UNASSIGNED: In temporal bone specimens from long-term cochlear implant users, foreign body response within the cochlea has been demonstrated. However, how hearing changes after implantation and fibrosis progresses within the cochlea is unknown.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate the short-term dynamic changes in hearing and cochlear histopathology in minipigs after electrode array insertion.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve minipigs were selected for electrode array insertion (EAI) and the Control. Hearing tests were performed preoperatively and on 0, 7, 14, and 28 day(s) postoperatively, and cochlear histopathology was performed after the hearing tests on 7, 14, and 28 days after surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Electrode array insertion had a significant effect for the frequency range tested (1 kHz-20kHz). Exudation was evident one week after electrode array insertion; at four weeks postoperatively, a fibrous sheath formed around the electrode. At each time point, the endolymphatic hydrops was found; no significant changes in the morphology and packing density of the spiral ganglion neurons were observed.
UNASSIGNED: The effect of electrode array insertion on hearing and intracochlear fibrosis was significant. The process of fibrosis and endolymphatic hydrops seemed to not correlate with the degree of hearing loss, nor did it affect spiral ganglion neuron integrity in the 4-week postoperative period.

Cochlear implantation (CI) allows rehabilitation for patients with severe to profound hearing impairment. Although the use of a robotic assistant provides technical assistance to the surgeon, the assessment of the impact of its use on auditory outcomes remains uncertain. We aim to compare the hearing results of patients who underwent bilateral cochlear implantation; one side was performed with manual insertion and the other side with robot-assisted insertion. The electrode array intrascalar positioning and the surgery duration were also studied. This retrospective intra-individual study involved 10 patients who underwent bilateral cochlear implantation. The study included two infants and eight adults. The unique composition of this cohort enabled us to utilize each patient as their own control. Regarding speech disyllabic recognition, pure tone average, ECAP, ratio of array translocation, basilar membrane rupture, and percentage of translocated electrodes, there was no difference between manual and robot-assisted CI groups. This study is the first to compare intra-individual hearing performance after cochlear implantation, either manually or robot-assisted. The number of patients and the time delay between manual and robotic implantation may have led to a lack of power, but there was no apparent difference in hearing performance between manual and robotic implantation.