BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban, compared to Warfarin, for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Iran.
METHODS: A Markov model with a 30-year time horizon was employed to simulate and assess different treatment strategies\' cost-effectiveness. The study population comprised Iranian adults with NVAF, identified through specialist consultations, hospital visits, and archival record reviews. Direct medical costs, direct nonmedical, and indirect costs were included. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were assessed using an EQ-5D questionnaire. This study utilized a cost-effectiveness threshold of $11 134 per QALY.
RESULTS: Apixaban demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness compared to Rivaroxaban and Warfarin. Over 30 years, total costs were lower in the Apixaban and Rivaroxaban groups compared to the Warfarin group ($126.18 and $109.99 vs. $150.49). However, Apixaban showed higher total QALYs gained compared to others (0.134 vs. 0.133 and 0.116). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for comparing Apixaban to Warfarin was calculated at -1332.83 cost per QALY, below the threshold of $11 134, indicating Apixaban\'s cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, with ICER consistently remaining below the threshold. Over 5 years (2024-2028) of Apixaban usage, the incremental cost starts at USD 70 250 296 in the first year and gradually rises to USD 71 770 662 in the fifth year. DSA and PSA were assessed to prove the robustness of the results.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that Apixaban is a cost-effective option for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in Iran compared to Warfarin.

UNASSIGNED: Rivaroxaban, a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, has become widely used for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients. However, few trials have explored the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in VTE patients over 80 years of age. This necessitates further real-world studies of rivaroxaban across elderly populations.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective single center study involving extremely aged VTE sufferers treated with rivaroxaban. The sample comprised 121 patients newly initiated on rivaroxaban diagnosed between January 2018 and January 2020. Patients were followed up for no less than 2 years. The effectiveness outcome was the disappearance of thromboembolism. The safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding events. Comorbidities and complications were recorded throughout the entire study.
UNASSIGNED: The efficacy outcome occurred in 114 of 121 patients (94.21%) and the safety outcome occurred in 12 of 121 patients (9.91%). Increased hemorrhages were observed in patients with infection (15.15% vs 7.80%), but no significant difference was observed due to limited sample size (P=0.3053). Patients with an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score higher than 6 points exhibited higher bleeding rates (14.08% vs 4.00%; P=0.0676) and lower thrombus cure rates (88.73% vs 100%; P=0.0203).
UNASSIGNED: Patients with infection should be more careful of bleeding events during rivaroxaban therapy. An age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score higher than 6, which predicted poor survival, indicated inferior safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban in an aged venous thromboembolism patient population under real-world conditions.

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation is increasing, and frailty prevalence increases with age, posing challenges for physicians in prescribing anticoagulants to such patients because of possible harm. The effects of frailty on anticoagulant therapy in older Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are unclear. Herein, we prescribed rivaroxaban to Japanese patients with NVAF and monitored for a mean of 2.0 years. The primary endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism. The secondary endpoints were all-cause or cardiovascular death, composite endpoint, and major or non-major bleeding. Frailty was assessed using the Japanese long-term care insurance system. A multiple imputation technique was used for missing data. The propensity score (PS) was obtained to estimate the treatment effect of frailty and was used to create two PS-matched groups. Overall, 5717 older patients had NVAF (mean age: 73.9 years), 485 (8.5%) were classified as frail. After PS matching, background characteristics were well-balanced between the groups. Rivaroxaban dosages were 10 and 15 mg/day for approximately 80% and the remaining patients, respectively. Frailty was not associated with the primary endpoint or secondary endpoints. In conclusion, frailty does not affect the effectiveness or safety of rivaroxaban anticoagulant therapy in older Japanese patients with NVAF.Trial registration: UMIN000019135, NCT02633982.

Background/Objectives: There are limited data on the risks and benefits of using Andexanet alfa (AA) compared with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Our aim was to describe a compilation of the information available in the literature to date. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until December 2023. Following the \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)\" guidelines, our systematic literature review included studies that were retrospective in design and evaluated both drugs to control bleeding and complications (death and thromboembolic events). Two researchers re-examined the studies for relevance, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. No meta-analyses were performed for the results. Results: In this limited patient sample, we found no differences between published articles in terms of neuroimaging stability or thrombotic events. However, some studies show significant differences in mortality, suggesting that one of the AAs may be superior to 4F-PCC. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis shows that AA has a better efficacy profile compared with 4F-PCC. However, further studies monitoring these patients and a multicenter collaborative network dedicated to this topic are needed.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT02950168, NCT02951039.

The evidence of rivaroxaban\'s pharmacokinetics in obese compared with non-obese populations remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban between obese and non-obese populations under fed state. Participants who met the study\'s eligibility criteria were assigned into one of two groups: obese (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2) or non-obese (body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2). A single dose of rivaroxaban 20 mg was orally administered to each participant. Nine blood samples over 48 h, and multiple urine samples over 18 h were collected and analyzed for rivaroxaban concentration using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass detector. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using WinNonlin software. Thirty-six participants were recruited into the study. No significant changes were observed between obese and non-obese participants in peak plasma concentration, time to reach peak plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 48 h or to infinity, elimination rate constant, half-life, apparent volume of distribution, apparent clearance, and fraction of drug excreted unchanged in urine over 18 h. Rivaroxaban\'s exposure was similar between the obese and non-obese subjects, and there were no significant differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters between the two groups. These results suggest that dose adjustment for rivaroxaban is probably unwarranted in the obese population.

This manuscript is a consensus document of an expert panel on the Evaluation and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Taking Anticoagulants Presenting to the Emergency Department, sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians.

UNASSIGNED: While treatment interruption of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for elective surgery or procedures among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming more prevalent, there remains insufficient evidence regarding the optimal perioperative management of NOACs, particularly procedures with minor bleeding risks.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a simplified, standardized protocol for perioperative management of direct factor Xa inhibitors in patients, with AF undergoing procedures associated with minor bleeding risk.
UNASSIGNED: This multicenter, prospective single-arm registry study plans to enroll patients undergoing procedures with minor bleeding risk who were prescribed direct factor Xa inhibitors for AF. The procedures with minor bleeding risk will include gastrointestinal endoscopy for diagnostic purposes, selected dental procedures, and ocular surgery for cataracts or glaucoma. For apixaban, patients will withhold the last evening dose and resume either from the evening dose of the procedure day or the following morning, depending on the bleeding risk of the patient. For edoxaban or rivaroxaban, patients will withhold only a single dose on the procedure day. The primary outcome is the occurrence of major bleeding events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes include systemic thromboembolism, all-cause mortality, and a composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events.
UNASSIGNED: This study has the potential to generate evidence regarding the safety of perioperative management for patients, with AF undergoing procedures associated with minor bleeding risk.
UNASSIGNED: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05801068.

UNASSIGNED: This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients on dialysis.
UNASSIGNED: All types of studies published on PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up to 10 September 2023 and comparing outcomes of apixaban vs. VKA in dialysis patients were eligible.
UNASSIGNED: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six retrospective studies were included. Apixaban treatment was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.77; I2 = 50%) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.98, I2 = 9%) compared to VKA. Meta-analysis also showed that the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.85, I2 = 16%) and intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.84, I2 = 0%) was significantly reduced with apixaban. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of ischemic stroke (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.06, 2.69, I2 = 0%), mortality (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.74, 2.16, I2 = 94%) and recurrent venous thromboembolism (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.21, I2 = 0%) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed no difference in bleeding outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Low-quality evidence from a mix of RCTs and retrospective studies shows that apixaban may have better safety and equivalent efficacy as compared to VKA in dialysis patients. Apixaban treatment correlated with significantly reduced risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in observational studies but not in RCTs. The predominance of retrospective data warrants caution in the interpretation of results.

UNASSIGNED: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormal heart rhythm in elderly patients. Rivaroxaban has been widely used for stroke prevention. The anticoagulant response to rivaroxaban increases with age, which may make elderly patients susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small differences in bioavailability between generic and brand products.
UNASSIGNED: We designed a cohort study of ≥65-year-old inpatients with AF. Sociodemographic and laboratory measures of qualified patients who received brand or generic rivaroxaban for at least 72 hours at the study hospital from January 2021 to June 2023 were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of bleeding.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1008 qualifying patients were included for analysis, with 626 (62.1%) receiving brand rivaroxaban and 382 (37.9%) receiving generic rivaroxaban. After propensity score matching and weighting to account for confounders, the odds ratios comparing brand vs generic rivaroxaban (95% confidence intervals) for the bleeding was 1.15 (0.72-1.82). Results from subgroup analyses of patients with age ≥85, HAS-BLED score ≥ 3, containment of antiplatelet drugs, and female patients were consistent with the primary analysis.
UNASSIGNED: It provides evidence regarding the clinical safety outcome of generic rivaroxaban in the elderly AF population that may be particularly susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small allowable differences in pharmacokinetics.