Glare

眩光
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高光谱成像在诊断应用中显示出巨大的前景,特别是在癌症手术中。然而,非块状组织相关的光谱变化使数据分析复杂化。常用技术,例如标准正态变量归一化,通常会导致振幅和散射信息的丢失。这项研究研究了一种新颖的方法来解决光学体模和切除的人体乳房组织的高光谱图像中的这些光谱变化。我们的方法分离表面和体积反射率,假设光谱变异性是由于像素之间表面反射率的显着变化引起的。开发了一种照明设置,以使用高光谱相机从不同的轴向位置但具有相同的天顶角来测量样品。此配置,结合一种新颖的数据分析方法,允许估计和分离每个方向的表面反射率和所有方向的体积反射率。用光学体模验证,我们的方法实现了83%的光谱变异性降低。在切除的人乳腺组织中进一步证明了其功能。我们的方法有效地解决了由表面反射率或眩光引起的变化,同时保留了表面反射率信息,这可以增强样品分析和评估。它有利于具有未知折射率光谱的样品,并且可以很容易地适应并应用于使用高光谱成像的广泛领域。
    Hyperspectral imaging has shown great promise for diagnostic applications, particularly in cancer surgery. However, non-bulk tissue-related spectral variations complicate the data analysis. Common techniques, such as standard normal variate normalization, often lead to a loss of amplitude and scattering information. This study investigates a novel approach to address these spectral variations in hyperspectral images of optical phantoms and excised human breast tissue. Our method separates surface and volume reflectance, hypothesizing that spectral variability arises from significant variations in surface reflectance across pixels. An illumination setup was developed to measure samples with a hyperspectral camera from different axial positions but with identical zenith angles. This configuration, combined with a novel data analysis approach, allows for the estimation and separation of surface reflectance for each direction and volume reflectance across all directions. Validated with optical phantoms, our method achieved an 83% reduction in spectral variability. Its functionality was further demonstrated in excised human breast tissue. Our method effectively addresses variations caused by surface reflectance or glare while conserving surface reflectance information, which may enhance sample analysis and evaluation. It benefits samples with unknown refractive index spectra and can be easily adapted and applied across a wide range of fields where hyperspectral imaging is used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    窗户提供日光和户外景观,影响建筑设计。各种玻璃和窗户遮阳材料用于减轻眩光,过热和隐私问题,它们会影响视野的清晰度。其中,我们评估了窗膜的效果,电致变色(EC)玻璃,和织物色调对视野的清晰度。我们对50名参与者进行了一项实验,使用根据临床视力测试改编的视觉测试(视敏度,对比敏感度,色彩敏感度)和在受控实验室的计算机显示器上显示的图像。窗膜和EC玻璃色调在视敏度方面优于织物色调,对比敏感度和视图满意度,除了最暗的EC色调状态和深灰色VLT3%的颜色敏感度和视图满意度。EC色调造成内部反射问题,织物色调是视觉隐私的首选。窗膜和EC玻璃阻碍了参与者的蓝绿色辨别,而织物阴影也降低了红黄色辨别。视敏度可预测视图满意度,对比敏感度是视觉隐私的最强预测指标。一般来说,较高的可见光透射率和较低的太阳反射率(较深的颜色)增强了人类的视觉性能。拟议的工作流程提供了一个实验程序,确定主要变量并建立用于评估开窗视图清晰度的预测框架。
    Windows provide access to daylight and outdoor views, influencing building design. Various glazing and window shade materials are used to mitigate glare, overheating and privacy issues, and they affect view clarity. Among them, we evaluated the effect of window films, electrochromic (EC) glass, and fabric shades on view clarity. We conducted an experiment with 50 participants using visual tests adapted from clinical vision tests (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color sensitivity) and images displayed on a computer monitor in a controlled laboratory. Window films and EC glass tints outperformed fabric shades in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and view satisfaction with the exception of the darkest EC tint state and dark grey VLT 3% shade for color sensitivity and view satisfaction. The EC tints pose internal reflection issues and fabric shades are preferred for visual privacy. Window films and EC glass hinder participants\' blue-green color discrimination while fabric shades also decrease red-yellow color discrimination. Visual acuity predicts view satisfaction and contrast sensitivity is the strongest predictor for visual privacy. Generally, higher visible light transmittance and lower solar reflectance (darker color) enhance human visual performance. The proposed workflow provides an experimental procedure, identifies the primary variables and establishes a predictive framework for assessing view clarity of fenestration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术近几十年来,诸如发光二极管(LED)或激光器的强单色点光源已经越来越多地使用。这也增加了导致眩光现象和相关视力损害的误用的风险。这项前瞻性和部分盲化研究的目的是通过在残疾和不适眩光方面使用单色点光源使眩光引起的暗点在视野中的可视化和表征。在31名健康受试者中进行了通过LED在三种不同波长(470、530和625nm)和四种不同强度(25、50、75和100%)的眩光下的自动阈值视野检查,导致434个视野检查。与未暴露的对照组相比,通过中央30°的灵敏度损失来测量视力残疾,并通过向后计算重建每组的平均视野来可视化。心理眩光通过随后的问卷进行评估,并根据deBoer不适等级量表进行评估。增加眩光强度导致所有测试波长的平均灵敏度显著下降,同时增加了不适眩光。灵敏度的损失分散在所有象限上,并加重了相应的平均曝光面积。重建的视野确认了所有象限中至少30°的视力障碍。我们得出的结论是,即使离轴光暴露也可能影响中央视野感知。我们的结果扩展了以前关于定向光相互作用的研究,并有助于解释其对人类表现的无能影响。
    Strong monochromatic point light sources such as Light Emitting Diodes (LED) or Lasers have been increasingly used in recent decades. This also raises the risk of misuse resulting in glare phenomena and associated visual impairment. The objective of this prospective and partially blinded study was the visualization and characterization of glare-induced scotomas in visual field by dazzling with monochromatic point light sources in terms of disability and discomfort glare. Automated threshold perimetry under dazzling by LED exposure at three different wavelengths (470, 530 and 625 nm) and four different intensities (25, 50, 75, and 100%) was performed in 31 healthy subjects resulting in 434 visual field examinations. Visual disability was measured by sensitivity loss in the central 30°as compared to unexposed controls and visualized by reconstruction of mean visual fields for each group via backward-calculation. Psychological glare was assessed by subsequent questionnaire and evaluated based on the de Boer rating scale of discomfort. Increasing glare intensities resulted in a significant decrease in mean sensitivity for all wavelengths tested, paralleled by an increase of discomfort glare. The loss of sensitivity was scattered over all quadrants with accentuation of the corresponding mean exposure area. Reconstructed visual fields confirmed visual impairment in all quadrants at an extent of at least 30°. We conclude that even off-axis light exposure may affect central visual field perception. Our results extend previous research on directed light interaction and contribute in explaining its incapacitating impact on human performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    眩光是人工晶状体(IOL)植入的已知副作用,主要受人工晶状体材料和光学的影响,尽管据报道,主观上影响随着时间的推移而减少。然而,随着时间的推移,很少有客观的数据被公布,这些与主观报告有什么关系,以及在IOL植入之前是否可以预测那些报告更多眩光症状的人。
    共有32例眼睛健康的患者(年龄72.4±8.0岁)双侧植入亲水性600s(Rayner,更糟糕的是,英国)或疏水Acrysof(Alcon,德州,美国)丙烯酸IOL(每个n=16,随机分配)。每位患者使用经过验证的强迫性选择摄影问卷主观地报告了他们的视力障碍症状,使用AstonHalometer在八个方向上客观地量化了黑暗环境中强光产生的光晕大小。术前以及IOL植入后1、2、3和4周进行双眼评估。
    这项研究是在国家卫生服务眼科部门进行的,伊丽莎白女王医院,伯明翰,英国。
    视力(平均0.37±0.26logMAR)与术前主观眩光(r=0.184,p=0.494)或客观眩光(r=0.294,p=0.270)无关。目标晕圈大小(F=112.781,p<0.001)随着白内障摘除和人工晶状体植入而减小,并在术后一个月内继续减小。主观性失眠主诉(p<0.001)也更多的是手术前,但此后没有变化(p=0.228)。在两种情况下,与IOL材料均不存在差异(p>0.05)。不可能从症状或症状与手术前光环大小的比率来预测手术后视力障碍(p>0.05)。
    白内障摘除后植入IOL可大大减少白内障引起的主观视力障碍和客观光晕,几乎没有可察觉的症状。然而,客观测量能够量化IOL植入后第一个月光散射的进一步减少,这表明在此期间的任何主观影响都是由于愈合过程而不是由于神经适应。
    UNASSIGNED: Glare is a known side effect of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, affected principally by IOL material and optics, although it is reported subjectively to decrease in impact with time. However, little objective data have been published on changes over time, how these relate to subjective reports, and whether those who will report greater glare symptoms can be predicted prior to IOL implantation.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 32 patients (aged 72.4 ± 8.0 years) with healthy eyes were implanted bilaterally with hydrophilic 600s (Rayner, Worthing, UK) or hydrophobic Acrysof (Alcon, Texas, USA) acrylic IOLs (n = 16 each, randomly assigned). Each patient reported their dysphotopsia symptoms subjectively using the validated forced choice photographic questionnaire for photic phenomena, and halo size resulting from a bright light in a dark environment was quantified objectively in eight orientations using the Aston Halometer. Assessment was performed binocularly pre-operatively and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after IOL implantation.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was carried out at the National Health Service Ophthalmology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
    UNASSIGNED: Visual acuity (average 0.37 ± 0.26 logMAR) did not correlate with subjective glare (r = 0.184, p = 0.494) or objective glare (r = 0.294, p = 0.270) pre-surgery. Objective halo size (F = 112.781, p < 0.001) decreased with cataract removal and IOL implantation and continued to decreased over the month after surgery. Subjective dysphotopsia complaints (p < 0.001) were also greater pre-surgery, but did not change thereafter (p = 0.228). In neither case was there a difference with IOL material (p > 0.05). It was not possible to predict post-surgery dysphotopsia from symptoms or a ratio of symptoms to halo size pre-surgery (p > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Subjective dysphotopsia and objective halos caused by cataracts are greatly reduced by implantation of IOL after cataract removal causing few perceivable symptoms. However, objective measures are able to quantify a further reduction in light scatter over the first month post-IOL implantation, suggesting that any subjective effects over this period are due to the healing process and not due to neuroadaptation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与年龄相关的视力变化显着导致老年驾驶员夜间致命撞车。然而,照明条件对年龄相关视力变化和相关驾驶表现的影响尚不清楚.
    目的:这项初步研究检查了由高保真驾驶模拟器评估的60岁及以上驾驶员在3种照明条件下的视觉功能与驾驶表现之间的关联:白天(明视),夜间(中视),和夜晚的眩光。
    方法:60岁或以上的活跃驾驶员在高保真驾驶模拟器上参与了视觉功能评估和模拟驾驶。视敏度(VA),对比敏感度函数(CSF),和视野图(VFM)使用定量VA测量,定量CSF,以及明视和中视条件下的定量VFM程序。在存在眩光的情况下,在中视条件下也获得了VA和CSF。两个汇总指标,对数CSF下的面积(AULCSF)和VFM表面下的体积(VUSVFM),定量CSF和VFM。驾驶性能指标(平均速度,速度的SD[SDspeed],车道位置SD(SDLP),和反应时间)在白天进行评估,夜间,和夜间眩光条件。皮尔逊相关性确定了在3种照明条件下视觉功能与驾驶性能之间的关联。
    结果:在包含的20个驱动程序中,平均年龄为70.3岁;55%为男性。不良明视VA与更高的SDspeed(r=0.26;P<.001)和更高的SDLP(r=0.31;P<.001)显着相关。浅视AULCSF与较高的SDLP相关(r=-0.22;P=0.01)。不良的中视VUSFVM与较慢的平均速度显着相关(r=-0.24;P=.007),更高的SDspeed(r=-0.19;P=.04),更高的SDLP(r=-0.22;P=0.007),和更长的反应时间(r=-0.22;P=.04),而在夜间驾驶。对于在带眩光的中视条件下的功能视觉,夜间行车时,不良的VA与较长的反应时间(r=0.21;P=0.046)显着相关;不良的AULCSF与较慢的车速(r=-0.32;P<.001)显着相关,夜间眩光驾驶时,SDLP更大(r=-0.26;P=.001)和反应时间更长(r=-0.2;P=.04)。在相同的照明条件下,视觉功能与驾驶性能之间没有其他显着相关性。
    结论:老年驾驶员在不同照明条件下的视觉功能对驾驶性能的影响不同,对夜间驾驶有更大的影响,尤其是在眩光中。需要更大样本量的额外研究来证实这些结果。
    BACKGROUND: Age-related vision changes significantly contribute to fatal crashes at night among older drivers. However, the effects of lighting conditions on age-related vision changes and associated driving performance remain unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: This pilot study examined the associations between visual function and driving performance assessed by a high-fidelity driving simulator among drivers 60 and older across 3 lighting conditions: daytime (photopic), nighttime (mesopic), and nighttime with glare.
    METHODS: Active drivers aged 60 years or older participated in visual function assessments and simulated driving on a high-fidelity driving simulator. Visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity function (CSF), and visual field map (VFM) were measured using quantitative VA, quantitative CSF, and quantitative VFM procedures under photopic and mesopic conditions. VA and CSF were also obtained in the presence of glare in the mesopic condition. Two summary metrics, the area under the log CSF (AULCSF) and volume under the surface of VFM (VUSVFM), quantified CSF and VFM. Driving performance measures (average speed, SD of speed [SDspeed], SD of lane position (SDLP), and reaction time) were assessed under daytime, nighttime, and nighttime with glare conditions. Pearson correlations determined the associations between visual function and driving performance across the 3 lighting conditions.
    RESULTS: Of the 20 drivers included, the average age was 70.3 years; 55% were male. Poor photopic VA was significantly correlated with greater SDspeed (r=0.26; P<.001) and greater SDLP (r=0.31; P<.001). Poor photopic AULCSF was correlated with greater SDLP (r=-0.22; P=.01). Poor mesopic VUSFVM was significantly correlated with slower average speed (r=-0.24; P=.007), larger SDspeed (r=-0.19; P=.04), greater SDLP (r=-0.22; P=.007), and longer reaction times (r=-0.22; P=.04) while driving at night. For functional vision in the mesopic condition with glare, poor VA was significantly correlated with longer reaction times (r=0.21; P=.046) while driving at night with glare; poor AULCSF was significantly correlated with slower speed (r=-0.32; P<.001), greater SDLP (r=-0.26; P=.001) and longer reaction times (r=-0.2; P=.04) while driving at night with glare. No other significant correlations were observed between visual function and driving performance under the same lighting conditions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Visual functions differentially affect driving performance in different lighting conditions among older drivers, with more substantial impacts on driving during nighttime, especially in glare. Additional research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估先天性红绿色视力缺陷患者在有无眩光条件下的中视和明视对比敏感度,并将这些发现与年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者进行比较。
    方法:这项横断面比较研究包括先天性红绿色视力缺陷患者和年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。在4种不同的条件下,对所有受试者进行了对比敏感度测量;双眼近视眼-无眩光,mesopic-withglarge,明视-无眩光,明视-眩光,并对结果进行了比较。
    结果:21例色觉缺陷患者(13例,研究中包括8个原型)和22个年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。protan组的平均年龄为35.2±13.5岁,Deutan组30.6±7.7年,对照组32.0±8.8岁,组间年龄差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。当通过ANOVA的多因素重复测量测试来评估光条件(有和没有眩光)的影响时,在所有空间频率(1.5、3、6、12、18cpd)下各组的平均中视和明视对比敏感度值没有统计学意义(P>.05)。
    结论:先天性红绿色视力缺陷患者的中视和明视对比敏感度值与健康对照在有无眩光条件下相似。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity in patients with congenital red-green color vision deficiency regarding with and without glare conditions and to compare these findings with age- and gender-matched healthy controls with normal color vision.
    METHODS: Patients with congenital red-green color vision deficiency and age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included in this cross-sectional comparative study. Contrast sensitivity measurements were taken from all subjects in 4 different conditions; binocular mesopic-without glare, mesopic-with glare, photopic-without glare, photopic-with glare, and the results were compared.
    RESULTS: Twenty one patients with color vision deficiency (13 deuteranopic, 8 protanopic) and 22 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included in the study. The mean age was 35.2 ± 13.5 years in the protan group, 30.6 ± 7.7 years in the deutan group, 32.0 ± 8.8 years in the control group, and there was no significant difference in age between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity values of the groups at all spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18 cpd) were not statistically significant when evaluated by the multifactor repeated measures test of ANOVA to evaluate the effect of light conditions (with and without glare) (P > .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivity values of patients with congenital red-green color vision deficiency were similar to healthy controls regarding with and without glare conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这篇综述强调光对视觉效率的影响,不同照明焦点的影响,照明类型,以及它们对视力和生产力的影响。光源和标准是眼科医生感兴趣的主题。关于照明对视觉活动的影响水平的指南可以增强视觉表现。方法:本文在文献综述的基础上,通过在PubMed等数据库中进行的书目调查,MEDLINE,WebofScience,Embase,LILACS,还有SciELO.
    结果:提供有关理解有关照明对视觉性能影响的信息的建议。
    结论:适当的工作场所照明对于提高视觉效率至关重要,安全,生产力,和工人健康。高效的工作场所照明应避免光源指向工人的脸,防止有害眩光,在工作区域更加紧张,房间其他地方都穿制服。眼科医生应该了解并提供正确照明的指导,以确保患者的舒适度和对视觉矫正的满意度。
    OBJECTIVE: This review emphasizes the effect of light on visual efficiency, the impact of different lighting focuses, types of lighting, and their influence on vision and productivity. Light sources and standards are intriguing subjects for ophthalmologists. Guidelines regarding the level of lighting influence on visual activities can enhance visual performance.Methods: This article was developed based on literature reviews, with a bibliographic survey conducted in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and SciELO.
    RESULTS: Provides recommendations for understanding information regarding the influence of lighting on visual performance.
    CONCLUSIONS: Proper workplace lighting is crucial for improving visual efficiency, safety, productivity, and worker health. Efficient workplace lighting should avoid light sources directed towards the worker\'s face, prevent harmful glare, be more intense in the work area, and uniform in the rest of the room. Ophthalmologists should be knowledgeable about and provide guidance on correct lighting to ensure patient comfort and satisfaction with visual correction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现代环境中的闪烁和条纹图案可以唤起视觉幻觉,偏头痛不适,和癫痫发作。我们测量了阅读速度,同时用LED灯照亮了条纹和条纹较少的文本。在实验1中,与60kHz(感知为稳定光)相比,光以60Hz和120Hz闪烁。在实验2中,灯光以60Hz或600Hz(在该频率下,幻影阵列最明显)闪烁,并与连续光进行了比较。使用了两种类型的文本:一种包含具有高的水平自相关性(条纹)的单词,另一种包含具有低的自相关性(较少条纹)的单词。我们测量了参与者在模式眩光(PG)测试中看到的错觉数量。总的来说,在60Hz和600Hz闪烁期间阅读速度最慢,而在阅读高自相关文本时阅读速度较慢。有趣的是,低PG组的闪烁对阅读速度的影响大于高PG组,总体上趋于较慢。此外,当文本的自相关性高时,高PG组的阅读速度降低。这些发现表明,不舒适的视觉环境降低了阅读效率,对视觉敏感的人更是如此。
    Flicker and patterns of stripes in the modern environment can evoke visual illusions, discomfort migraine, and seizures. We measured reading speed while striped and less striped texts were illuminated with LED lights. In Experiment 1, the lights flickered at 60 Hz and 120 Hz compared to 60 kHz (perceived as steady light). In Experiment 2, the lights flickered at 60 Hz or 600 Hz (at which frequency the phantom array is most visible), and were compared to continuous light. Two types of text were used: one containing words with high horizontal autocorrelation (striped) and another containing words with low autocorrelation (less striped). We measured the number of illusions participants saw in the Pattern Glare (PG) Test. Overall, reading speed was slowest during the 60 Hz and 600 Hz flicker and was slower when reading the high autocorrelation text. Interestingly, the low PG group showed greater effects of flicker on reading speed than the high PG group, which tended to be slower overall. In addition, reading speed in the high PG group was reduced when the autocorrelation of the text was high. These findings suggest that uncomfortable visual environments reduce reading efficiency, the more so in individuals who are visually sensitive.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神分裂症和自闭症谱系障碍是不同的神经发育障碍,具有临床相关行为。然而,早期感觉反应表现出不同的反应。精神分裂症患者通常表现出皮质兴奋性低下,而自闭症患者表现出皮质兴奋性低下。识别疾病之间可靠的神经生物学差异可以减少误诊并优化治疗。
    模式眩光测试(PGT)是行为过度兴奋性的简单量度。它测量在静态水平光栅中看到的错觉数量。我们从自闭症和精神分裂症(分裂型)特征不同的非临床成人收集PGT数据。576名本科生完成了一项在线调查,其中包括分裂型人格问卷-简要修订,自闭症频谱商,和PGT。
    亚临床孤独症与分裂型性状呈高度正相关。然而,只有分裂型评分可显著预测报告更多模式眩光(PG)错觉.在评估分裂型和自闭症评分的子成分时,阳性和无组织的分裂型特征预示着报告更多的PG错觉。然而,亚临床自闭症因素不能预测PG错觉.
    高分裂型以与行为过度兴奋一致的方式进行PGT。PGT区分了亚临床自闭症特征和分裂型,提示潜在的临床应用。
    UNASSIGNED: Schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder are distinct neurodevelopmental disorders sharing clinically relevant behaviours. However, early sensory responses show divergent responses. Individuals with schizophrenia typically exhibit cortical hypo-excitability whereas individuals with autism show cortical hyperexcitability. Identifying reliable neurobiological differences between the disorders can diminish misdiagnosis and optimise treatments.
    UNASSIGNED: The pattern glare test (PGT) is a simple measure of behavioural hyperexcitability. It measures the number of illusions seen in a static horizontal grating. We collected PGT data from non-clinical adults varying in traits of autism and schizophrenia (schizotypy). 576 undergraduate students completed an online survey consisting of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire - Brief Revised, the Autism Spectrum Quotient, and the PGT.
    UNASSIGNED: Subclinical autism and schizotypy traits were highly positively correlated. However, only schizotypy scores were significantly predictive of reporting more pattern glare (PG) illusions. When assessing the subcomponents of the schizotypy and autism scores, positive and disorganised schizotypy traits were predictive of reporting more PG illusions. Whereas, subclinical autism factors were not predictive of PG illusions.
    UNASSIGNED: High schizotypy performed the PGT in a manner consistent with behavioural hyperexcitability. The PGT distinguished subclinical autistic traits from schizotypy, suggesting potential clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较多功能设备(PentacamAXLWave(OCULUS;缩写为Pentacam)和两个基于红外的瞳孔计(PupilX(Albomed),Colvard(绿洲医疗)),并比较Pentacam和PupilX的可重复性。
    方法:眼科,歌德大学,法兰克福,德国。
    方法:前瞻性,比较试验。
    方法:用Colvard一次和Pentacam无(WO)和眩光(WG)测量健康眼睛的瞳孔直径,PupilX在0、1和16勒克斯各三次。在第二个系列测量中,评估了PentacamWO和PupilX在0.06和0.12勒克斯的情况。
    结果:纳入了年龄在21-63岁的参与者的36只眼。Colvard的平均瞳孔直径为6.05mm,5.79mm(第1系列),5.50mm(第二系列),采用PentacamWO,3.42mmWG,7.26mmPupilX在0,4.67mm1,3.66mm16,6.82mm在0.06和6.39mm在0.12勒克斯。PentacamWO的测量值与PupilX在0、0.06、0.12和1勒克斯(所有p<0.001)方面显着不同,但不是Colvard(p=0.086)。用PentacamWG和PupilX在16勒克斯中测量的瞳孔大小没有显着差异(p=0.647)。使用PentacamWO和WG连续测量的平均标准偏差分别为0.23和0.20mm,PupilX0.11在0、0.241和0.20mm在16勒克斯。
    结论:Pentacam提供了良好的瞳孔大小评估,但在低光照条件下并不等同于PupilX。重复性对Pentacam更为有利。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare precision of pupil size measurements of a multifunctional device (Pentacam AXL Wave [Pentacam]) and 2 infrared-based pupillometers (PupilX, Colvard) and to compare repeatability of Pentacam and PupilX.
    METHODS: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
    METHODS: Prospective, comparative trial.
    METHODS: Pupil diameter of healthy eyes was measured with Colvard once and Pentacam without glare (WO) and with glare (WG), PupilX in 0, 1, and 16 lux 3 times each. In a second series, measurements with Pentacam WO and PupilX in 0.06 and 0.12 lux were assessed.
    RESULTS: 36 eyes of participants aged 21 to 63 years were included. Mean pupil diameter was 6.05 mm with Colvard, 5.79 mm (first series), 5.50 mm (second series) with Pentacam WO, 3.42 mm WG, 7.26 mm PupilX in 0, 4.67 mm 1, 3.66 mm 16, 6.82 mm in 0.06, and 6.39 mm in 0.12 lux. Measurements with Pentacam WO were significantly different to PupilX in 0, 0.06, 0.12, and 1 lux (all P < .001), but not to Colvard ( P = .086). Pupil size measured with Pentacam WG and PupilX in 16 lux was not significantly different ( P = .647). Consecutive measurements with Pentacam WO and WG had mean SD of 0.23 mm and 0.20 mm, respectively, and with PupilX 0.11 in 0, 0.24 mm 1, and 0.20 mm in 16 lux.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pentacam provided good assessment of pupil size but was not equivalent to PupilX in low lighting conditions. Repeatability was more favorable for Pentacam.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号