%0 Journal Article %T The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. %A Bancroft EK %A Page EC %A Brook MN %A Pope J %A Thomas S %A Myhill K %A Helfand BT %A Talaty P %A Ong KR %A Douglas E %A Cook J %A Rosario DJ %A Salinas M %A Buys SS %A Anson J %A Davidson R %A Longmuir M %A Side L %A Eccles DM %A Tischkowitz M %A Taylor A %A Cruellas M %A Ballestero EP %A Cleaver R %A Varughese M %A Barwell J %A LeButt M %A Greenhalgh L %A Hart R %A Azzabi A %A Jobson I %A Cogley L %A Evans DG %A Rothwell J %A Taylor N %A Hogben M %A Saya S %A %A Eeles RA %A Aaronson NK %J BJU Int %V 0 %N 0 %D 2024 Jun 5 %M 38839570 %F 5.969 %R 10.1111/bju.16432 %X OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term outcomes from a longitudinal psychosocial study that forms part of the 'Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted Screening in men at higher genetic risk and controls' (IMPACT) study. The IMPACT study is a multi-national study of targeted prostate cancer (PrCa) screening in individuals with a known germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in either the BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1) or the BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2).
METHODS: Participants enrolled in the IMPACT study were invited to complete a psychosocial questionnaire prior to each annual screening visit for a minimum of 5 years. The questionnaire included questions on sociodemographics and the following measures: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, Memorial Anxiety Scale for PrCa, Cancer Worry Scale, risk perception and knowledge.
RESULTS: A total of 760 participants completed questionnaires: 207 participants with GPV in BRCA1, 265 with GPV in BRCA2 and 288 controls (non-carriers from families with a known GPV). We found no evidence of clinically concerning levels of general or cancer-specific distress or poor health-related quality of life in the cohort as a whole. Individuals in the control group had significantly less worry about PrCa compared with the carriers; however, all mean scores were low and within reported general population norms, where available. BRCA2 carriers with previously high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels experience a small but significant increase in PrCa anxiety (P = 0.01) and PSA-specific anxiety (P < 0.001). Cancer risk perceptions reflected information provided during genetic counselling and participants had good levels of knowledge, although this declined over time.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report the longitudinal psychosocial impact of a targeted PrCa screening programme for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. The results reassure that an annual PSA-based screening programme does not have an adverse impact on psychosocial health or health-related quality of life in these higher-risk individuals. These results are important as more PrCa screening is targeted to higher-risk groups.