BACKGROUND: Patient adherence to therapy and compliance is always a challenge for care providers in the management of chronic disorders with multiple medications.
OBJECTIVE: Our study focused on formulating concurrently prescribed ARB (Angiotensin Receptor Blocker), i.e., losartan potassium, and a cholesterol-lowering statin derivative, i.e., rosuvastatin calcium, in a fixed-dose combination tablet.
METHODS: The drugs were selected based on the presence of synergism and variation in solubility characteristics. Trial batches with fixed concentrations of both active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and varying quantities of different excipients were prepared by dry granulation technique and subjected to different quality control tests for tablets. Batch F5 was selected on the basis of in-process quality control data for the development of a drug release protocol. Experimental conditions were optimized. Based on the sink condition, phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) was selected as the dissolution medium. Simultaneous determination of both APIs in samples collected at predetermined time intervals was carried out using the RP-HPLC technique with acetonitrile, methanol, and water (20:25:55 v/v/v) as mobile phase.
RESULTS: Complete dissolution of both APIs in the FDC tablet was achieved in 45 min in 900 mL of the selected medium. The in vitro drug release protocol was validated for accuracy and precision without interference with sample analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a validated, accurate, and robust dissolution testing method was developed for the newly formulated FDC tablet.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide versus its free equivalent combination (FEC) in adults with hypertension in Italy.
UNASSIGNED: A Markov model was developed to perform a cost-utility analysis with a lifetime horizon and an Italian healthcare payer\'s perspective. In the model, the additional effect of the SPC on blood pressure level compared with the FEC was translated into a decreased risk of cardiovascular events and CKD, which was modeled via Framingham risk algorithms. Difference in persistence rates of SPC and FEC were modeled via discontinuation rates.
UNASSIGNED: A perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide SPC is associated with lower cost and better health outcomes compared to its FEC. Over a lifetime horizon, it is associated with a 0.050 QALY gain and cost savings of €376, resulting from lower cardiovascular event rates. In the alternative scenario, where different approach for modeling impact of adherence was considered, incremental gain of 0.069 QALY and savings of €1,004 were observed. Results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses, indicating that use of this SPC is a cost-effective strategy.
UNASSIGNED: The findings indicate that a perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide SPC is a cost-saving treatment option for hypertension in Italy, compared to its FEC.

Background: Our institution introduced fixed-dose prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) to streamline order verification and medication administration. Previous studies using fixed-dose PCC for vitamin K antagonist reversal showed comparable efficacy to weight-based dosing. Objective: To compare fixed versus weight-based PCC dosing for reversal of Factor Xa Inhibitor (FXaI) effects. Methods: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center. Patients who received PCC to reverse the effects of apixaban or rivaroxaban were eligible. Subjects in the fixed-dose group (5000 units or 2000 units) were compared to weight-based PCC (50 units/kg). The primary outcome was time between order entry and medication administration. Secondary outcomes included: average PCC dose, postadministration procedures, achieved hemostasis, 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay, and adverse drug events. Results: 72 patients received fixed-dose PCC and 101 received weight-based PCC. Median time between order entry and administration was 4.5 min shorter in the fixed-dose group compared to weight-based (34.5 vs 39 min, P = .10). In patients who received fixed-dose, 79.2% achieved hemostasis versus 71.3% in the weight-based group (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.94-1.32). There was no difference in the number of subsequent hemorrhage-related surgeries (29.2% vs 36.7%, RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.51-1.24) or mortality rate (26.4% vs 35.6%, RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.46-1.17). There were zero adverse drug events reported. Rates of thrombosis were 2.8% and < 1% (P = .57) in the fixed and weight-based groups, respectively. Conclusion and Relevance: The fixed-dosing strategy did not reduce time to PCC administration nor impact hemostasis or mortality. These data support that the fixed-dosing method is a viable option.

UNASSIGNED: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death worldwide. While two approved fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) triple therapies reduce all-cause mortality (ACM) versus dual LAMA/LABA therapy in patients with COPD, head-to-head studies have not compared the effects of these therapies on ACM. We compared ACM in adults with moderate-to-very severe COPD receiving budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) in ETHOS versus fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in IMPACT using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature review identified two studies (ETHOS [NCT02465567]; IMPACT [NCT02164513]) of ≥52 weeks reporting ACM as an efficacy endpoint in patients receiving triple therapy. As ETHOS and IMPACT lack a common comparator, an unanchored MAIC compared ACM between licensed doses of BGF (320/18/9.6 μg) from ETHOS and FF/UMEC/VI (100/62.5/25 μg) from IMPACT in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Using on- and off-treatment data from the final retrieved datasets of the intention-to-treat populations, BGF data were adjusted according to aggregate FF/UMEC/VI data using 11 baseline covariates; a supplementary unadjusted indirect treatment comparison was also conducted. P-values for these post-hoc analyses are not adjusted for Type I error.
UNASSIGNED: ACM over 52 weeks was statistically significantly reduced by 39% for BGF versus FF/UMEC/VI in the MAIC (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.38, 0.95], p = 0.030) and unadjusted analysis (HR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.41, 0.92], p = 0.019).
UNASSIGNED: In this MAIC, which adjusted for population heterogeneity between ETHOS and IMPACT, ACM was significantly reduced with BGF versus FF/UMEC/VI in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (known as COPD) is a leading cause of death worldwide, being responsible for over 3 million deaths in 2019. People living with COPD are more likely to die. Importantly, a sudden worsening of COPD symptoms (known as an exacerbation) is associated with a higher chance of death from heart-related and breathing-related problems. Therefore, reducing risk of death is an important treatment goal for COPD. Of the three medications approved for treating COPD that combine three drugs in a single-inhaler device, there are two—referred to generically as budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI)—that can reduce the risk of death in people living with COPD compared with treatments that combine two drugs. However, no studies have directly compared the risk of death in people living with COPD treated with these medicines. We compared the risk of death in people living with moderate-to-very severe COPD who received either BGF during a clinical trial called ETHOS or FF/UMEC/VI during a clinical trial called IMPACT. To make this comparison, we used a method called “matching-adjusted indirect comparison”, which used specific features (such as sex, breathing difficulty, and whether they were current smokers) to match patients from the two studies to ensure similar groups were examined. Our analysis showed a 39% decrease in the chance of death in patients who received BGF compared with patients who received FF/UMEC/VI. This finding may be important for doctors to improve patient health and reduce the risk of death in people living with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Acute pain is a common symptom in children of all ages, and is associated with a variety of conditions. Despite the availability of guidelines, pain often remains underestimated and undertreated. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most commonly used drugs for analgesia in Pediatrics. Multimodal pain management by using a combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen results in greater analgesia.
METHODS: An investigation using the Nominal Group Technique was carried out between May and August 2022. Two open (non-anonymous) questionnaires were consecutively sent to a Board of ten clinicians to understand their opinions on the use of the oral paracetamol and ibuprofen association. Answers were examined in a final meeting where conclusions were drawn.
RESULTS: The board achieved a final consensus on a better analgesic power of paracetamol and ibuprofen in fixed-dose combination as compared to monotherapy, without compromising safety. Strong consensus was reached on the opinion that the fixed-dose combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen may be a useful option in case of inefficacy of one or other drug as monotherapy, especially in case of headaches, odontalgia, earache, and musculoskeletal pain. The use of the fixed combination may be also considered suitable for postoperative pain management.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the fixed-dose combination may represent advantage in terms of efficacy and safety, allowing a better control of the dose of both paracetamol and ibuprofen as monotherapy, thus minimizing the risk of incorrect dosage. However, the limited evidence available highlights the need for future well designed studies to better define the advantages of this formulation in the various therapeutic areas.

The fixed-dose combination of Amlodipine Besylate (ADB) with Perindopril Tertbutylamine (PTBA) drug is used to treat patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. In recent times researchers are interested to find the efficient analytical method development and validation for the simultaneous determination of ADB and PTBA in a fixed-dose, film-coated tablet. Therefore, the current study was performed with a reverse-phase liquid chromatography method developed to simultaneously analyze ADB and PTBA in film-coated tablets as fixed-dose combinations. The linearity of the proposed method was calculated by preparing six different mixtures of both ADB and PTBA in the mobile phase. The concentration of both the analytes was analyzed at 56mg/100 mL to 84mg/100 mL and 32mg/100 mL to 48mg/100 mL, respectively. The ratio of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer was 35:65. The flow rate was adjusted to 1.5 ml per minute to reduce the retention time. The validation study was performed for the parameters specificity, linearity, precision, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, accuracy/biasness, and robustness. The relative percentage standard deviation for Perindopril Tertbutyl amine was 0.148%, and for Amlodipine is 0.312%. These results show that the advanced analysis method for simultaneous analysis of fixed-dose is precise. The theoretical IR spectra were also calculated by Gaussian 9.2 by employing the B3LYP functional at density functional theory (DFT) level study. All these parameters studied in this work authenticate the effectiveness of the developed validation method and ensure its repeatability/reproducibility accordingly. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time to develop a new fast, and easy method for simultaneous identification and quantification of ADB and PTBA by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a time-efficient and cost-effective approach.

Introduction Radioactive iodine (RAI) has been used to treat hyperthyroidism for more than 70 years. Cure rates after RAI therapy range between 80% and 100%, with some patients requiring two or more doses. There is continued debate over which dosing regimen is optimal. We evaluated our cure rates after giving a single dose of radioactive iodine to treat hyperthyroidism using the fixed-dose regimen as opposed to the calculated-dose regimen. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who had received their first single dose of RAI between 2016 and 2021. The patients had clinical and biochemical assessments every six weeks until six months post-RAI therapy, then every three months thereafter, if still not cured. Patients were deemed cured if they developed persistent hypothyroidism or euthyroidism after a single dose of RAI. The data included baseline demographics, adverse events, and cure rates after RAI treatment. Results One hundred and thirty-eight patients received their first dose of RAI during the study period. Their mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 56.9 ± 15.3 years, and there were 101 women and 37 men. The median duration of hyperthyroidism was 34 months, and 62% of the cases were affected by Graves\' disease. A majority of patients (90%) were on an antithyroid drug prior to RAI therapy. The median (interquartile range) dose of RAI received by the group was 559 (546-577) megabecquerels (MBq). Four patients (2.9%) reported adverse events shortly after receiving RAI. Our overall cure rate was 87.7% amongst patients who received a single dose of RAI therapy. This number consisted of 96 patients (69.6%) who developed hypothyroidism and 25 patients (18.1%) who remained euthyroid. Our one-year cure rate was 84.1%. Further analysis revealed that women had a greater cure rate than men over the study period (92% vs 75.7%, p = 0.017).  Conclusion We have evaluated cure rates after a single dose of RAI therapy for the treatment of hyperthyroidism at our center. Our results are comparable to those reported at other centers using a similar dosing regimen.

Two active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with limited solubility, simvastatin and ezetimibe, prepared as a drug-drug solid dispersion (SD) was evaluated for physicochemical, microstructural, and aqueous dissolution properties. The simvastatin-ezetimibe SD was prepared using the co-grinding method in a wide range of weight fractions and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) were used to perform the phase composition analysis. DSC studies confirmed that simvastatin and ezetimibe form a simple eutectic phase equilibrium diagram. Analysis of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) studies excluded strong interactions between the APIs. Our investigations have revealed that all studied dispersions are characterized by substantially improved ezetimibe dissolution regardless of simvastatin content, and are best when the composition oscillates near the eutectic point. Data obtained in our studies provide an opportunity for the development of well-formulated, ezetimibe-simvastatin fixed-dose combinations (for hypercholesterolemia treatment) with reduced ezetimibe dosages based on its dissolution improvement.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term cost-effectiveness of fixed-dose busulfan (Bu) administration and pharmacokinetically (PK) guided adjustment of Bu dose for patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The efficacy and safety of both dosing strategies were compared using a systematic review and meta-analysis. A Markov model was used in estimating relevant cost and health outcomes from the perspective of the health system. The primary outcomes of interest were lifetime cost, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in dollar per QALY gained. Results showed that progression-free survival and overall survival in the PK-guided group were higher than that in the fixed-dose group, and the PK-guided group was associated with low non-relapse mortality and relapse rate. In contrast to safety, the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was the same in the two groups (P > 0.05). Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the QALY of the PK-guided group (12.8135 QALYs and $582,475.07) increased by 2.0609 relative to that in the fixed-dose group (10.7526 QALYs and $562,833.20), and the ICER was $9530.72/QALY. One-way and probability sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of the results. In conclusion, the PK-guided approach has higher efficacy and is safer.

BACKGROUND: The concurrent administration of statins and antihypertensive agents has been associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes, although the optimal fixed-dose combination remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to compare the blood pressure and lipid-lowering effects of various statin and antihypertensive drug combinations.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 20 March 2021. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of statin-antihypertensive agent combinations on systolic blood pressure or serum lipids were held eligible. A random-effects frequentist model was applied to provide estimates of mean difference of percentage change.
RESULTS: Overall, 18 studies were included, comprising 4450 patients. Compared to statin monotherapy no significant difference in the percentage change of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was achieved by adding any antihypertensive agent. Compared to amlodipine monotherapy, the addition of moderate-intensity statin resulted in a significantly greater percentage reduction of systolic blood pressure (-2.22%, 95% confidence intervals: [-3.82 to -0.62]). Combined high-intensity statin and amlodipine lead to significant increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (8.34%, 95% confidence intervals: [0.73 to 15.95]), while effective triglyceride reduction was achieved by adding amlodipine and telmisartan to high-intensity statin (-14.68%, 95% confidence intervals: [-28.48 to -0.89]). No significant difference of adverse effects was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The present network meta-analysis suggests that the administration of fixed-dose combinations of statins and antihypertensive agents is safe and effective in reducing blood pressure and serum lipids. The optimal dosing strategy to prevent cardiovascular events remains to be determined.