Functional Constipation

功能性便秘
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定黎巴嫩儿童功能性便秘(FC)的频率和可能相关的饮食和环境因素。方法:在贝鲁特美国大学医学中心(AUBMC)的所有儿科诊所进行了前瞻性横断面研究。招募了2-7岁的儿童进行良好的儿童访问。与孩子的排便习惯和其他历史项目相关的数据来自父母问卷。结果:172名参与者的平均年龄为4.94岁,其中56.4%为男性。FC出现在32.6%的参与者中。尽管根据年龄和性别,FC的频率没有差异,FC的峰值频率在5年。每天扣留大便的频率为64.3%,在过去的2个月中,有46.6%的FC儿童在大便时总是感到紧张。体力活动和饮食减少与FC没有显着相关。结论:本研究表明,黎巴嫩2-7岁儿童中有32.6%患有便秘,而招募的儿童医生中只有51.7%在查井期间询问儿童的排便情况。这些数字突出表明,需要提高儿科医生对在诊所就诊期间筛查便秘作为护理实践标准的认识。
    Aim: To determine the frequency and possible associated dietary and environmental factors of functional constipation (FC) among children in Lebanon followed at a single pediatric health system. Method: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in all pediatrics clinics at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC). Children aged 2-7 years presenting for a well-child visit were recruited. Data relating to the child\'s bowel habits and other history items were obtained from parental questionnaires. Results: The mean age of the 172 recruited participants was 4.94 years with 56.4% being males. FC was present in 32.6% of the participants. Although there was no difference in the frequency of FC based on age and gender, the peak frequency of FC was at 5 years. The daily frequency of withholding stools was 64.3%, and 46.6% of the children with FC always experienced straining while stooling for the past 2 months. Decreased physical activity and diet were not significantly associated with FC. Conclusion: The present study shows that 32.6% of children aged 2-7 years in Lebanon suffer from constipation while only 51.7% of the recruited children\'s physicians inquire about the child\'s bowel movement during the well check visit. These numbers highlight the need to raise more awareness among pediatricians on the need to screen for constipation during clinic visits as a standard of care practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对脊髓栓系综合征(TCS)对结直肠区域生理学的影响的理解是有限的。我们的目的是描述TCS儿童的肛门直肠和结肠运动,并将其与功能性便秘(FC)儿童的发现进行比较。
    方法:我们对2011年1月至2023年9月在我们机构进行了肛门直肠测压(ARM)的TCS儿童进行了回顾性审查。我们记录了人口统计,病史和手术史,临床症状,和ARM时的治疗,ARM发现(静息压力,推动机动,直肠感觉,直肠肛门抑制反射[RAIR],和RAIR持续时间),以及结肠测压(CM)的最终解释。我们确定了年龄和性别匹配的FC儿童对照组。
    结果:我们纳入了24名接受ARM测试的TCS儿童(50%为女性)(中位年龄为ARM6.0岁,四分位数范围4.0-11.8年)。所有儿童在ARM时都有便秘。在进行ARM之前,有19名儿童进行了束缚手术。在ARM之前进行过分离手术的儿童和FC儿童之间,ARM参数没有显着差异。在24个孩子中,14人也进行了CM(13/14在松脱手术后)。在有TCS病史的儿童和有FC的儿童之间,结肠动力没有显着差异。
    结论:有TCS病史的儿童和有FC的儿童的肛门直肠生理和结肠动力相似,提示有和没有TCS病史的儿童排便障碍的潜在病理生理学相似。
    OBJECTIVE: The understanding of the impact of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) on the physiology of the colorectal area is limited. Our aim was to describe anorectal and colonic motility in children with TCS and compare the findings to those of children with functional constipation (FC).
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of children with TCS who had an anorectal manometry (ARM) performed at our institution from January 2011 to September 2023. We recorded demographics, medical and surgical history, clinical symptoms, and treatment at time of ARM, ARM findings (resting pressure, push maneuver, rectal sensation, rectoanal inhibitory reflex [RAIR], and RAIR duration), and the final interpretation of colonic manometry (CM) if performed. We identified age and sex-matched control groups of children with FC.
    RESULTS: We included 24 children with TCS (50% female) who had ARM testing (median age at ARM 6.0 years, interquartile range 4.0-11.8 years). All children had constipation at time of ARM. Nineteen children had detethering surgery before ARM was performed. No significant differences in ARM parameters were found between children who had detethering surgery before ARM and children with FC. Among the 24 children, 14 also had a CM performed (13/14 after detethering surgery). No significant differences in colonic motility were found between children with a history of TCS and children with FC.
    CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal physiology and colonic motility are similar between children with a history of TCS and children with FC, suggesting that the underlying pathophysiology of defecatory disorders in children with and without history of TCS is similar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性胃肠病(FGIDs)是指一组具有慢性症状的疾病,比如腹痛,吞咽困难,消化不良,腹泻,便秘,和腹胀。其中,功能性便秘显着影响生活质量,并与合并症有关,如焦虑和抑郁。尽管广泛发生,但确切的病理生理学仍不清楚。研究表明,肠-脑轴在FGID中起作用。大脑和胃肠道(GI)之间的双向通信中断会导致胃肠道症状和情绪障碍。对FGID病理生理学的不完全理解导致治疗选择有限。传统治疗通常集中在单一症状上,并伴有副作用,提示需要解决GI和心理成分的替代方法。包括草药补充剂在内的替代方法通过促进规律性和肠道健康,为传统医学提供了天然的替代品。AbelmoschusesculentusL.或秋葵有在传统医学中使用的历史。在秋葵中发现的生物活性化合物如多糖和纤维提供胃保护益处。Withaniasomnifera是一种通常被称为ashwagandha的植物。植物根因其促进健康的作用而被使用。研究支持使用W.somnifera来帮助缓解压力和睡眠。Digexin是一种草药补充剂,结合了W.somnifera(ashwagandha)和A.esculentus(秋葵)。通过调节肠-脑轴,它已显示出改善胃肠道规律性和情绪的希望。临床研究支持一种有助于FGID管理的新型草药补充剂的潜力。这篇叙述性评论着眼于FGID,病因,目前的治疗,和可能的治疗补充剂,以帮助症状管理。
    Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) refer to a group of disorders with chronic symptoms, such as abdominal pain, dysphagia, dyspepsia, diarrhea, constipation, and bloating. Among these, functional constipation significantly impacts the quality of life and is linked with comorbidities, such as anxiety and depression. The exact pathophysiology remains unclear despite the widespread occurrence. Research suggests that the gut-brain axis plays a role in FGIDs. Disruptions in the bidirectional communication between the brain and gastrointestinal (GI) tract contribute to GI symptoms and mood disturbances. The incomplete understanding of FGID pathophysiology has led to limited treatment options. Traditional treatments often focus on single symptoms and come with side effects, prompting the need for alternative approaches that address both GI and psychological components. Alternative approaches including herbal supplements offer a natural alternative to conventional medicine by promoting regularity and gut health. Abelmoschus esculentus L. or okra has a history of use in traditional medicine. Bioactive compounds such as polysaccharides and fibers found in okra offer gastroprotective benefits. Withania somnifera is a plant commonly referred to as ashwagandha. The plant root has been used for its health-promoting effects. Research supports the use of W. somnifera to help with stress and sleep. Digexin is a herbal supplement combining W. somnifera (ashwagandha) and A. esculentus (okra). It has shown promise in improving both GI regularity and mood by modulating the gut-brain axis. Clinical studies support the potential of a novel herbal supplement that aids in the management of FGIDs. This narrative review looks at FGIDs, etiologies, current treatment, and possible therapeutic supplements to aid in symptom management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:thumbtack刺法(TN)已用于治疗功能性便秘(FC),尽管支持其有效性的现有证据有限。本研究旨在评估TN改善FC的功效。
    方法:共招募482名符合条件的患者,并随机分配到TN组或枸橼酸莫沙必利(MC)组。TN被埋了三天,在连续两次埋葬后休息一天,随后进行为期4周的随访。主要结果指标是完全和自发排便评分(CSBM)。次要结果指标包括布里斯托尔凳子形式量表(BSFS),克利夫兰诊所评分(CCS),便秘患者生活质量评估问卷(PAC-QOL)。
    结果:在随机分组的482例患者中,241个被分配到每个组。其中,两组共216例(89.6%)患者完成干预和随访。与基线相比,在第4周时,TN组[1.76(95%CI,1.61~1.91)]和MC组[1.35(95%CI,1.20~1.50)]的CSBMs差异达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的阈值.然而,两组在第2周和第8周与基线无临床差异.在第4周,TN组为3.35±0.99,MC组为3±1.03(组间调整后的差异,0.37点[95%CI,0.18至0.55];P<0.001),尽管两组之间的差异未达到MCID阈值.
    结论:与柠檬酸莫沙必利相比,图钉针刺在CSBM中产生了更大的改进,尽管与对照组的差异无临床意义。
    结果:
    ChiCTR2100043684。
    OBJECTIVE: Thumbtack Needling (TN) has been employed in the treatment of functional constipation (FC), although the existing evidence supporting its effectiveness is limited. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of TN in ameliorating FC.
    METHODS: A total of 482 eligible patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the TN group or the Mosapride Citrate (MC) group. The TN was buried once for three days, rest for one day after two consecutive burials, followed by a 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the score for Complete and spontaneous bowel movement score (CSBMs). Secondary outcome measures included the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS), and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL).
    RESULTS: Out of the 482 patients randomized, 241 were allocated to each group. Of these, 216 patients (89.6 %) in both groups completed the intervention and follow-up. Compared with the baseline, the differences of CSBMs in TN group [1.76(95 % CI, 1.61 to 1.91)] and MC group [1.35(95 % CI, 1.20 to 1.50)] at week 4 meet the threshold for minimal clinically important difference (MCID). However, there were no clinical difference from baseline at week 2 and week 8 in both groups. Mean CSBMs at week 4 was 3.35 ± 0.99 in the TN group and 3 ± 1.03 in the MC group (adjusted difference between groups, 0.37 points [95 % CI, 0.18 to 0.55]; P < 0.001), although differences between the two groups did not meet the MCID threshold.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with mosapride citrate, thumbtack needling produced a greater improvement in CSBMs, although the difference from control was not clinically significant.
    RESULTS:
    UNASSIGNED: ChiCTR2100043684.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估两种不同参数(体位和扩张介质)对功能性便秘患者直肠感觉测试的影响,为临床实践中标准化操作程序的制定提供数据支持。
    方法:基于直肠感觉测试的单中心过程,对39例功能性便秘患者在不同体位和扩张介质下进行直肠感觉测试。
    结果:在便秘评分系统的项目中,排便次数评分与第一恒定感觉量呈负相关(r=-0.323,P=0.045)。相反,疼痛性疏散努力得分与排便欲望呈正相关(r=0.343,P=0.033)。在不同体位(左侧卧位,坐姿,蹲下位置),蹲位测量的数据明显高于左侧卧位(P<0.05)。在膨胀介质的研究方面,发现在下蹲位置(当膨胀介质为水时)测得的第一恒定感觉量明显低于气体(P<0.05)。
    结论:对于功能性便秘患者,体位和扩张介质之间的直肠感觉测试结果存在差异。在进行多中心研究时,有必要统一标准操作程序(SOP)的操作细节,以确保测试结果的一致性和可靠性。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of two different parameters (body position and distension medium) on the rectal sensory test in patients with functional constipation and provide data support for the development of standardized operating procedures in clinical practice.
    METHODS: Based on a single-center process of the rectal sensory test, 39 patients with functional constipation were recruited for rectal sensory test under different body positions and distension mediums.
    RESULTS: Among the items of the Constipation Scoring System, the score of frequency of bowel movements showed a negative correlation with the first constant sensation volume (r = -0.323, P = 0.045). Conversely, the score of painful evacuation effort showed a positive correlation with the desire to defecate volume (r = 0.343, P = 0.033). There was a statistically significant difference in the first constant sensation volume (when the distension medium was gas) measured in different body positions (left lateral position, sitting position, squatting position), and the data measured in the squatting position were significantly higher than those in left lateral position (P < 0.05). In terms of research on distension medium, it was found that the first constant sensation volume measured in the squatting position (when the distension medium was water) was significantly lower than that of gas (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients with functional constipation, there are differences in the results of rectal sensory tests between body positions and distension mediums. When conducting multicenter studies, it is necessary to unify the standard operating procedure (SOP) for operational details to ensure consistency and reliability of the test results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性便秘(FC)是一种常见的儿童疾病,通过罗马IV标准诊断。标准治疗包括生活方式和饮食调整,然后开始渗透泻药治疗。尽管进行了适当的管理,但仍有约30%的儿童继续出现与FC相关的症状。新的药理学,外科,和FC的神经调节疗法现在可用于成人和儿科人群。2023年,第一种药物,利那洛肽,获得FDA批准用于治疗6-17岁儿童的FC。
    本文回顾了当前和新兴的药理学,手术和神经调节疗法用于儿科患者FC的管理。回顾并讨论了每种模式的疗效和安全性数据。
    可用于FC管理的治疗方法的进步需要进一步研究儿科人群的安全性和有效性。由于成人和小儿FC具有不同的潜在病理生理学并且需要不同的治疗方法,因此在选择儿科证据有限的可用治疗方法时应仔细考虑。需要方法学和儿科终点的标准化以优化比较不同治疗的功效的能力。我们预测儿科FC管理的未来将包括个性化的护理方法,从而改善结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Functional constipation (FC) is a common childhood condition, diagnosed via the Rome IV criteria. Standard therapy includes lifestyle and dietary modification followed by initiation of osmotic laxative therapy. About 30% of children continue to experience symptoms related to FC despite appropriate management. New pharmacologic, surgical, and neuromodulatory therapies for FC are now available for use in adult and pediatric populations. In 2023, the first pharmacologic agent, linaclotide, obtained FDA approval for treatment of FC in children 6-17 years old.
    UNASSIGNED: This article reviews current and emerging pharmacologic, surgical, and neuromodulation therapies for the management of FC in pediatric patients. Efficacy and safety data regarding each of these modalities was reviewed and discussed.
    UNASSIGNED: Advancements in therapeutics available for the management of FC necessitate further investigation on safety and efficacy in pediatric populations. Careful consideration should be taken in choosing an available treatment with limited pediatric evidence as adult and pediatric FC have different underlying pathophysiology and require a different therapeutic approach. Standardization of methodology and pediatric endpoints are needed to optimize ability to compare efficacy of different treatments. We predict the future of pediatric FC management will include a personalized approach to care, resulting in improved outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在作者以前的报告中发现了功能性便秘(FC)相关口臭的特征。在这份报告中,作者旨在进一步探讨其治疗方法和疗效。这项回顾性研究回顾了100例FC患者,包括82例(82%)口臭患者和18例(18%)非口臭患者。他们接受了感官测试(OLT)来诊断口臭,感官评分(OLS)(0-5)用于评估口臭严重程度。克利夫兰临床便秘评分(CCCS)(0-30)用于评估FC严重程度。患者接受泻药聚乙二醇电解质粉(PGEP)治疗4周。这些测试在治疗之前和之后进行。作者发现,治疗前,所有患者的CCCS为20.00(18.00-23.00),21.00(19.00-24.00)口臭患者,非口臭患者为18.00(17.00-18.25)。口臭患者与非口臭患者之间存在显着差异(P<0.001)。口臭患者的OLS为3.00(3.00-4.00)。OLS与CCCS呈正相关(r=0.814,95%CI:0.732~0.872,P<0.001)。CCCS≥18预测口臭概率超过50%。治疗后,CCCS显著下降至11.50(6.00-14.75)(P<0.001),OLS显著降低至1.00(0.00-2.00)(P<0.001)。OLS和CCCS之间存在正相关(r=0.770,95%CI:0.673-0.841,P<0.001)。治疗前CCCS≥21预测治疗后口臭的概率超过50%,而治疗后CCCS≥12预测治疗后口臭的概率超过50%。作者得出结论,FC的严重程度与FC相关口臭的严重程度相似,并能预测口臭的概率.PGEP的泻药治疗可有效改善FC相关的口臭。
    The features of functional constipation (FC)-associated halitosis were identified in the author\'s previous report. In this report, the author aimed to further investigate its treatment and efficacy. This retrospective study reviewed 100 FC patients, including 82 (82%) halitosis patients and 18 (18%) non-halitosis patients. They underwent the organoleptic test (OLT) to diagnose halitosis, and the organoleptic score (OLS) (0-5) was used to evaluated halitosis severity. The Cleveland Clinical Constipation Score (CCCS) (0-30) was used to evaluate FC severity. Patients were treated with the laxative polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PGEP) for four weeks. These tests were performed before and after treatment. The author found that, before treatment, the CCCS was 20.00 (18.00-23.00) for all patients, 21.00 (19.00-24.00) for halitosis patients, and 18.00 (17.00-18.25) for non-halitosis patients. A significant difference was observed between halitosis patients and non-halitosis patients (P< 0.001). The OLS for halitosis patients was 3.00 (3.00-4.00). A positive correlation (r= 0.814, 95% CI: 0.732-0.872,P< 0.001) was found between OLS and CCCS. A CCCS ⩾18 predicted over 50% probability of halitosis. After treatment, the CCCS significantly decreased to 11.50 (6.00-14.75) (P< 0.001), and OLS significantly decreased to 1.00 (0.00-2.00) (P< 0.001). A positive correlation (r= 0.770, 95% CI: 0.673-0.841,P< 0.001) persisted between OLS and CCCS. A pre-treatment CCCS ⩾21 predicted over 50% probability of post-treatment halitosis, while a post-treatment CCCS ⩾12 predicted over 50% probability of post-treatment halitosis. The author concludes that the severity of FC parallels the severity of FC-associated halitosis, and can predict the probability of halitosis. Laxative treatment with PGEP is effective in improving FC-associated halitosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痛苦的排便,硬凳子的通道,不愉快或不规则的肠道偏离/运动与正常速度,和/或感觉排便不充分是功能性便秘的常见症状。治疗便秘的目标是产生柔软,无痛粪便和防止粪便的再积累。这项研究着眼于远程康复家庭计划(TRP)如何影响FC和便秘儿童的生活质量。一项随机对照试验包括400名年龄在4-18岁的功能性便秘儿童,分为两组:对照组包括200名接受药物治疗的儿童,干预组包括200名接受药物治疗的儿童。两组均接受为期6个月的干预措施。测量并比较干预前后功能性便秘症状和生活质量方面的结果。将远程康复家庭计划添加到儿童功能性便秘的药物治疗中,可以显着改善病情;在评估功能性便秘症状的所有罗马标准中,干预组和对照组之间都存在显着差异,除了急于去洗手间便便表现出无显着差异外;在SF-36问卷的所有领域中,干预组和对照组之间也存在显着差异,除了心理健康领域外,其评估生活质量的差异无统计学意义。
    结论:将远程康复家庭计划添加到儿童功能性便秘的药物治疗中,可显著改善功能性便秘的症状和生活质量。
    背景:我们的研究于2024年1月5日在Clinicaltrials.gov以NCT06207721的标识符进行了回顾性注册。
    背景:•痛苦的排便,硬大便的通道,不愉快或不规则的排便,排便不完全的感觉是功能性便秘的常见症状。•治疗便秘的目标包括产生柔软,无痛的粪便和防止粪便的再积累。
    背景:•将远程康复家庭计划添加到药物治疗中,可以显着改善功能性便秘症状和生活质量。•在所有罗马标准中观察到干预组(除药物治疗外,还接受远程康复家庭计划的200名儿童)和对照组(接受药物治疗的200名儿童)之间的显着差异,除了急于上厕所便便,以及SF36问卷的所有领域,除了心理健康领域。
    Painful defecation, the passage of hard stools, unpleasant or irregular bowel deviation/movements from regular rate, and/or the feeling of not enough elimination of stool are common symptoms of functional constipation. The goals in treating constipation are to produce soft, painless stools and to prevent the re-accumulation of feces. This study looked at how the telerehabilitation home program (TRP) affected the symptoms of FC and the children who were constipated in terms of their quality of life. A randomized controlled trial included 400 children aging 4-18 years with functional constipation distributed in two groups: control group consisted of 200 children receiving pharmaceutical treatment and the intervention group consisted of 200 children receiving the telerehabilitation home program in addition to pharmaceutical treatment. Both groups received the interventions for 6 months. The outcomes in terms of functional constipation symptoms and quality of life are measured and compared pre- and post-interventions. Adding the telerehabilitation home program to pharmaceutical treatment of functional constipation in children results in prominent improvement in the condition; there is a significant difference between the intervention and control group in all Rome criteria which assess symptoms of functional constipation except rush to the bath-room to poop which showed non-significant difference; there is also a significant difference between the intervention and control group in all domains of the SF-36 questionnaire which assess quality of life except the mental health domain which showed non-significant difference.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adding the telerehabilitation home program to pharmaceutical treatment of functional constipation in children results in prominent improvement in symptoms of functional constipation and quality of life.
    BACKGROUND: Our study was registered retrospectively with Clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT06207721 on 5 January 2024.
    BACKGROUND: • Painful defecation, passage of hard stools, unpleasant or irregular bowel movements, feeling of incomplete stool elimination are common symptoms of functional constipation. • Goals in treating constipation include producing soft, painless stools and preventing re-accumulation of feces.
    BACKGROUND: • Adding telerehabilitation home program to pharmaceutical treatment resulted in significant improvement in functional constipation symptoms and quality of life. • Significant differences between intervention group (200 children receiving telerehabilitation home program in addition to pharmaceutical treatment) and control group (200 children receiving pharmaceutical treatment) were observed in all Rome criteria except for rush to the bathroom to poop, and in all domains of SF36 questionnaire except for the mental health domain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目的是比较药物和物理治疗干预与物理治疗和药物治疗的组合的直接效果。以及儿童功能性便秘3个月后的生活质量和症状复发。
    方法:对69名年龄在5至14岁之间的功能性便秘儿童进行评估,并随机分为三组:A组,B,和C.视觉模拟量表,布里斯托尔凳子表格秤,排便频率,PedsQLGI症状量表,和PedsQL通用核心量表被用作结局指标。药理学用于治疗A组,B组采用物理治疗,两者联合用于治疗C组。
    结果:该研究显示视觉模拟评分有统计学意义的结果,布里斯托尔凳子表格秤,所有组的排便频率。然而,A组PedsQLGI症状量表和通用核心量表无明显变化,而在B组和C组中观察到显著变化。
    结论:在本研究中,我们发现,各组的短期和长期效应存在显著差异.C组比A组和B组发生更多的变化。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the immediate effects of pharmacological versus physiotherapy intervention versus a combination of physiotherapy and pharmacological treatment, as well as the quality of life and the recurrence of symptoms in children with functional constipation after 3 months.
    METHODS: A total of 69 children with functional constipation between the ages of 5 and 14 years of either gender were assessed and randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A, B, and C. Visual Analogue Scale, Bristol Stool Form Scale, frequency of defecation, PedsQL GI symptom scale, and PedsQL Generic Core Scale were used as outcome measures. Pharmacology was used to treat Group A, physiotherapy was used to treat Group B, and a combination of both was used to treat Group C.
    RESULTS: The study revealed statistically significant results on Visual Analogue Scale, Bristol Stool Form Scale, and frequency of defecation in all groups. However, no significant changes were observed on the PedsQL GI symptom scale and the Generic Core scale in Group A, whereas significant changes were observed in Groups B and C.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that there were significant differences in the short- and long-term effects across all groups. More changes occurred in Group C than in Groups A and B.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性便秘(FC)是一种常见疾病,其特征是排便困难。不经常排便,或者两者兼而有之。FC非常普遍,经常复发,伴随着严重的疾病,并影响生活质量;因此,迫切需要安全有效的长期获益疗法.微生物处理对FC治疗具有潜在价值。微生物治疗包括调节剂,如益生菌,益生元,合生元,postbiotics,和粪便微生物移植(FMT)。一些益生菌和益生元已经被采用,和其他微生物群调节剂的功效正在探索中。FMT因其疗效而被认为是一个新兴领域;尽管如此,在临床实施之前必须进行大量工作。
    Functional constipation (FC) is a common disorder that is characterized by difficult stool passage, infrequent bowel movement, or both. FC is highly prevalent, recurs often, accompanies severe diseases, and affects quality of life; therefore, safe and effective therapy with long-term benefits is urgently needed. Microbiota treatment has potential value for FC treatment. Microbiota treatments include modulators such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Some probiotics and prebiotics have been adopted, and the efficacy of other microbiota modulators is being explored. FMT is considered an emerging field because of its curative effects; nevertheless, substantial work must be performed before clinical implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号