BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban, compared to Warfarin, for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Iran.
METHODS: A Markov model with a 30-year time horizon was employed to simulate and assess different treatment strategies\' cost-effectiveness. The study population comprised Iranian adults with NVAF, identified through specialist consultations, hospital visits, and archival record reviews. Direct medical costs, direct nonmedical, and indirect costs were included. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were assessed using an EQ-5D questionnaire. This study utilized a cost-effectiveness threshold of $11 134 per QALY.
RESULTS: Apixaban demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness compared to Rivaroxaban and Warfarin. Over 30 years, total costs were lower in the Apixaban and Rivaroxaban groups compared to the Warfarin group ($126.18 and $109.99 vs. $150.49). However, Apixaban showed higher total QALYs gained compared to others (0.134 vs. 0.133 and 0.116). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for comparing Apixaban to Warfarin was calculated at -1332.83 cost per QALY, below the threshold of $11 134, indicating Apixaban\'s cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, with ICER consistently remaining below the threshold. Over 5 years (2024-2028) of Apixaban usage, the incremental cost starts at USD 70 250 296 in the first year and gradually rises to USD 71 770 662 in the fifth year. DSA and PSA were assessed to prove the robustness of the results.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that Apixaban is a cost-effective option for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in Iran compared to Warfarin.

UNASSIGNED: Few real-world studies have investigated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The interactions encompass drugs inducing or inhibiting cytochrome P450 3A4 and permeability glycoprotein. These agents potentially modulate the breakdown and elimination of NOACs. This study investigated the impact of DDIs on thromboembolism in this clinical scenario.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who had NVAF and were treated with NOACs were selected as the study cohort from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. Cases were defined as patients hospitalised for a thromboembolic event and who underwent a relevant imaging study within 7 days before hospitalisa-tion or during hospitalisation. Each case was matched with up to 4 controls by using the incidence density sampling method. The concurrent use of a cytochrome P450 3A4/permeability glycoprotein inducer or inhibitor or both with NOACs was identified. The effects of these interactions on the risk of thromboembolic events were examined with univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regressions.
UNASSIGNED: The study cohort comprised 60,726 eligible patients. Among them, 1288 patients with a thromboembolic event and 5144 matched control patients were selected for analysis. The concurrent use of a cytochrome P450 3A4/permeability glycoprotein inducer resulted in a higher risk of thromboembolic events (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.004-1.51).
UNASSIGNED: For patients with NVAF receiving NOACs, the concurrent use of cytochrome P450 3A4/ permeability glycoprotein inducers increases the risk of thromboembolic events.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Rivaroxaban, a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, has become widely used for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients. However, few trials have explored the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in VTE patients over 80 years of age. This necessitates further real-world studies of rivaroxaban across elderly populations.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective single center study involving extremely aged VTE sufferers treated with rivaroxaban. The sample comprised 121 patients newly initiated on rivaroxaban diagnosed between January 2018 and January 2020. Patients were followed up for no less than 2 years. The effectiveness outcome was the disappearance of thromboembolism. The safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding events. Comorbidities and complications were recorded throughout the entire study.
UNASSIGNED: The efficacy outcome occurred in 114 of 121 patients (94.21%) and the safety outcome occurred in 12 of 121 patients (9.91%). Increased hemorrhages were observed in patients with infection (15.15% vs 7.80%), but no significant difference was observed due to limited sample size (P=0.3053). Patients with an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score higher than 6 points exhibited higher bleeding rates (14.08% vs 4.00%; P=0.0676) and lower thrombus cure rates (88.73% vs 100%; P=0.0203).
UNASSIGNED: Patients with infection should be more careful of bleeding events during rivaroxaban therapy. An age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score higher than 6, which predicted poor survival, indicated inferior safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban in an aged venous thromboembolism patient population under real-world conditions.

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation is increasing, and frailty prevalence increases with age, posing challenges for physicians in prescribing anticoagulants to such patients because of possible harm. The effects of frailty on anticoagulant therapy in older Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are unclear. Herein, we prescribed rivaroxaban to Japanese patients with NVAF and monitored for a mean of 2.0 years. The primary endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism. The secondary endpoints were all-cause or cardiovascular death, composite endpoint, and major or non-major bleeding. Frailty was assessed using the Japanese long-term care insurance system. A multiple imputation technique was used for missing data. The propensity score (PS) was obtained to estimate the treatment effect of frailty and was used to create two PS-matched groups. Overall, 5717 older patients had NVAF (mean age: 73.9 years), 485 (8.5%) were classified as frail. After PS matching, background characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. Rivaroxaban dosages were 10 and 15 mg/day for approximately 80% and the remaining patients, respectively. Frailty was not associated with the primary endpoint or secondary endpoints. In conclusion, frailty does not affect the effectiveness or safety of rivaroxaban anticoagulant therapy in older Japanese patients with NVAF.Trial registration: UMIN000019135, NCT02633982.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anticoagulation treatment is increasing as an aging global population faces a high burden of cardiovascular comorbidities. Direct oral anticoagulants, including factor Xa inhibitors (FXai), are replacing vitamin K antagonists as the most commonly prescribed treatment for reducing risk of thrombotic events. While the risk of FXai-associated spontaneous bleeds is established, less is understood about their management and the effect of treatment on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The primary objectives of the REVERXaL study are to describe patient characteristics, health care interventions during the acute-care phase, in-hospital outcomes, and associations between timing of reversal/replacement agent administration and in-hospital outcomes. Secondary/exploratory objectives focus on clinical assessments and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 30 and 90 days.
METHODS: REVERXaL is a multinational, observational study of hospitalized patients with FXai-associated major bleeds in Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The study includes 2 cohorts of approximately 2000 patients each. Cohort A is a historic cohort for whom medical chart data will be collected from hospitalization to discharge for patients admitted for major bleeds during FXai use within 2 years prior to enrollment of Cohort B. Cohort B will prospectively enroll patients administered any reversal/replacement agent during hospitalization to manage FXai-associated major bleeds and will include the collection of clinical outcomes and PROMs data over 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: REVERXaL will generate insights on patient characteristics, treatment approaches, and associated outcomes in patients hospitalized with FXai-associated major bleeds. These data may inform clinical practice and streamline treatment pathways in this population.
BACKGROUND: URL: https://www.
RESULTS: gov; unique identifier: NCT06147830.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the association between polymorphisms in fibrinogen genes and bleeding risk in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
UNASSIGNED: Patients treated with DOACs from June 2018 to December 2021 were enrolled in the study. Genotyping was done for rs2070011, rs6050, and rs2070022 in fibrinogen alpha chain (FGA); rs1800788, rs4220, and rs4463047 in fibrinogen beta chain (FGB); and rs2066865 and rs1800792 in fibrinogen gamma chain (FGG), along with F2 rs5896 and F10 rs5960. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the risk factors for bleeding and to develop a risk scoring system.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 468 patients were included in the analysis, 14 of whom experienced major bleeding and 36 experienced clinically relevant non-major bleeding. In the multivariable analysis, overdose, anaemia, F2 rs5896, and FGG rs1800792 were found to be significantly associated with bleeding risk. Specifically, patients with the TT genotype of F2 rs5896 and the CC genotype of FGG rs1800792 had 2.1 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.9) and 2.7 times (95% CI 1.2-5.9) higher bleeding risk than the C allele and T allele carriers, respectively. Based on the risk scoring system, patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 points were predicted to have 5.2%, 10.8%, 22.4%, 32.3%, 42.3%, and 61.8% of bleeding risk, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effects of polymorphisms in fibrinogen genes on DOAC response. After validation, these results will be useful for personalised DOAC therapy.

Background/Objectives: There are limited data on the risks and benefits of using Andexanet alfa (AA) compared with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Our aim was to describe a compilation of the information available in the literature to date. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until December 2023. Following the \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)\" guidelines, our systematic literature review included studies that were retrospective in design and evaluated both drugs to control bleeding and complications (death and thromboembolic events). Two researchers re-examined the studies for relevance, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. No meta-analyses were performed for the results. Results: In this limited patient sample, we found no differences between published articles in terms of neuroimaging stability or thrombotic events. However, some studies show significant differences in mortality, suggesting that one of the AAs may be superior to 4F-PCC. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis shows that AA has a better efficacy profile compared with 4F-PCC. However, further studies monitoring these patients and a multicenter collaborative network dedicated to this topic are needed.

There are insufficient reports on the use of andexanet alfa in cardiac surgery. A 67-year-old man was diagnosed with type A aortic dissection and performed emergent surgery. His medical history included atrial fibrillation treated with Edoxaban. We performed total arch replacement. Despite administration of enough protamine, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet administration, controlling bleeding was difficult. Thus, Andexanet Alfa was initiated after CPB withdrawal. Surgical bleeding was dramatically controlled after its administration. There were no findings suggestive of an embolic event. In conclusion, administration of Andexanet Alfa is safe after cardiopulmonary bypass withdrawal.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT02950168, NCT02951039.