%0 Journal Article
%T Risk factors of missed early gastric cancer in endoscopic resected population: a retrospective, case-control study.
%A Zhang Z
%A Gao N
%A Liu K
%A Ni M
%A Zhang X
%A Yan P
%A Chen M
%A Dou X
%A Guo H
%A Yang T
%A Ding X
%A Xu G
%A Tang D
%A Wang L
%A Zou X
%J Surg Endosc
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jun 17
%M 38886230
%F 3.453
%R 10.1007/s00464-024-10970-0
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Missed early gastric cancer (MEGC) is prevalent during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which is the first-line recommended strategy for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC). Hence, we explored the risk factors for MEGC and different types of MEGC, based on the endoscopic resected population.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This retrospective, case-control study was conducted at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (NJDTH). We included patients who were diagnosed with EGC during screening EGD, underwent endoscopic resection, and were confirmed by postoperative pathology at the NJDTH from January 2014 to December 2021, and classified them into different types according to the different root causes of misses. Univariable, multivariable, subgroup and propensity score analyses were used to explore the risk factors for MEGC and different types of MEGC.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>A total of 447 patients, comprising 345 with initially detected early gastric cancer (IDEGC) and 102 with MEGC, were included in this study. Larger size (≥ 1 cm) (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.74, P = 0.002) and invasion depth of submucosa (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.69, P = 0.007) were negatively associated with MEGC. Use of sedation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.20-0.52, P < 0.001) and longer observation time (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.96, P = 0.034) exhibited protective effect on MEGC.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Smaller and more superficial EGC lesions are more susceptible to misdiagnosis. The use of sedation and prolonged observation time during EGD could help reduce the occurrence of MEGC.