < 0.050).
    CONCLUSIONS: The SME-TMS intervention led to a greater increase in the weekly physical activity and health belief score in the older patients at 6-month follow-up than with the usual care. Further research is needed to ascertain how these benefits could be translated into favorable medium-and long-term glycaemic control.
    BACKGROUND: This study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300075112).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨曼凯的作用,一种栽培的水生浮萍绿色植物,2型糖尿病(T2D)的餐后葡萄糖(PG)偏移。
    方法:在4周内,随机交叉对照试验,我们纳入了45名来自以色列两个地点的T2D成年人(HbA1c范围:6.5%-8.5%)。参与者被随机分配饮用Mankai(200mL生鲜水生植物+100mL水,40千卡,约10克干物质当量)或晚餐后的水(300毫升),每个两周,有4天的冲洗间隔,没有饮食,身体活动或药物治疗改变。我们使用连续血糖监测(CGM)设备。
    结果:40名患者(依从性=88.5%;743人干预天数,68.9%男性,年龄=64岁,HbA1c=6.8%)以一致的饮食和完整的CGM读数完成研究。只有三分之二的人对Mankai做出了有益的回应。总的来说,Mankai将PG峰值显着降低了19.3%(取决于峰值=24.3±16.8与30.1±18.5mg/dL;P<.001),并将达到峰值的时间延迟了20.0%(112.5[四分位距:75-135]vs.90[60-105]min;P<.001)与水相比。曼凯晚宴后,PG的倾斜和下降坡度较浅(倾斜坡度:16.8vs.水:29.9mg/[dLh];P<.001;下降斜率:-6.1vs.水:-7.9mg/[dLh];P<0.01)。与水相比,Mankai的平均餐后净增量葡萄糖曲线下面积降低了20.1%(P=0.03)。在几个敏感性和亚组分析中,结果是一致的,包括抗糖尿病药物治疗组。2周内,Mankai组的甘油三酯/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(-0.5±1.3)与水(0.3±1.5,P=0.05)相比降低。
    结论:Mankai消费可以减轻T2D患者的PG反应,血糖值改善约20%。这些发现为T2D中基于植物的治疗提供了案例研究证据,以补充健康的生活方式和药物治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of Mankai, a cultivated aquatic duckweed green plant, on postprandial glucose (PG) excursions in type 2 diabetes (T2D).
    METHODS: In a 4-week, randomized crossover-controlled trial, we enrolled 45 adults with T2D (HbA1c range: 6.5%-8.5%) from two sites in Israel. Participants were randomized to drink Mankai (200 mL of raw-fresh-aquatic plant + 100 mL of water, 40 kcal, ~10 g of dry matter equivalent) or water (300 mL) following dinner, for 2 weeks each, with a 4-day washout interval, without dietary, physical activity or pharmacotherapy alterations. We used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices.
    RESULTS: Forty patients (adherence rate = 88.5%; 743 person-intervention-days, 68.9% men, age = 64 years, HbA1c = 6.8%) completed the study with a consistent diet and complete CGM reads. Only two-thirds of the individuals responded beneficially to Mankai. Overall, Mankai significantly lowered the PG peak by 19.3% (∆peak = 24.3 ± 16.8 vs. 30.1 ± 18.5 mg/dL; P < .001) and delayed the time-to-peak by 20.0% (112.5 [interquartile range: 75-135] vs. 90 [60-105] min; P < .001) compared with water. The PG incline and decline slopes were shallower following postdinner Mankai (incline slope: 16.8 vs. water: 29.9 mg/[dL h]; P < .001; decline slope: -6.1 vs. water: -7.9 mg/[dL h]; P < .01). Mean postprandial net incremental area-under-the-glucose-curve was lowered by 20.1% with Mankai compared with water (P = .03). Results were consistent across several sensitivity and subgroup analyses, including across antidiabetic pharmacotherapy treatment groups. Within 2 weeks, the triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in the Mankai group (-0.5 ± 1.3) decreased versus water (+0.3 ± 1.5, P = .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Mankai consumption may mitigate the PG response in people with T2D with an ~20% improvement in glycaemic values. These findings provide case-study evidence for plant-based treatments in T2D to complement a healthy lifestyle and pharmacotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童/青少年1型糖尿病(T1D)从儿科到成人糖尿病护理(TPA)的转变代表了一个独特的挑战,并且仍然是T1D护理途径的关键阶段。本研究旨在从参与者的角度描述和理解生活在法国患有T1D的年轻人的过渡过程的经验,并衡量他们的满意度。
    方法:在全球在线参与者社区平台上向法国的T1D患者提供了在线问卷。问卷是由包括儿科和成人糖尿病专家在内的科学委员会开发的,并由一组参与者完善。对答复进行了专题定性分析。
    结果:共有104名受访者被纳入调查(平均年龄24.4岁[95%CI23.8-25.0];61.5%女性)。过渡时的平均年龄为18.4岁(95%CI17.8-18.9),56%的受访者在同一机构进行了首次成人糖尿病学随访。在TPA期间,在经历过个人问题的76名参与者中,74%的人在过渡后的几个月中经历了至少一个糖尿病管理问题。在接下来的几个月里,61%的人在过渡后监测糖尿病时遇到了新的或意外的问题,44%的人报告了不寻常的血糖失衡。包括需要住院治疗的低血糖(8%)和高血糖(9%)。TPA期间个人问题的存在与糖尿病管理或血糖失衡的问题的发生显着相关。成功过渡的三个因素是(i)与成人糖尿病护理团队的早期会面,(ii)让参与者选择合适的年龄离开儿科诊所,以及(iii)在TPA过程开始时具有良好的糖尿病控制。
    结论:大多数患有T1D的年轻人报告在TPA周围出现问题,对他们的疾病管理产生重大影响。因此,有必要识别这些问题,以更好地支持这些问题,并在这一阶段改善糖尿病管理.
    BACKGROUND: The transition from paediatric to adult diabetes care (TPA) of children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) represents a unique challenge and remains a critical phase in the T1D care pathway. This study aims to describe and understand the experience of the transition process from a participant\'s perspective in young adults who are living in France with T1D and to measure their satisfaction.
    METHODS: An online questionnaire was presented to people with T1D in France on a global online participant community platform. The questionnaire was developed by a scientific committee including paediatric and adult diabetologists and refined by a group of participants. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed on the responses.
    RESULTS: A total of 104 respondents were included in the survey (mean age 24.4 years [95% CI 23.8-25.0]; 61.5% female). The mean age at the time of transition was 18.4 years (95% CI 17.8-18.9), and 56% of respondents had their first adult diabetology follow-up in the same institution. During TPA, of the 76 participants who experienced personal issues, 74% experienced at least one issue with their diabetes management in the months following the transition. In the following months, 61% experienced new or unexpected problems in monitoring their diabetes after transition and 44% reported unusual glycaemic imbalances, including hypoglycaemia (8%) and hyperglycaemia (9%) requiring hospitalisation. Presence of personal issues during TPA was significantly associated with occurrence of problems with diabetes management or glycaemic imbalance. Three factors identified for a successful transition were (i) early meeting with the \'adult\' diabetes care team, (ii) letting the participants choose the right age to leave paediatric clinic and (iii) having good diabetes control at the beginning of the TPA process.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most young adults with T1D report experiencing issues around TPA with significant consequences on their disease management. Hence, it is necessary to identify these issues to better support them and improve diabetes management during this phase.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在中国社区居住的成年人中,研究饮茶(频率和类型)与(1)糖尿病前期和糖尿病以及(2)尿葡萄糖和钠排泄的关系。
    方法:在1923名参与者(457名糖尿病患者,720患有前驱糖尿病,和746血糖正常),频率(偶尔,频繁,daily,或无)和类型(绿色,黑色,黑暗,或其他)的茶消费量使用标准化问卷进行评估。晨点尿葡萄糖和尿葡萄糖与肌酐之比(UGCR)被评估为尿葡萄糖排泄的标志物。田中方程用于估计24小时尿钠排泄。进行Logistic和多元线性回归分析。
    结果:与非饮茶者相比,每天喝茶的参与者中,糖尿病前期和糖尿病的相应多变量校正比值比(OR)分别为0.63(95%置信区间[CI]0.48,0.83)和0.58(95%CI0.41,0.82).然而,仅饮用黑茶与糖尿病前期(0.49,95%CI0.36,0.66)和糖尿病(0.41,95%CI0.28,0.62)的OR降低相关.黑茶消费与晨斑尿糖升高相关(0.22mmol/L,95%CI0.11,0.34mmol/L),UGCR(0.15mmol/mmol,95%CI0.05,0.25mmol/L)和估计的24小时尿钠(7.78mEq/天,95%CI2.27,13.28mEq/天)。
    结论:经常喝茶,尤其是黑茶,在中国社区居住的成年人中,与血糖异常和尿葡萄糖和钠排泄增加的风险降低相关。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of tea consumption (both frequency and type) with (1) prediabetes and diabetes and (2) urinary glucose and sodium excretion in Chinese community-dwelling adults.
    METHODS: In 1923 participants (457 with diabetes, 720 with prediabetes, and 746 with normoglycaemia), the frequency (occasional, frequent, daily, or nil) and type (green, black, dark, or other) of tea consumption were assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Morning spot urinary glucose and urine glucose-to-creatinine ratios (UGCRs) were assessed as markers of urinary glucose excretion. Tanaka\'s equation was used to estimate 24-h urinary sodium excretion. Logistic and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed.
    RESULTS: Compared with non-tea drinkers, the corresponding multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for prediabetes and diabetes were 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48, 0.83) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.41, 0.82) in participants drinking tea daily. However, only drinking dark tea was associated with reduced ORs for prediabetes (0.49, 95% CI 0.36, 0.66) and diabetes (0.41, 95% CI 0.28, 0.62). Dark tea consumption was associated with increased morning spot urinary glucose (0.22 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.11, 0.34 mmol/L), UGCR (0.15 mmol/mmol, 95% CI 0.05, 0.25 mmol/L) and estimated 24-h urinary sodium (7.78 mEq/day, 95% CI 2.27, 13.28 mEq/day).
    CONCLUSIONS: Regular tea consumption, especially dark tea, is associated with a reduced risk of dysglycaemia and increased urinary glucose and sodium excretion in Chinese community-dwelling adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:自胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)的引入以来,2型糖尿病的治疗在过去的二十年中取得了进展。然而,多种因素可能会干扰实现更好的血糖控制。本研究评估了各种GLP-1RA在疗效上的差异,坚持和坚持。
    方法:我们使用ClalitHealthServices的电子医学数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。包括在2009年至2021年之间购买任何GLP-1RA的2型糖尿病成年人。索引日期定义为首次购买任何GLP-1RA的日期。我们评估了依从性,GLP-1RAs启动后的持久性和血糖控制。分析基线血糖和治疗后血糖对照。
    结果:总计,包括70654名患者。平均年龄为11.7±60.4,女性占51%。在所有接受GLP-1RA的患者中观察到糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)显著降低。然而,每周GLP-1RA的HbA1c变化百分比高于每日起始者(14.6%vs.10.2%,p<0.001)。与每日剂量相比,每周一次HbA1c下降的受试者比例较高(82.4%vs.74.7%),主要是患者开始使用司马鲁肽或杜拉鲁肽,分别减少16.0%和14.7%。在每周组比值比=1.25(95%置信区间1.21-1.28)中,良好依从性的频率(覆盖天数的比例≥80%)明显更高。据报道,老年人的依从性良好,女性性别,犹太种族和较高的社会经济地位(p<0.001)。
    结论:每周的GLP-1RAs起始剂更有依附性,坚持治疗,并获得更好的血糖控制。流行病学变量可能在实现这一目标方面发挥作用。
    OBJECTIVE: The management of type 2 diabetes mellitus has advanced in the last two decades since the introduction of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). However, multiple factors may interfere with achieving better glycaemic control. This study evaluated the differences between various GLP-1RAs in efficacy, adherence and persistence.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical database from Clalit Health Services. Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who purchased any GLP-1RA between 2009 and 2021 were included. The Index Date was defined as the date of the first purchase of any GLP-1RA. We evaluated the adherence, persistence and glycaemic control after GLP-1RAs initiation. Baseline glycaemic and post-treatment glycaemic controls were analysed.
    RESULTS: In total, 70 654 patients were included. The mean age was 11.7 ± 60.4, and 51% were females. A significant reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was observed in all patients who received GLP-1RAs. However, the percentage of changes in the HbA1c was higher among weekly GLP-1RA than daily initiators (14.6% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.001). The proportion of subjects with any decrease in HbA1c was higher among the once-weekly compared with the daily dose (82.4% vs. 74.7%) and mainly patients initiated semaglutide or dulaglutide, with 16.0% and 14.7% reduction. The frequency of good adherence (the proportion of days covered ≥80%) was significantly higher among the weekly group odds ratio = 1.25 (95% confidence interval 1.21-1.28). Good adherence was reported in older age, female gender, Jewish ethnicity and high socio-economic status (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Weekly GLP-1RAs initiators were more adherent, persistent to therapy and achieved better glycaemic control. Epidemiological variables might play a role in achieving this goal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了自我报告的糖尿病,血糖控制,通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平测量,美国成年人中未经治疗的根面龋齿,探讨糖尿病状态和血糖控制水平对根龋风险的影响。
    方法:分析2015年至2018年国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据,我们包括7490名30岁及以上的参与者。我们调查了自我报告的糖尿病,血糖控制,和未经处理的根面龋齿,调整人口统计学和健康相关变量。加权逻辑回归模型通过糖尿病状态和HbA1c截止值(6.5-9%)估计未经治疗的根龋几率,适应人口统计,健康行为,BMI,饮食,口腔健康因素。
    结果:发现较高的HbA1c水平与未经处理的根龋风险增加之间存在显着关联(比值比[OR]:1.11,95%CI:1.01-1.22,p<.05)。在调整HbA1c和其他因素后,自我报告的糖尿病与未经治疗的根癌没有显着联系。糖尿病参与者的血糖控制阈值(HbA1c≥8%)与未经治疗的根面龋的几率较高相关。
    结论:在美国成年人中,控制不佳的糖尿病似乎与未经治疗的根部龋齿有关。这突出了血糖控制与自我报告的糖尿病对牙齿健康的更大影响,并且需要对血糖控制不佳的患者进行定期口腔筛查。
    OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association between self-reported diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control, measured by glycohaemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and untreated root caries among U.S. adults, exploring the impact of diabetes status and glycaemic control levels on root caries risk.
    METHODS: Analysing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015 to 2018, we included 7490 participants aged 30 and above. We investigated the association between self-reported diabetes, glycaemic control, and untreated root caries, adjusting for demographic and health-related variables. Weighted logistic regression models estimated untreated root caries odds by diabetes status and HbA1c cutoffs (6.5-9%), adjusting for demographics, health behaviours, BMI, diet, oral health factors.
    RESULTS: A significant association was found between higher HbA1c levels and an increased risk of untreated root caries (odds ratio [OR]: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.22, p < .05). Self-reported diabetes was not significantly linked to untreated root caries after adjusting for HbA1c and other factors. Glycaemic control thresholds (HbA1c ≥8%) among diabetic participants were associated with higher odds of untreated root caries.
    CONCLUSIONS: Poorly controlled diabetes appears to be associated with untreated root caries among U.S. adults. This highlights the greater impact of glycaemic control versus self-reported diabetes on dental health and the need for regular oral screenings for patients with poor glycaemic control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定1型糖尿病成人亚组,并在5年的随访中分析其治疗途径和糖尿病相关并发症的风险。
    方法:我们使用T1DCexchange注册表(n=6,302)进行了k均值聚类分析,以根据人口统计学和临床特征识别亚组。年度重新评估将治疗轨迹与这些集群联系起来,考虑药物和技术的使用。使用Cox回归分析并发症风险。
    结果:确定了五组:1)所有变量的有利组合(31.67%);2)更长的糖尿病持续时间(22.63%);3)更高的HbA1c水平(13.28%);4)更高的BMI(15.25%);5)诊断年龄更大(17.17%)。每年有三分之二的患者留在他们的初始群。技术的采用表明,随着时间的推移,血糖控制得到了改善。Cox比例风险显示不同的风险模式:1组并发症风险低;2组视网膜病变风险最高,冠状动脉疾病和自主神经病变;第3组蛋白尿的风险最高,抑郁症和糖尿病酮症酸中毒;第4组增加了多种并发症的风险;第5组高血压和严重低血糖的风险最高。冠状动脉疾病风险升高。
    结论:临床特征可以确定T1DM患者的亚组,在随访期间显示治疗和并发症的差异。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify subgroups of adults with type 1 diabetes and analyse their treatment pathways and risk of diabetes-related complications over a 5-year follow-up.
    METHODS: We performed a k-means cluster analysis using the T1DExchange Registry (n = 6,302) to identify subgroups based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Annual reassessments linked treatment trajectories with these clusters, considering drug and technology use. Complication risks were analysed using Cox regression.
    RESULTS: Five clusters were identified: 1) A favourable combination of all variables (31.67 %); 2) Longer diabetes duration (22.63 %); 3) Higher HbA1c levels (13.28 %); 4) Higher BMI (15.25 %); 5) Older age at diagnosis (17.17 %). Two-thirds of patients remained in their initial cluster annually. Technology adoption showed improved glycaemic control over time. Cox proportional hazards showed different risk patterns: Cluster 1 had low complication risk; Cluster 2 had the highest risk for retinopathy, coronary artery disease and autonomic neuropathy; Cluster 3 had the highest risk for albuminuria, depression and diabetic ketoacidosis; Cluster 4 had increased risk for multiple complications; Cluster 5 had the highest risk for hypertension and severe hypoglycaemia, with elevated coronary artery disease risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics can identify subgroups of patients with T1DM showing differences in treatment and complications during follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号