BACKGROUND: Although treatment options for gastric cancer (GC) continue to advance, the overall prognosis for patients with GC remains poor. At present, the predictors of treatment efficacy remain controversial except for high microsatellite instability.
OBJECTIVE: To develop methods to identify groups of patients with GC who would benefit the most from receiving the combination of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and chemotherapy.
METHODS: We acquired data from 63 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative GC with a histological diagnosis of GC at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between November 2020 and October 2022. All of the patients screened received a PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment.
RESULTS: As of July 1, 2023, the objective response rate was 61.9%, and the disease control rate was 96.8%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for all patients was 6.3 months. The median overall survival was not achieved. Survival analysis showed that patients with a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 exhibited an extended trend in progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to patients with a CPS of 0 after receiving a PD-1 inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin and tegafur as the first-line treatment. PFS exhibited a trend for prolongation as the expression level of HER2 increased. Based on PFS, we divided patients into two groups: A treatment group with excellent efficacy and a treatment group with poor efficacy. The mPFS of the excellent efficacy group was 8 months, with a mPFS of 9.1 months after excluding a cohort of patients who received interrupted therapy due to surgery. The mPFS was 4.5 months in patients in the group with poor efficacy who did not receive surgery. Using good/poor efficacy as the endpoint of our study, univariate analysis revealed that both CPS score (P = 0.004) and HER2 expression level (P = 0.015) were both factors that exerted significant influence on the efficacy of treatment the combination of a PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC (AGC). Finally, multivariate analysis confirmed that CPS score was a significant influencing factor.
CONCLUSIONS: CPS score and HER2 expression both impacted the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in AGC patients who were non-positive for HER2.

BACKGROUND: In CheckMate 227 Part 1, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥1% versus chemotherapy. We report results from CheckMate 227 Part 2, which evaluated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression.
METHODS: Seven hundred and fifty-five patients with systemic therapy-naive, stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR mutations or ALK alterations were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. OS in all randomized patients was a hierarchically tested secondary endpoint.
RESULTS: At 19.5 months\' minimum follow-up, no significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC [median OS 18.8 versus 15.6 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95.62% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.08, P = 0.1859]. Descriptive analyses showed OS improvement with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in all randomized patients (median OS 18.3 versus 14.7 months, HR 0.81, 95.62% CI 0.67-0.97) and in an exploratory analysis in squamous NSCLC (median OS 18.3 versus 12.0 months, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.97). A trend toward improved OS was seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, regardless of the tumor mutation status of STK11 or TP53, regardless of tumor mutational burden, and in patients with intermediate/poor Lung Immune Prognostic Index scores. Safety with nivolumab plus chemotherapy was consistent with previous reports of first-line settings.
CONCLUSIONS: CheckMate 227 Part 2 did not meet the primary endpoint of OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Descriptive analyses showed prolonged OS with nivolumab plus chemotherapy in all-randomized and squamous NSCLC populations, suggesting that this combination may benefit patients with untreated metastatic NSCLC.

UNASSIGNED: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC) is a group of rare but highly aggressive malignancies. The standard chemotherapy regimens composed of etoposide and cisplatin/carboplatin (EP/EC) are of limited efficacy. This prospective, multicenter, phase II study is conducted to explore the effectiveness and safety of first-line anti-PD-1 antibody (camrelizumab) combined with chemotherapy in advanced GEP-NEC patients.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with unresectable or metastatic GEP-NEC will receive camrelizumab combined with standard first-line chemotherapy every 3 weeks (camrelizumab 200 mg, administered intravenously on day 1; etoposide 100 mg/m2, administered intravenously on days 1-3; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, administered intravenously on day 1 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/ml per min, administered intravenously on day 1). All patients were naïve to systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary endpoint is a 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints are objective response rate, PFS, overall survival and adverse reactions.
UNASSIGNED: This is the first study to investigate the therapeutic potential of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced GEP-NEC. It is expected that this trial will propose a new and effective treatment strategy for GEP-NEC in the first-line setting.
UNASSIGNED: This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100047314.
UNASSIGNED: June 12, 2021.

UNASSIGNED: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a standard care option in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. TKI-based combination treatment modes show encouraging outcomes. However, it remains unknown which is the optimal treatment as the first-line regimen for these patients on overall survival (OS).
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trials and meeting abstracts that investigated EGFR-TKIs alone or in combination as front-line care for patients with NSCLC were systematically searched in relevant databases and reviewed. Fixed and random effects network meta-analysis models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate, and grade three and higher adverse events (AEs). Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were used to rank treatment effects.
UNASSIGNED: Eighteen studies covering six treatments and involving a total of 4389 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. On OS, the top three treatment were first-generation EGFR-TKIs (1G EGFR-TKIs) plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 88.1%), osimertinib (SUCRA, 65.8%) and second-generation EGFR-TKIs (2GEGFR-TKIs) (SUCRA, 63.3%). On PFS, the top three treatments were osimertinib (SUCRA, 96.0%), 1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 67.1%), and 1G EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenesis (SUCRA, 48.2%). Two types of TKI-based combination therapy have significantly higher risk of grade three and higher AEs than TKI alone.
UNASSIGNED: 1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy and osimertinib seem to be the two better options as first-line care in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-mutation. Osimertinib caused the lowest incidence of AEs. However, TKIs-based combination therapy significantly increased AEs.

Combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy improves the therapeutic outcome for first-line (1L) patients with advance nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two cohorts of a phase 1b study (NCT02937116) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, plus chemotherapy in 1L patients with nonsquamous and squamous NSCLC (nsqNSCLC/sqNSCLC); and to identify potential biomarkers for treatment response. Treatment-naïve patients with nsqNSCLC were enrolled and intravenously given sintilimab (200 mg), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 4 cycles in cohort D. Treatment-naïve patients with sqNSCLC were enrolled and intravenously given sintilimab (200 mg), gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), Q3W, for 6 cycles in cohort E. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The additional objective was to explore biomarkers for the treatment efficacy. Twenty-one patients with nsqNSCLC, and 20 patients with sqNSCLC were enrolled in cohort D and cohort E, respectively. By the data cutoff (April 17, 2019), 8 (38.1%) patients in cohort D and 17 (85.0%) patients in cohort E experienced grade 3-4 adverse events. The median follow-up duration was 16.4 months (14.8-23.0) in cohort D and 15.9 months (11.7-17.7) in cohort E. The objective response rate was 68.4% (95% CI 43.4%, 87.4%) in cohort D and 64.7% (95% CI 38.3%, 85.8%) in cohort E. Neither PD-L1 expression nor tumor mutation burden value was significantly associated with an improved treatment response. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy exhibited manageable toxicity and an encouraging antitumor activity in patients with nsqNSCLC and sqNSCLC.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Increasing clinical investigations have explored the value of EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenic drugs as the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating EGFR-TKIs administered with or without antiangiogenic agents for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The latest RCT that was presented orally at the 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress was obtained online. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rates (DCRs), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs). Results: We included seven articles on five trials with 1,226 patients. The interventions for the experimental group were the first-generation EGFR-TKI erlotinib combined with bevacizumab (four studies) or ramucirumab (one study), and erlotinib monotherapy (four studies) or erlotinib plus placebo (one study) for the control group. All studies reached their primary study endpoints (i.e., PFS). Compared to erlotinib monotherapy, erlotinib plus antiangiogenic agents remarkably prolonged PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.51-0.69, P = 0.000]; however, ORR, DCR, and OS were similar between the two groups. The overall grade 3-5 AEs increased in combination group (OR = 5.772, 95% CI = 2.38-13.94, P = 0.000), particularly the incidence of diarrhea (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.21-5.23, P = 0.014), acneiform (OR = 1.815, 95% CI = 1.084-3.037, P = 0.023), hypertension (OR = 6.77, 95% CI = 3.62-12.66, P = 0.000), and proteinuria (OR = 13.48, 95% CI = 4.11-44.22, P = 0.000). Additionally, subgroup analysis demonstrated that Asian patients could significantly benefit from combination therapy (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.50-0.69, P = 0.000). Patients with exon 19 deletions (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.49-0.75, P = 0.000) and 21 Leu858Arg mutations (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.47-0.73, P = 0.000) had almost equivalent PFS benefits when treated with double-blocking therapy. Patients with brain metastases at baseline in the combination group had a trend toward better PFS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.30-1.01, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Erlotinib plus bevacizumab or ramucirumab in EFGR-mutated NSCLC first-line setting yielded remarkable PFS benefits; however, this was accompanied by higher AEs. Epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI plus antiangiogenic agent therapy may be considered a new option for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: A first-line biologic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still controversial. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of first-line cetuximab versus bevacizumab for RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC.
METHODS: In March 2018, an electronic search of the following biomedical databases was performed: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Knowledge. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or observational cohort studies (OCSs) were included. Subgroup analyses of all RCTs were performed in all outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.3.
RESULTS: Two RCTs and three OCSs, involving a total 2576 patients, were included. The meta-analysis reported that cetuximab was associated with a longer overall survival (OS) [HR 0.89, 95% CI (0.81-0.98); p = 0.02], a higher ORR [RR 1.11, 95% CI (1.03-1.19); p = 0.006], higher complete response [RR 3.21, 95% CI (1.27-8.12); p = 0.01] and a greater median depth of response than bevacizumab. However, no significant difference was observed between cetuximab and bevacizumab groups for PFS, DCR, partial response, progressive disease, curative intent metastasectomy, EORR and incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events. In the subgroup meta-analyses of the RCTs, inconsistent results compared to the main analysis, however, were found, in the ORR, DCR and curative intent metastasectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence indicates that compared to bevacizumab treatment, cetuximab provides a clinically relevant effect in first-line treatment against mCRC, at the cost of having lower stable disease.

Antibodies that target programmed death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand [programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)] have become a mainstay of first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable genetic alterations. In this review, we summarize results from recent clinical trials that have evaluated the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab and the anti-PD-L1 antibodies atezolizumab and durvalumab as first-line treatment as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, other immunotherapies, and antiangiogenesis agents. We discuss factors that may influence treatment selection, including patient baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, tumor histology, and biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden. While immunotherapy has become a central component of first-line treatment of most patients with advanced NSCLC, important questions remain about how treatment should be managed for individual patients.

The phase II YO28252 study (NCT01590719) examined first-line onartuzumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. MET immunohistochemistry expression as a biomarker of onartuzumab activity was also examined.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard mFOLFOX6 plus onartuzumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo in 2-week cycles for 12 cycles, followed by onartuzumab or placebo until disease progression. Coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in intent-to-treat (ITT) and MET-positive populations. The target hazard ratio (HR) was 0.70 for patients in the ITT group and 0.60 in the MET-positive population. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety.
Overall, 123 patients were enrolled (n = 62 onartuzumab, n = 61 placebo). Median PFS was 6.77 versus 6.97 months for onartuzumab versus placebo, respectively (HR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.63; p = .71). In the MET-positive population, median PFS was 5.95 versus 6.80 months, onartuzumab versus placebo (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.60-3.20; p = .45). Median OS was 10.61 months for onartuzumab versus 11.27 months for placebo) (HR, 1.06, 0.64-1.75; p = .83). In the MET-positive population, median OS was 8.51 versus 8.48 months for onartuzumab versus placebo, respectively (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.45-2.78; p = .80). ORR was 60.5% for the onartuzumab group and 57.1% for placebo. Grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 88.3% of patients receiving onartuzumab and in 78.3% of patients receiving placebo, with serious AEs in 55% and 40%, respectively.
The addition of onartuzumab to mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer did not improve efficacy in an unselected population or in a MET immunohistochemistry-positive population.
The YO28252 study demonstrated that the addition of the anti-MET agent onartuzumab to mFOLFOX6 for treatment of gastric cancer did not improve efficacy in an overall study population or those selected for positive MET status by immunohistochemistry. This highlights the importance of correctly selecting biomarkers for targeted therapies. A multivariate analysis suggested that MET positivity may still be prognostic for worse median overall survival in gastric cancer; therefore, it is important to continue investigation into the optimal approach to inhibit MET signaling in gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare hospital costs per treatment cycle (HCTC) for nonchemotherapy drugs and nondrug care associated with platinum-based doublets in the first-line setting for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (AdvNS-NSCLC) in Chinese patients.
METHODS: Patients receiving platinum-based doublets in the first-line setting for AdvNS-NSCLC from 2010 to 2012 in two Chinese tertiary hospitals were identified to create the retrospective study cohort. Propensity score methods were used to create matched treatment groups for head-to-head comparisons on HCTC between pemetrexed-platinum and other platinum-based doublets. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to rank studied platinum-based doublets for their associations with the log10 scale of HCTC for nonchemotherapy drugs and nondrug care.
RESULTS: Propensity score methods created matched treatment groups for pemetrexed-platinum versus docetaxel-platinum (61 pairs), paclitaxel-platinum (39 pairs), gemcitabine-platinum (93 pairs), and vinorelbine-platinum (73 pairs), respectively. Even though the log10 scale of HCTC for nonchemotherapy drugs and nondrug care associated with pemetrexed-platinum was ranked lowest in all patients (coefficient -0.174, P=0.015), which included patients experiencing any hematological adverse events (coefficient -0.199, P=0.013), neutropenia (coefficient -0.426, P=0.021), or leukopenia (coefficient -0.406, P=0.001), pemetrexed-platinum had the highest total HCTC (median difference from RMB 1,692 to RMB 7,400, P<0.001) among platinum-based doublets because of its higher drug acquisition costs (median difference from RMB 4,636 to RMB 7,332, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among Chinese patients receiving platinum-based doublets in the first-line setting for AdvNS-NSCLC, the higher acquisition costs for nonplatinum cytotoxic drugs associated with pemetrexed-platinum could be partially offset by its significantly lower hospital costs for nonchemotherapy drugs and nondrug care.