Galen

盖伦
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Galen静脉畸形(VOGMs),也被称为Galen动脉瘤畸形静脉(VGAMs),是罕见和复杂的脑血管异常,构成重大的诊断和治疗挑战。这些畸形是由胚胎发育过程中异常的动静脉分流引起的,导致一系列严重的临床表现,包括高输出心力衰竭和脑积水.产前成像的进展,尤其是胎儿MRI,改善了早期检测,允许及时干预。血管内技术,尤其是经动脉栓塞,已经成为主要的治疗方式,由于其有效性和较低的风险,通常优先于手术方法。然而,挑战依然存在,特别是在处理新生儿和婴儿的畸形时,并发症的风险很高。伽玛刀放射外科为特定病例提供了一种非侵入性替代方案,尽管其影响是渐进的,可能会带来延迟的风险。尽管取得了进步,VOGM的管理仍然需要多学科的方法,正在进行的研究集中在通过更好地了解疾病的遗传和分子基础来改善结果。未来的方向包括将遗传研究整合到临床实践中,并完善治疗策略以优化这种复杂状况的结果。
    Vein of Galen malformations (VOGMs), also known as Vein of Galen Aneurysmal Malformations (VGAMs), are rare and complex cerebrovascular anomalies that pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. These malformations result from abnormal arteriovenous shunts during embryonic development, leading to a range of severe clinical manifestations, including high-output cardiac failure and hydrocephalus. Advances in prenatal imaging, particularly fetal MRI, have improved early detection, allowing for timely intervention. Endovascular techniques, especially transarterial embolization, have become the primary treatment modality, often preferred over surgical approaches due to their effectiveness and lower risk. However, challenges remain, particularly in managing these malformations in neonates and infants, where the risk of complications is high. Gamma Knife radiosurgery offers a non-invasive alternative for select cases, though its effects are gradual and may carry delayed risks. Despite advancements, the management of VOGMs continues to require a multidisciplinary approach, with ongoing research focused on improving outcomes through a better understanding of the genetic and molecular underpinnings of the disease. Future directions include the integration of genetic studies into clinical practice and the refinement of treatment strategies to optimize outcomes for this complex condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    科学史上流行的叙述认为,古希腊人没有“自然法则”的概念。本文推翻了这种叙述,并表明一些古希腊哲学家确实有自然法则的想法,此外,他们把它们称为“自然法则”。本文分析了柏拉图文本中自然规律的具体例子,亚里士多德,亚历山大的Philo,Gerasa的Nicomachus,还有Galen.这些例子源于柏拉图式和毕达哥拉斯式的传统,这些哲学家在描述算术方法时引用了自然规律,算术学说,或者医学理论.尼科马修斯的自然法则尤其值得注意,因为它们具有历史学家在寻找现代自然法则概念起源时寻找的特征。尼科马修斯自然法则是数学的,普遍,和必要的。本文提出了古代柏拉图和毕达哥拉斯传统影响了中世纪和现代早期欧洲自然法则思想的后续发展的可能性,包括约翰内斯·开普勒和艾萨克·牛顿提出的自然法则的概念。
    The prevailing narrative in the history of science maintains that the ancient Greeks did not have a concept of a \'law of nature\'. This paper overturns that narrative and shows that some ancient Greek philosophers did have an idea of laws of nature and, moreover, they referred to them as \'laws of nature\'. This paper analyzes specific examples of laws of nature in texts by Plato, Aristotle, Philo of Alexandria, Nicomachus of Gerasa, and Galen. These examples emerged out of the closely intertwined Platonic and Pythagorean traditions, and these philosophers\' texts make reference to laws of nature when describing arithmetical methods, arithmological doctrines, or medical theories. Nicomachus\' laws of nature are especially noteworthy, because they have features that historians look for in the search for the origin of the modern concept of laws of nature. Nicomachus\' laws of nature are mathematical, universal, and necessary. This paper raises the possibility that the ancient Platonic and Pythagorean traditions influenced the subsequent development of the idea of laws of nature in medieval and early modern Europe, including the conception of laws of nature deployed by Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亚里士多德关于人体的三方概念,灵魂和精神-形成了杰出的养育制度的基础,激活和动画化支流域,由肝脏支配,心脏和大脑,分别。哥特式大教堂的结构成类似的三方安排的中殿,唱诗班和避难所。我们研究了盖伦概念之间是否可以找到一致的相似之处,Galenic心脏本身和哥特式大教堂的结构。
    回顾了盖伦文献和学术文献。参观并研究了哥特式大教堂的示例。我们使用中世纪的分析工具来比较大教堂建筑的特征和人与心的当代概念。
    在Galenic系统和哥特式大教堂的结构部分之间发现了一致的相似之处。同源性原则,盖伦系统和哥特式建筑都是固有的,在Galenic心脏本身中确定了相同的三方组织,并且可以将这些部分投影到大教堂结构上。因此,身体/营养领域与右心室入口和中殿一致;心理/活力领域与右心室出口/室间隔和教堂合唱团相对应;动画/精神领域与左心室/主动脉瓣和大教堂的避难所平行。
    亚里士多德/Galenic三方概念似乎与哥特式建筑一致,并且都提供了对世界的全面看法;他们的关系源于共同的哲学和象征基础。三方解释是如此连贯,以至于有效地延迟了对循环和心脏在其中的作用的认识。
    UNASSIGNED: Aristotle\'s tripartite concept of man-body, soul and spirit-formed the basis of the Galenic system that distinguished nurturing, vitalizing and animating tributary domains, governed by the liver, heart and brain, respectively. The Gothic cathedral structures into similar tripartite arrangements of nave, choir and sanctuary. We studied whether consistent parallels can be found between the Galenic concept of man, the Galenic heart itself and the structuring of the Gothic cathedral.
    UNASSIGNED: Galenic literature along with scholastic texts were reviewed. Examples of Gothic cathedrals were visited and studied in locations. We used medieval analytical tools to compare characteristics of cathedral architecture and contemporary concepts on man and the heart.
    UNASSIGNED: Consistent parallels were found between the Galenic system and the structural parts of the Gothic cathedral. The principle of homology, intrinsic to both the Galenic system and Gothic architecture, identified the same tripartite organization in the Galenic heart itself and the segments could be projected onto the cathedral structure. Thus, the physical/nurturing domain was identified with the right ventricle inlet and the nave; the psychological/vitalizing domain corresponded with the right ventricle outlet/interventricular septum and the cathedral\'s choir; the animating/spiritual domain paralleled with the left ventricle/aortic valve and the sanctuary in the cathedral.
    UNASSIGNED: The Aristotelian/Galenic tripartite concept appears consistent with Gothic architecture and both provided a comprehensive view of the world; their relationship stems in a common philosophical and symbolic foundation. The tripartite interpretation was so coherent that it effectively delayed recognition of circulation and the heart\'s role in it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    古代社会认为心脏是人体最重要的器官。古代宗教认为,只有通过心脏才能与上帝联系。在欧洲的中世纪,关于心脏的工作几乎没有进步。随着中世纪被文艺复兴所取代,科学家和医生开始质疑关于心脏的长期理论。第一次准确地描述了心脏及其功能,并绘制了第一个解剖学上正确的心脏表示。
    Ancient societies believed the heart was the most important organ in the body. Ancient religions held that only through the heart could one connect with God. During Europe\'s Middle Ages there was little to no advances regarding the heart\'s workings. As the Middle Ages gave way to the Renaissance, scientists and physicians began questioning long-standing theories on the heart. The first accurate descriptions of the heart and its function were written, and the first anatomically correct representations of the heart were drawn.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇文章反映了医学的一个新的(但古老的)定义,从复杂的人类经历中考虑医生和病人。它通过历史的视角探讨了医患关系以及医学本身的实践,通过研究Pergamum的Galen的一些奖学金,公元二世纪的古希腊医生和哲学家。目的不是给一个新的,明确的答案,但是用过去的例子来看待这个问题,也许不寻常,透视。
    This article is a reflection on a new (but ancient) definition of medicine, which considers doctors and patients alike from their complex human experiences. It explores the doctor-patient relationship as well as the practice of medicine itself through an historical lens, by examining some of the scholarship of Galen of Pergamum, the ancient Greek doctor and philosopher of the second century CE. The intention is not to give a new, definite answer, but to use an example from the past to look at the matter from a different, perhaps unusual, perspective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    从17世纪中叶开始,睾丸“发酵”的吸收和精液某些部分的吸收构成了第二性征的著名说法。只有在20世纪初,才是后者,“重新分泌”理论,明确认为被一种内部分泌物取代,迎来激素时代的进步。从第一个开始就提供了这些原始内分泌概念的重建,1490印刷版的盖伦的精液。早期的现代医生从盖伦那里拿起广泛讨论了男性和女性睾丸对整个身体的影响的媒介和途径,“包括思想,在身体上造成“女性气质”和“男性气质”,精神气质,和行为术语。从“热量和强度”(盖伦)到血液传播的“男子气概”或睾丸蒸气(例如托马斯·罗德里格斯·达·维加在1564年提出的),关于“开创性发酵”的医疗化学假设(在1650年代后期提出,也许是独立的,牛津的托马斯·威利斯和乌得勒支的兰伯特·范·韦尔图森),终于在不久之后出现了“精修精修”或“重新吸收精液”的概念(在乔瓦尼·阿方索·博雷利的死后作品中出现,除其他外)。在18世纪后期,越来越多的争议围绕着这个概念的概念和所涉及的解剖学途径,通过多个实验。
    From the mid-seventeenth century, resorption of a testicular \"ferment\" and resorption of some part of the semen constituted reputable accounts of secondary sexual characteristics. Only in the early twentieth century was the latter, \"recrementitious secretion\" theory, explicitly considered superseded by one of internal secretion, an advance ushering in the hormone era. A reconstruction of these proto-endocrinological concepts is offered onward from the first, 1490 print edition of Galen\'s On Semen. Early modern physicians picking up from Galen deliberated widely on the medium and pathway of male and female testicular influences on \"the entire body,\" including the mind, causing \"femininity\" and \"masculinity\" in physical, mental-temperamental, and behavioral terms. A switch is discernible from \"heat and strength\" (Galen) to blood-borne \"virility\" or testicular vapor (such as proposed in 1564 by Tomás Rodrigues da Veiga), to iatrochemical postulations of a \"seminal ferment\" (suggested in the late 1650s, perhaps independently, by Thomas Willis at Oxford and Lambert van Velthuysen in Utrecht), finally to a \"seminal recrement\" or \"reabsorbed semen\" concept soon after (emergent in the posthumous work of Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, among others). During the late eighteenth century, mounting controversy surrounded both the very idea of that concept and the involved anatomical pathways, informed by multiple experiments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对静脉解剖结构的全面了解是适应多种条件的关键因素。此外,静脉系统作为治疗特发性颅内高压(IIH)等疾病的新前沿已成为关注的焦点,动静脉畸形(AVM),脉动性耳鸣,脑积水,和脑脊液(CSF)静脉瘘。它的知识越来越成为现代大脑医生的基本要求。在这篇文章中,作者在5个小节中探讨了中枢神经系统静脉系统的描述性和功能解剖学:胚胎学,硬脑膜窦,皮质静脉,深静脉,和脊髓静脉.
    Comprehensive understanding of venous anatomy is a key factor in the approach to a multitude of conditions. Moreover, the venous system has become the center of attention as a new frontier for treatment of diseases such as idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), arteriovenous malformation (AVM), pulsatile tinnitus, hydrocephalus, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) venous fistulas. Its knowledge is ever more an essential requirement of the modern brain physician. In this article, the authors explore the descriptive and functional anatomy of the venous system of the CNS in 5 subsections: embryology, dural sinuses, cortical veins, deep veins, and spinal veins.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本章还概述了四位外科医生的特征,他们改变了思维方向并因此改变了实践方向。随后是对控制外科实践的不断变化的观念的回顾。JeremyC.Ganz的“两种手术器械”一章研究了钻头和双凸透镜的用途。在本章中,对颅骨手术过程中使用的其他仪器进行了评估,以及它们的使用与改变观念的关系。最后,有一个结论部分将所有这些元素联系在一起。
    The chapter begins with also an outline of the characteristics of four surgeons who changed the direction of thinking and hence of practice. This is followed by a review of the changing ideas which governed surgical practice. Chapter \"Two surgical instruments\" by Jeremy C. Ganz has examined the uses of drills and lenticulars. In this chapter there is an appraisal of the other instruments used during cranial surgery and how their use related to changing ideas. Finally, there is a concluding section which ties all these elements together.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的50年中,Galen对医学和外科艺术的贡献的重要性已得到越来越多的认可。尽管他犯了错误,他对医学和外科实践的贡献是深远的。在目前的情况下,他在颅骨手术器械和技术方面的教导将在一千年半的时间里继续产生影响。他的技术建议是正确的。他关于供应中枢神经系统的血管解剖结构的错误并没有太大的后果,因为中枢神经系统直到19世纪末仍无法通过手术进入。他将骨折重新分类为延伸到二倍体或通过内部桌子。此外,它们可以很简单,粉碎了,沮丧,或升高。他没有提到适应症或临床改变,另一方面,他对颅骨手术所需的仪器有许多明智的评论。如下所示,他引用了他的继任者的决定的理由。重大错误与他对颅骨及其缝线的解剖结构的描述有关。他对颅骨附件的担忧,希波克拉底对其固有弱点的担忧增加了缝合线的血管成分和排泄功能,这导致了钻孔应避免这些结构的教导。这对钻孔开口的放置具有限制作用,这对患者没有益处。此外,他对放血的热情也有助于加强希波克拉底在这个问题上的教学,对任何人都没有好处。
    Over the last 50 years the significance of Galen\'s contributions to the arts of medicine and surgery have been increasingly recognized. Despite his errors, his contributions to medical and surgical practice have been profound. In the present context, his teachings on cranial surgical instruments and technique would continue to be influential throughout one and a half millenia. His technical advice was sound. His error about the anatomy of blood vessels supplying CNS were not of much consequence since the CNS would remain surgically inaccessible until the end of the 19th century. He reclassified fractures as extending to the diploe or through the internal table. Moreover, they could be simple, comminuted, depressed, or elevated. He did not mention indications or clinical changes, on the other hand he had many sensible remarks to make on the instrumentation required for cranial surgery. As will be seen in what follows, he was much quoted in justification of the decisions of his successors. The major errors of significance related to his description of the anatomy of the cranium and its sutures. His concern about the cranial attachment, vascular components and excretory functions of the sutures added to Hippocrates\' concerns about their inherent weakness resulted in the teaching that trepanation should avoid these structures. This was to have a limiting effect on the placement of trepanation openings which was of no benefit to the patients. Moreover, his enthusiasm for bloodletting would also serve to potentiate Hippocrates teaching on this matter, to the advantage of nobody.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解舌骨的命名。
    方法:舌骨,脖子上的小骨头,是骨骼的一部分,很难在骨骼遗骸中发掘和发现。
    结果:这个名字是古希腊人创造的,以及它的解剖学描述。盖伦(公元2-3c。)和Protospatharius(公元7世纪),面对宗教和社会障碍,成功地展示了它的解剖结构,并暗示了它在言语和吞咽方面的可能功能,将骨骼视为颈部区域的肌肉支柱。
    结论:希腊古代权威以其解剖学描述的准确性和弹性使我们感到惊讶。
    OBJECTIVE: To understand the nomenclature of the hyoid bone.
    METHODS: Hyoid, a small bone of the neck, is a bony part that is rather difficult to unearth and discover among skeletal remains.
    RESULTS: The named was coined by the ancient Greeks, along with its anatomic description. Galen (2nd - 3rd c. AD) and Theophilus Protospatharius (7th century AD), facing religious and social barriers, succeeded in presenting its anatomy and suggesting its probable function in speech and swallowing, regarding the bone as a muscle pillar of the neck area.
    CONCLUSIONS: Authorities of Hellenic antiquity surprise us with their accuracy and the resilience of their anatomical descriptions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号