Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) is an established treatment option for patients with severe emphysema. Not all patients are candidates for this type of intervention, and in the context of significant airway secretions, they may be excluded from treatment. Bronchial Rheoplasty (BR) was developed to treat mucus hypersecretion by delivering nonthermal pulsed electric fields to the airway epithelium and submucosa. The literature to date demonstrates that patients treated with BR in clinical studies have a reduction in airway goblet cell hyperplasia as well as substantive clinical improvement in the setting of chronic bronchitis (CB). In this case series, we present four patients treated at three different institutions who had previously undergone ELVR with beneficial outcome. However, over time, these patients subsequently developed worsening clinical issues, including complaints of increased and thickened mucus, along with exacerbations in the setting of a loss of some ELVR-associated benefits. These patients then underwent exploratory treatment with BR with the intent of reducing their secretion burden and potentially restoring the efficacy associated with the initial placement of the airway valves. All BR procedures were well tolerated, and three of the four patients showed substantial improvement in their symptom burden. Airway examinations during the second of the two BR procedures also revealed what appeared to be less airway mucosal inflammation and a decrease in the quantity of airway secretions. Therefore, treatment with BR may have the potential to improve and restore the initial benefits associated with ELVR, thus enhancing long-term outcomes. Further clinical studies with sufficient follow-up are warranted to assess this in a larger cohort of patients, and to determine whether treatment with BR prior to ELVR may make more patients eligible for this treatment through reduction in their secretions and/or symptoms.

Advanced diagnostic and therapeutic flexible bronchoscopy in children is a rapidly evolving field. Recent advances in technology and awareness of indications, risks, and benefits by pediatric providers have greatly increased the use of advanced techniques in children. This review highlights advanced diagnostic procedures including assessment of endobronchial lesions, mediastinal/hilar masses, and peripheral lung nodules as well as therapeutic techniques for restoring airway lumen patency, managing persistent air leaks, and treating tracheoesophageal fistulas in children as well as the potential to spare these patients more invasive procedures.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with one-way endobronchial valves (EBV) has better outcomes when the target lobe has poor collateral ventilation, resulting in complete lobe atelectasis. High-inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2) promotes atelectasis through faster gas absorption after airway occlusion, but its application during BLVR with EBV has been poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the real-time effects of FIO2 on regional lung volumes and regional ventilation/perfusion by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) during BLVR with EBV.
METHODS: Six piglets were submitted to left lower lobe occlusion by a balloon-catheter and EBV valves with FIO2 0.5 and 1.0. Regional end-expiratory lung impedances (EELI) and regional ventilation/perfusion were monitored. Local pocket pressure measurements were obtained (balloon occlusion method). One animal underwent simultaneous acquisitions of computed tomography (CT) and EIT. Regions-of-interest (ROIs) were right and left hemithoraces.
RESULTS: Following balloon occlusion, a steep decrease in left ROI-EELI with FIO2 1.0 occurred, 3-fold greater than with 0.5 (p < 0.001). Higher FIO2 also enhanced the final volume reduction (ROI-EELI) achieved by each valve (p < 0.01). CT analysis confirmed the denser atelectasis and greater volume reduction achieved by higher FIO2 (1.0) during balloon occlusion or during valve placement. CT and pocket pressure data agreed well with EIT findings, indicating greater strain redistribution with higher FIO2.
CONCLUSIONS: EIT demonstrated in real-time a faster and more complete volume reduction in the occluded lung regions under high FIO2 (1.0), as compared to 0.5. Immediate changes in the ventilation and perfusion of ipsilateral non-target lung regions were also detected, providing better estimates of the full impact of each valve in place.
BACKGROUND: Not applicable.

OBJECTIVE: Both bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (BLVR-EBV) and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are effective treatments for improving exercise capacity and patient-reported outcomes in patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). According to current recommendations, all BLVR-EBV patients should have undergone PR first. Our aim was to study the effects of PR both before and after BLVR-EBV compared to BLVR-EBV alone.
METHODS: We included patients with severe COPD who were eligible for BLVR-EBV and PR. Participants were randomized into three groups: PR before BLVR-EBV, PR after BLVR-EBV or BLVR-EBV without PR. The primary outcome was change in constant work rate cycle test (CWRT) endurance time at 6-month follow-up of the PR groups compared to BLVR-EBV alone. Secondary endpoints included changes in 6-minute walking test, daily step count, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven participants were included. At 6-month follow-up, there was no difference in change in CWRT endurance time between the PR before BLVR-EBV and BLVR-EBV alone groups (median: 421 [IQR: 44; 1304] vs. 787 [123; 1024] seconds, p = 0.82) or in any of the secondary endpoints, but the PR after BLVR-EBV group exhibited a smaller improvement in CWRT endurance time (median: 107 [IQR: 2; 573], p = 0.04) and health-related quality of life compared to BLVR-EBV alone.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PR to BLVR-EBV did not result in increased exercise capacity, daily step count or improved patient-reported outcomes compared to BLVR-EBV alone, neither when PR was administered before BLVR-EBV nor when PR was administered after BLVR-EBV.

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with Zephyr one-way valves is an effective guideline-based treatment option for patients with severe emphysema and hyperinflation. However, in some cases the treatment response is less than anticipated or there might be a loss of initial treatment effect. Reasons for the lack of response can include incorrect assessment of collateral ventilation, improper valve placement, or patient related factors. Loss of initial benefit can be due to granulation tissue formation and subsequent valve dysfunction, or there may be side effects such as excessive coughing or infectious problems. Careful follow-up after treatment with valves is important and evaluation with a CT scan and/or bronchoscopy is helpful if there is no improvement after treatment or loss of initial benefit. This paper aims to describe the most important causes and provide a strategy of how to approach and manage these patients.

BACKGROUND: Enhancing the efficacy of treatment for Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) and Extensively Drug Resistant (XDR) Tuberculosis has prompted exploration into adjunctive therapies, such as Endobronchial Valve Placement (EVP) in addition to pharmacological interventions.
METHODS: EVP was performed utilizing a combination of rigid and flexible bronchoscopes to address airway hemorrhage and facilitate closure of TB cavities. The procedure involved the deployment of large valves (12 mm and 17 mm), necessitating the utilization of a rigid bronchoscope.
RESULTS: Sputum conversion was confirmed through culture analysis after one month, and chest CT scans revealed complete closure of the tuberculous cavity five months post the EVP procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: We posit that when used in conjunction with anti-TB chemotherapy, this method holds promise for shortening treatment duration and improving overall efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves has been widely recognized for treating hyperinflation in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema patients. The main challenges include the technical complexity of upper lobe implantation and the number of endobronchial valves required. These issues might be addressed by placing larger diameter valves in the lobar bronchus. This study evaluated the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of the new valve PulmValve (model PV-13) in porcine models.
METHODS: Six PV-13 valves were bronchoscopically implanted into the caudal lobe bronchus of six healthy pigs. The procedure time, valve deployment, and removability were recorded. Follow-up examinations included blood tests, chest CT scans, and bronchoscopy at 30 min, 14 days, 28 days, and 84 days post-procedure, with necropsy and pathological evaluations after the final follow-up examination.
RESULTS: The successful in vivo deployment and removal of PV-13 valves was established, with a median procedure time of 6.5 min. The distal lung volume reduction was evident at 30 min post-operation and was persistently monitored on day 84. No migration or malfunction of any PV-13 valves was detected, but a mild angle deviation was found in 3 cases. Coughing was observed in four pigs within the first 7 days and localized granulation tissue was observed in all pigs. No cases of pneumothorax, diffuse pneumonia, or hemoptysis were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we report the successful implantation and removal of a new valve PulmValve in a short operation time. Complete lobar atelectasis was induced without device migration, malfunction, or severe complications. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term, sustained effects and potential benefits in human patients.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections, such as tuberculosis, can result in numerous pleural complications including empyemas, pneumothoraces with broncho-pleural fistulas, and persistent air leak (PAL). While definitive surgical interventions are often initially considered, management of these complications can be particularly challenging if a patient has an active infection and is not a surgical candidate.
METHODS: Autologous blood patch pleurodesis and endobronchial valve placement have both been described in remedying PALs effectively and safely. PALs due to broncho-pleural fistulas in active pulmonary disease are rare, and we present two such cases that were managed with autologous blood patch pleurodesis and endobronchial valves.
CONCLUSIONS: The two cases presented illustrate the complexities of PAL management and discuss the treatment options that can be applied to individual patients.

Rationale: Follow-up of patients with emphysema treated with endobronchial valves is limited to 3-12 months after treatment in prior reports. To date, no comparative data exist between treatment and control subjects with a longer follow-up. Objectives: To assess the durability of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema over a 24-month period. Methods: EMPROVE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial, presents a rigorous comparison between treatment and control groups for up to 24 months. Lung function, respiratory symptoms, and quality-of-life (QOL) measures were assessed. Results: A significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second was maintained at 24 months in the SVS treatment group versus the control group. Similarly, significant improvements were maintained in several QOL measures, including the St. George\'s Respiratory Questionnaire and the COPD Assessment Test. Patients in the SVS treatment group experienced significantly less dyspnea than those in the control group, as indicated by the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale score. Adverse events at 24 months did not significantly differ between the SVS treatment and control groups. Acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation rates in the SVS treatment and control groups were 13.7% (14 of 102) and 15.6% (7 of 45), respectively. Pneumothorax rates in the SVS treatment and control groups were 1.0% (1 of 102) and 0.0% (0 of 45), respectively. Conclusions: SVS treatment resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful durable improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, and QOL, as well as a statistically significant reduction in dyspnea, for at least 24 months while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01812447).

Exacerbations drive the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with valves is an established treatment option for patients with severe emphysema. Post-interventional exacerbations are observed in 8-17% of cases. Whether the exacerbation rate changes in the medium term after ELVR, is not known.
This is a single-center retrospective analysis of severe emphysema patients with endobronchial valve implantation. The number of exacerbations before and after ELVR was compared, including lung function parameters, exercise capacity and degree of lung volume reduction. The primary endpoint of the study was the number of exacerbations one year after ELVR compared to one year before ELVR.
129 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 7.7 years, 57% female, mean FEV1 0.8 ± 0.2 l, mean RV 243.4 ± 54.9 %) with ELVR in the years 2016-2019 and complete exacerbation history were analyzed. Patients experienced a mean of 2.5 ± 2.2 moderate and severe exacerbations in the year before ELVR. The number of exacerbations decreased significantly to 1.8 ± 2.2 exacerbations in the first year after ELVR (p = 0.009). The decrease in exacerbation rate was associated with the development of complete lobar atelectasis (r = 0.228. p = 0.009). Accordingly, in 41 patients with complete lobar atelectasis, the decrease in exacerbation rate was higher from 2.8 ± 2.0 to 1.4 ± 1.8 exacerbations (p < 0.001).
ELVR with valves appears promising to reduce the exacerbation rate in COPD patients, especially when the full treatment benefit of complete lobar atelectasis is achieved.