General population

一般人口
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氟化液晶单体(FLCM)是一类潜在的新兴的持久性,生物蓄积性,和有毒化合物。人类不可避免地通过食物和环境摄入FLCM。然而,关于FLCM内部暴露生物监测的研究有限。在此,我们根据血清残留水平评估了普通人群中FLCM的估计日摄入量(EDI).第一次,在北京普通人群的314份血清样本中检测到38份FLCM,中位值为132.48ng/g脂质重量(lw)。BDPrB是血清中的主要FLCM。一般居民∑38FLCM的EDI中位数为37.96pg/kgbw/天。城市地区大多数FLCM的残留水平高于郊区(p<0.05)。EFPEB的浓度,EDPrB,EDFPBB,血清中PDTFMTFT与血糖(GLU)呈正相关(r=0.126-0.275,p<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,FLCMs与血脂异常呈显著正相关,比值比为2.19;BDPrB与高血糖呈显著正相关(OR:2.48)。总的来说,本研究表明,FLCM在非职业人群中的发生,某些FLCM的暴露可能会导致血糖和血脂水平异常。
    Fluorinated liquid-crystal monomers (FLCMs) are a potential emerging class of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic compounds. Humans inevitably ingest FLCMs via food and the environment. However, there are limited studies on internal exposure biomonitoring of FLCMs. Herein, we evaluated the estimated daily intakes (EDIs) of FLCMs in the general population based on serum residue levels. For the first time, 38 FLCMs were detected in 314 serum samples from the general population in Beijing, with a median value of 132.48 ng/g of lipid weight (lw). BDPrB is a predominant FLCM in serum. The median EDI of ∑38FLCMs in the general residents was 37.96 pg/kg bw/day. The residual levels of most FLCMs were higher in urban than in suburban areas (p < 0.05). The concentrations of EFPEB, EDPrB, EDFPBB, and PDTFMTFT in serum showed positive associations with blood glucose (GLU) (r = 0.126-0.275, p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that FLCMs were significantly positively correlated with dyslipidemia, with an odds ratio of 2.19; BDPrB was significantly positively correlated with hyperglycemia (OR: 2.48). Overall, the present study suggests the occurrence of FLCMs in the nonoccupational population, and the exposure of certain FLCMs may cause abnormal blood glucose and lipid levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:西方国家三分之一的成年人睡眠质量受损。一个可能的解决方案是通过智能手机应用程序分发睡眠辅助工具,但大多数实证研究仅限于不同人群的小型试点试验(例如,士兵)或患有临床睡眠障碍的个人;因此,需要一般人口数据。此外,最近的研究表明,睡眠应用程序用户渴望一种个性化的方法,提供个性化的技术选择。一个这样的帮助是峰值睡眠,基于科学验证的改善睡眠质量的原则的智能手机应用程序,比如正念冥想和认知行为疗法。
    目的:我们旨在测试智能手机应用程序PeakSleep对睡眠质量的影响,并收集用户体验数据,以便于未来的应用程序开发。
    方法:这是一项双臂先导随机对照试验。参与者是英国的普通成年人(年龄≥18岁),他们对改善睡眠质量感兴趣,并且没有接受睡眠障碍的临床治疗或每周使用睡眠药物≥1次。参与者分别随机接受干预(3个月的应用程序使用),而非无治疗对照。干预措施包括免费进入睡眠峰值,一个提供行为技巧选择的应用程序,以支持更好的睡眠(正念,认知行为疗法,和接受承诺疗法)。主要结果是在基线时使用失眠严重程度指数评估睡眠质量,2-,和3个月的随访。使用基于网络的问卷进行远程评估。计划使用Oura环(大uraHealthOy)进行客观的睡眠数据收集;但是,因为COVID-19大流行的封锁是在招募开始后才开始的,这个计划无法实现。使用数字行为改变干预参与量表和对子样本的定性电话采访来评估参与者对应用程序的参与。
    结果:共有101名参与者参加了试验,21人(21%)接受了定性访谈.随着时间的推移,两组的睡眠质量都有所改善。干预组失眠严重程度指数评分平均提高2.5,对照组平均提高1.6(组间平均差0.9,95%CI-2.0至3.8),组无显著影响(P=.91)。应用程序用户的参与度参差不齐,定性采访支持一个强烈喜欢或不喜欢这款应用的两极分化样本的观点。
    结论:在本试验中,干预和控制臂的自我报告睡眠随着时间的推移而改善,没有团体的影响,暗示睡眠应用程序没有效果。定性数据表明,人们对喜欢或不喜欢该应用程序有两极化的看法,人们参与的特征,和需要改进的地方。未来的工作可能涉及开发应用程序功能,然后在更大的样本中使用客观的睡眠测量来测试应用程序。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04487483;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/研究/NCT04487483。
    BACKGROUND: A third of adults in Western countries have impaired sleep quality. A possible solution involves distributing sleep aids through smartphone apps, but most empirical studies are limited to small pilot trials in distinct populations (eg, soldiers) or individuals with clinical sleep disorders; therefore, general population data are required. Furthermore, recent research shows that sleep app users desire a personalized approach, offering an individually tailored choice of techniques. One such aid is Peak Sleep, a smartphone app based on scientifically validated principles for improving sleep quality, such as mindfulness meditation and cognitive behavioral therapy.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the impact of the smartphone app Peak Sleep on sleep quality and collect user experience data to allow for future app development.
    METHODS: This was a 2-arm pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were general population adults in the United Kingdom (aged ≥18 years) who were interested in improving their sleep quality and were not undergoing clinical treatment for sleep disorder or using sleep medication ≥1 per week. Participants were individually randomized to receive the intervention (3 months of app use) versus a no-treatment control. The intervention involved free access to Peak Sleep, an app that offered a choice of behavioral techniques to support better sleep (mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy, and acceptance commitment therapy). The primary outcome was sleep quality assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index at baseline and 1-, 2-, and 3-month follow-ups. Assessments were remote using web-based questionnaires. Objective sleep data collection using the Oura Ring (Ōura Health Oy) was planned; however, because the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns began just after recruitment started, this plan could not be realized. Participant engagement with the app was assessed using the Digital Behavior Change Intervention Engagement Scale and qualitative telephone interviews with a subsample.
    RESULTS: A total of 101 participants were enrolled in the trial, and 21 (21%) were qualitatively interviewed. Sleep quality improved in both groups over time, with Insomnia Severity Index scores of the intervention group improving by a mean of 2.5 and the control group by a mean of 1.6 (between-group mean difference 0.9, 95% CI -2.0 to 3.8), with was no significant effect of group (P=.91). App users\' engagement was mixed, with qualitative interviews supporting the view of a polarized sample who either strongly liked or disliked the app.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, self-reported sleep improved over time in both intervention and control arms, with no impact by group, suggesting no effect of the sleep app. Qualitative data suggested polarized views on liking or not liking the app, features that people engaged with, and areas for improvement. Future work could involve developing the app features and then testing the app using objective measures of sleep in a larger sample.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04487483; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04487483.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管胰岛素抵抗(IR)已被认为是各种疾病的病因,目前关于一般人群中IR与长期死亡率之间关系的信息有限,不同IR指标和不同人群之间的结论存在差异.我们旨在评估不同IR测量值与普通人群长期全因死亡率和心血管死亡风险之间的关联。
    方法:我们纳入了来自第三次全国健康和营养调查的13,909人。死亡率是通过国家死亡指数信息确定的,直到2019年12月31日。使用空腹胰岛素测量IR,IR的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR),稳态模型评估β细胞功能,定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI),胰岛素葡萄糖比(IGR),甘油三酯葡萄糖(TyG)指数,TyG-体重指数(TyG-BMI),和高甘油三酯腰围表型。
    结果:在中位25年随访期间,发生了5,306例全因死亡事件。经过多变量调整后,与全因死亡风险升高显著相关的变量为(风险比[95%置信区间]):胰岛素升高(1.07[1.02;1.13]);HOMA-IR(1.08[1.03;1.13]);IGR(1.05[1.00;1.11]);TyG(1.07[1.00;1.14]);TyG-BMI(1.24[1.02;1.51]);QUICKI(0.96)按糖尿病状态分层后,更高的胰岛素,HOMA-IR,在糖尿病和非糖尿病人群中,TyG-BMI和较低的QUICKI与全因死亡风险增加显著相关(所有交互作用P均>0.05)。更高的TyG(调整后的HR1.17[1.09;1.26],相互作用的P=0.018)和高甘油三酯腰围表型(调整后的HR1.26[1.08;1.46],交互作用的P=0.047)与糖尿病患者的全因死亡率风险增加显着相关,然而,这些关联在没有糖尿病的人群中看不到。在上述IR指标和心血管死亡之间观察到类似的结果。
    结论:空腹胰岛素,HOMA-IR,TyG-BMI,QUICKI可能表明糖尿病和非糖尿病人群的死亡风险,TyG和高甘油三酯腰围表型显示与糖尿病个体特别相关。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并确定其更广泛的适用性。
    OBJECTIVE: Although insulin resistance (IR) has been recognized to be a causal component in various diseases, current information on the relationship between IR and long-term mortality in the general population is limited and conclusions varied among different IR indicators and different populations. We aimed to assess associations between different measurements of IR with long-term all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality risk for the general population.
    METHODS: We included 13,909 individuals from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Mortality was identified via National Death Index information until December 31, 2019. IR was measured using fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), insulin-to-glucose ratio (IGR), triglyceride glucose (TyG) index, TyG-body mass index (TyG-BMI), and hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype.
    RESULTS: During median 25-year follow-up, 5,306 all-cause mortality events occurred. After multivariate adjustment, variables significantly associated with elevated all-cause mortality risk were (hazard ratio [95 % confidence interval]): higher insulin (1.07 [1.02;1.13]); HOMA-IR (1.08 [1.03;1.13]); IGR (1.05 [1.00;1.11]); TyG (1.07 [1.00;1.14]); TyG-BMI (1.24 [1.02;1.51]); lower QUICKI (0.91 [0.86-0.96]). After stratification by diabetes status, higher insulin, HOMA-IR, TyG-BMI and lower QUICKI were significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in both diabetes and non-diabetes populations (all P for interaction > 0.05). Higher TyG (adjusted HR 1.17 [1.09;1.26], P for interaction = 0.018) and hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype (adjusted HR 1.26 [1.08;1.46], P for interaction = 0.047) were significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes, however, these associations could not be seen in people without diabetes. Similar results were observed between the above-mentioned IR indicators and cardiovascular death.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, TyG-BMI, and QUICKI may indicate mortality risk in diabetes and non-diabetes populations, with TyG and the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype showing particular relevance for individuals with diabetes. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and determine their broader applicability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究血清klotho浓度与虚弱之间的潜在线性关系。
    方法:对全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)五个周期的9,597名中老年人(40-79岁)的数据进行回顾性分析。使用脆弱指数评估脆弱,以53项健康项目累计赤字的百分比计算。受限制的三次样条曲线,亚组分析和逻辑回归模型用于评估循环klotho蛋白浓度与虚弱之间的特定线性趋势关系.
    结果:当将Klotho作为模型1和模型2中的连续成分考虑在内时,增加的Klotho水平与降低的虚弱风险之间存在实质性关联。模型3显示了Klotho和Failty之间的强烈负相关,表明高水平的Klotho蛋白降低了虚弱患病率[奇数比(OR):0.25;95%置信区间(CI):0.15-0.43].此外,根据四分位数分析,在完全调整协变量后,据观察,与Klotho的最低四分位数相比,Klotho的最高四分位数表现出最低的虚弱风险(OR0.69;95%CI0.58-0.81,Ptrend<0.001).受限的三次样条曲线显示出脆弱与Klotho水平之间的线性关系和逆关联(Plinearity<0.001;Pnon-linearity=0.736)。
    结论:Klotho与一般人群(40-79岁)的身体虚弱呈负相关和线性相关,特别是在年龄<65且体重指数(BMI)≥25kg/m2的人群中。应进行更多必要的前瞻性研究,以进一步研究虚弱和衰老的潜在机制,并阐明个体虚弱的原因。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential linear relationship between serum concentrations of klotho and frailty.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 9,597 middle-aged and older adults (aged 40-79 years) from the five cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Frailty was assessed using the Frailty Index, calculated as a percentage of accumulated deficits across 53 health items. Restricted cubic spline curves, subgroup analyses and logistic regression models were employed to evaluate the specific linear trend connection between circulating klotho protein concentration and frailty.
    RESULTS: When taking Klotho into account as a continuous component in Models 1 and 2, there was a substantial association between the increasing Klotho level and the reduced risk of frailty. Model 3 revealed a strong negative correlation between the Klotho and Frailty, suggesting that high levels of Klotho protein decreases the frailty prevalence [Odd ratio (OR): 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-0.43]. Furthermore, according to the quartile analyses, after fully adjusting for the covariates, it was observed that, comparing to the lowest quartile of Klotho, the highest quartile of Klotho demonstrated lowest risk of frailty (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.58-0.81, Ptrend < 0.001). The restricted cubic spline curves showed a linear relationship and an inverse association between frailty and the Klotho levels (Plinearity < 0.001; Pnon-linearity = 0.736).
    CONCLUSIONS: Klotho is inversely and linearly associated with physical frailty in the general population (aged 40-79 years), specifically in the population with an age < 65 and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2. More necessary prospective studies should be done to further investigate the mechanisms underlying frailty and aging and to elucidate individual frailty causes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:估计葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)是一种新颖的方法,临床可用,和具有成本效益的替代胰岛素抵抗。当前的研究旨在评估eGDR与普遍心力衰竭(HF)之间的关联。并进一步评估eGDR在检测普通人群中普遍存在的HF中的价值。
    方法:纳入了1999-2018年国家健康和营养检查调查的25,450名受试者。根据受试者报告记录HF。采用Logistic回归分析eGDR与HF的相关性。结果总结为每标准偏差(SD)变化。然后,亚组分析检验了逻辑回归的主要结果在几个常规亚群中是否稳健.最后,使用接收器工作特征曲线(ROC)和重新分类分析来评估eGDR在改善流行HF检测中的潜在价值。
    结果:报告的HF的患病率为2.96%(753名受试者)。调整人口结构后,实验室,人体测量学,和病史资料,eGDR的每一个SD增量可导致流行HF的风险降低43.3%(P<0.001).在四分位数分析中,在全模型中,与底部四分位数相比,顶部四分位数有31.1%(P<0.001)的普遍HF风险.平滑曲线拟合表明,在eGDR的整个范围内,该关联是线性的(非线性的P=0.313)。亚组分析显示,这种关联在年龄上是稳健的,性别,种族,糖尿病,和高血压亚组(所有P>0.05)。此外,ROC分析显示,在普遍HF的检测方面有显著改善(0.869vs.0.873,P=0.008);重新分类分析也证实了eGDR的改善(所有P<0.001)。
    结论:我们的研究表明,eGDR,一个无成本的胰岛素抵抗的替代品,可能与普遍的HF具有线性和稳健的关联。此外,我们的发现暗示了eGDR在改善普通人群中普遍存在的HF检测方面的潜在价值.
    BACKGROUND: Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a novel, clinically available, and cost-effective surrogate of insulin resistance. The current study aimed to assess the association between eGDR and prevalent heart failure (HF), and further evaluate the value of eGDR in detecting prevalent HF in a general population.
    METHODS: 25,450 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018 were included. HF was recorded according to the subjects\' reports. Logistic regression was employed to analyze the association between eGDR and HF, the results were summarized as Per standard deviation (SD) change. Then, subgroup analysis tested whether the main result from logistic regression was robust in several conventional subpopulations. Finally, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and reclassification analysis were utilized to evaluate the potential value of eGDR in improving the detection of prevalent HF.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of reported HF was 2.96% (753 subjects). After adjusting demographic, laboratory, anthropometric, and medical history data, each SD increment of eGDR could result in a 43.3% (P < 0.001) risk reduction for prevalent HF. In the quartile analysis, the top quartile had a 31.1% (P < 0.001) risk of prevalent HF compared to the bottom quartile in the full model. Smooth curve fitting demonstrated that the association was linear in the whole range of eGDR (P for non-linearity = 0.313). Subgroup analysis revealed that the association was robust in age, sex, race, diabetes, and hypertension subgroups (All P for interaction > 0.05). Additionally, ROC analysis displayed a significant improvement in the detection of prevalent HF (0.869 vs. 0.873, P = 0.008); reclassification analysis also confirmed the improvement from eGDR (All P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that eGDR, a costless surrogate of insulin resistance, may have a linear and robust association with the prevalent HF. Furthermore, our findings implicate the potential value of eGDR in refining the detection of prevalent HF in the general population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:癌症患者常出现睡眠问题。已经开发了用于评估睡眠质量的多个问卷。这项研究的目的是提出转移规则,允许将患者的分数从一份问卷转换为另一份问卷。此外,我们将这个共同的指标锚定到普通人群。
    方法:1,733名癌症患者的样本完成了以下问卷:匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,失眠睡眠指数,詹金斯睡眠量表,EORTCQLQ-C30和EORTCQLQ-SURV100的睡眠规模。建立通用度量的方法基于项目反应理论。
    结果:研究的主要结果是一个数字,该数字允许从上述睡眠量表之一转换为另一种。此外,问卷的得分可以转换为theta得分,该得分指示癌症患者组中的位置,也可以转换为T得分,该得分指示与普通人群有关的位置。睡眠量表之间的相关性介于0.70和0.85之间。
    结论:研究中提出的转换规则使研究人员和临床医生能够使用不同的睡眠量表直接比较研究中的单个得分或平均得分。评估一般人群的睡眠问题程度,并将一份问卷的截止分数与另一份问卷的截止分数相关联。
    OBJECTIVE: Sleep problems are frequently observed in cancer patients. Multiple questionnaires for assessing sleep quality have been developed. The aim of this study was to present transfer rules that allow the conversion of the patients\' scores from one questionnaire to another. In addition, we anchored this common metric to the general population.
    METHODS: A sample of 1,733 cancer patients completed the following questionnaires: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Insomnia Sleep Index, Jenkins Sleep Scale, EORTC QLQ-C30, and the sleep scale of the EORTC QLQ-SURV100. The methods for establishing a common metric were based on Item Response Theory.
    RESULTS: The main result of the study is a figure that allows the conversion from one of the above-mentioned sleep scales into another. Furthermore, the scores of the questionnaires can be transferred to theta scores that indicate the position within the group of cancer patients and also to T scores that indicate the position in relation to the general population. The correlations between the sleep scales ranged between 0.70 and 0.85.
    CONCLUSIONS: The conversion rules presented in the study enable researchers and clinicians to directly compare single scores or mean scores across studies using different sleep scales, to assess the degree of sleep problems with regard to the general population, and to relate cutoff scores from one questionnaire to another.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解肾功能的正常老化对于帮助区分患有慢性肾脏疾病的特定风险的个体至关重要。肾小球滤过率(GFR)通常通过血清肌酸酐(eGFR)或胱抑素C(eGFR)来估计。由于eGFR和eGFR下降的基于人群的年龄组特定参考值很少,我们旨在从广泛年龄范围的基于人群的数据中提供这些参考值。在四个德国基于人口的队列中(KORA-3,KORA-4,AugUR,DIACORE),参与者接受了医学检查,采访,在长达25年的时间内抽血五次。我们对eGFRcrea和eGFRcys进行了横截面和纵向分析(12,000名个体,年龄25-95岁)。跨领域,我们发现特定年龄组的eGFRcrea在整个年龄范围内近似线性下降,对于60岁以下的eGFRcys。在年龄组中,性别或糖尿病状态差异不大。纵向,线性混合模型估计eGFRcrea的年度下降为-0.80[95%置信区间-0.82,-0.77],-0.79[-0.83,-0.76],一般人群为-1.20毫升/分钟/1.73平方米[-1.33,-1.08],“健康”的人,或糖尿病患者,分别。使用横截面数据的eGFR参考值显示为“健康”个体和糖尿病个体的百分位曲线。使用纵向数据的eGFR下降的参考值表示为“健康”个体和糖尿病个体的95%预测间隔,肥胖,和/或蛋白尿。因此,我们的结果可以帮助临床医生根据年龄判断临床实践中个体的eGFR值,并根据他们的风险状况了解每年eGFR下降的预期范围.
    Understanding normal aging of kidney function is pivotal to help distinguish individuals at particular risk for chronic kidney disease. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is typically estimated via serum creatinine (eGFRcrea) or cystatin C (eGFRcys). Since population-based age-group-specific reference values for eGFR and eGFR-decline are scarce, we aimed to provide such reference values from population-based data of a wide age range. In four German population-based cohorts (KORA-3, KORA-4, AugUR, DIACORE), participants underwent medical exams, interview, and blood draw up to five times within up to 25 years. We analyzed eGFRcrea and eGFRcys cross-sectionally and longitudinally (12,000 individuals, age 25-95 years). Cross-sectionally, we found age-group-specific eGFRcrea to decrease approximately linearly across the full age range, for eGFRcys up to the age of 60 years. Within age-groups, there was little difference by sex or diabetes status. Longitudinally, linear mixed models estimated an annual eGFRcrea decline of -0.80 [95% confidence interval -0.82, -0.77], -0.79 [-0.83, -0.76], and -1.20 mL/min/1.73m2 [-1.33, -1.08] for the general population, \"healthy\" individuals, or individuals with diabetes, respectively. Reference values for eGFR using cross-sectional data were shown as percentile curves for \"healthy\" individuals and for individuals with diabetes. Reference values for eGFR-decline using longitudinal data were presented as 95% prediction intervals for \"healthy\" individuals and for individuals with diabetes, obesity, and/or albuminuria. Thus, our results can help clinicians to judge eGFR values in individuals seen in clinical practice according to their age and to understand the expected range of annual eGFR-decline based on their risk profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管将低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)降低到正常范围,残余的心血管风险仍然存在。残余胆固醇(RC)对心血管疾病(CVD)预防具有潜在的残余风险,RC和死亡率之间的长期纵向关联尚未得到很好的阐明。
    这项研究调查了一个全国代表性的样本13,383名20岁或以上的成年人(平均年龄45.7岁和52%的女性)参加了NHANESIII(从1988年到1994年)。死亡原因是通过与2019年12月31日之前的死亡记录联系来确定的。使用加权Cox比例风险模型测试RC与全因和CVD死亡率的关系。
    经过26.6年的中位随访,报告了5,044人死亡,包括1,741例CVD死亡[1,409例缺血性心脏病(IHD)死亡和332例中风死亡]和1,126例癌症。与RC<14.26mg/dl(最低四分位数)相比,RC≥29.80mg/dl(最高四分位数)的参与者的全因死亡率的多变量校正HR为1.23(95%CI:1.07-1.42),1.22(95%CI:0.97-1.53)的CVD死亡率,IHD死亡率为1.32(95%CI:1.03-1.69),卒中死亡率为0.89(95%CI:0.55-1.43),癌症死亡率为1.17(95%CI0.90-1.52)。我们观察到,尽管LDL-C在正常范围内,但RC水平升高会增加CVD风险和IHD死亡率。
    血液RC升高与全因长期风险增加有关,CVD,和IHD死亡率。这些关联独立于社会经济因素,生活方式,和疾病史,并在整个LDL-C层中保持稳健。测量RC水平可能有利于早期CVD风险的临床评估。需要进一步研究以阐明一般人群中心血管疾病健康的RC水平的最佳范围。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to the normal range, residual cardiovascular risk remain. Remnant cholesterol (RC) exerts a potential residual risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, and the long-term longitudinal association between RC and mortality has yet to be well elucidated.
    UNASSIGNED: This study examined a nationally representative sample of 13,383 adults aged 20 years or older (mean age 45.7 and 52% women) who participated in the NHANES III (from1988 to1994). Causes of death were ascertained by linkage to death records through December 31, 2019. The relations of RC with all-cause and CVD mortality were tested using weighted Cox proportional hazard models.
    UNASSIGNED: Through a median follow-up of 26.6 years, 5,044 deaths were reported, comprising 1,741 deaths of CVD [1,409 deaths of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and 332 deaths of stroke] and 1,126 of cancer. Compared to those with RC <14.26 mg/dl (lowest quartile), participants with RC ≥29.80 mg/dl (highest quartile) had multivariable-adjusted HRs of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.07-1.42) for all-cause mortality, 1.22 (95% CI: 0.97-1.53) for CVD mortality, and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03-1.69) for IHD mortality, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.55-1.43) for stroke mortality, and 1.17 (95% CI 0.90-1.52) for cancer mortality. We observed that elevated RC levels increased CVD risk and IHD mortality despite LDL-C being in the normal range.
    UNASSIGNED: Elevated blood RC was associated with an increased long-term risk of all-cause, CVD, and IHD mortality. These associations were independent of socioeconomic factors, lifestyles, and history of diseases, and remained robust across the LDL-C stratum. Measuring RC levels might favor clinical assessment of early CVD risk. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the optimal range of RC levels for cardiovascular disease health in the general population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:子宫切除术被认为会增加尿失禁(UI)的风险,尽管证据是有争议的。在我们基于人群的队列研究中,我们旨在评估子宫切除术对新发UI风险的独立影响.
    方法:这是一项针对1966年北芬兰出生队列妇女的基于人群的队列研究(n=5889)。我们使用国家医疗保健登记册确定了队列中的所有子宫切除术(n=461),并根据腹腔镜手术方法对其进行了分类(n=247)。阴道(n=107),和腹部子宫切除术(n=107)。未进行子宫切除术的妇女为参照组(n=3495)。所有有UI诊断和手术的女性都在登记册中被确认,术前UI诊断的女性(n=36)被排除在评估从头UI的分析之外.从登记册和队列问卷中收集有关潜在混杂因素的数据。比较子宫切除组和参照组不同UI亚型和UI操作的发生率,并通过不同的子宫切除术方法进一步分类。采用Logistic回归模型分析子宫切除术与UI、对几个UI相关的协变量进行调整。
    结果:我们发现子宫切除术与参照组之间UI诊断的发生率或后续UI手术的发生率没有显着差异(24[5.6%]与166[4.7%],p=0.416和14[3.3%]与87[2.5%],p=0.323)。子宫切除术与任何亚型UI的风险均无显著相关(总体UI:OR1.20,95%CI0.77-1.86;应激性UI(SUI):OR1.51,95%CI0.89-2.55;其他UI:OR0.80,95%CI0.36-1.74)。在调整术前盆腔器官脱垂(POP)诊断后,风险降低(总体UI:OR0.54,95%CI0.32-0.90;除SUI:OR0.40,95%CI0.17-0.95).关于不同的子宫切除术方法,阴道整体UI和SUI的风险显著增加,但不能用于腹腔镜或开腹子宫切除术。然而,调整术前POP诊断消除了这些风险.
    结论:子宫切除术不是新发UI的独立危险因素。相反,潜在的POP似乎是子宫切除术后UI发生率的重要危险因素.
    BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy has been suggested to increase the risk of urinary incontinence (UI), although evidence is controversial. In our population-based cohort study, we aimed to assess the independent effect of hysterectomy on the risk of de novo UI.
    METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study on the women of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 5889). We identified all hysterectomies among the cohort (n = 461) using the national Care Register for Health Care and classified them according to surgical approach into laparoscopic (n = 247), vaginal (n = 107), and abdominal hysterectomies (n = 107). Women without hysterectomy formed the reference group (n = 3495). All women with UI diagnoses and operations were identified in the register, and women with preoperative UI diagnosis (n = 36) were excluded from the analysis to assess de novo UI. Data on potential confounding factors were collected from registers and the cohort questionnaire. Incidences of different UI subtypes and UI operations were compared between the hysterectomy and the reference groups, and further disaggregated by different hysterectomy approaches. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between hysterectomy and UI, with adjustments for several UI-related covariates.
    RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the incidence of UI diagnoses or the rate of subsequent UI operations between the hysterectomy and the reference groups (24 [5.6%] vs. 166 [4.7%], p = 0.416 and 14 [3.3%] vs. 87 [2.5%], p = 0.323). Hysterectomy was not significantly associated with the risk of any subtype of UI (overall UI: OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.77-1.86; stress UI (SUI): OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.89-2.55; other UI: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36-1.74). After adjusting for preoperative pelvic organ prolapse (POP) diagnoses, the risk was decreased (overall UI: OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.90; other than SUI: OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95). Regarding different hysterectomy approaches, the risks of overall UI and SUI were significantly increased in vaginal, but not in laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy. However, adjusting for preoperative POP diagnosis abolished these risks.
    CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy is not an independent risk factor for de novo UI. Instead, underlying POP appears to be a significant risk factor for the incidence of UI after hysterectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然重要,临床上显著的肝纤维化在一般人群中经常被忽视。我们的目的是使用非侵入性测试(NIT)在一般人群中检查临床上显着的肝纤维化的患病率。
    我们从四个数据库(MEDLINE,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和KoreaMed)从成立到2023年6月13日。报告在一般人群中有临床意义的肝纤维化的患病率的原始文章被包括在内。Statametaprop功能用于获得普通人群中NIT合并肝纤维化的患病率。
    我们筛选了6,429篇文章,并纳入了45项符合条件的研究,这些研究报告了普通人群中临床上显着的肝纤维化的患病率。晚期肝纤维化的患病率,使用纤维化-4(FIB-4)指数的高概率截止值,为2.3%(95%置信区间[CI],1.2-3.7%)。显著肝纤维化的患病率,晚期肝纤维化,肝硬化,在一般人群中使用振动控制瞬时弹性成像(VCTE)进行评估,为7.3%(95%CI,5.9-8.8%),3.5%(95%CI,2.7-4.5),和1.2%(95%CI,0.8-1.8%),分别。基于区域的亚组分析显示,使用FIB-4指数的高概率截止,在美洲地区观察到晚期纤维化的最高患病率。此外,美洲地区表现出最高的患病率显著肝纤维化,晚期肝纤维化,肝硬化,使用VCTE。
    通过NIT在普通人群中发现了先前未诊断的临床显着肝纤维化。未来的研究有必要对普通人群的风险进行分层。
    Although important, clinically significant liver fibrosis is often overlooked in the general population. We aimed to examine the prevalence of clinically significant liver fibrosis using noninvasive tests (NITs) in the general population.
    We collected data from four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) from inception to June 13, 2023. Original articles reporting the prevalence of clinically significant liver fibrosis in the general population were included. The Stata metaprop function was used to obtain the pooled prevalence of liver fibrosis with NITs in the general population.
    We screened 6,429 articles and included 45 eligible studies that reported the prevalence of clinically significant liver fibrosis in the general population. The prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis, using the high probability cutoff of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.7%). The prevalence of significant liver fibrosis, advanced liver fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis, assessed using vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) among the general population, was 7.3% (95% CI, 5.9-8.8%), 3.5% (95% CI, 2.7-4.5), and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.8-1.8%), respectively. Region-based subgroup analysis revealed that the highest prevalence of advanced fibrosis using the high probability cutoff of the FIB-4 index was observed in the American region. Furthermore, the American region exhibits the highest prevalence of significant liver fibrosis, advanced liver fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis, using VCTE.
    Previously undiagnosed clinically significant liver fibrosis is found in the general population through NITs. Future research is necessary to stratify the risk in the general population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号