Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has dramatically improved the flexibility and outcomes of cancer research and clinical trials, providing highly sensitive and accurate high-throughput platforms for large-scale genomic testing. In contrast to whole-genome (WGS) or whole-exome sequencing (WES), targeted genomic sequencing (TS) focuses on a panel of genes or targets known to have strong associations with pathogenesis of disease and/or clinical relevance, offering greater sequencing depth with reduced costs and data burden. This allows targeted sequencing to identify low frequency variants in targeted regions with high confidence, thus suitable for profiling low-quality and fragmented clinical DNA samples. As a result, TS has been widely used in clinical research and trials for patient stratification and the development of targeted therapeutics. However, its transition to routine clinical use has been slow. Many technical and analytical obstacles still remain and need to be discussed and addressed before large-scale and cross-centre implementation. Gold-standard and state-of-the-art procedures and pipelines are urgently needed to accelerate this transition. In this review we first present how TS is conducted in cancer research, including various target enrichment platforms, the construction of target panels, and selected research and clinical studies utilising TS to profile clinical samples. We then present a generalised analytical workflow for TS data discussing important parameters and filters in detail, aiming to provide the best practices of TS usage and analyses.

The present report describes the case of a 64-year-old woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma expressing mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The patient developed follicular lymphoma during treatment with the EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor afatinib. Standard immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma was introduced in addition to continuing treatment with afatinib for lung cancer. Immunochemotherapy was effective and improved the patient\'s performance status while afatinib controlled the progression of lung cancer. Our case study suggests that it is safe to introduce standard immunochemotherapy for patients who develop malignant lymphoma while continuing treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for lung adenocarcinoma expressing mutant EGFR.

The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene codes for the MTHFR enzyme which plays a key role in the pathway of folate and methionine metabolism. Polymorphisms of genes in this pathway affect its regulation and have been linked to lymphoma. In this study we examined whether we could detect an association between two common non-synonymous MTHFR polymorphisms, 677C > T (rs1801133) and 1298A > C (rs1801131), and susceptibility to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in an Australian case-control cohort. We found no significant differences between genotype or allele frequencies for either polymorphisms between lymphoma cases and controls. We also explored whether epigenetic modification of MTHFR, specifically DNA methylation of a CpG island in the MTHFR promoter region, is associated with NHL using blood samples from patients. No difference in methylation levels was detected between the case and control samples suggesting that although hypermethylation of MTHFR has been reported in tumour tissues, particularly in the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtype of NHL, methylation of this MTHFR promoter CpG island is not a suitable epigenetic biomarker for NHL diagnosis or prognosis in peripheral blood samples. Further studies into epigenetic variants could focus on genes that are robustly associated with NHL susceptibility.