BACKGROUND: Endoscopic strip craniectomy followed by helmet therapy (ESCH) is a minimally invasive approach for correcting sagittal craniosynostosis. The treatment involves a patient-specific helmet designed to facilitate lateral growth while constraining sagittal expansion. In this study, finite element modelling was used to predict post-treatment head reshaping, improving our comprehension of the necessary helmet therapy duration.
METHODS: Six patients (aged 11 weeks to 9 months) who underwent ESCH at Connecticut Children\'s Hospital were enrolled in this study. Day-1 post-operative 3D scans were used to create skin, skull, and intracranial volume models. Patient-specific helmet models, incorporating areas for growth, were designed based on post-operative imaging. Brain growth was simulated through thermal expansion, and treatments were modelled according to post-operative Imaging available. Mechanical testing and finite element modelling were combined to determine patient-specific mechanical properties from bone samples collected from surgery. Validation compared simulated end-of-treatment skin surfaces with optical scans in terms of shape matching and cranial index estimation.
RESULTS: Comparison between the simulated post-treatment head shape and optical scans showed that on average 97.3 ± 2.1 % of surface data points were within a distance range of -3 to 3 mm. The cranial index was also accurately predicted (r = 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, finite element models effectively predicted the ESCH cranial remodeling outcomes up to 8 months postoperatively. This computational tool offers valuable insights to guide and refine helmet treatment duration. This study also incorporated patient-specific material properties, enhancing the accuracy of the modeling approach.

BACKGROUND: This cohort study aimed to elucidate the caregiver burden of helmet therapy (HT), following endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) to treat craniosynostosis, in an effort to inform clinicians and future caregivers navigating this therapeutic option.
METHODS: Fourteen caregivers of children with positional plagiocephaly (6) and craniosynostosis treated by ESC (8) undergoing HT at a single center were recruited via convenience sampling. Using a phenomenological qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the experience of HT for caregivers. Data collection and analysis were iterative and conducted until thematic saturation was reached.
RESULTS: Emerging themes revealed five domains of caregiver burden: emotional, cognitive, physical, psychosocial, and financial. No caregiver felt the therapy was too burdensome to complete. Caregivers of both groups also expressed positive aspects of HT related to support from the team, the noninvasive nature of treatment, and the outcomes of therapy. Furthermore, caregivers report overall satisfaction with the process, stating willingness to repeat the treatment with subsequent children if required.
CONCLUSIONS: HT is associated with five major domains of caregiver burden; however, none of the caregivers regret choosing this treatment option, nor was the burden high enough to encourage treatment cessation. This study will inform future prospective analyses that will quantify real-time caregiver burden throughout HT.

To summarize the ophthalmic manifestations of unilateral coronal synostosis patients.
We performed a literature search in the electronic database of PubMed, CENTRAL, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement for studies evaluating ophthalmic manifestations of unilateral coronal synostosis.
Unilateral coronal synostosis, also called unicoronal synostosis, may be mistaken for deformational plagiocephaly, an asymmetric skull flattening common in newborns. Characteristic facial features, however, distinguish the two. Ophthalmic manifestations of unilateral coronal synostosis include a \"harlequin deformity\", anisometropic astigmatism, strabismus, amblyopia, and significant orbital asymmetry. The astigmatism is greater on the side opposite the fused coronal suture. Optic neuropathy is uncommon unless unilateral coronal synostosis accompanies more complex multi-suture craniosynostosis. In many cases, surgical intervention is recommended; without intervention, skull asymmetry and ophthalmic disorders tend to worsen with time. Unilateral coronal synostosis can be managed by early endoscopic stripping of the fused suture and helmeting through a year of age or by fronto-orbital-advancement at approximately 1 year of age. Several studies have demonstrated that anisometropic astigmatism, amblyopia, and severity of strabismus are significantly lower after earlier intervention with endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmeting compared to treatment by fronto-orbital-advancement. It remains unknown whether the earlier timing or the nature of the procedure is responsible for the improved outcomes. As endoscopic strip craniectomy can only be performed in the first few months of life, early recognition of the facial, orbital, eyelid, and ophthalmic characteristics by consultant ophthalmologists enables expeditious referral and optimized ophthalmic outcomes.
Timely identification of craniofacial and ophthalmic manifestations of infants with unilateral coronal synostosis is important. Early recognition and prompt endoscopic treatment appears to optimize ocular outcomes.

Endoscopic mini-invasive treatment for sporadic trigonocephaly is becoming a widely accepted surgical treatment. In most centers this treatment is performed in association with postoperative helmeting. The aim of the present study was to review and report the authors\' 11-year experience of endoscope-assisted metopic suturectomy for treatment of 62 trigonocephaly patients without helmet use.
For this retrospective study, clinical data of 62 consecutive pediatric patients (age 3-8 months) were obtained from the data bank of the \"Anna Meyer\" Children Hospital. These patients had been diagnosed with trigonocephaly (type II and III) and undergone surgery performed with a mini-invasive endoscopic technique during the period from January 2011 to January 2022. No helmet was used postoperatively in these patients, and they were evaluated through craniometric measurements, pre-/postoperative photographs, and parents\' impressions, as well as thorough clinical examinations during follow-up appointments.
The mean patient follow-up period was 6 ± 1.3 years. The female/male ratio was 1:2; 52% of the patients presented with type II trigonocephaly and the remaining patients with type III. The mean age at surgery was 153 ± 44 days (5 ± 1.5 months, range 3-8 months). In 92% of the patients the surgical outcome was defined as good to excellent. However, 4 patients presented with an unsatisfactory outcome, including 1 patient with a CSF collection requiring surgical repair 2 months after the first surgery and 1 patient who developed infection of the surgical wound and needed a second surgery. In the latter patient the outcome was evaluated as satisfactory, and no sequelae regarding the infection were encountered during follow-up.
According to the authors\' experience, endoscopic metopic suturectomy alone, without the use of a helmet, is a valid surgical option for trigonocephaly treatment, and its application can be considered in patients of older age groups (up to 8 months). Thus, in the right patient selection context, this technique represents the treatment of choice.

Endoscopic strip craniectomy for metopic craniosynostosis relies on rapid growth and postoperative helmeting for correction. Endoscopic repair is generally performed before patients reach 4 months of age, and outcomes in older patients have yet to be quantified. Here, the authors examined a cohort of patients treated with endoscopic repair before or after 4 months of age to determine aesthetic outcomes of delayed repairs.
Data from eligible patients were retrospectively assessed and aggregated in a dedicated metopic synostosis database. Inclusion criteria were radiographically confirmed metopic synostosis and endoscopic treatment. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: those younger than 4 months and those 4 months or older at the time of repair. The frontal width and interfrontal divergence angle (IFDA) were measured on reconstructed CT images. These measurements, alongside operative time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion rates, were compared between groups using the Student t-test or chi-square test.
The study population comprised 28 patients treated before 4 months of age and 8 patients treated at 4-6 months of age. Patient sex and perioperative complications did not differ by age group. Older age at repair was not significantly associated with 1-year postoperative IFDA (140° ± 4.2° vs 142° ± 5.0°, p = 0.28) or frontal width (84 ± 5.2 vs 83 ± 4.4 mm, p = 0.47).
One-year postoperative IFDA and frontal width do not differ significantly between patients treated before and after 4 months of age. Further study with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm the longevity of these results at skeletal maturity.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to analyze cranial width and length growth curves in the early postoperative period of patients by undergoing endoscopic sagittal strip craniectomy (ESC) to determine the timing of the maximal growth curve change. By analyzing the complex interplay of cephalic length and width measurements, we hope to better understand the cephalic index (CI) growth curve during this early period. This is the first of a multistep process to elucidate the ideal cranial remolding orthosis (CRO) treatment duration.
METHODS: Retrospective review.
METHODS: Tertiary academic institution.
METHODS: Children with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis.
METHODS: ESC and postoperative CRO treatment (2015-2019).
METHODS: One cranial orthotist obtained preoperative and postoperative measurements. The maximal rate of change of width, length, and CI were compared against the postoperative week these occurred.
RESULTS: Thirteen children (mean age: 3.3 months, average preoperative CI: 73.4) underwent this intervention. CI reached its highest growth rate by 4.9 average weeks postoperatively, which correlated with the maximal width growth rate (5.2 weeks). Length curves reached their maximal growth rate by 15.5 weeks. CI peaked (81.3) by 22.7 weeks postoperatively, a significant increase from baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Following ESC, in the early postoperative period, the CI growth curve has 4 phases: initial rapid expansion, early and late slowed expansion, and plateau, followed by possible regression phases. This highlights the importance of early postoperative CRO initiation, CRO compliance, and properly fitting CROs, especially in the first 2 phases. This data sets the stage for investigating the ideal treatment length.

The resurgence of strip craniectomies began in the mid-1990s with advances in surgical technique and anesthesia coupled with the critical observation that earlier interventions benefitted from an easily molded skull. Jimenez and Barone\'s pioneering introduction of endoscopic approaches to strip craniectomies coupled with postoperative helmeting in newborns and young infants and Claes Lauritzen\'s introduction of spring-mediated cranioplasty began the era of minimally invasive approaches in the surgical correction of craniosynostosis. This article provides technical descriptions of these treatment modalities, a comparative literature review, and our institutional algorithms for the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis and unilambdoid craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to propose a new skull outline-based method to objectively quantify complex 3D skull shapes and frontal and supraorbital retrusion in metopic craniosynostosis using 3D photogrammetry.
METHODS: A standard section from 3D photogrammetry, which represents the trigonocephalic shape, was used in this study. From the midpoint of the area of this section, half diagonals were calculated to the skull outline at 5° increments in the anterior half of the head. These half diagonals were used to create a sinusoidal curve, and the area under the sinusoidal curve (AUC) was used to represent the mathematical expression of the trigonocephalic head shape. The AUC from 0° to 180° (90° from the midline to each side) was calculated and is referred to as AUC0→180. The AUC from 60° to 120° (30° from the midline to each side) was also calculated and is referred to as AUC60→120. A total of 24 patients who underwent endoscopic strip craniectomy and 13 age- and sex-matched controls were included in the study. The AUC values obtained in patients at different time points and controls were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative AUC60→120 and AUC0→180 in the patients were significantly lower than those in control individuals. The increase in both AUC60→120 and AUC0→180 values is statistically significant at the discontinuation of helmet therapy and at final follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that AUC60→120 is a more accurate classifier than AUC0→180.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method objectively quantifies complex head shape and frontal retrusion in patients with metopic craniosynostosis and provides a quantitative measure for follow-up after surgical treatment. It avoids ionizing radiation exposure.

This study describes a modified technique addressing bony defects and incomplete ossification after endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) for SC followed by postoperative helmet therapy (PHT). The study aims to delineate quantitative and qualitative outcomes of this modified ESC technique followed by PHT and discern the optimal duration of PHT following ESC. A secondary aim is to address the effects of the technique on bony defects.
Patients undergoing ESC followed by PHT between 2017 and 2021 were included. Patient sex, age at surgery, duration of surgery, red blood cell transfusion, length of hospital stay, PHT duration, cephalic index (CI) at multiple time points, and bony defect information were collected. Descriptive and correlative analysis was done.
Thirty-one patients (25 male, 6 female) were operated in study period. Mean age at surgery was 12.81 weeks, mean duration of surgery was 57.50 min, average transfused RBC volume was 32 cc, mean length of hospital stay was 1.84 days, mean PHT duration was 33.16 weeks, and mean follow-up time was 63.42 weeks. Mean preoperative CI was 70.6, and mean CI at the end of PHT was significantly higher, being 77.1. Maximum improvement in CI (CImax) took place at week 22.97. PHT duration did not have a correlation with CI at last follow up. There were no bony defects.
Modified ESC technique is effective in successful correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. CImax already takes place, while PHT is continuing, but there is no certain time point for dishelmeting. The technique avoided bony defects and incomplete ossification.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) and spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) are two minimally invasive techniques for treating sagittal craniosynostosis in early infancy. Data comparing the perioperative outcomes of these two techniques are sparse. Here, the authors hypothesized that outcomes would be similar between patients undergoing SMC and those undergoing ESC and conducted a study using the multicenter Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry (PCSPR).
METHODS: The PCSPR was queried for infants under the age of 6 months who had undergone SMC or ESC for sagittal synostosis. SMC patients were propensity score matched 1:2 with ESC patients on age and weight. Primary outcomes were transfusion-free hospital course, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital length of stay (HLOS). The authors also obtained data points regarding spring removal. Comparisons of outcomes between matched groups were performed with multivariable regression models.
RESULTS: The query returned data from 676 infants who had undergone procedures from June 2012 through September 2019, comprising 580 ESC infants from 32 centers and 96 SMC infants from 5 centers. Ninety-six SMC patients were matched to 192 ESC patients. There was no difference in transfusion-free hospital course between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.45-1.35). SMC patients were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (aOR 7.50, 95% CI 3.75-14.99) and had longer ICU LOSs (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.37-1.48) and HLOSs (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17-1.39).
CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study of ESC and SMC, the authors found similar transfusion-free hospital courses; however, SMC infants had longer ICU LOSs and HLOSs. A trial comparing longer-term outcomes in SMC versus ESC would further define the roles of these two approaches in the management of sagittal craniosynostosis.