Genes, BRCA2

基因,BRCA2
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    双阴性前列腺癌,无神经内分泌肿瘤特征的雄激素受体非依赖性前列腺癌,难以治疗,但可能是个体化治疗的理想候选者。
    一名85岁的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者,无前列腺特异性抗原进展,在睾丸切除术和阿帕鲁胺术后6个月出现局部复发和肝和肺转移。肝肿瘤活检导致诊断为双阴性前列腺癌。FoundationOne®CDx显示BRCA2突变和高肿瘤突变负荷。奥拉帕尼和帕博利珠单抗依次给药,患者对每种治疗均有反应,持续5个月,直至影像学进展.
    序贯使用奥拉帕尼和派姆单抗可能对具有BRCA2突变和高肿瘤突变负担的双阴性前列腺癌有效。
    UNASSIGNED: Double-negative prostate cancer, an androgen receptor-independent prostate cancer without features of neuroendocrine tumors, is refractory to treatment but could be an ideal candidate for individualized treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: An 85-year-old patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without prostate-specific antigen progression presented with local recurrence and liver and lung metastases 6 months after orchiectomy and apalutamide. A liver tumor biopsy led to a diagnosis of double-negative prostate cancer. FoundationOne® CDx showed BRCA2 mutation and high tumor mutation burden. Olaparib and pembrolizumab were administered sequentially, and the patient responded to each treatment for 5 months until radiographic progression.
    UNASSIGNED: Sequential use of olaparib and pembrolizumab may be effective for double-negative prostate cancer with BRCA2 mutations and high tumor mutation burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在提供前列腺癌中BRCA1/2和HRR基因突变患病率的实际数据。
    方法:我们收集了197例原发性和转移性前列腺癌的测序数据,其中HRR突变分析是在过去5年内根据临床要求进行的.所有病例均使用靶向NGSBRCAness多基因小组进行分析,包括8个HRR基因(ATM,BRCA1,BRCA2,CDK12,CHEK2,FANCA,HDAC2,PALB2)。
    结果:我们的研究结果表明,根据FDA标准,潜在的可靶向突变的患病率为20.8%,这与文献相当。然而,我们队列中可靶向BRCA2突变的频率低于mCRPC的报告,ATM和CHEK2突变反而更普遍.因此,根据FDA批准,20.8%(n=38)的病例符合奥拉帕尼治疗标准,只有4.9%(n=9)符合EMA批准的资格标准。
    结论:这项研究为BRCA1/2和HRR基因突变的前景以及前列腺癌中HRR基因检测的实际临床管理提供了有价值的现实世界见解。有助于更好地了解患者接受PARPi治疗的资格。
    OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to contribute real-world data on the prevalence of BRCA1/2 and HRR gene mutations in prostate cancer.
    METHODS: We compiled sequencing data of 197 cases of primary and metastatic prostate cancer, in which HRR mutation analysis was performed upon clinical request within the last 5 years. All cases were analyzed using a targeted NGS BRCAness multigene panel, including 8 HRR genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, PALB2).
    RESULTS: Our findings reveal a prevalence of potentially targetable mutations based on FDA criteria of 20.8%, which is comparable to the literature. However, the frequency of targetable BRCA2 mutations within our cohort was lower than reported for mCRPC and ATM and CHEK2 mutations were more prevalent instead. Thus, while 20.8% (n = 38) of the cases meet the criteria for olaparib treatment per FDA approval, only 4.9% (n = 9) align with the eligibility criteria according to the EMA approval.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study offers valuable real-world insights into the landscape of BRCA1/2 and HRR gene mutations and the practical clinical management of HRR gene testing in prostate cancer, contributing to a better understanding of patient eligibility for PARPi treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    共有271名巴基斯坦年轻人回答了自行设计的基于多项选择的问卷(α=0.83),然后将其用于评估有关乳腺癌易感性(BRCA)基因突变的知识水平。使用每个响应的总分评估总体知识水平;还测试了知识得分与教育背景以及性别之间的任何可能的意义。结果表明,161(63.9%)的样本人群对BRCA基因突变有认识。两组(医学和非医学教育背景)的知识得分具有可比性,其中20名(13.8%)医学受访者和14名(13.5%)非医学受访者对BRCA基因突变及其检测具有较高的知识水平。性别和教育背景对知识得分均无重大影响。这份报告的结果表明,对BRCA基因的认识是足够的,而样本人群的知识水平较差。
    A total of 271 young Pakistani adults responded to a selfdesigned multiple choice-based questionnaire (α = 0.83) which was then used to assess the levels of knowledge regarding breast cancer susceptibility (BRCA) gene mutation. Overall knowledge levels were assessed using the sum score of each response; any possible significance between knowledge scores and educational backgrounds as well as gender were also tested. The results show that 161 (63.9%) of the sample population had awareness about BRCA gene mutation. Knowledge scores were comparable across both groups (medical and non-medical educational backgrounds) with 20 (13.8%) of medical and 14 (13.5%) of non-medical respondents demonstrating a high level of knowledge about the BRCA gene mutation and its testing. Neither gender nor educational background had a significant influence on knowledge scores. The results from this report suggest that awareness regarding BRCA gene was adequate, while knowledge levels were noted to be poor among the sample population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估社会经济人口统计学与BRCA1和BRCA2(BRCA1/2)突变患者建议和接受降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(rrBSO)的相关性。
    方法:回顾性队列,半结构化定性访谈。
    方法:城市地区的BRCA1/2突变携带者,公立医院,种族和社会经济多样化的人口。
    方法:无。
    方法:主要结果是rrBSO推荐率和完成率。次要结果是与rrBSO完成相关的社会人口统计学变量。
    结果:该队列包括167例BRCA1/2突变患者,其中39%被鉴定为黑色(n=65),35%的白人(n=59)和19%的西班牙裔(n=32)。超过95%(n=159)接受了适合年龄的rrBSO的建议,52%(n=87)接受rrBSO。在单变量分析中,完成rrBSO的女性年龄较大(p=0.05),但不是在多变量分析中。rrBSO的完成与邮政编码中的居住相关,失业率较低,并且有记录的rrBSO建议(p<0.05)。所有仍在卫生系统接受护理的受试者(n=79)被邀请完成关于rrBSO决策的访谈,但只有四项调查完成,回应率为5.1%。出现的主题包括更年期,情感影响和家庭支持。
    结论:在这个研究不足的人群中,遗传咨询和财务健康替代与rrBSO摄取有关,强调遗传转介和解决健康的社会决定因素,将其作为改善癌症预防和减少健康不平等的机会。我们的研究表明,需要在边缘化社区中进行更多的以文化为中心的招募方法进行定性研究,以确保在有关rrBSO的文献中具有足够的代表性。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of socioeconomic demographics with recommendation for and uptake of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (rrBSO) in patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort, semistructured qualitative interviews.
    METHODS: BRCA1/2 mutation carriers at an urban, public hospital with a racially and socioeconomically diverse population.
    METHODS: None.
    METHODS: The primary outcomes were rate of rrBSO recommendation and completion. Secondary outcomes were sociodemographic variables associated with rrBSO completion.
    RESULTS: The cohort included 167 patients with BRCA1/2 mutations of whom 39% identified as black (n=65), 35% white (n=59) and 19% Hispanic (n=32). Over 95% (n=159) received the recommendation for age-appropriate rrBSO, and 52% (n=87) underwent rrBSO. Women who completed rrBSO were older in univariable analysis (p=0.05), but not in multivariable analysis. Completion of rrBSO was associated with residence in zip codes with lower unemployment and documented recommendation for rrBSO (p<0.05). All subjects who still received care in the health system (n=79) were invited to complete interviews regarding rrBSO decision-making, but only four completed surveys for a response rate of 5.1%. Themes that emerged included menopause, emotional impact and familial support.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this understudied population, genetic counselling and surrogates of financial health were associated with rrBSO uptake, highlighting genetics referrals and addressing social determinants of health as opportunities to improve cancer prevention and reduce health inequities. Our study demonstrates a need for more culturally centred recruiting methods for qualitative research in marginalised communities to ensure adequate representation in the literature regarding rrBSO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:遗传了致病性BRCA1或BRCA2突变的女性患乳腺癌和卵巢癌的风险明显高于平均水平。存在几种癌症风险管理策略来解决这种增加的风险。关于选择哪些策略的决定很复杂,这些女性的个人和多因素。决策辅助工具(DAs)是帮助患者做出与健康相关的决策的工具。这项范围审查的目的是绘制与患者DA的开发和测试有关的证据,以寻找未受影响的BRCA突变携带者。
    方法:根据JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)的范围审查方法框架进行范围审查。
    方法:MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,Web的科学。语言或发布日期没有限制。还进行了手动搜索。
    方法:针对癌症风险管理的DA研究,设计用于或适用于未受乳腺癌或卵巢癌影响的具有致病性BRCA1或BRCA2突变的女性。
    方法:使用基于JBI仪器的表格提取数据,以提取研究特征和结果的细节。数据提取由两名审阅者独立进行。提取的数据制成表格。
    结果:包括了与21个DA的开发或测试相关的32个证据来源。四个DA是专门为癌症未受影响的BRCA突变携带者开发的。其中,两项指南涵盖了针对该人群的所有指南推荐的风险管理策略,尽管其中只有一项是公开的完整版本.所有调查DA有效性的研究都报告了DA对至少一项评估结果的积极影响,然而,在随机对照试验中,仅测试了6个DA。
    结论:本范围综述绘制了与开发和测试相关的文献的概况,适用于癌症未受影响的BRCA突变携带者的DA。
    OBJECTIVE: Women who inherit a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are at substantially higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer than average. Several cancer risk management strategies exist to address this increased risk. Decisions about which strategies to choose are complex, personal and multifactorial for these women. Decision aids (DAs) are tools that assist patients in making health-related decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to map evidence relating to the development and testing of patient DAs for cancer unaffected BRCA mutation carriers.
    METHODS: Scoping review conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s (JBI\'s) scoping review methodological framework.
    METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science. No restrictions applied for language or publication date. A manual search was also performed.
    METHODS: Studies on DAs for cancer risk management designed for or applicable to women with a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who are unaffected by breast or ovarian cancer.
    METHODS: Data were extracted using a form based on the JBI instrument for extracting details of studies\' characteristics and results. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Extracted data were tabulated.
    RESULTS: 32 evidence sources relating to development or testing of 21 DAs were included. Four DAs were developed exclusively for cancer unaffected BRCA mutation carriers. Of these, two covered all guideline recommended risk management strategies for this population though only one of these was readily available publicly in its full version. All studies investigating DA effectiveness reported a positive effect of the DA under investigation on at least one of the outcomes evaluated, however only six DAs were tested in randomised controlled trials.
    CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review has mapped the landscape of the literature relating to developing and testing, DAs applicable to cancer unaffected BRCA mutation carriers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注释基因组序列的改变有时是一个困难的决定,特别是在具有不确定的致病意义的错义变体中,以及在假定为种系致病变体的那些中。我们在这里建议突变谱也可能对判断它们有用。从公共数据库中,获得982个BRCA1/1861个BRCA2种系错义变体和294个BRCA1/420个BRCA2体细胞错义变体。然后我们比较了它们的突变光谱,即,两个过渡型和四个颠换型突变的频率,在每个类别。有趣的是,在BRCA1变体中,A:T到C:G转换,在种系中相对频繁,在躯体中极为罕见,尤其是乳腺癌,单元格(p=.03)。相反,答:T到T:在种系中最罕见的是变性,但在体细胞中并不罕见。因此,具有A:T至T:变性的BRCA1变体可能被怀疑为体细胞,A:T到C:G是种系的。突变谱的这些趋势也可能表明碱基改变的生物学和化学起源。另一方面,不幸的是,不确定显著性变异(VUS)不能通过突变谱区分.我们的发现值得进一步和更详细的研究。
    Annotating genomic sequence alterations is sometimes a difficult decision, particularly in missense variants with uncertain pathogenic significance and also in those presumed as germline pathogenic variants. We here suggest that mutation spectrum may also be useful for judging them. From the public databases, 982 BRCA1/1861 BRCA2 germline missense variants and 294 BRCA1/420 BRCA2 somatic missense variants were obtained. We then compared their mutation spectra, i.e., the frequencies of two transition- and four transversion-type mutations, in each category. Intriguingly, in BRCA1 variants, A:T to C:G transversion, which was relatively frequent in the germline, was extremely rare in somatic, particularly breast cancer, cells (p = .03). Conversely, A:T to T:A transversion was most infrequent in the germline, but not rare in somatic cells. Thus, BRCA1 variants with A:T to T:A transversion may be suspected as somatic, and those with A:T to C:G as being in the germline. These tendencies of mutation spectrum may also suggest the biological and chemical origins of the base alterations. On the other hand, unfortunately, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were not distinguishable by mutation spectrum. Our findings warrant further and more detailed studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:母乳喂养与许多短期和长期的新生儿和产妇健康益处相关。具体来说,在BRCA1/2女性携带者中,母乳喂养已被证明可以降低乳腺癌和卵巢癌的风险。然而,关于推荐的BRCA1/2携带者产后监测的数据很少.这项研究的目的是评估卫生专业人员关于BRCA携带者母乳喂养的建议。方法:这项横断面调查是通过“良好的BRCA基因-BRCA携带者的支持和信息组”协会分发的匿名问卷进行的。问卷包括李克特量表和开放式问题,旨在评估卫生专业人员在建议的后续行动的各个方面的表现。结果:在388名参与者中,233(60.0%)对卫生专业人员提供的有关怀孕和母乳喂养的解释表示不满。与对解释满意的女性(38.8±7.6岁)相比,对解释不满意的女性年轻(36.8±7.0岁),p=0.0081)。在基因诊断的年龄方面,满意的女性和不满意的女性之间没有发现显着差异,origin,宗教,地理位置,以及个人或家族癌症病史的发生率。在对一个悬而未决的问题的175份答复中,“请描述不满意解释的原因,“76.6%的人表示他们没有收到关于这个问题的解释,而5.4%的人描述了最少的解释或相互矛盾的建议。令人惊讶的是,4.7%的人回忆说被建议避免,停止,或限制母乳喂养。讨论:这项调查的结果强调了卫生专业人员对BRCA携带者母乳喂养问题的知识不足。由于这些基因中的遗传变异涉及相当大的人口比例(在Ashkenazi犹太人口中高达2.5%),提高卫生保健人员对这些妇女母乳喂养益处的认识似乎是谨慎的。
    Purpose: Breastfeeding is associated with numerous short- and long-term neonatal and maternal health benefits. Specifically, in BRCA1/2 female carriers, breastfeeding has been shown to reduce the considerably increased risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, there is paucity of data referring to the recommended postpartum surveillance of BRCA1/2 carriers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the recommendations of health professionals regarding breastfeeding in BRCA carriers. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted using an anonymous questionnaire distributed through the \"Good BRCA Genes-a support and information group for BRCA carriers\" association. The questionnaire included Likert scale and open-ended questions, aimed to evaluate the performance of health professionals at various aspects of the recommended follow-up. Results: Of the 388 participants, 233 (60.0%) expressed dissatisfaction with explanations provided by health professionals regarding pregnancy and breastfeeding. Women reporting dissatisfaction with explanations were younger (36.8 ± 7.0 years) compared to those satisfied with the explanations (38.8 ± 7.6 years, p = 0.0081). No significant differences were noted between women satisfied and those dissatisfied with the explanations in terms of age of genetic diagnosis, origin, religion, geographic location, and the rates of personal or familial cancer history. Of the 175 responses to an open question \"please describe the reasons for unsatisfactory explanation,\" 76.6% stated they received no explanation on the subject, whereas 5.4% described minimal explanation or conflicting recommendations. Surprisingly, 4.7% recalled being advised to avoid, stop, or limit breastfeeding. Discussion: The results of this survey emphasize the lack of knowledge of health professionals on the issue of breastfeeding in BRCA carriers. As genetic variants in these genes involve significant proportion of the population (up to 2.5% in Ashkenazi Jewish population), raising the awareness of health care personnel to the benefits of breastfeeding in these women seems prudent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:报告一项纵向社会心理研究的长期结果,该研究构成了“对前列腺癌遗传易感性男性的鉴定:在遗传风险较高的男性中进行有针对性的筛查和对照”(IMPACT)研究的一部分。IMPACT研究是一项针对在BreastCAncer基因1(BRCA1)或BreastCAncer基因2(BRCA2)中具有已知种系致病变异(GPV)的个体中进行靶向前列腺癌(PrCa)筛查的跨国研究。
    方法:参加IMPACT研究的参与者被邀请在每次年度筛查访问之前完成心理社会问卷,为期至少5年。问卷包括社会人口统计学问题和以下措施:医院焦虑和抑郁量表,事件规模的影响,36项简式健康调查,PrCa的纪念焦虑量表,癌症忧虑量表,风险感知和知识。
    结果:共有760名参与者完成了问卷调查:207名参与者在BRCA1中患有GPV,265名参与者在BRCA2中患有GPV,288名对照(非携带者来自已知GPV的家庭)。我们发现,在整个队列中,没有临床上有关一般或癌症特异性痛苦或不良健康相关生活质量的证据。与携带者相比,对照组的个体对PrCa的担忧明显减少;然而,所有平均得分都很低,在报告的一般人群规范范围内,可用的地方。先前具有较高的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平的BRCA2携带者在PrCa焦虑(P=0.01)和PSA特异性焦虑(P<0.001)方面略有但显着增加。癌症风险认知反映了遗传咨询期间提供的信息,参与者有良好的知识水平,尽管随着时间的推移,这种情况有所下降。
    结论:这是首次报道针对BRCA1和BRCA2携带者的有针对性的PrCa筛查计划的纵向社会心理影响的研究。结果保证了每年基于PSA的筛查计划不会对这些高风险个体的社会心理健康或与健康相关的生活质量产生不利影响。这些结果很重要,因为更多的PrCa筛查针对高风险人群。
    OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term outcomes from a longitudinal psychosocial study that forms part of the \'Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted Screening in men at higher genetic risk and controls\' (IMPACT) study. The IMPACT study is a multi-national study of targeted prostate cancer (PrCa) screening in individuals with a known germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in either the BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1) or the BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2).
    METHODS: Participants enrolled in the IMPACT study were invited to complete a psychosocial questionnaire prior to each annual screening visit for a minimum of 5 years. The questionnaire included questions on sociodemographics and the following measures: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, Memorial Anxiety Scale for PrCa, Cancer Worry Scale, risk perception and knowledge.
    RESULTS: A total of 760 participants completed questionnaires: 207 participants with GPV in BRCA1, 265 with GPV in BRCA2 and 288 controls (non-carriers from families with a known GPV). We found no evidence of clinically concerning levels of general or cancer-specific distress or poor health-related quality of life in the cohort as a whole. Individuals in the control group had significantly less worry about PrCa compared with the carriers; however, all mean scores were low and within reported general population norms, where available. BRCA2 carriers with previously high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels experience a small but significant increase in PrCa anxiety (P = 0.01) and PSA-specific anxiety (P < 0.001). Cancer risk perceptions reflected information provided during genetic counselling and participants had good levels of knowledge, although this declined over time.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report the longitudinal psychosocial impact of a targeted PrCa screening programme for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. The results reassure that an annual PSA-based screening programme does not have an adverse impact on psychosocial health or health-related quality of life in these higher-risk individuals. These results are important as more PrCa screening is targeted to higher-risk groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    历史上,在乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者中观察到的髓样肿瘤发病率增加的原因主要是之前接受过针对癌症的治疗.然而,随着有害种系变异与造血系统恶性肿瘤(HMs)发展之间的联系变得更好,我们认为乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者中髓系肿瘤的发病率增加可能至少部分与潜在的种系癌症易感性等位基因有关。BRCA1/2,ATM,CHEK2,PALB2和其他相关基因阻止了双链断裂的正常同源重组DNA修复,导致对低效修复机制的依赖。这导致乳腺癌和卵巢癌的终生风险很高,也可能增加后续治疗相关髓系肿瘤(t-MNs)的风险。这些有害的种系变异也可能增加从头HMs的风险,在有有害种系BRCA1/2变异体的患者中观察到的HMs发生率增加,甚至在没有癌症定向治疗的情况下也是如此。因此,聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂和其他实体瘤定向疗法与t-MNs的发展之间的关联可能与有害种系变体的存在有关,这些变体固有地增加了从头和t-MNs的风险,并且需要有关这些药物对骨髓功能的直接毒性作用的其他数据。
    Historically, the increased incidence of myeloid neoplasms observed in individuals with breast and ovarian cancer has been attributed exclusively to prior exposure to cancer-directed therapies. However, as the association between deleterious germline variants and the development of hematopoietic malignancies (HMs) becomes better established, we propose the increased incidence of myeloid neoplasms in those with breast and ovarian cancer may be at least partially related to underlying germline cancer predisposition alleles. Deleterious germline variants in BRCA1/2, ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, and other related genes prevent normal homologous recombination DNA repair of double-strand breaks, leading to reliance on less effective repair mechanisms. This results in a high lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer, and likely also increases the risk of subsequent therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs). These deleterious germline variants likely increase the risk for de novo HMs as well, as evidenced by the increased incidence of HMs observed in those with deleterious germline BRCA1/2 variants even in the absence of prior cancer-directed therapy. Thus, the association between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and other solid tumor directed therapies and the development of t-MNs may be confounded by the presence of deleterious germline variants which inherently increase the risk of both de novo and t-MNs, and additional data regarding the direct toxic effects of these drugs on bone marrow function are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是描述无症状的BRCA1/2种系致病变异型(GPV)携带者合并高级别浆液性癌(HGSC)的长期结局,以降低输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)的风险。
    方法:在先前描述的来自荷兰遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HEBON)研究的无症状BRCA1/2GPV携带者队列中,确定了在RRSO患有HGSC的女性。主要结果是10年无病生存期(DFS)。次要结果是复发时间,十年疾病特异性生存期(DSS),10年总生存期(OS)。病人,描述了与复发相关的疾病和治疗特征。
    结果:在RRSO诊断为HGSC的28名女性的中位年龄为55.3岁(范围:33.5-74.3)。分期之后,18位女性有(FIGO)第一阶段,3个II期和5个III期疾病。两名妇女没有接受手术分期,被归类为未知阶段。经过13.5年的中位随访(范围:9.1-24.7),6名女性第一阶段(33%),一名女性进入第二阶段(33%),2名III期女性(40%)和未知期女性均未出现复发.中位复发时间为6.9年(范围:0.8-9.2年)。十年DFS为68%,十年DSS为88%,十年OS为82%。
    结论:大多数无症状的BRCA1/2GPV携带者在RRSO时被诊断为早期。然而,经过13.5年的中位随访,28名接受RRSO治疗的HGSC患者中,有9名在中位6.9年后复发.
    The aim of this study was to describe the long-term outcome of asymptomatic BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variant (GPV) carriers with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) in their risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) specimen.
    In a previously described cohort of asymptomatic BRCA1/2 GPV carriers derived from the Hereditary Breast and Ovarian cancer in the Netherlands (HEBON) study, women with HGSC at RRSO were identified. Main outcome was ten-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes were time to recurrence, ten-year disease-specific survival (DSS), ten-year overall survival (OS). Patient, disease and treatment characteristics associated with recurrence were described.
    The 28 included women with HGSC at RRSO were diagnosed at a median age of 55.3 years (range: 33.5-74.3). After staging, eighteen women had (FIGO) stage I, three stage II and five had stage III disease. Two women did not undergo surgical staging and were classified as unknown stage. After a median follow-up of 13.5 years (range: 9.1-24.7), six women with stage I (33%), one woman with stage II (33%), two women with stage III (40%) and none of the women with unknown stage developed a recurrence. Median time to recurrence was 6.9 years (range: 0.8-9.2 years). Ten-year DFS was 68%, ten-year DSS was 88% and ten-year OS was 82%.
    Most asymptomatic BRCA1/2 GPV carriers with HGSC at RRSO were diagnosed at an early stage. Nevertheless, after a median follow-up of 13.5 years, nine of the 28 women with HGSC at RRSO developed a recurrence after a median of 6.9 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号