■在过去的十年中,虚拟病房的采用激增。虚拟病房旨在防止不必要的入院,加快家庭出院,提高患者满意度,这对面临住院相关风险的老年人口特别有利。因此,虚拟康复病房(VRW)正在进行大量投资,尽管有证据表明它们的实施取得了不同程度的成功。然而,虚拟病房工作人员为快速实施这些创新护理模式所经历的促进者和障碍仍然知之甚少。
本文介绍了在澳大利亚VRW上工作的医院工作人员的见解,以应对对旨在防止住院的计划日益增长的需求。我们探讨了员工对VRW的促进者和障碍的看法,在服务设置和交付上发光。
■使用非收养对21名VRW员工进行了定性访谈,放弃,放大,传播,可持续发展(NASSS)框架。使用框架分析和NASSS框架的7个领域进行数据分析。
■结果被映射到NASSS框架的7个领域。(1)条件:管理一定的条件,特别是那些涉及合并症和社会文化因素的,可以是具有挑战性的。(2)技术:VRW证明适合无认知障碍的技术患者,通过远程监控和视频通话在临床决策中提供优势。然而,互操作性问题和设备故障导致员工沮丧,强调迅速应对技术挑战的重要性。(3)价值主张:VRW授权患者选择他们的护理地点,扩大农村社区获得护理的机会,并为老年人提供家庭治疗。(4)采用者和(5)组织:尽管有这些好处,从面对面治疗到远程治疗的文化转变引入了工作流程的不确定性,专业责任,资源分配,和摄入过程。(6)更广泛的系统和(7)嵌入:随着服务的不断发展,以解决医院能力的差距,必须优先考虑正在进行的适应。这包括完善患者顺利转移回医院的过程,解决技术方面的问题,确保护理的无缝连续性,并深思熟虑地考虑护理负担如何转移到患者及其家人身上。
■在这项定性研究中,探索医护人员对创新VRW的体验,我们确定了实施和可接受性的几个驱动因素和挑战。这些发现对考虑在服务设置和交付方面为老年人实施VRW的未来服务具有影响。未来的工作将集中在评估VRW的患者和护理人员体验。
UNASSIGNED: Over the past decade, the adoption of virtual wards has surged. Virtual wards aim to prevent unnecessary hospital admissions, expedite home discharge, and enhance patient satisfaction, which are particularly beneficial for the older adult population who faces risks associated with hospitalization. Consequently, substantial investments are being made in virtual rehabilitation wards (VRWs), despite evidence of varying levels of success in their implementation. However, the facilitators and barriers experienced by virtual ward staff for the rapid implementation of these innovative care models remain poorly understood.
UNASSIGNED: This paper presents insights from hospital staff working on an Australian VRW in response to the growing demand for programs aimed at preventing hospital admissions. We explore staff\'s perspectives on the facilitators and barriers of the VRW, shedding light on service setup and delivery.
UNASSIGNED: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 VRW staff using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. The analysis of data was performed using framework analysis and the 7 domains of the NASSS framework.
UNASSIGNED: The results were mapped onto the 7 domains of the NASSS framework. (1) Condition: Managing certain conditions, especially those involving comorbidities and sociocultural factors, can be challenging. (2) Technology: The VRW demonstrated suitability for technologically engaged patients without cognitive impairment, offering advantages in clinical decision-making through remote monitoring and video calls. However, interoperability issues and equipment malfunctions caused staff frustration, highlighting the importance of promptly addressing technical challenges. (3) Value proposition: The VRW empowered patients to choose their care location, extending access to care for rural communities and enabling home-based treatment for older adults. (4) Adopters and (5) organizations: Despite these benefits, the cultural shift from in-person to remote treatment introduced uncertainties in workflows, professional responsibilities, resource allocation, and intake processes. (6) Wider system and (7) embedding: As the service continues to develop to address gaps in hospital capacity, it is imperative to prioritize ongoing adaptation. This includes refining the process of smoothly transferring patients back to the hospital, addressing technical aspects, ensuring seamless continuity of care, and thoughtfully considering how the burden of care may shift to patients and their families.
UNASSIGNED: In this qualitative study exploring health care staff\'s experience of an innovative VRW, we identified several drivers and challenges to implementation and acceptability. The findings have implications for future services considering implementing VRWs for older adults in terms of service setup and delivery. Future work will focus on assessing patient and carer experiences of the VRW.