目的:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1-RA)与胃内容物的更大滞留有关,然而,没有受到控制,进行基于人群的研究,以评估GLP1-RA在围手术期的潜在不良反应.我们旨在确定使用GLP1-RA的患者在上消化道内窥镜检查后是否存在误吸和误吸相关并发症的风险增加。
方法:我们使用全国性的商业行政索赔数据库,对2005-2021年接受门诊上消化道内窥镜检查的18-64岁2型糖尿病患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们确定了6,806,046个独特的上消化道内窥镜检查程序。我们比较了GLP1-RA患者在上内窥镜检查后14天内的误吸和相关肺部不良事件的索赔,二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i),和慢性阿片类药物。我们调整了年龄,性别,Charlson合并症评分,潜在的呼吸系统疾病,和胃轻瘫.
结果:我们发现上消化道内窥镜检查后的肺部不良事件很少见,范围从6-25事件每10,000个程序。比较GLP1-RA与DPP4i时,粗略的误吸相对风险(0.6795CI0.25,1.75),吸入性肺炎(0.9595CI0.40,2.29),肺炎(1.0795CI0.62,1.86),或呼吸衰竭(0.7595CI0.38,1.48)在服用GLP1-RA的患者中并不高。当比较GLP1-RA与阿片类药物时,吸入的粗相对风险(95CI)为0.42(0.15,1.16),吸入性肺炎为0.60(0.24,1.52),0.30(0.19,0.49)用于肺炎,呼吸衰竭为0.24(0.13,0.45)。这些结果在几个敏感性分析中是一致的。
结论:在2型糖尿病患者中,与使用DPP4i相比,使用GLP1-RA与上内镜检查后肺部并发症的风险增加无关。
OBJECTIVE: Glucagon-like peptide-1-receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have been associated with greater retention of gastric contents, however, there is minimal controlled, population-based data evaluating the potential adverse effects of GLP1-RA in the periprocedural setting. We aimed to determine if there is increased risk of aspiration and aspiration-related complications after upper endoscopy in patients using GLP1-RAs.
METHODS: We used a nationwide commercial administrative claims database to conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18 to 64 with type 2 diabetes who underwent outpatient upper endoscopy from 2005 to 2021. We identified 6,806,046 unique upper endoscopy procedures. We compared claims for aspiration and associated pulmonary adverse events in the 14 days after upper endoscopy between users of GLP1-RAs, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is), and chronic opioids. We adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity score, underlying respiratory disease, and gastroparesis.
RESULTS: We found that pulmonary adverse events after upper endoscopy are rare, ranging from 6 to 25 events per 10,000 procedures. When comparing GLP1-RAs with DPP4i, crude relative risks of aspiration (0.67; 95% CI, 0.25-1.75), aspiration pneumonia (0.95; 95% CI, 0.40-2.29), pneumonia (1.07; 95% CI, 0.62-1.86), or respiratory failure (0.75; 95% CI, 0.38-1.48) were not higher in patients prescribed a GLP1-RA. When comparing GLP1-RAs with opioids, crude relative risks were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15-1.16) for aspiration, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.24-1.52) for aspiration pneumonia, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.19-0.49) for pneumonia, and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.13-0.45) for respiratory failure. These results were consistent across several sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: GLP1-RA use is not associated with an increased risk of pulmonary complications after upper endoscopy compared with DPP4i use in patients with type 2 diabetes.