One important issue in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy is the delivered dose to the tissues outside the tumor. An international standard for light ion beam systems sets two recommended limits for out-of-field dose based on distance from the field edge: maximum absorbed dose from all radiation types shall not exceed 0.5 % of the maximum dose at distances 15 cm to 50 cm from the field edge. At distances >50 cm from the field edge, the maximum absorbed dose shall not exceed 0.1 %. This paper is a continuation of our previous works focused on the design of an accelerator-based neutron source for BNCT. We already designed a novel Beam Shape Assembly which meets the IAEA criteria for BNCT treatments. Using this BSA, in the present work, we characterize by Monte Carlo simulations the dose outside the neutron field. The out-of-field dose has been assessed via estimates using the ambient and equivalent dose. Also the boron uptake in healthy tissues has been analyzed for the equivalent dose computation. It is concluded that our design for a future accelerator-based source for BNCT meets reasonably well the criteria defined from other forms of radiotherapy on both equivalent and effective dose outside the field.

OBJECTIVE: The combined effect of hyperthermia and radiation therapy can be quantified by an enhanced equivalent radiation dose (EQDRT). Uncertainties in hyperthermia treatment planning and adjustments during treatment can impact achieved EQDRT. We developed and compared strategies for EQDRT optimization of radiation therapy plans, focusing on robustness against common adjustments.
METHODS: Using Plan2Heat, we computed preplanning hyperthermia plans and treatment adjustment scenarios for 3 cervical cancer patients. We imported these scenarios into RayStation 12A for optimization with 4 different strategies: (1) conventional radiation therapy optimization prescribing 46 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV), (2) nominal EQDRT optimization using the preplanning scenario, targeting uniform 58 Gy in the gross tumor volume (GTV), keeping organs at risk doses as in plan 1, (3) robust EQDRT optimization, as plan 2 but adding adjusted scenarios for optimization, and (4) library of plans (4 plans) with strategy 2 criteria but optimizing on 1 adjusted scenario per plan. We calculated for each radiation therapy plan EQDRT distributions for preplanning and adjusted scenarios, evaluating each combination of GTV coverage and homogeneity objectives.
RESULTS: EQDRT95% increased from 49.9 to 50.9 Gy in strategy 1 to 56.1 to 57.4 Gy in strategy 2 with the preplanning scenario, improving homogeneity by ∼10%. Strategy 2 demonstrated the best overall robustness, with 62% of all GTV objectives within tolerance. Strategy 3 had a higher percentage of coverage objectives within tolerance than strategy 2 (68% vs 54%) but a lower percentage for uniformity (44% vs 71%). Strategy 4 showed a similar EQDRT95% and homogeneity for adjusted scenarios than strategy 2 for a preplanning scenario. D0.1% (radiation dose received by the 0.1% most irradiated volume) for organs at risk was increased by strategies 2 to 4 by up to ∼6 Gy.
CONCLUSIONS: EQDRT optimization enhances EQDRT levels and uniformity compared with conventional optimization. Better overall robustness is achieved by optimizing the preplanning hyperthermia plan. Robust optimization improves coverage but reduces homogeneity. A library of plans ensures coverage and uniformity when dealing with adjusted hyperthermia scenarios.

Terrestrial gamma radiation is one of the major outdoor radiation exposures to the general public that varies substantially based on the type and geological properties of the soil. The objective of this study is to evaluate the naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) distribution and assess the hazard parameters in the riverbank soil within various industrial zones in the densely populated Dhaka and Chattogram cities of Bangladesh. The mean activities of 226Ra (37 ± 3), 232Th (58 ± 4), and 40K (1129 ± 18) Bqkg-1 in the assessed soil samples were found to be slightly higher than the world average values 32, 35, and 420 Bqkg-1, respectively. The mean radium equivalent activity (207.49 Bqkg-1) and the external and internal hazard indices were within the recommended limits of 370 Bqkg-1 and <1, respectively. The mean absorbed dose rate (99.47 nGyhr-1), annual effective dose (0.12 mSva-1), ELCR (4.27 × 10-4), and gamma level index (1.58) exceeded the world average values 59 nGyhr-1, 0.07 mSva-1, 2.9 × 10-4, and 1 respectively. However, the studied areas are safe from a radiological viewpoint with no radiation health hazard to the people. The results of this study can be utilized to produce factual baseline data for future studies.

An increasing number of radiopharmaceuticals and proteins are available for diagnosing and treating various diseases. The demand for existing and newly developed pharmaceutical radionuclides and proteins is steadily increasing. The radiation exposure levels of workers in the radiopharmaceutical industry and nuclear medicine field are closely monitored, specifically their effective dose and equivalent dose, leading to the question, of whether the dawn of radiopharmaceuticals affects the occupational exposure level. This development is analyzed and evaluated with data from the German National Dose Register. Data shows that the effective dose in the work categories production and distribution of radioisotopes as well as nuclear medicine slightly decreased from 1997 to 2021. Over the same period, the hand equivalent dose in nuclear medicine increases steadily, with no discernible trend in production and distribution of radioisotopes. Over the past few decades, intentional efforts and measures have been taken to ensure radiation protection. Instruments for monitoring and dose reduction must be continuously applied. Given the low effective dose, the focus in future shall be on dose reduction following theaslowasreasonablyachievable principle. The development of the hand equivalent dose should be carefully observed in the upcoming years.

OBJECTIVE: In psychiatry, polypharmacy or high psychotropic drug doses increase adverse drug event (ADE) prevalence. However, the full relationship between polypharmacy and ADEs is unclear, and few studies have evaluated dose equivalents for psychotropic drugs for ADEs. Thus, we conducted a retrospective analysis to clarify the effects of polypharmacy and chlorpromazine (CP)-, diazepam (DAP)-, and imipramine- equivalent doses on all ADEs in inpatients.
METHODS: Psychiatric inpatients in a Japanese hospital from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2018, were enrolled. ADE severity and causality were assessed. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate ADE risk factors.
RESULTS: Among 462 patients analyzed, out of 471 patients enrolled, 145 (31.4%) experienced ADEs. The causality assessment determined that \"possible\" was 96.5%. The most common ADEs were nervous system disorders (35%). Multiple logistic regression analyses indicated an increase in ADE prevalence with the number of drugs used (≥5; p = 0.026); CP-equivalent dose (p = 0.048); and endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic disorders (p = 0.045). DAP-equivalent dose; infectious and parasitic diseases; and injury, poisoning, and consequences of other external causes decreased ADE prevalence (p = 0.047, 0.022, and 0.021, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding polypharmacy in psychiatric inpatients and adjusting drug regimens to safe equivalent doses could reduce ADEs during hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermia treatment quality is usually evaluated by thermal (dose) parameters, though hyperthermic radiosensitization effects are also influenced by the time interval between the two modalities. This work applies biological modelling for clinical treatment evaluation of cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia by calculating the equivalent radiation dose (EQDRT, i.e., the dose needed for the same effect with radiation alone). Subsequent analyses evaluate the impact of logistics.
METHODS: Biological treatment evaluation was performed for 58 patients treated with 23-28 fractions of 1.8-2 Gy plus 4-5 weekly hyperthermia sessions. Measured temperatures (T50) and recorded time intervals between the radiotherapy and hyperthermia sessions were used to calculate the EQDRT using an extended linear quadratic (LQ) model with hyperthermic LQ parameters based on extensive experimental data. Next, the impact of a 30-min time interval (optimized logistics) as well as a 4‑h time interval (suboptimal logistics) was evaluated.
RESULTS: Median average measured T50 and recorded time intervals were 41.2 °C (range 39.7-42.5 °C) and 79 min (range 34-125 min), respectively, resulting in a median total dose enhancement (D50) of 5.5 Gy (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-6.6 Gy). For 30-min time intervals, the enhancement would increase by ~30% to 7.1 Gy (IQR 5.5-8.1 Gy; p < 0.001). In case of 4‑h time intervals, an ~ 40% decrease in dose enhancement could be expected: 3.2 Gy (IQR 2.3-3.8 Gy; p < 0.001). Normal tissue enhancement was negligible (< 0.3 Gy), even for short time intervals.
CONCLUSIONS: Biological treatment evaluation is a useful addition to standard thermal (dose) evaluation of hyperthermia treatments. Optimizing logistics to shorten time intervals seems worthwhile to improve treatment efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The use of lutetium-177 (177Lu)-based radiopharmaceuticals in peptide receptor nuclear therapy is increasing, but so is the number of nuclear medicine workers exposed to higher levels of radiation. In recent years, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE has begun to be widely used for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. However, there are few studies evaluating the occupational radiation exposure during its administration, and there are still some challenges that can result in higher doses to the staff, such as a lack of trained personnel or fully standardised procedures. In response, this study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of occupational doses to the staff involved in the administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.
RESULTS: A total of 32 administrations of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (7.4 GBq/session) carried out by a physician and a nurse, were studied. In total, two physicians and four nurses were independently monitored with cumulative (passive) and/or real-time (active) dosemeters. Extremity, eye lens and whole-body doses were evaluated in terms of the dosimetric quantities Hp(0.07), Hp(3) and Hp(10), respectively. It was obtained that lead aprons reduced dose rates and whole-body doses by 71% and 69% for the physicians, respectively, and by 56% and 68% for the nurses. On average, normalised Hp(10) values of 0.65 ± 0.18 µSv/GBq were obtained with active dosimetry, which is generally consistent with passive dosemeters. For physicians, the median of the maximum normalised Hp(0.07) values was 41.5 µSv/GBq on the non-dominant hand and 45.2 µSv/GBq on the dominant hand. For nurses 15.4 µSv/GBq on the non-dominant and 13.9 µSv/GBq on the dominant hand. The ratio or correction factor between the maximum dose measured on the hand and the dose measured on the base of the middle/ring finger of the non-dominant hand resulted in a factor of 5/6 for the physicians and 3/4 for the nurses. Finally, maximum normalised Hp(3) doses resulted in 2.02 µSv/GBq for physicians and 1.76 µSv/GBq for nurses.
CONCLUSIONS: If appropriate safety measures are taken, the administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a safe procedure for workers. However, regular monitoring is recommended to ensure that the annual dose limits are not exceeded.

BACKGROUND: Although re-irradiation is increasingly used in clinical practice, almost no dedicated planning software exists.
OBJECTIVE: Standard dose-based optimization functions were adjusted for re-irradiation planning using accumulated equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) with rigid or deformable dose mapping, tissue-specific α/β, treatment-specific recovery coefficients, and voxelwise adjusted EQD2 penalization levels based on the estimated previously delivered EQD2 (EQD2deliv ).
METHODS: To demonstrate proof-of-concept, 35 Gy in 5 fractions was planned to a fictitious spherical relapse planning target volume (PTV) in three separate locations following previous prostate treatment on a virtual human phantom. The PTV locations represented one repeated irradiation scenario and two re-irradiation scenarios. For each scenario, three re-planning strategies with identical PTV dose-functions but various organ at risk (OAR) EQD2-functions was used: 1) reRTregular : Regular functions with fixed EQD2 penalization levels larger than EQD2deliv for all OAR voxels. 2) reRTreduce : As reRTregular , but with lower fixed EQD2 penalization levels aiming to reduce OAR EQD2. 3) reRTvoxelwise : As reRTregular and reRTreduce , but with voxelwise adjusted EQD2 penalization levels based on EQD2deliv . PTV near-minimum and near-maximum dose (D98% /D2% ), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and accumulated OAR EQD2 (α/β = 3 Gy) were evaluated.
RESULTS: For the repeated irradiation scenario, all strategies resulted in similar dose distributions. For the re-irradiation scenarios, reRTreduce and reRTvoxelwise reduced accumulated average and near-maximum EQD2 by ˜1-10 Gy for all relevant OARs compared to reRTregular . The reduced OAR doses for reRTreduce came at the cost of distorted dose distributions with D98% = 92.3%, HI = 12.0%, CI = 73.7% and normal tissue hot spots ≥150% for the most complex scenario, while reRTregular (D98% = 98.1%, HI = 3.2%, CI = 94.2%) and reRTvoxelwise (D98%  = 96.9%, HI = 6.1%, CI = 93.7%) fulfilled PTV coverage without hot spots.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed re-irradiation-specific EQD2-based optimization functions introduce novel planning possibilities with flexible options to guide the trade-off between target coverage and OAR sparing with voxelwise adapted penalization levels based on EQD2deliv .

Objective.Different radiation therapy (RT) strategies, e.g. conventional fractionation RT (CFRT), hypofractionation RT (HFRT), stereotactic body RT (SBRT), adaptive RT, and re-irradiation are often used to treat head and neck (HN) cancers. Combining and/or comparing these strategies requires calculating biological effective dose (BED). The purpose of this study is to develop a practical process to estimate organ-specific radiobiologic model parameters that may be used for BED calculations in individualized RT planning for HN cancers.Approach.Clinical dose constraint data for CFRT, HFRT and SBRT for 5 organs at risk (OARs) namely spinal cord, brainstem, brachial plexus, optic pathway, and esophagus obtained from literature were analyzed. These clinical data correspond to a particular endpoint. The linear-quadratic (LQ) and linear-quadratic-linear (LQ-L) models were used to fit these clinical data and extract relevant model parameters (alpha/beta ratio, gamma/alpha,dTand BED) from the iso-effective curve. The dose constraints in terms of equivalent physical dose in 2 Gy-fraction (EQD2) were calculated using the obtained parameters.Main results.The LQ-L and LQ models fitted clinical data well from the CFRT to SBRT with the LQ-L representing a better fit for most of the OARs. The alpha/beta values for LQ-L (LQ) were found to be 2.72 (2.11) Gy, 0.55 (0.30) Gy, 2.82 (2.90) Gy, 6.57 (3.86) Gy, 5.38 (4.71) Gy, and the dose constraint EQD2 were 55.91 (54.90) Gy, 57.35 (56.79) Gy, 57.54 (56.35) Gy, 60.13 (59.72) Gy and 65.66 (64.50) Gy for spinal cord, optic pathway, brainstem, brachial plexus, and esophagus, respectively. Additional two LQ-L parametersdTwere 5.24 Gy, 5.09 Gy, 7.00 Gy, 5.23 Gy, and 6.16 Gy, and gamma/alpha were 7.91, 34.02, 8.67, 5.62 and 4.95.Significance.A practical process was developed to extract organ-specific radiobiological model parameters from clinical data. The obtained parameters can be used for biologically based radiation planning such as calculating dose constraints of different fractionation regimens.

OBJECTIVE: Communicating the amount and effects of ionizing radiation to patients prior to an examination using x‑rays is associated with challenges: first, calculating the expected dose prior to the examination and, second, quantifying and illustrating cancer risks. Analogies, such as comparing radiation exposure to accident risks, have limitations and may evoke unease. This study explores and compares two new approaches to discuss radiation exposure from common clinical examinations with patients: effective dose and exposure based on radioactive potassium-40 intake from the ingestion of bananas, the banana equivalent dose (BED).
METHODS: The effective doses of the diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for computed tomography (CT) and X-ray examinations in adults were calculated using mean conversion factors for specific anatomic body regions. For the BED calculation of the diagnostic reference levels, the radiation dose from a conventional banana ingested over 50 years per becquerel was calculated. The outcomes were juxtaposed against an equivalent number of bananas and its respective radiation doses.
RESULTS: The calculated doses, namely effective dose and BED, of the German DRL can serve as a reliable metric to discuss radiation exposure from medical imaging with patients prior to an examination.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to calculate the effective doses of the current DRL and to compare these with the pseudoscientific unit BED. While the BED serves as an interesting illustration to metaphorize radiation exposure, it is recommended to use the calculated effective dose of the DRL as the basis for educational consultations with patients.
UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND UND ZIEL: Patient*innen vor einer Untersuchung mit Röntgenstrahlung die Menge und Wirkung ionisierender Strahlung zu vermitteln, ist mit Herausforderungen verbunden: Zum einen ist es schwierig, die erwartete Dosis vor der Untersuchung zu berechnen, und zum anderen lässt sich das Krebsrisiko nicht einfach bemessen. Analogien wie der Vergleich der Strahlenexposition mit Unfallrisiken haben Limitationen und können Bedenken verursachen. Diese Studie vergleicht zwei Ansätze, um die Strahlenexposition klinischer Routineuntersuchungen Patient*innen näherzubringen: die effektive Dosis und die Strahlenexposition anhand der Aufnahme des radioaktiven Kalium-40 beim Verzehr von Bananen, die Bananenäquivalentdosis (BED).
METHODS: Die effektiven Dosen der deutschen diagnostischen Referenzwerte (DRW) für die Computertomographie (CT) und Röntgenuntersuchungen bei Erwachsenen wurden mithilfe von mittleren Umrechnungsfaktoren für spezifische anatomische Körperregionen berechnet. Für die BED-Berechnung der DRW wurde die Strahlendosis beim Verzehr einer herkömmlichen Banane über 50 Jahre pro Becquerel berechnet. Die Ergebnisse wurden einer gleichwertigen Anzahl an Bananen und ihren jeweiligen Strahlendosen gegenübergestellt.
UNASSIGNED: Die berechneten Dosen, d. h. effektive Dosis und BED, der deutschen DRW könnten als zuverlässige Kennzahl dienen, um mit Patient*innen vor einer Untersuchung über die Strahlenexposition durch die medizinische Bildgebung zu sprechen.
UNASSIGNED: Dies ist die erste Studie, welche die effektiven Dosen der deutschen DRW berechnet und sie mit der pseudowissenschaftlichen Einheit BED vergleicht. Auch wenn die BED als interessante Veranschaulichung dient, empfehlen wir, die berechnete effektive Dosis der deutschen DRW als Grundlage für Aufklärungsgespräche mit Patient*innen zu verwenden.