First line

第一行
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者二线治疗的有效管理的文献存在显著差距。大多数发表的文章是小型多中心系列或第二阶段研究。据我们所知,尚未进行系统评价,全面概述对一线ICIs无反应的转移性RCC患者的治疗选择范围.我们的目的是综合ICI初始治疗后转移性RCC患者二线治疗的证据,并根据现有文献提供最佳治疗方案的建议。
    方法:我们在PubMed中进行了搜索,Embase,以及2024年2月29日的Cochrane图书馆,遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。我们选择了符合预定纳入标准的文章(用英语写,回顾性观察研究,前瞻性系列,以及报告基于ICI的治疗失败后转移性肾癌二线治疗的随机试验)。参考清单中确定了相关文章。主要终点是总有效率(ORR),以中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)为次要终点。
    结果:我们纳入了27项研究,报告了1970例患者的结局。救助疗法在18项研究中被分类为靶向疗法(VEGFRTKIs),在8项研究中被分类为ICIs。在TKIs是第二选择线的研究中,合并ORR为34%(95%CI:30.2-38%).在ICIs的研究中,单独或与TKIs结合使用,被用作二线疗法,ORR为25.7%(95%CI:15.7-39.2%)。在TKIs和ICIs是二线选择的研究中,合并的中位PFS值分别为11.4个月(95%CI:9.5-13.6个月)和9.8个月(95%CI:7.5-12.7个月),分别。
    结论:本系统评价显示,VEGFRTKIs和ICIs是单独或联合使用抗PD(L)1初始治疗后的有效二线治疗方法。治疗选择应该是个性化的,考虑到患者对一线ICI的反应,疾病的部位,一线组合的类型(有或没有VEGFRTKIs),和病人的整体状况。
    BACKGROUND: There is a significant gap in the literature concerning the effective management of second-line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Most of the published articles were small multicenter series or phase 2 studies. To our knowledge, a systematic review that comprehensively outlines the range of treatment options available for patients with metastatic RCC who do not respond to first-line ICIs has not yet been conducted. Our aim was to synthesize evidence on second-line therapies for patients with metastatic RCC after initial treatment with ICIs and to offer recommendations on the best treatment regimens based on the current literature.
    METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on 29 February 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We selected articles that met the predetermined inclusion criteria (written in English, retrospective observational studies, prospective series, and randomized trials reporting second-line therapy for metastatic RCC after failure of ICI-based therapy). Relevant articles were identified in the reference lists. The main endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), with the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints.
    RESULTS: We included 27 studies reporting the outcomes of 1970 patients. Salvage therapies were classified as targeted therapy (VEGFR TKIs) in 18 studies and ICIs in 8 studies. In studies where TKIs were the second line of choice, the pooled ORR was 34% (95% CI: 30.2-38%). In studies where ICIs, alone or in combination with TKIs, were used as second-line therapies, the ORR was 25.7% (95% CI: 15.7-39.2%). In studies where TKIs and ICIs were the second-line choices, the pooled median PFS values were 11.4 months (95% CI: 9.5-13.6 months) and 9.8 months (95% CI: 7.5-12.7 months), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that VEGFR TKIs and ICIs are effective second-line therapies following an initial treatment with anti-PD(L)1 alone or in combination. The treatment choice should be personalized, taking into account the patient\'s response to first-line ICIs, the site of the disease, the type of first-line combination (with or without VEGFR TKIs), and the patient\'s overall condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸腺癌(TC)是一种罕见的具有侵袭行为的肿瘤。卡铂加紫杉醇的化疗代表了晚期疾病的治疗选择。抗血管生成药物,包括雷莫珠单抗,在以前接受过治疗的患者中表现出活性。RELEVENT试验旨在评估ramucirumab联合化疗作为晚期TC一线治疗的活性和安全性。
    方法:本II期试验在意大利TYME网络内进行。符合条件的患者接受了幼稚的晚期TC治疗。他们接受了雷莫珠单抗,卡铂和紫杉醇共6个周期,随后进行雷莫西单抗维持治疗,直至疾病进展或无法耐受的毒性。主要终点是研究者根据RECISTv1.1评估的ORR。次要终点是PFS,OS和安全。进行了集中的放射学检查。
    结果:从2018年11月至2023年06月,对52例患者进行了筛查,35人报名参加。中位年龄为60.8岁,71.4%的患者为男性,85.7%的患者患有Masaoka-Koga阶段IVB。ECOGPS在68.5%中为0,31.4%的患者中有1。目前,几个月后对35名患者进行了中期分析(比预期的要早),ORR为80.0%[95CI63.1-91.6]。在33/35可评估患者的集中放射学检查中,ORR为57.6%[95CI39.2-74.5]。经过31.6个月的中位随访,中位PFS为18.1个月[95CI10.8-52.3],中位OS为43.8个月[95CI31.9-NR].35例患者中有32例(91.4%)经历了至少一次治疗相关不良事件(AE),其中48.6%的AE≥G3。
    结论:在先前未经处理的晚期TC中,与历史对照相比,在卡铂和紫杉醇中添加雷莫西单抗显示出最高的活性,具有可管理的安全性。尽管患者人数很少,鉴于这种疾病的罕见性,试验结果支持将该组合作为TC一线治疗的考虑.
    BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare tumor with aggressive behavior. Chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel represents the treatment of choice for advanced disease. Antiangiogenic drugs, including ramucirumab, have shown activity in previously treated patients. The RELEVENT trial was designed to evaluate the activity and safety of ramucirumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced TC.
    METHODS: This phase II trial was conducted within the Italian TYME network. Eligible patients had treatment-naïve advanced TC. They received ramucirumab, carboplatin and paclitaxel for six cycles, followed by ramucirumab maintenance until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1 as assessed by the investigator. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Centralized radiologic review was carried out.
    RESULTS: From November 2018 to June 2023, 52 patients were screened and 35 were enrolled. Median age was 60.8 years, 71.4% of patients were male and 85.7% had Masaoka-Koga stage IVB. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 in 68.5% and 1 in 31.4% of patients. At the present analysis carried out some months after the interim analysis (earlier than expected) on 35 patients, ORR was 80.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 63.1% to 91.6%]. At the centralized radiological review of 33/35 assessable patients, ORR was 57.6% (95% CI 39.2% to 74.5%). After a median follow-up of 31.6 months, median PFS was 18.1 months (95% CI 10.8-52.3 months) and median OS was 43.8 months (95% CI 31.9 months-not reached). Thirty-two out of 35 patients (91.4%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE), of which 48.6% were AE ≥ grade 3.
    CONCLUSIONS: In previously untreated advanced TC, the addition of ramucirumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel showed the highest activity compared to historical controls, with a manageable safety profile. Despite the small number of patients, given the rarity of the disease, the trial results support the consideration of this combination as first-line treatment in TC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤,约占所有病例的30-60%。由于人口的多样性,亚洲DLBCL的管理有几个未满足的需求,DLBCL当地临床指南的异质性以及不同地区间资源和医疗保健系统的巨大差异.利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺,阿霉素,长春新碱,和泼尼松(RCHOP)被广泛认为是DLBCL的标准一线治疗方法;然而,需要替代方案来改善具有挑战性的亚型患者的预后,如国际预后指数评分较高的患者,老/虚弱的病人,以及患有双重打击和双重表达DLBCL或并发中枢神经系统疾病的患者。这篇综述文章借鉴了该地区执业血液学家/肿瘤学家的专业知识,目的是整合来自当前科学证据的数据,以解决亚太地区高风险患者群体面临的未满足的需求和独特的社会经济挑战。
    Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for around 30-60% of all cases. The management of DLBCL in Asia has several unmet needs due to the diversity of the population, the heterogeneity of local clinical guidelines for DLBCL and the wide disparity in resources and healthcare systems across different regions. Rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) is widely recognized as the standard first-line treatment for DLBCL; however, alternative regimens are required to improve patient outcomes in challenging subtypes, such as patients with high International Prognostic Index scores, old/frail patients, and patients with double-hit and double-expressor DLBCL or concurrent central nervous system disease. This review article draws from the expertise of practicing hematologists/oncologists in the region, with the aim of integrating data from current scientific evidence to address the unmet needs and unique socioeconomic challenges faced by challenging high risk patient groups in the Asia-Pacific region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尿路上皮癌提出了重大的治疗挑战,尤其是在高级阶段。传统上以铂类药物为基础的化疗,免疫疗法的出现,特别是免疫检查点抑制剂,彻底改变了尿路上皮癌的治疗方法。这篇综述探讨了尿路上皮癌治疗的演变,专注于从免疫检查点抑制剂单一疗法到创新组合疗法的过渡。Pembrolizumab,在KEYNOTE-045试验之后,在预处理的转移性尿路上皮癌中作为关键的ICI出现,优于传统化疗。然而,在未经治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者中出现了局限性,特别是在PD-L1低表达的人群中,如IMtivenp130和KEYNOTE-361等试验所证明。这些挑战导致了联合疗法的探索,包括免疫检查点抑制剂和铂类化疗,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,和抗体-药物缀合物。值得注意的是,CheckMate901试验表明,nivolumab-化疗联合治疗可改善结局.enfortumabvedotin的组合取得了重大突破,抗体-药物结合物,和派博利珠单抗,为局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的一线治疗制定新标准。未来的方向涉及进一步探索抗体-药物缀合物和免疫检查点抑制剂,如TROPHY-U-01和TROPiCS-4试验所示。该综述得出的结论是,局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的治疗前景正在迅速发展,联合疗法为改善患者预后提供了有希望的途径,标志着尿路上皮癌管理的新时代。
    Urothelial carcinoma presents significant treatment challenges, especially in advanced stages. Traditionally managed with platinum-based chemotherapy, the advent of immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionized urothelial carcinoma treatment. This review explores the evolution of urothelial carcinoma management, focusing on the transition from immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy to innovative combination therapies. Pembrolizumab, following the KEYNOTE-045 trial, emerged as a pivotal ICI in pretreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma, outperforming traditional chemotherapy. However, limitations surfaced in untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients, particularly in those with low PD-L1 expression, as evidenced by trials like IMvigor130 and KEYNOTE-361. These challenges led to the exploration of combination therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors with platinum-based chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Notably, the CheckMate 901 trial demonstrated improved outcomes with a nivolumab-chemotherapy combination. A significant breakthrough was achieved with the combination of enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugates, and pembrolizumab, setting a new standard in first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Future directions involve further exploration of antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, as seen in the TROPHY-U-01 and TROPiCS-4 trials. The review concludes that the locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment landscape is rapidly evolving, with combination therapies offering promising avenues for improved patient outcomes, signaling a new era in urothelial carcinoma management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管胃癌(GC)的治疗方案不断发展,GC患者的总体预后仍然较差.目前,除了高度的微卫星不稳定性外,治疗疗效的预测因素仍存在争议.
    目的:开发一些方法,以确定接受程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)抑制剂和化疗联合治疗的GC患者组获益最大。
    方法:我们从肿瘤医院的63例人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性GC患者中获得了组织学诊断为GC的数据,中国医学科学院,2020年11月至2022年10月。所有筛查的患者均接受PD-1抑制剂联合化疗作为一线治疗。
    结果:截至2023年7月1日,客观反应率为61.9%,疾病控制率为96.8%。所有患者的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为6.3个月。未达到中位总生存期。生存分析显示,在接受PD-1抑制剂联合奥沙利铂和替加氟作为一线治疗后,与CPS为0的患者相比,合并阳性评分(CPS)≥1的患者表现出延长的无进展生存期(PFS)趋势。随着HER2表达水平的增加,PFS表现出延长的趋势。基于PFS,我们将患者分为两组:治疗组疗效好,治疗组疗效差。显效组的mPFS为8个月,排除一组因手术而中断治疗的患者后,mPFS为9.1个月。未接受手术的疗效差的患者的mPFS为4.5个月。使用好/差的疗效作为我们研究的终点,单因素分析显示,CPS评分(P=0.004)和HER2表达水平(P=0.015)均显著影响PD-1抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期GC(AGC)患者的疗效.最后,多因素分析证实CPS评分是一个显著的影响因素。
    结论:CPS评分和HER2表达均影响HER2非阳性AGC患者免疫治疗联合化疗的疗效。
    BACKGROUND: Although treatment options for gastric cancer (GC) continue to advance, the overall prognosis for patients with GC remains poor. At present, the predictors of treatment efficacy remain controversial except for high microsatellite instability.
    OBJECTIVE: To develop methods to identify groups of patients with GC who would benefit the most from receiving the combination of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and chemotherapy.
    METHODS: We acquired data from 63 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative GC with a histological diagnosis of GC at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between November 2020 and October 2022. All of the patients screened received a PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment.
    RESULTS: As of July 1, 2023, the objective response rate was 61.9%, and the disease control rate was 96.8%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for all patients was 6.3 months. The median overall survival was not achieved. Survival analysis showed that patients with a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 exhibited an extended trend in progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to patients with a CPS of 0 after receiving a PD-1 inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin and tegafur as the first-line treatment. PFS exhibited a trend for prolongation as the expression level of HER2 increased. Based on PFS, we divided patients into two groups: A treatment group with excellent efficacy and a treatment group with poor efficacy. The mPFS of the excellent efficacy group was 8 months, with a mPFS of 9.1 months after excluding a cohort of patients who received interrupted therapy due to surgery. The mPFS was 4.5 months in patients in the group with poor efficacy who did not receive surgery. Using good/poor efficacy as the endpoint of our study, univariate analysis revealed that both CPS score (P = 0.004) and HER2 expression level (P = 0.015) were both factors that exerted significant influence on the efficacy of treatment the combination of a PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC (AGC). Finally, multivariate analysis confirmed that CPS score was a significant influencing factor.
    CONCLUSIONS: CPS score and HER2 expression both impacted the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in AGC patients who were non-positive for HER2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Ponatinib是第三代BCR::ABL1酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI),在费城染色体阳性白血病中具有强大的活性。在这里,我们报道了ponatinib治疗慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期2期试验的长期随访.
    方法:患者接受普纳替尼30-45mg/天。主要终点是6个月完全细胞遗传学应答(CCyR)的比率。该研究于2014年6月举行,因为心血管毒性的风险,要求患者更换TKI。
    结果:51例患者接受了ponatinib治疗(中位剂量,45毫克/天)。中位年龄为48岁(范围,21-75);30(59%)有基线心血管合并症。中位治疗时间为13个月(范围,2-25).14名患者(28%)因毒性而停药,36(71%)在食品和药物管理局警告/研究结束后,一个是不合规的。达沙替尼是最常选择的二线TKI(n=34;66%)。在6个月时可评估的46例患者中,44(96%)达到CCyR,37(80%)主要分子响应,28(61%)MR4和21(46%)MR4.5。CCyR的累计6个月利率,主要的分子反应,MR4和MR4.5为96%,78%,50%,36%,分别。在67%和51%的患者中观察到耐久MR4≥24或≥60个月,分别。24个月无事件生存率为97%。经过128个月的中位随访,10年总生存率为90%.8例患者(16%)有严重的2-3级心血管不良事件,导致五个(10%)永久停药。
    结论:Ponatinib在新诊断的慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期中产生了较高的细胞遗传学和分子反应。其在前线设置中的使用受到动脉/血管闭塞和其他严重毒性的阻碍。
    BACKGROUND: Ponatinib is a third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust activity in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. Herein, we report the long-term follow-up of the phase 2 trial of ponatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.
    METHODS: Patients received ponatinib 30 to 45 mg/day. The primary end point was the rate of 6-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). The study was held in June 2014 because of the risk of cardiovascular toxicity, requiring patients to change TKI.
    RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were treated with ponatinib (median dose, 45 mg/day). Median age was 48 years (range, 21-75); 30 (59%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. Median treatment duration was 13 months (range, 2-25). Fourteen patients (28%) discontinued ponatinib because of toxicities, 36 (71%) after the Food and Drug Administration warning/study closure, and one for noncompliance. Dasatinib was the most frequently chosen second-line TKI (n = 34; 66%). Among 46 patients evaluable at 6 months, 44 (96%) achieved CCyR, 37 (80%) major molecular response, 28 (61%) MR4, and 21 (46%) MR4.5. The cumulative 6-month rates of CCyR, major molecular response, MR4, and MR4.5 were 96%, 78%, 50%, and 36%, respectively. Durable MR4 ≥24 or ≥60 months was observed in 67% and 51% of patients, respectively. The 24-month event-free survival rate was 97%. After a median follow-up of 128 months, the 10-year overall survival rate was 90%. Eight patients (16%) had serious grade 2 to 3 cardiovascular adverse events, leading to permanent discontinuation in five (10%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ponatinib yielded high cytogenetic and molecular responses in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Its use in the frontline setting is hindered by arterio-/vaso-occlusive and other severe toxicities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:坚持幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)根除治疗是实现足够治疗效果的基石。
    目的:确定哪些因素影响治疗依从性。
    方法:欧洲胃肠病学家临床实践的系统前瞻性非介入注册(Hp-EuReg)。如果药物摄入量≥90%,则认为依从性足够。直到2021年9月,使用AEG-REDCape-CRF收集数据,并进行质量控制。进行了改良的意向治疗分析。对影响治疗效果和依从性的因素进行多因素分析。
    结果:38,698例患者中646例(1.7%)患者的依从性不足。处方时间较长的患者的不依从率较高(10-,14天)和抢救治疗,未经调查的消化不良/功能性消化不良患者,以及报告不良反应的患者。一线治疗的非依从性患病率低于抢救治疗(1.5%vs.2.2%;p<0.001)。在三种最常见的一线治疗中,不依从性存在差异:质子泵抑制剂克拉霉素阿莫西林为1.1%;质子泵抑制剂克拉霉素阿莫西林甲硝唑为2.3%;铋四联疗法为1.8%。这些治疗方法的依从性明显高于非依从性患者:86%对44%,90%对71%,93%对64%,分别(p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,与更高的有效性最显著相关的变量是足够的依从性(比值比,6.3[95CI,5.2-7.7];p<0.001)。
    结论:幽门螺杆菌根除治疗的依从性非常好。与依从性差相关的因素包括未经调查/功能性消化不良,抢救治疗,延长治疗方案,不良事件的存在,以及使用非铋序贯和伴随治疗。适当的治疗依从性是与成功根除最密切相关的变量。
    BACKGROUND: Adherence to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication treatment is a cornerstone for achieving adequate treatment efficacy.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors influence compliance with treatment.
    METHODS: A systematic prospective non-interventional registry (Hp-EuReg) of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists. Compliance was considered adequate if ≥90% drug intake. Data were collected until September 2021 using the AEG-REDCap e-CRF and were subjected to quality control. Modified intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Multivariate analysis carried out the factors associated with the effectiveness of treatment and compliance.
    RESULTS: Compliance was inadequate in 646 (1.7%) of 38,698 patients. The non-compliance rate was higher in patients prescribed longer regimens (10-, 14-days) and rescue treatments, patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia/functional dyspepsia, and patients reporting adverse effects. Prevalence of non-adherence was lower for first-line treatment than for rescue treatment (1.5% vs. 2.2%; p < 0.001). Differences in non-adherence in the three most frequent first-line treatments were shown: 1.1% with proton pump inhibitor + clarithromycin + amoxicillin; 2.3% with proton pump inhibitor clarithromycin amoxicillin metronidazole; and 1.8% with bismuth quadruple therapy. These treatments were significantly more effective in compliant than in non-compliant patients: 86% versus 44%, 90% versus 71%, and 93% versus 64%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the variable most significantly associated with higher effectiveness was adequate compliance (odds ratio, 6.3 [95%CI, 5.2-7.7]; p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment is very good. Factors associated with poor compliance include uninvestigated/functional dyspepsia, rescue-treatment, prolonged treatment regimens, the presence of adverse events, and the use of non-bismuth sequential and concomitant treatment. Adequate treatment compliance was the variable most closely associated with successful eradication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:我们在高克拉霉素耐药地区进行了四联非铋“伴随”和“混合”方案根除幽门螺杆菌的等效性试验。方法:在这项多中心临床试验中,有321名未经治疗的幽门螺杆菌阳性个体随机分为两种(艾司奥美拉唑40mg/bid,阿莫西林1克/标7天,然后7天埃索美拉唑40mg/bid,阿莫西林1克/标,克拉霉素500mg/bid,和甲硝唑500mg/bid)或合并方案(所有药物同时给予bid10天)。使用组织学和/或13C-尿素呼气试验测试根除。结果:伴随方案有161例患者(90F/71M,平均54.5年,26.7%吸烟者,30.4%溃疡)和混合方案有160(80F/80M,平均52.8年,35.6%的吸烟者,31.2%溃疡)。这些方案是等同的,打算治疗85%和81.8%,(p=0.5),根据方案分析,分别为91.8%和87.8%,(p=0.3),分别。抗性的根除率,在伴随和杂交方案之间,在易感菌株中(97%和97%,p=0.6),克拉霉素单一耐药菌株(86%和90%,p=0.9),甲硝唑单一耐药菌株(96%和81%,p=0.1),和双重耐药菌株(70%和53%,p=0.5)。副作用相当,除了腹泻在伴随方案中更常见。结论:14天的混合方案相当于目前在高克拉霉素和甲硝唑耐药地区使用的10天合并方案。这两种治疗方案都具有良好的耐受性和安全性。
    Background and aim: We conducted an equivalence trial of quadruple non-bismuth \"concomitant\" and \"hybrid\" regimens for H. pylori eradication in a high clarithromycin resistance area. Methods: There were 321 treatment-naïve H. pylori-positive individuals in this multicenter clinical trial randomized to either the hybrid (esomeprazole 40 mg/bid, amoxicillin 1 g/bid for 7 days, then 7 days esomeprazole 40 mg/bid, amoxicillin 1 g/bid, clarithromycin 500 mg/bid, and metronidazole 500 mg/bid) or the concomitant regimen (all medications given concurrently bid for 10 days). Eradication was tested using histology and/or a 13C-urea breath test. Results: The concomitant regimen had 161 patients (90F/71M, mean 54.5 years, 26.7% smokers, 30.4% ulcer) and the hybrid regimen had 160 (80F/80M, mean 52.8 years, 35.6% smokers, 31.2% ulcer). The regimens were equivalent, by intention to treat 85% and 81.8%, (p = 0.5), and per protocol analysis 91.8% and 87.8%, (p = 0.3), respectively. The eradication rate by resistance, between concomitant and hybrid regimens, was in susceptible strains (97% and 97%, p = 0.6), clarithromycin single-resistant strains (86% and 90%, p = 0.9), metronidazole single-resistant strains (96% and 81%, p = 0.1), and dual-resistant strains (70% and 53%, p = 0.5). The side effects were comparable, except for diarrhea being more frequent in the concomitant regimen. Conclusions: A 14-day hybrid regimen is equivalent to a 10-day concomitant regimen currently used in high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance areas. Both regimens are well tolerated and safe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    晚期胰腺癌预后差,5年生存率<5%;因此,晚期不可切除或转移性疾病患者的治疗具有挑战性.目前的指南建议使用吉西他滨联合nab-紫杉醇(GnP)或FOLFIRINOX(FOL)作为一线治疗。关于FOL与GnP在转移性癌症中的功效和毒性的数据是有限的。这项研究旨在比较两种化疗方案在现实世界中的疗效和毒性。
    这项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究回顾了2013年3月至2019年1月在GuglielmodaSaliceto医院接受GnP或FOL治疗的123例晚期或转移性胰腺癌连续患者的医疗记录。皮亚琴察.
    50名患者(40.65%)接受了FOL,以减毒剂量给药,73例患者(59.35%)接受GnP。在倾向匹配分数之后,对100例患者进行回顾性评估。在最终匹配的队列中,新辅助治疗没有差异,放射治疗,两组在一线治疗前进行手术。两组之间的无进展生存期和总生存期相当,毒性百分比无差异。
    接受FOL的患者和接受GnP的患者之间的结局没有差异。出乎意料的是,没有发现更大的FOL相关毒性,可能是由于剂量减少。
    UNASSIGNED: Advanced pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate <5%; thus, treatment of patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic disease is challenging. Current guidelines recommend either gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) or FOLFIRINOX (FOL) as first-line treatment. Data on both efficacy and toxicity of FOL versus GnP in metastatic cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the two chemotherapy regimens in terms of efficacy and toxicity in a real-world setting.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective propensity score matching study reviewed the medical records of 123 consecutive patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who received either GnP or FOL between March 2013 and January 2019 in Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty patients (40.65%) received FOL, administered in an attenuated dose, and seventy-three patients (59.35%) received GnP. After a propensity matching score, 100 patients were retrospectively evaluated. In the final matched cohort, there was no difference in neoadjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, and surgery performed before the first-line therapy between the two groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable between the two groups and no difference was found in the percentage of toxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no difference in outcomes between patients who received FOL and those who received GnP. Unexpectedly, no greater FOL-related toxicity was found, probably due to the dose reduction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:免疫治疗改变了子宫内膜癌治疗领域,特别是那些表现出错配修复缺陷(MMRd/MSI-H)。越来越多的证据支持将免疫治疗与化疗整合作为一线治疗策略。最近,来自正在进行的试验的结果,如RUBY(NCT03981796),NRG-GY018(NCT03914612),AtTEnd(NCT03603184),和DUO-E(NCT04269200)已经被公开。
    方法:本文对研究免疫治疗在晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌一线治疗中的作用的III期试验进行综述和荟萃分析。
    结果:这些试验的2,320名患者的汇总数据证实了化疗和免疫疗法的采用。在所有患者组中,与单纯化疗相比,无进展生存期显著改善(危险比(HR):0.70,95%置信区间(CI):0.62,0.79).无进展生存获益在MMRd/MSI-H肿瘤中更为显著(n=563;HR:0.33,95%CI:0.23,0.43)。这个好处,尽管不那么健壮,MMRp/MSS组仍然存在(n=1,757;HR:0.74,95%CI:0.60,0.91)。汇总数据进一步表明,与单独化疗相比,化疗加免疫治疗可提高所有患者的总生存率(HR:0.75,95%CI:0.63,0.89)。然而,总体生存数据成熟度仍然很低.
    结论:在晚期和转移性子宫内膜癌的初始治疗中加入免疫疗法可以显著改善肿瘤预后。特别是在MMRd/MSI-H子集内。该特定亚组目前是评估无化疗方案潜力的研究重点。正在进行的探索性分析旨在确定有资格纳入临床试验的无反应患者。
    BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has transformed the endometrial cancer treatment landscape, particularly for those exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency [MMRd/microsatellite instability-hypermutated (MSI-H)]. A growing body of evidence supports the integration of immunotherapy with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment strategy. Recently, findings from ongoing trials such as RUBY (NCT03981796), NRG-GY018 (NCT03914612), AtTEnd (NCT03603184), and DUO-E (NCT04269200) have been disclosed.
    METHODS: This paper constitutes a review and meta-analysis of phase III trials investigating the role of immunotherapy in the first-line setting for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.
    RESULTS: The pooled data from 2320 patients across these trials substantiate the adoption of chemotherapy alongside immunotherapy, revealing a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.79] across all patient groups. Progression-free survival benefits are more pronounced in MMRd/MSI-H tumors (n = 563; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.43). This benefit, albeit less robust, persists in the MMR-proficient/microsatellite stable group (n = 1757; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91). Pooled data further indicate that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy enhances overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone in all patients (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89). However, overall survival data maturity remains low.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of immunotherapy into the initial treatment for advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer brings about a substantial improvement in oncologic outcomes, especially within the MMRd/MSI-H subset. This specific subgroup is currently a focal point of investigation for evaluating the potential of chemotherapy-free regimens. Ongoing exploratory analyses aim to identify non-responding patients eligible for inclusion in clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号