■猫科动物(家猫和野猫)的钩端螺旋体病对我们的理解提出了持续的挑战。许多研究报道了钩端螺旋体的检测。在这些猫科动物中,突出了它们作为人畜共患携带者的潜力。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在深入了解家猫和野猫钩端螺旋体病的全球流行情况。
■我们在五个数据库中进行了广泛的搜索(PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,科学直接,和GoogleScholar)遵循系统评论和荟萃分析协议指南的首选报告项目。使用R软件4.3.0版进行随机效应荟萃分析,以估计合并患病率。亚组荟萃分析基于大陆,诊断方法,样品类型,和野猫属。
■共有71篇关于家猫钩端螺旋体病的文章和23篇关于野猫钩端螺旋体病的文章符合资格标准。我们的研究结果表明,与感染患病率相比,家猫钩端螺旋体病的合并血清阳性率明显更高(9.95%[95%置信区间(CI),7.60%-12.54%]与4.62%[95%CI,2.10%-7.83%],p=0.01)。相比之下,野猫的合并血清阳性率和感染率没有显着差异(13.38%[95%CI,6.25%-21.93%]与2.9%[95%CI,0.00%-18.91%],p=0.21)。家猫的亚组荟萃分析显示,各大洲的血清阳性率存在显着差异,样品类型,和诊断方法。相反,野猫在任何亚组中都没有显着差异。
■钩端螺旋体属。显然已经接触过家猫和野猫,强调它们作为钩端螺旋体病的水库宿主的潜在作用。这些发现强调了将felids视为可能的公共卫生威胁的重要性。
UNASSIGNED: Leptospirosis in felids (domestic and wild cats) presents an ongoing challenge in our understanding. Numerous studies have reported the detection of Leptospira spp. in these feline populations, highlighting their potential as zoonotic carriers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide insight into the global prevalence of leptospirosis in domestic and wild cats.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted extensive searches across five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Google Scholar) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols guidelines. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed using R software version 4.3.0 to estimate pooled prevalence rates. Subgroup meta-analyses were conducted based on continents, diagnostic methods, sample types, and wildcat genera.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 71 articles on leptospirosis in domestic cats and 23 articles on leptospirosis in wild cats met the eligibility criteria. Our findings indicated a significantly higher pooled seroprevalence of leptospirosis in domestic cats compared with infection prevalence (9.95% [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.60%-12.54%] vs. 4.62% [95% CI, 2.10%-7.83%], p = 0.01). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in pooled seroprevalence and infection prevalence among wild cats (13.38% [95% CI, 6.25%-21.93%] vs. 2.9% [95% CI, 0.00%-18.91%], p = 0.21). A subgroup meta-analysis of domestic cats revealed significant differences in seroprevalence across continents, sample types, and diagnostic methods. On the contrary, wild cats had no significant differences in any of the subgroups.
UNASSIGNED: Leptospira spp. have evidently been exposed to both domestic and wild cats, highlighting their potential roles as reservoir hosts for leptospirosis. These findings highlight the importance of considering felids as a possible public health threat.