Delayed diagnosis is recognized as a poor prognostic factor in eosinophilic fasciitis (EF). Elevated serum eosinophil counts, a minor criterion in the diagnostic standards, occur early in the disease course. However, signs such as the groove sign and orange-peel sign typically do not appear in the initial stages, posing challenges for early detection under the current diagnostic criteria. We report a case where the combination of \"joint sparing\" physical findings and elevated eosinophil counts facilitated early diagnosis and treatment. A 79-year-old woman presented with an acute onset of swelling in the upper and lower limbs. Physical examination revealed non-pitting edema with \"joint sparing\", and blood tests showed increased eosinophil counts. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lower limbs showed post-contrast enhancement along the fascia, leading to a diagnosis of EF. The presence of non-pitting edema with \"joint sparing\" may be a valuable diagnostic indicator for EF. Furthermore, combining this with serum eosinophil counts can enable early diagnosis and treatment, potentially improving patient outcomes.

暂无摘要。

Eosinophilic fasciitis can be a debilitating diagnosis and is often delayed given its similarities to other sclerotic conditions including morphea, such as bound-down indurated skin and inflammation and sclerotic thickening of tissue layers on histopathology. Delaying treatment can lead to joint contracture and residual hardness in skin which has both cosmetic and functional implications. Therefore, finding the definitive diagnosis and differentiating from other sclerotic diseases is important early in the disease course. We present a case of a 77-year-old female with a generalized rash on her back and extremities, and progressive symptoms of pain, joint contractures, and limited movement, which highlights the challenges in diagnosis and management given clinical and histological parallels between eosinophilic fasciitis and morphea.

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare connective tissue disorder characterized by painful edema and induration of the limbs and trunk, likely associated with hypereosinophilia and hypergammaglobulinemia. EF causes arthralgia and range of motion limitation, leading to significant functional impairment and poor quality of life. Since its description by Shulman in 1974, over 300 cases have been reported. We present here a review of the latest diagnostic, pathophysiological and therapeutic developments in this disease. Magnetic resonance imaging appears useful to guide diagnosis and biopsy. Diagnosis is based on a deep skin biopsy involving the fascia, which will reveal edema, sclerofibrosis of the muscular fascia and subcutaneous tissue, and an inflammatory infiltrate sometimes composed of eosinophilic polynuclear cells. EF may occur in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the diagnosis should be raised in case of cutaneous sclerosis in these patients. The pathophysiology of the disease remains poorly understood, and its management lacks randomized, controlled, blinded trials. First-line treatment consists in oral corticosteroid therapy, sometimes combined with an immunosuppressant, mainly methotrexate. A better understanding of the pathophysiology has opened new therapeutic perspectives and clarified the role of targeted therapies in the management of EF, such as interleukin-6 inhibitors, whose efficacy has been reported in several cases.

暂无摘要。

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is an uncommon disorder of unknown etiology and poorly understood pathogenesis. In this report, we present a case of a 68-year-old female presented with a rapidly progressing skin tightening condition in her extremities associated with eosinophilia. Four months prior, the patient\'s initial complaint was skin sensitivity in the legs and forearms. Over time, this led to severe skin tightening, edema, and decreased range of motion. Clinical examination showed tightening of the skin over the anterior forearms, posterior knees, and calves without sclerodactyly or Raynaud\'s phenomenon. Laboratory investigations showed eosinophilia, elevated antinuclear antibody titer, and negative rheumatoid factor. This presentation raised suspicion of EF, and biopsy results showed scattered lymphocytic infiltrate involving associated fibrous tissue and perivascular lymphocytic inflammation that involved vessel walls. She was treated with low-dose steroids due to her diabetes but the stiffness continued. She was started with immunomodulators methotrexate, which showed improvement in symptoms, including softening in her arm tissues.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Eosinophilic Fasciitis (EF) is a rare disease, originally proposed as \"diffuse fasciitis with eosinophilia\" by Shulman in 1974. Symptoms of EF include peripheral eosinophilia accompanied by symmetrical inflammation of the subcutaneous fascia and muscle, usually locating in the upper arms or thighs. There is no approved standard of care treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Taking into account that eosinophils may be pathogenetically involved in EF, we performed a review on Medline focusing on anti-Interleukin-5 (IL-5) therapies in EF.
UNASSIGNED: Only one case of a patient with EF has been reported who was successfully treated with reslizumab, an anti-IL-5 therapy. The patient had EF refractory to the commonly used immunosuppressive treatment but when reslizumab was added, the patient experienced remission of her symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: The exact aetiology of EF is still unclear, and many therapeutic approaches have been tested. Commonly used immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids are not always effective and associate with significant side effects. Eosinophils seem to have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease; anti-eosinophilic therapies targeting IL-5/IL-5 Receptor could be an attractive alternative for the treatment of the disease.

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF), also known as Shulman syndrome, is a rare auto-immune fibrosing disorder of the fascia. Etiopathogeny of EF is still unclear. Nowadays, it is widely known that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may induce hyper-stimulation of the immune system. Several cases with fasciitis and rhabdomyolysis induced by coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines have been reported in the literature. Herein, we report the first case of EF possibly triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 45-year-old Tunisian woman, with no medical history, presented to our department with severe widespread muscle pain noticed one month after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Physical examination showed an induration of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the arms, forearms and legs with a restricted joint mobility. The level of eosinophils was 430 E/mm3 (6.1%) [1-4%]. Electromyography and creatine kinase levels were normal. Myositis-related antibodies were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging of the left arm showed high-intensity signal and thickness of the fascia without evidence of muscle or bone involvement. A muscular biopsy from the right deltoid showed thickening and inflammation of the fascia. The patient received intraveinous injections of 1000 mg of methylprednisolone for 3 days with an oral relay of 1 mg/kg per day of prednisone equivalent during 4 weeks. At one-month follow-up, a significant improvement of the skin induration and myalgia was observed, with a disappearance of the biological inflammatory syndrome. This brief report suggests a potential link between SARS-CoV-2 infection and new-onset of auto-immune fasciitis.

Morphea is an autoimmune fibrotic skin disease. Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is considered to belong to the severe spectrum of morphea. We conducted a scoping review assessing the risk of secondary cancer among morphea/EF patients, paraneoplastic morphea/EF and morphea/EF developing secondary to cancer therapy. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane databases for articles published from inception to September 2022 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines with no language or date restrictions. Two hundred and one studies were included. Of these, 32 studies reported on secondary cancer in morphea/EF patients, 45 on paraneoplastic morphea/EF and 125 on cancer-treatment-induced morphea/EF. While the current evidence remains limited, data suggest an increased risk of secondary cutaneous and possibly pancreatic malignancy in morphea patients, particularly the generalized subtype. There were insufficient data for EF. On the other hand, paraneoplastic morphea was anecdotal, whereas several observational studies suggested that ~10% of EF cases may be paraneoplastic, primarily in the context of hematologic malignancies. Radiotherapy-induced morphea is rare, seen in ~0.2% of treated patients and is usually localized to the treatment site, except in patients with pre-existing autoimmunity. While chemotherapy-induced cases are reported, immunotherapy morphea/EF cases are emerging and are preferentially seen with PD-1 and not CTLA-4 inhibitors. This study is limited by the type of articles included (case reports, case series and observational studies), and hence, additional research on this important topic is needed.