Exercise therapy

运动疗法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估运动疗法对轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者的有效性。
    方法:从数据库开始到2024年3月,我们搜索了PubMed(通过Medline),科克伦图书馆,Embase,WebofScience,Scopus,和SPORTDiscus适用于所有相关出版物,不受任何语言限制。
    方法:我们纳入了axSpA患者的随机对照试验(RCTs),其中至少有一组患者接受了运动疗法。
    方法:两名独立审稿人使用Cochrane协作偏差风险工具2.0评估文献质量。结果为强直性脊柱炎(AS)疾病活动评分(ASDAS),巴斯AS疾病活动指数(BASDAI),浴AS功能指数(BASFI),BathAS计量学指数(BASMI),6分钟步行距离(6MWT),胸部扩展能力,峰值耗氧量(VO2peak),疼痛,疲劳,C反应蛋白(CRP),和红细胞沉降率(ESR)。
    结果:共20项RCT,包括1670名病人,包括在这项研究中。与对照组相比,运动疗法改善了BASFI(加权平均差[WMD]:-0.49,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.65至-0.32,I2=3.4%,P=0.414),BASMI(大规模毁灭性武器:-0.49,95%CI:-0.87至-0.11,I2=71.9%,P=0.679),BASDAI(大规模杀伤性武器:-0.78,95%CI:-1.08,-0.47,I2=55.9%,P=0.021),ASDAS(大规模毁灭性武器:-0.44,95%CI:-0.64至-0.24,I2=0.0%,P=0.424),VO2peak(WMD:3.16,95%CI:1.37至4.94,I2=0.0%,P=0.873),6MWT(大规模毁灭性武器:27.64,95%CI:12.04至43.24,I2=0.0%,P=0.922),疼痛(标准化平均差[SMD]:-0.47,95%CI:-0.74至-0.21,I2=66.0%,P=0.046)和疲劳(SMD:-0.49,95%CI:-0.71至-0.27,I2=0.0%,P=0.446)。然而,胸部扩张没有发现显著的好处,CRP,和ESR结果。
    结论:运动疗法是改善axSpA疾病控制和症状缓解的有效策略。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of exercise therapy for Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients.
    METHODS: From the database inception to March 2024, we searched PubMed (via Medline), Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus for all relevant publications without any language restriction.
    METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for axSpA patients in which at least one group received exercise therapy.
    METHODS: Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the literature using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. The outcomes were ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease activity score (ASDAS), Bath AS disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath AS functional index (BASFI), Bath AS metrology index (BASMI), 6-minute walk distance (6MWT), Chest expansion capacity, Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), pain, fatigue, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Eythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).
    RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs, including 1,670 patients, were included in this study. Compared with the control group, exercise therapy improved BASFI (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.65 to -0.32, I2= 3.4%, P=0.414), BASMI (WMD: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.11, I2= 71.9%, P=0.679), BASDAI (WMD: -0.78, 95% CI: -1.08, -0.47, I2=55.9%, P=0.021), ASDAS (WMD: -0.44, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.24, I2 =0.0%, P=0.424), VO2peak (WMD: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.37 to 4.94, I2=0.0%, P=0.873), 6MWT (WMD: 27.64, 95% CI: 12.04 to 43.24, I2= 0.0%, P=0.922), Pain (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.47, 95% CI: -0.74 to -0.21, I2= 66.0%, P=0.046) and Fatigue (SMD: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.27, I2= 0.0%, P=0.446). However, no significant benefit was found in Chest expansion, CRP, and ESR outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy is an effective strategy for improving disease control and symptom relief in axSpA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:台湾是一个老龄化社会,痴呆症患者的数量正在迅速增加。由于认知和身体功能的下降,患有痴呆症的老年人不仅逐渐失去了自己完成日常生活任务的能力,但也有更高的跌倒和伤害性跌倒的风险。重要的是要制定干预措施,将认知和运动训练相结合,以促进或维持老年人的认知和身体功能,并降低跌倒的风险。本研究旨在探讨基于认知的棋盘游戏和多成分运动干预对认知功能的可行性和效果。身体健康,老年痴呆症患者的跌倒风险。
    方法:这是一项准实验研究,具有单组前测和后测设计。研究参与者是41名社区居住的轻度至中度痴呆的老年人。他们接受基于认知的棋盘游戏和多成分运动干预,每周一次,持续12周。干预措施包括1小时的运动训练和1小时的认知训练。台湾版蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA-T)的分数,身体健康,和圣托马斯老年住院患者跌倒风险评估工具(STRATIFY)作为基线和12周后的结果指标进行测量。
    结果:总体MoCA-T评分显着增加(效应大小=0.402),轻度痴呆的参与者(效应大小=0.522)比中度痴呆的参与者(效应大小=0.310)表现出更大的增加。参与者的体能表现有所改善。女性参与者在30秒的椅子站立测试(效果大小=0.483)和8英尺的起跑测试(效果大小=0.437)中表现出显着的改善。跌倒风险评分下降0.05分,变化不明显。
    结论:本研究中使用的基于认知的棋盘游戏和多成分运动干预措施有利于改善老年痴呆症患者的认知功能和身体素质。这些干预措施是可行的,适合在患有轻度认知障碍或痴呆症的社区居住和机构居住的老年人中推广,以延缓认知和身体功能的下降。
    BACKGROUND: Taiwan is an aging society, and the number of people with dementia is rapidly increasing. Due to a decline in cognitive and physical function, older adults with dementia not only gradually lose the ability to complete daily living tasks on their own, but are also at a higher risk of falls and injurious falls. It is important to develop interventions that combine cognitive and exercise training for older adults with dementia to promote or maintain their cognitive and physical functions and reduce their risk of falls. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effect of cognitive-based board games and multi-component exercise interventions on cognitive function, physical fitness, and fall risk in older adults with dementia.
    METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study with a single-group pretest and post-test design. The study participants were 41 community-dwelling older adults with mild to moderate dementia. They received cognitive-based board games and multi-component exercise interventions once a week for 12 weeks. The interventions included 1 hour of exercise training and 1 hour of cognitive training. Scores for the Taiwan version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T), physical fitness, and the St. Thomas Risk Assessment Tool for Falling Elderly Inpatients (STRATIFY) were measured as outcome indicators at baseline and after the 12-week period.
    RESULTS: The overall MoCA-T score increased significantly (effect size = 0.402), with participants with mild dementia showing a greater increase (effect size = 0.522) than those with moderate dementia (effect size = 0.310). Participants\' physical fitness performance improved. Female participants exhibited significant improvements in the 30-second chair stand test (effect size = 0.483) and 8-foot up-and-go test (effect size = 0.437). The fall risk score decreased by 0.05 points, the change was not significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: The cognitive-based board game and multi-component exercise interventions used in this study are beneficial for improving cognitive function and physical fitness in older adults with dementia. These interventions are feasible and suitable for promotion among community-dwelling and institution-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia to delay the decline in cognitive and physical function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在批判性地重新评估现有的关于中国传统运动(TCE)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的系统评价(SR)。主要目标包括综合现有证据,评估综述和总体证据的方法学质量,并全面了解不同类型的TCE治疗COPD的有效性。Sinomed,CNKI,VIP,万方,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience从开始到2023年4月检索有关TCE治疗COPD的SR文献。从包含的SR中提取的数据涵盖了各个方面,如一般信息、研究人群,干预措施,荟萃分析结果,和结论。使用AMSTARII工具评估纳入的SR的方法学质量。此外,GRADE工具用于确定结局指标的证据水平.这项研究包括17个SR和4种类型的TCE。CCA为0.041,表明主要研究之间略有重叠。值得注意的是,一项研究在AMSTARII量表上被评为低质量,其余的被归类为严重低质量。等级评定结果显示26条质量很低的证据,55份低质量证据,和17份中等质量的证据。中等质量证据提示,六子决有效改善COPD患者中医证候积分。此外,低质量的证据表明,六子爵可以改善患者的肺功能(FEV1,FVC)和生活质量(CAT,MRC/mMRC)。同样,低质量的证据表明八段锦可以改善患者的肺功能(FEV1%,FVC)和生活质量(SGRQ)。低质量的证据还表明,健身气功可以显着提高患者的运动耐力(6MWD)。无SR报告TCE相关不良反应。TCE干预对COPD的治疗是有效和安全的。不同类型的TCE对COPD患者的预后有不同的影响。然而,这些发现受到纳入SRs的方法学和证据质量普遍较低的限制.因此,强烈建议改进研究设计,以获得更高质量的临床证据,并严格遵循SR方案.
    This study aims to critically reassess existing systematic reviews (SR) on Traditional Chinese Exercises (TCE) for treating Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The primary objectives include synthesizing available evidence, evaluating the methodological quality of reviews and overall evidence, and providing comprehensive insights into the effectiveness of different TCE types in managing COPD. Sinomed, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 2023 for SR literature on the treatment of COPD with TCE. The extracted data from the included SRs encompassed various aspects such as general information, study population, intervention measures, meta-analysis results, and conclusions. The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using the AMSTAR II tool. Additionally, the GRADE tool was used to determine the evidence level of outcome indicators. This study included 17 SRs and 4 types of TCE. The CCA was 0.041, indicating a slight overlap between the primary studies. Notably, one study was rated as low quality on the AMSTAR II scale, while the rest were classified as critically low quality. The results from the GRADE evaluation revealed 26 pieces of very low-quality evidence, 55 pieces of low-quality evidence, and 17 pieces of moderate-quality evidence. The moderate-quality evidence suggests that Liuzijue effectively improves TCM syndrome scores in patients with COPD. Additionally, low-quality evidence suggests that Liuzijue improves patients\' lung function (FEV1, FVC) and quality of life (CAT, MRC/mMRC). Similarly, low-quality evidence suggests that Baduanjin can improve patients\' lung function (FEV1%, FVC) and quality of life (SGRQ). Low-quality evidence also suggests that Health Qigong can significantly improve patients\' exercise endurance (6MWD). No SR reported TCE-related adverse reactions. TCE interventions are effective and safe in the treatment of COPD. Different types of TCE have varying effects on outcomes in COPD patients. However, these findings are limited by the generally low methodological and evidence quality of the included SRs. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to improve study designs to obtain higher-quality clinical evidence and to strictly follow SR protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:上肢功能障碍是中风最常见的后遗症之一,机器人治疗被认为是上肢康复的有希望的方法之一。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨使用康复机器人设备(Rebless®)对中风患者进行上肢训练的临床有效性。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,未失明,随机对照试验,患者被随机分配接受机器人训练(实验组,n=15)或常规治疗(对照组,n=15)。两组均接受持续30分钟的上肢训练,4周内共进行10次训练。电机功能,功能评估,和痉挛在训练前后进行临床评估。在第1次和第10次训练中使用功能性近红外光谱法测量皮质活化。
    结果:实验组在Fugl-Meyer评估-上肢评分和改良的Ashworth量表评分方面显示出显着改善。与对照组相比,实验组在10次训练后,未受影响的半球的皮质活动显着降低。
    结论:实验组在Fugl-Meyer评估-上肢评分和肘屈肌痉挛方面有显著改善,未受累半球的皮质活动显著降低。使用Rebless®进行训练可以帮助慢性中风患者恢复上肢功能并恢复对侧运动功能激活的优势。
    BACKGROUND: Upper limb dysfunction is one of the most common sequelae of stroke and robotic therapy is considered one of the promising methods for upper limb rehabilitation.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the clinical effectiveness of upper limb training using a rehabilitation robotic device (Rebless®) for patients with stroke.
    METHODS: In this prospective, unblinded, randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive robotic training (experimental group, n = 15) or conventional therapy (control group, n = 15). Both groups received upper limb training lasting for 30 minutes per session with a total of 10 training sessions within 4 weeks. Motor function, functional evaluation, and spasticity were clinically assessed before and after the training. Cortical activation was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy at the 1st and 10th training sessions.
    RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in the Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity score and the modified Ashworth scale grade in elbow flexors. The cortical activity of the unaffected hemisphere significantly decreased after 10 training sessions in the experimental group compared with the control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The experimental group showed significant improvement in the Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity score and spasticity of elbow flexors and had significantly decreased cortical activity of the unaffected hemisphere. Training with Rebless® may help patients with chronic stroke in restoring upper limb function and recovering the contralateral predominance of activation in motor function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国,脊髓损伤(SCI)患者缺乏规律的体力活动(PA)是一种持续的健康危机。定期PA和基于运动的干预措施与SCI患者的改善结果和更健康的生活方式有关。为人们提供对其日常PA水平的准确估计可以促进PA。此外,PA跟踪可以与智能手机和智能手表等移动健康技术相结合,为SCI患者的日常生活提供即时自适应干预(JITAI)。JITAI可以提示个人设置PA目标或提供有关其PA水平的反馈。
    目的:本研究的主要目的是调查是否可以通过将JITAI与基于网络的PA干预(WI)计划相结合来增加SCI患者中中等强度PA的分钟数。WI计划是一项为期14周的基于网络的PA计划,广泛推荐给残疾人。次要目标是调查JITAI对近端PA的益处,定义为PA反馈提示后120分钟内中等强度PA的分钟数。
    方法:患有SCI(N=196)的个体将被随机分配到WI组或WI+JITAI组。在WI+JITAI手臂内,一项微随机试验将用于每天几次将参与者随机分配到不同的定制反馈和PA建议.参与者将在社区的家庭环境中参加为期24周的研究。该研究分为三个阶段:(1)基线,(2)有或没有JITAI的WI计划,(3)PA可持续性。参与者将在初次会议和第2、8、16和24周结束时提供基于调查的信息。在研究期间,参与者将被要求每天佩戴智能手表≥12小时。
    结果:招募和注册于2023年5月开始。数据分析预计将在完成参与者数据收集后的6个月内完成。
    结论:JITAI有潜力通过提供量身定制的PA性能,及时反馈基于个人的实际PA行为,而不是一般的PA建议。这项研究的新见解可能会指导干预设计者为残障人士开发引人入胜的PA干预措施。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05317832;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05317832。
    DERR1-10.2196/57699。
    BACKGROUND: The lack of regular physical activity (PA) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States is an ongoing health crisis. Regular PA and exercise-based interventions have been linked with improved outcomes and healthier lifestyles among those with SCI. Providing people with an accurate estimate of their everyday PA level can promote PA. Furthermore, PA tracking can be combined with mobile health technology such as smartphones and smartwatches to provide a just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) for individuals with SCI as they go about everyday life. A JITAI can prompt an individual to set a PA goal or provide feedback about their PA levels.
    OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether minutes of moderate-intensity PA among individuals with SCI can be increased by integrating a JITAI with a web-based PA intervention (WI) program. The WI program is a 14-week web-based PA program widely recommended for individuals with disabilities. A secondary aim is to investigate the benefit of a JITAI on proximal PA, defined as minutes of moderate-intensity PA within 120 minutes of a PA feedback prompt.
    METHODS: Individuals with SCI (N=196) will be randomized to a WI arm or a WI+JITAI arm. Within the WI+JITAI arm, a microrandomized trial will be used to randomize participants several times a day to different tailored feedback and PA recommendations. Participants will take part in the 24-week study from their home environment in the community. The study has three phases: (1) baseline, (2) WI program with or without JITAI, and (3) PA sustainability. Participants will provide survey-based information at the initial meeting and at the end of weeks 2, 8, 16, and 24. Participants will be asked to wear a smartwatch every day for ≥12 hours for the duration of the study.
    RESULTS: Recruitment and enrollment began in May 2023. Data analysis is expected to be completed within 6 months of finishing participant data collection.
    CONCLUSIONS: The JITAI has the potential to achieve long-term PA performance by delivering tailored, just-in-time feedback based on the person\'s actual PA behavior rather than a generic PA recommendation. New insights from this study may guide intervention designers to develop engaging PA interventions for individuals with disability.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05317832; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05317832.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/57699.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性肾脏病(CKD)在影响患者的身体功能和生活质量的同时,对全球公共卫生构成重大挑战。在治疗期间,解决身体活动不足和疼痛管理的问题对于改善与健康相关的生活质量至关重要。本研究调查了具有核心稳定运动的有氧训练计划对血液透析(HD)患者在移植等待名单和肾移植(RTx)患者中的影响。
    共有45名CKD患者纳入了为期12周的研究:25名接受HD的患者(12名HD治疗组,13例HD对照组)和20例RTx患者(9RTx治疗组,11RTx控制组)。使用6分钟步行测试测量功能能力,使用视觉模拟量表测量疼痛,和健康相关的生活质量测量使用肾脏疾病生活质量-简表12问卷。在0.05的显著性水平下进行非参数统计检验。
    HD和RTx治疗组均显示6分钟步行试验的时间显着减少(分别为p=0.002和p=0.008),疼痛严重程度显著降低(分别为p=0.002和p=0.008),与对照组相比,到研究结束时显着改善了生活质量评分(分别为p=0.006和p=0.041)。
    根据结果,结构化运动计划可能是CKD管理的有效疗法。因此,卫生提供者应促进他们融入常规护理实践,以提高患者的预后和福祉。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant public health challenge globally while impacting patients\' physical function and quality of life. Addressing the issues of physical inactivity and pain management is essential during treatment to improve health-related quality of life. The present study investigated the effect of an aerobic training program with core stabilization exercises for hemodialysis (HD) patients on a transplant waiting list and renal transplant (RTx) patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 45 patients with CKD were included in the 12-week study: 25 patients receiving HD (12 HD treatment group, 13 HD control group) and 20 patients with RTx (9 RTx treatment group, 11 RTx control group). Functional capacity was measured using the 6-min walk test, pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and health-related quality of life was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form 12 questionnaire. Nonparametric statistical tests were performed at a significance level of 0.05.
    UNASSIGNED: Both the HD and RTx treatment groups showed significantly reduced times for the 6-min walking test (p = 0.002 and p = 0.008, respectively), significantly reduced pain severity (p = 0.002 and p = 0.008, respectively), and significantly improved quality of life scores (p = 0.006 and p = 0.041, respectively) by the end of the study compared with control groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the results, structured exercise programs could be effective therapies in CKD management. Therefore, health providers should promote their integration into routine care practices to enhance patient outcomes and well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非药物干预具有无数可用的干预选择,并且包含多种成分。非药物干预或组合的特定成分是否优于其他成分尚不清楚。这项研究的主要目的是比较非药物干预措施的不同组合及其特定成分对主观认知能力下降的成年人与健康相关的结果的影响。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦,CINAHL,PsycINFO,中部,WebofScience,和中国最大的两个数据库,CNKI和万方,从开始到22日被搜索,2023年1月。包括使用非药物干预措施并报告主观认知能力下降的成年人的健康结果的随机对照试验。两名独立审稿人筛选了研究,提取的数据,并评估偏见的风险。成分网络荟萃分析采用加性成分模型进行网络荟萃分析。本研究遵循PRISMA报告指南,PRISMA清单见附加文件2。
    结果:共纳入39项试验,共2959名患者(平均年龄范围,58.79-77.41年)。抵抗运动可能是减少主观认知能力下降的成年人的记忆力抱怨的最佳干预措施;累积排名p得分下的表面为0.888,其次是平衡运动(p=0.859)。有氧运动(p=0.832),和认知干预(p=0.618)。音乐疗法,认知训练,经颅直流电刺激,正念疗法,和平衡练习可能是改善全球认知功能的最有效干预成分(iSMD,0.83;95%CI,0.36至1.29),语言(iSMD,0.31;95%CI,0.24至0.38),执行日常生活活动的能力(iSMD,0.55;95%CI,0.21至0.89),身体健康(iSMD,3.29;95%CI,2.57至4.00),和焦虑缓解(iSMD,0.71;95%CI,0.26至1.16),分别。
    结论:对于患有主观认知功能下降的成年人,进行的身体活动形式似乎比认知干预更有利于减少主观记忆投诉。这种差异反映在抵抗上,有氧,平衡练习。高质量和大规模的随机临床试验是必要的,以验证研究结果。
    背景:PROSPERO注册表号。CRD420223555363。
    BACKGROUND: Non-pharmacological interventions have a myriad of available intervention options and contain multiple components. Whether specific components of non-pharmacological interventions or combinations are superior to others remains unclear. The main aim of this study is to compare the effects of different combinations of non-pharmacological interventions and their specific components on health-related outcomes in adults with subjective cognitive decline.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and China\'s two largest databases, CNKI and Wanfang, were searched from inception to 22nd, January 2023. Randomized controlled trials using non-pharmacological interventions and reporting health outcomes in adults with subjective cognitive decline were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Component network meta-analysis was conducted employing an additive component model for network meta-analysis. This study followed the PRISMA reporting guideline and the PRISMA checklist is presented in Additional file 2.
    RESULTS: A total of 39 trials with 2959 patients were included (range of mean ages, 58.79-77.41 years). Resistance exercise might be the optimal intervention for reducing memory complaints in adults with subjective cognitive decline; the surface under the cumulative ranking p score was 0.888, followed by balance exercise (p = 0.859), aerobic exercise (p = 0.832), and cognitive interventions (p = 0.618). Music therapy, cognitive training, transcranial direct current stimulation, mindfulness therapy, and balance exercises might be the most effective intervention components for improving global cognitive function (iSMD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.29), language (iSMD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.38), ability to perform activities of daily living (iSMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.89), physical health (iSMD, 3.29; 95% CI, 2.57 to 4.00), and anxiety relief (iSMD, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.16), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The form of physical activity performed appears to be more beneficial than cognitive interventions in reducing subjective memory complaints for adults with subjective cognitive decline, and this difference was reflected in resistance, aerobic, and balance exercises. Randomized clinical trials with high-quality and large-scale are warranted to validate the findings.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO registry number. CRD42022355363.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估出版物通常总结研究结果,以证明干预措施的有效性,但很少有人分享关于在研究期间实施的任何变化。我们提出了一种基于家庭的步态的过程评估协议,balance,根据过程评估的7个关键要素,进行抗阻运动干预以改善紫杉烷引起的持续性神经病变研究。
    方法:过程评估平行于纵向,随机对照临床试验检查家庭步态的影响,balance,以及针对紫杉烷类药物治疗乳腺癌后患有持续性周围神经病变的女性的抵抗运动计划(IRB批准:Pro00040035)。流程图阐明了如何在可比的环境中实施干预措施,保真程序有助于确保参与者感到舒适,并确定他们的个人需求,并且过程评估允许个人的注意力定制和研究的重点,以避免协议偏差。
    结论:评估方案计划的公布增加了临床试验结果的透明度,并有利于在未来的研究中复制过程。过程评估使团队能够系统地登记征聘期间应用的信息和程序以及影响干预措施实施的因素,从而允许主动的方法来防止偏离协议。当持续跟踪干预时,积极或消极的干预效果在研究的早期就显现出来了,为不一致的结果提供有价值的见解。此外,过程评估在研究协议中增加了以参与者为中心的元素,这允许将以患者为中心的方法应用于数据收集。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04621721,2020年11月9日,前瞻性注册。
    方法:2020年4月27日,第2卷。
    BACKGROUND: Evaluation publications typically summarize the results of studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of an intervention, but little is shared concerning any changes implemented during the study. We present a process evaluation protocol of a home-based gait, balance, and resistance exercise intervention to ameliorate persistent taxane-induced neuropathy study according to 7 key elements of process evaluation.
    METHODS: The process evaluation is conducted parallel to the longitudinal, randomized control clinical trial examining the effects of the home-based gait, balance, and resistance exercise program for women with persistent peripheral neuropathy following treatment with taxanes for breast cancer (IRB approval: Pro00040035). The flowcharts clarify how the intervention should be implemented in comparable settings, fidelity procedures help to ensure the participants are comfortable and identify their individual needs, and the process evaluation allows for the individual attention tailoring and focus of the research to avoid protocol deviation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The publication of the evaluation protocol plan adds transparency to the findings of clinical trials and favors process replication in future studies. The process evaluation enables the team to systematically register information and procedures applied during recruitment and factors that impact the implementation of the intervention, thereby allowing proactive approaches to prevent deviations from the protocol. When tracking an intervention continuously, positive or negative intervention effects are revealed early on in the study, giving valuable insight into inconsistent results. Furthermore, a process evaluation adds a participant-centered element to the research protocols, which allows a patient-centered approach to be applied to data collection.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04621721, November 9, 2020, registered prospectively.
    METHODS: April 27, 2020, v2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较和排名四个主要类别的运动方式的有效性(有氧,阻力,身心,和联合运动[CE])在网络荟萃分析(NMA)中改善乳腺癌女性的生活质量(QoL)。
    方法:以英文发表并在PubMed(MEDLINE)中索引的文章,EBSCO,WebofScience,SPORTDiscus,科克伦图书馆,谷歌学者,PsycINFO,EMBASE,和CINAHLPlus数据库从开始到2023年10月12日被确定。对符合资格标准的研究进行偏倚风险评估。进行了频繁的NMA来评估不同运动类型的功效。
    结果:本研究包括56项研究,有3904名参与者。有氧运动,身心,与对照组相比,联合锻炼有效改善了QoL。累积排序曲线下的表面(SUCRA)表明CE最好地改善患者的QoL(SUCRA=96.7%)。对次要结果的分析表明,运动可以减少患者的抑郁(标准化平均差[SMD]=-0.38,95%置信区间[CI]=-0.70至-0.06,p<0.001;I2=79%)和焦虑(SMD=-0.50,95%CI=-0.69至-0.31,p<0.001;I2=27.4%),但不影响自尊。
    结论:除阻力外,所有运动类型都能有效改善乳腺癌患者的生活质量,CE(有氧运动和抵抗运动的组合)对改善QoL的最佳可能性最高。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare and rank the effectiveness of four primary categories of exercise modalities (aerobic, resistance, mind-body, and combined exercise [CE]) in improving the Quality of life (QoL) of women with breast cancer in a network meta-analysis (NMA).
    METHODS: Articles published in English and indexed in the PubMed (MEDLINE), EBSCO, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus databases were identified from inception to 12 October 2023. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were assessed for risk of bias. A frequentist NMA was conducted to appraise the efficacy of different exercise types.
    RESULTS: This study included 56 studies with 3904 participants. Aerobic, mind-body, and combined exercises effectively improved QoL compared to controls. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that CE best improved patients\' QoL (SUCRA = 96.7%). Analysis of the secondary outcomes suggests that exercise reduced patients\' depression (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.70 to -0.06, p < 0.001; I2 = 79%) and anxiety (SMD = -0.50, 95% CI = -0.69 to -0.31, p < 0.001; I2 = 27.4%) but did not affect self-esteem.
    CONCLUSIONS: All exercise types but resistance were effective in improving the QoL of women with breast cancer, CE (the combination of aerobic and resistance exercise) had the highest likelihood of being optimal for improving QoL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号