This study investigates the combination of FGFR inhibitor futibatinib (FTB) and MEK inhibitor binimetinib (BTB) for KRASmt NSCLC therapy. An analytical method was developed and validated for measuring FTB and BTB concentrations in rat plasma, adhering to USFDA guidelines. Using liquid-liquid extraction on 45-μL plasma samples, a 6.5-min run time was achieved. The linear calibration curve ranged from 2 to 100 ng/mL. Intra-day and inter-day accuracy ranged between 92.06% and 100.08%. Four blank injections post high-concentration samples resolved significant carryover. Extraction recoveries averaged 92.06% to 102.37% across concentrations. No significant endogenous interference was detected in blank plasma. The LLOQ for both drugs was 2.0 ng/mL. Selectivity, matrix effects, stability, and dilution integrity met the acceptance criteria. The method assessed FTB and BTB interaction potential in combination therapy at 5 mg/kg. The findings provide essential pharmacokinetics insights for future clinical trials.

While preclinical studies consistently implicate FGFR‑signalling in breast cancer (BC) progression, clinical evidence fails to support these findings. It may be that the clinical significance of FGFR ought to be analysed in the context of the stroma, activating or repressing its function. The present review aimed to provide such a context by summarizing the existing data on the prognostic and/or predictive value of selected cancer‑associated fibroblasts (CAFs)‑related factors, that either directly or indirectly may affect FGFR‑signalling. PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Medline (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medline/medline_home.html) databases were searched for the relevant literature related to the prognostic and/or predictive significance of: CAFs phenotypic markers (αSMA, S100A4/FSP‑1, PDGFR, PDPN and FAP), CAFs‑derived cognate FGFR ligands (FGF2, FGF5 and FGF17) or inducers of CAFs\' paracrine activity (TGF‑β1, HDGF, PDGF, CXCL8, CCL5, CCL2, IL‑6, HH and EGF) both expressed in the tumour and circulating in the blood. A total of 68 articles were selected and thoroughly analysed. The findings consistently identified upregulation of αSMA, S100A4/FSP‑1, PDGFR, PDPN, HDGF, PDGF, CXCL8, CCL5, CCL2, IL‑6, HH and EGF as poor prognostic markers in BC, while evaluation of the prognostic value of the remaining markers varied between the studies. The data confirm an association of CAFs‑specific features with BC prognosis, suggesting that both quantitative and qualitative profiling of the stroma might be required for an assessment of the true FGFR\'s clinical value.

UNASSIGNED: Covalent drugs contain electrophilic groups that can react with nucleophilic amino acids located in the active sites of proteins, particularly enzymes. Recently, there has been considerable interest in using covalent drugs to target non-catalytic amino acids in proteins to modulate difficult targets (i.e. targeted covalent inhibitors). Covalent compounds contain a wide variety of covalent reacting groups (CRGs), but only a few of these CRGs are present in FDA-approved covalent drugs.
UNASSIGNED: This review summarizes a 2020-23 patent landscape analysis that examined trends in the field of covalent drug discovery around targets and organizations. The analysis focused on patent applications that were submitted to the World International Patent Organization and selected using a combination of keywords and structural searches based on CRGs present in FDA-approved drugs.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 707 patent applications from > 300 organizations were identified, disclosing compounds that acted at 71 targets. Patent application counts for five targets accounted for ~ 63% of total counts (i.e. BTK, EGFR, FGFR, KRAS, and SARS-CoV-2 Mpro). The organization with the largest number of patent counts was an academic institution (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute). For one target, KRAS G12C, the discovery of new drugs was highly competitive (>100 organizations, 186 patent applications).

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease, often diagnosed at advanced stages, with a 5-year overall survival rate of around 10%. Current treatments have limited effectiveness, underscoring the need for new therapeutic options. This scoping review aims to identify and summarize preclinical and clinical studies on FGFR (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor) inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and FGFR-specific inhibitors, in pancreatic cancer with FGFR alterations. We included studies analyzing efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes in various populations. A comprehensive search across major databases identified 73 relevant studies: 32 preclinical, 16 clinical, and 25 from gray literature. The clinical trials focused primarily on efficacy (20 studies) and safety (14 studies), with fewer studies addressing survival outcomes. FGFR1 was the most studied alteration, followed by FGFR2 and FGFR4. Although FGFR alterations are relatively rare in pancreatic cancer, the available data, including promising real-life outcomes, suggest significant potential for FGFR inhibitors. However, more extensive research is needed to identify the correct genetic drivers and gather robust survival data. Ongoing and future trials are expected to provide more comprehensive insights, potentially leading to improved targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer patients with FGFR alterations.

FGFR have been demonstrated to perform a crucial role in biological processes but their overexpression has been perceived as the operator component in the occurrence and progression of different types of carcinoma. Out of all the interest around cancer, FGFR inhibitors have assembled pace over the past few years. Therefore, FGFR inhibitors are one of the main fundamental tools to reverse drug resistance, tumor growth, and angiogenesis. Currently, many FGFR inhibitors are under the development stage or have been developed. Due to great demand and hotspots, different pharmacophores were approached to access structurally diverse FGFR inhibitors. Here, we have selected to present several representative examples such as Naphthyl, Pyrimidine, Pyridazine, Indole, and Quinoline derivatives that illustrate the diversity and advances of FGFR inhibitors in medicinal chemistry. This review focuses on the SAR study of FGFR inhibitors last five years which will be a great future scope that influences the medicinal chemist to work towards more achievements in this area.

Despite numerous efforts to develop FGFR inhibitors for cancer treatment, the widespread clinical application of currently available FGFR inhibitors has been significantly limited due to the serious side effects caused by poor selectivity and resistance. PROTAC technology, a method for protein degradation, has shown notable advantages over conventional inhibitors. In our study, we coupled Erdafitinib, a pan-FGFR inhibitor, with a CRBN binder to synthesize and identify an effective FGFR2 degrader, N5. Our findings demonstrated that N5 displayed notable specificity for FGFR2 and outstanding enzyme inhibitory capabilities, achieving an IC50 value of 0.08 nM against FGFR2, and strong antiproliferative activity, maintaining an inhibitory rate above 50% on gastric cancer cells at a concentration of 0.17 nM. Mechanistically, N5 induced gastric cancer cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase and apoptosis by decreasing the levels of FGFR downstream proteins. Moreover, N5 demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics with a bioavailability of 74.8% when administered intraperitoneally and effectively suppressed the growth of SNU16 xenograft tumors, exhibiting greater potency compared to the parental inhibitor Erdafitinib. This study lays the groundwork for developing and potentially applying therapeutic agents targeting FGFR2 degradation.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) are emerging as key factors involved in tumorigenesis, tumor microenvironment remodeling and acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Pemigatinib is a Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor that selectively targets aberrant FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3. Pemigatinib is now approved for advanced-stage cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) but data suggests that other tumor histotypes exhibit FGFR alterations, thus hypothesizing its potential efficacy in other cancer settings. The present systematic review, based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to synthetize and critically interpret the results of all available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding Pemigatinib use in cancer. In April 2024, an extensive search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases using the keyword \"Pemigatinib\". Twenty-seven studies finally met all inclusion criteria. The promising results emerging from Pemigatinib preclinical and clinical studies pave the way for Pemigatinib extension to multiple solid cancer settings.

We conducted this three-part study in healthy subjects to investigate the pharmacokinetics of tasurgratinib (orally available selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3) and M2 (its major metabolite) under different conditions. In Part A, subjects received tasurgratinib 35 mg either fed with a high-fat meal or fasted. In Parts B and C, subjects received tasurgratinib 35 mg alone or with either rabeprazole (acid-reducing agent) 20 mg (Part B) or rifampin (strong CYP3A inducer) 600 mg (Part C). Primary endpoints were maximum concentration (Cmax), and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)) and extrapolated to infinite time (AUC(0-inf)). Forty-two subjects were enrolled, 14 each into Parts A, B, and C. In Part A, administration of tasurgratinib with a high-fat meal resulted in 33% reduction in Cmax and ∼23% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) of tasurgratinib, and 47% reduction in Cmax with ∼30% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) of M2. In Part B, co-administration of rabeprazole at steady state resulted in no/weak interaction with tasurgratinib (∼8% increase in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) without an effect on Cmax) and M2 (∼18% increase in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) without an effect on Cmax). In Part C, co-administration of rifampin at steady state resulted in a weak interaction with tasurgratinib (∼16% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf)) and M2 (∼12% reduction in AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf)). Administration of tasurgratinib with a high-fat meal appeared to reduce systemic exposure of tasurgratinib, however co-administration with an acid-reducing agent or a CYP3A inducer had a minimal impact on pharmacokinetics.

Background: Angiogenic factors are commonly activated in solid tumors and present a viable therapeutic target. However, anticancer treatment with angiogenesis inhibitors (AGI) is limited to a few cancers, mostly as monotherapy and not selected based on molecular indications. We aimed to determine whether patient-specific combination regimens with AGI and other anticancer agents when selected based on multi-analyte tumor interrogation (ETA: Encyclopedic Tumor Analysis) can expand the scope of AGIs in advanced refractory solid organ cancers with improved treatment responses. Methods: We evaluated treatment outcomes in 60 patients with advanced, refractory solid organ cancers who received ETA-guided combination regimens of AGI with other targeted, endocrine or cytotoxic agents. Radiological evaluation of treatment response was followed by determination of Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Results: Among the 60 patients, Partial Response (PR) was observed in 28 cases (46.7%), Stable Disease (SD) was observed in 29 cases (48.3%) and Disease Progression (PD, within 60 days) was observed in 3 cases (5.0%). The ORR was 46.7% and DCR was 95.0%. At the most recent follow-up the median PFS (mPFS) was 5.0 months and median OS (mOS) was 8.9 months. There were no Grade 4 therapy related adverse events or treatment related deaths. Conclusion: ETA-guided patient-specific combination regimens with AGI and other anti-neoplastic agents, can yield improved outcomes over AGI monotherapy. Trial Registration: Details of all trials are available at WHO-ICTRP: https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/. RESILIENT ID CTRI/2018/02/011,808. LIQUID IMPACT ID CTRI/2019/02/017,548.

Since their discovery nearly 30 years ago, fibroblast growth factor homologous factors (FHFs) are now known to control the functionality of excitable tissues through a range of mechanisms. Nervous and cardiac system dysfunctions are caused by loss- or gain-of-function mutations in FHF genes. The best understood \'canonical\' targets for FHF action are voltage-gated sodium channels, and recent studies have expanded the repertoire of ways that FHFs modulate sodium channel gating. Additional \'non-canonical\' functions of FHFs in excitable and non-excitable cells, including cancer cells, have been reported over the past dozen years. This review summarizes and evaluates reported canonical and non-canonical FHF functions.