Electroconvulsive Therapy

电惊厥治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究是一项单盲随机对照试验(RCT),旨在研究电惊厥治疗(ECT)对晚期痴呆患者重度治疗难治性躁动的疗效和安全性。目的是使用科恩-曼斯菲尔德躁动清单(CMAI)评估躁动的减少,评估耐受性和安全性结果,并探索减少躁动的长期稳定性和整体功能。由于在实施过程中遇到的挑战,包括招募障碍和业务困难,将研究设计修改为开放标签格式,并实施其他方案修订.
    方法:最初,RCT将参与者1:1随机分为ECT+常规治疗组或模拟ECT+常规治疗组(S-ECT).当患者入组时,数据来自ECT和模拟ECT(S-ECT)患者.该研究现在在开放标签研究设计中继续进行,所有患者都接受了实际的ECT,将目标样本量从200名减少到50名参与者。
    结果:研究正在进行中,并向注册开放。
    结论:ECT-AD研究设计从RCT到开放标签设计的转变体现了应对现实世界挑战的适应性研究方法。来自研究的RCT和开放标签阶段的数据将为ECT在管理痴呆症的严重治疗难治性躁动中的作用提供独特的视角。可能影响未来的临床实践和研究方法。
    OBJECTIVE: This study began as a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for severe treatment-refractory agitation in advanced dementia. The aims are to assess agitation reduction using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), evaluate tolerability and safety outcomes, and explore the long-term stability of agitation reduction and global functioning. Due to challenges encountered during implementation, including recruitment obstacles and operational difficulties, the study design was modified to an open-label format and other protocol amendments were implemented.
    METHODS: Initially, the RCT randomized participants 1:1 to either ECT plus usual care or simulated ECT plus usual care (S-ECT) groups. As patients were enrolled, data were collected from both ECT and simulated ECT (S-ECT) patients. The study now continues in an open-label study design where all patients receive actual ECT, reducing the targeted sample size from 200 to 50 participants.
    RESULTS: Study is ongoing and open to enrollment.
    CONCLUSIONS: The transition of the ECT-AD study design from an RCT to open-label design exemplifies adaptive research methodologies in response to real-world challenges. Data from both the RCT and open-label phases of the study will provide a unique perspective on the role of ECT in managing severe treatment-refractory agitation in dementia, potentially influencing future clinical practices and research approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景和目的:难治性双相抑郁(TRBPD)的选择有限。电惊厥疗法(ECT)已显示出在TRBPD中的功效。然而,与ECT相关的认知缺陷和记忆问题对相当多的患者是有问题的.目前尚不清楚ECT失败的TRBPD患者的下一步是什么。材料和方法:在本案例报告中,我们介绍了一名TRBPD患者,他连续接受了12次短暂脉冲右单侧ECT,22次氯胺酮输注0.5-0.75mg/kg,持续40分钟,和39次深重复经颅磁刺激(dTMS)。结果:患者从ECT中获益,但由于记忆问题而拒绝继续ECT。患者耐受氯胺酮输注良好,但获益有限。然而,患者对dTMS急性治疗反应良好,并保持相对稳定超过2年.结论:此病例表明,ECT和/或氯胺酮输注失败的TRBPD患者可能受益于dTMS。
    Background and Objectives: Options for treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBPD) are limited. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has shown efficacy in TRBPD. However, the cognitive deficits and memory concerns associated with ECT are problematic for a significant number of patients. It remains unclear what the next step is for patients with TRBPD who fail ECT. Materials and Methods: In this case report, we present a patient with TRBPD who sequentially received 12 sessions of brief-pulse right unilateral ECT, 22 sessions of ketamine infusion at 0.5-0.75 mg/kg for 40 min, and 39 sessions of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS). Results: The patient had some benefit from ECT, but declined continuation of ECT due to memory concerns. The patient tolerated ketamine infusion well but had limited benefit. However, the patient responded well to acute treatment with dTMS and maintained relative stability for more than 2 years. Conclusions: This case suggests that patients with TRBPD who fail ECT and/or ketamine infusion might benefit from dTMS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ELEKT-D:治疗性抑郁症(TRD)患者的电惊厥治疗(ECT)与氯胺酮(ELEKT-D)试验证明,静脉内氯胺酮与ECT对非精神病性TRD的非劣效性。可以指导氯胺酮与ECT选择的临床特征可以为TRD患者提供共同的决策。
    评估选择的临床特征是否与氯胺酮与ECT的差异改善相关。
    这项对开放标签非劣效性随机临床试验的二次分析是一项多中心研究,于2017年4月7日至2022年11月11日在美国5个学术医学中心进行。这项研究的分析,试验方案中没有预先指定的,于2023年5月10日至10月31日进行。研究队列包括TRD患者,年龄21至75岁,他们目前处于至少中等严重程度的非精神病性抑郁发作,并被临床医生转介接受ECT治疗。
    符合条件的参与者在3周内1:1随机接受6次氯胺酮输注或9次ECT治疗。
    基线因素之间的关联(包括抑郁症状自我报告的16项快速清单[QIDS-SR16],蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表[MADRS],病前情报,认知功能,自杀未遂史,以及住院患者与门诊状态)和治疗反应通过重复测量混合效应模型分析进行评估。
    在本研究纳入的365名参与者中(平均[SD]年龄,46.0[14.5]年;191[52.3%]女性),195个被随机分配到氯胺酮组,170个被随机分配到ECT组。在重复测量混合效应模型中,使用3周内和错误发现率调整后的抑郁水平,基线QIDS-SR16评分为20分或更低(-7.7分vs-5.6分)的参与者和作为门诊患者开始治疗的参与者(-8.4分vs-6.2分)报告,氯胺酮与ECT相比,QIDS-SR16下降更大.相反,基线QIDS-SR16得分超过20的人(即,非常严重的抑郁症)并开始治疗,因为住院患者在ECT治疗过程中早期报告QIDS-SR16的降低更大(-8.4vs-6.7分),但在治疗结束时,两组的评分相似(-9.0分vs-9.9分).仅在ECT组中,病前智力测量得分较高(-14.0vs-11.2分)和创伤后应激障碍诊断合并症(-16.6vs-12.0分)的参与者报告MADRS评分降低幅度更大.在第二周的治疗中,记忆记忆障碍患者的MADRS降低更大(-13.4vs-9.6分),但MADRS的水平与治疗结束时召回未受损的患者相似(-14.3vs-12.2分).其他结果在错误发现率调整后并不显著。
    在ELEKT-DECT与氯胺酮的随机临床试验的二次分析中,在患有中度或重度抑郁症的非精神病性TRD门诊患者中,静脉注射氯胺酮可观察到抑郁症的改善。提示这些患者可能会考虑氯胺酮而不是ECT治疗TRD。
    UNASSIGNED: The ELEKT-D: Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) vs Ketamine in Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) (ELEKT-D) trial demonstrated noninferiority of intravenous ketamine vs ECT for nonpsychotic TRD. Clinical features that can guide selection of ketamine vs ECT may inform shared decision-making for patients with TRD.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate whether selected clinical features were associated with differential improvement with ketamine vs ECT.
    UNASSIGNED: This secondary analysis of an open-label noninferiority randomized clinical trial was a multicenter study conducted at 5 US academic medical centers from April 7, 2017, to November 11, 2022. Analyses for this study, which were not prespecified in the trial protocol, were conducted from May 10 to Oct 31, 2023. The study cohort included patients with TRD, aged 21 to 75 years, who were in a current nonpsychotic depressive episode of at least moderate severity and were referred for ECT by their clinicians.
    UNASSIGNED: Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 6 infusions of ketamine or 9 treatments with ECT over 3 weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: Association between baseline factors (including 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report [QIDS-SR16], Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], premorbid intelligence, cognitive function, history of attempted suicide, and inpatient vs outpatient status) and treatment response were assessed with repeated measures mixed-effects model analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 365 participants included in this study (mean [SD] age, 46.0 [14.5] years; 191 [52.3%] female), 195 were randomized to the ketamine group and 170 to the ECT group. In repeated measures mixed-effects models using depression levels over 3 weeks and after false discovery rate adjustment, participants with a baseline QIDS-SR16 score of 20 or less (-7.7 vs -5.6 points) and those starting treatment as outpatients (-8.4 vs -6.2 points) reported greater reduction in the QIDS-SR16 with ketamine vs ECT. Conversely, those with a baseline QIDS-SR16 score of more than 20 (ie, very severe depression) and starting treatment as inpatients reported greater reduction in the QIDS-SR16 earlier in course of treatment (-8.4 vs -6.7 points) with ECT, but scores were similar in both groups at the end-of-treatment visit (-9.0 vs -9.9 points). In the ECT group only, participants with higher scores on measures of premorbid intelligence (-14.0 vs -11.2 points) and with a comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis (-16.6 vs -12.0 points) reported greater reduction in the MADRS score. Those with impaired memory recall had greater reduction in MADRS during the second week of treatment (-13.4 vs -9.6 points), but the levels of MADRS were similar to those with unimpaired recall at the end-of-treatment visit (-14.3 vs -12.2 points). Other results were not significant after false discovery rate adjustment.
    UNASSIGNED: In this secondary analysis of the ELEKT-D randomized clinical trial of ECT vs ketamine, greater improvement in depression was observed with intravenous ketamine among outpatients with nonpsychotic TRD who had moderately severe or severe depression, suggesting that these patients may consider ketamine over ECT for TRD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)是治疗难治性精神分裂症的一种有前途的干预措施。然而,有多种可用的技术,缺乏全面的综合证据。因此,我们将进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以研究NIBS技术作为抗精神病药物的附加药物治疗难治性精神分裂症的疗效和安全性.
    方法:我们将包括单盲和双盲随机对照试验(RCT),将任何NIBS技术相互比较或与对照干预作为抗精神病药物的附加药物在患有难治性精神分裂症的成年患者中。我们将排除针对主要阴性症状的研究,维持治疗,和单一会议。主要结果将是总体症状的变化,次要结果将是症状领域的变化,认知表现,生活质量,功能,回应,辍学,和副作用。我们将在以前的评论中搜索符合条件的研究,从一开始就有多个电子数据库和临床试验登记处。至少有两名独立评审员将进行研究选择,数据提取,和偏见风险评估。我们将使用连续和二分结果的标准化平均差异(SMD)和比值比(OR)来测量治疗差异,分别。我们将使用随机效应模型在频率论框架内进行成对和网络荟萃分析,除了罕见的事件结果,我们将使用固定效应Mantel-Haenszel方法。我们将调查亚组分析中异质性的潜在来源。报告偏差将通过漏斗图和由于网络荟萃分析(ROB-MEN)工具中缺少证据而导致的偏差风险进行评估。使用网络荟萃分析(CINeMA)方法评估证据的确定性。
    结论:我们的网络荟萃分析将提供最新的综合证据,从所有现有的随机对照试验中得出NIBS治疗难治性精神分裂症的比较疗效和安全性。这些信息可以指导循证临床实践并改善患者的预后。
    背景:PROSPERO-IDCRD42023410645。
    BACKGROUND: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, there are multiple available techniques and a comprehensive synthesis of evidence is lacking. Thus, we will conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of NIBS techniques as an add-on to antipsychotics for treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
    METHODS: We will include single- and double-blind randomized-controlled trials (RCT) comparing any NIBS technique with each other or with a control intervention as an add-on to antipsychotics in adult patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We will exclude studies focusing on predominant negative symptoms, maintenance treatment, and single sessions. The primary outcome will be a change in overall symptoms, and secondary outcomes will be a change in symptom domains, cognitive performance, quality of life, functioning, response, dropouts, and side effects. We will search for eligible studies in previous reviews, multiple electronic databases and clinical trial registries from inception onwards. At least two independent reviewers will perform the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We will measure the treatment differences using standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. We will conduct pairwise and network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework using a random-effects model, except for rare event outcomes where we will use a fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel method. We will investigate potential sources of heterogeneity in subgroup analyses. Reporting bias will be assessed with funnel plots and the Risk of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN) tool. The certainty in the evidence will be evaluated using the Confidence in Network Meta-analysis (CINeMA) approach.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our network meta-analysis would provide an up-to-date synthesis of the evidence from all available RCTs on the comparative efficacy and safety of NIBS for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. This information could guide evidence-based clinical practice and improve the outcomes of patients.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO-ID CRD42023410645.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:基于依恋的干预措施已在神经典型患者人群中进行了广泛研究。在神经分化的患者群体中,然而,对基于依恋的干预措施的重点和当前研究集中在幼儿期。在患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的学龄儿童中进行了最少的研究,更少的研究集中在基于依恋的干预措施上,对患有严重合并症的儿童,如紧张症。病例报告:我们介绍了一名12岁女性的病例,该女性涉及二联工作以及生物干预措施,以治疗ASD和卡顿多症。心理社会干预措施以基于依恋的框架和行为技能培训为中心,该培训纳入了父母管理培训的要素。我们观察并跟踪患者的不合作,低效率的演讲,情绪退缩,通过简短的儿童精神病学评定量表和焦虑。基于依恋和行为的干预措施与精神药物和电惊厥治疗相结合可以改善。结论:该案例说明了基于依恋和行为的心理治疗干预在涉及神经发散患者的复杂病例中可以带来的潜在优势。该案例还突显了目前对ASD儿童和青少年依恋理论的研究和理解不足。需要研究基于依恋的干预措施在ASD和其他精神病合并症患者中的作用,特别是在超过学龄前的患者人群中。启动非生物干预措施与生物干预措施相结合也可以提高结果,值得进一步研究。
    Background: Attachment-based interventions have been extensively studied in neurotypical patient populations. In neurodivergent patient populations, however, emphasis on and current research into attachment-based interventions are centered on early childhood. Minimal research has been conducted in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and even less research has focused on attachment-based interventions for children with significant comorbidities such as catatonia. Case Report: We present the case of a 12-year-old female that involved dyadic work in conjunction with biologic interventions for the treatment of ASD and catatonia. Psychosocial interventions were centered on an attachment-based framework and behavioral skills training that incorporated elements of parent management training. We observed and tracked the patient\'s uncooperativeness, underproductive speech, emotional withdrawal, and anxiety via the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children. Attachment- and behavioral-based interventions in conjunction with psychotropic medications and electroconvulsive therapy resulted in improvements. Conclusion: This case illustrates the potential advantages that attachment- and behavioral-based psychotherapeutic interventions can confer in complex cases involving neurodivergent patients. The case also highlights the lack of current research into and understanding of attachment theory in children and adolescents with ASD. Research is needed into the role of attachment-based interventions in patients with ASD and other psychiatric comorbidities, particularly in patient populations beyond preschool age. Initiating nonbiologic interventions in conjunction with biologic interventions may also enhance outcomes and warrants further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇简短的叙述性综述的目的是评估现有的关于氯胺酮在痴呆症患者中临床使用的文献。尤其是那些有行为障碍的人。PubMed,科克伦,和奥维德(Embase,APAPsycINFO,和MEDLINE)数据库使用搜索词“氯胺酮”和“痴呆症”搜索摘要。“仅包括描述在痴呆症患者中使用氯胺酮的文章。不包括痴呆症患者的文章,没有使用氯胺酮,以一种非英语语言出版,主要描述了动物研究,或者评论被排除在外。3例病例报告符合纳入标准。一个描述了使用皮下氯胺酮治疗抑郁症,一个人描述了肌内氯胺酮用于急性躁动,和一个描述了使用S-氯胺酮作为麻醉在电惊厥治疗抑郁症和紧张症。在任何情况下均未报告明显的不良反应。尽管使用氯胺酮治疗与痴呆相关的抑郁和躁动具有潜力,目前的证据仍然有限。在氯胺酮可用于治疗痴呆症患者的行为障碍之前,需要高质量的前瞻性研究来确认这些病例报告的观察结果。
    The aim of this short narrative review was to evaluate the existing literature regarding the clinical use of ketamine among individuals with dementia, especially those with behavioral disturbances. PubMed, Cochrane, and Ovid (Embase, APA PsycINFO, and MEDLINE) databases were searched for abstracts using the search terms \"ketamine\" AND \"dementia.\" Only articles describing the use of ketamine in individuals with dementia were included. Articles that did not include individuals with dementia, did not use ketamine, were published in a non-English language, primarily described animal studies, or were reviews were excluded. Three case reports met the inclusion criteria. One described the use of subcutaneous ketamine for depression, one described the use of intramuscular ketamine for acute agitation, and one described the use of S-ketamine as anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy for depression and catatonia. No significant adverse effects were reported in any of the cases. Although the use of ketamine in the treatment of depression and agitation associated with dementia has potential, the current evidence remains limited. High-quality prospective studies are needed to confirm the observations of these case reports before ketamine can be used to treat behavioral disturbances in individuals with dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电惊厥治疗(ECT)是对精神病患者的有效干预措施。琥珀酰胆碱被认为是ECT肌肉松弛的首选药物。琥珀酰胆碱的显著副作用包括肌束震颤和肌痛。右美托咪定是一种高度选择性的α-2肾上腺素能激动剂。本研究旨在确定低剂量右美托咪定在减少接受ECT患者琥珀酰胆碱诱导的肌痛中的功效。
    这项随机对照试验对100名患者进行,18-65岁,正在接受ECT,随机分为两组,分配比例为1:1。D组接受静脉注射(IV)右美托咪定0.25µg/kg,C组接受静脉生理盐水(0.9%)。手术60分钟后测量患者自我报告的肌痛评分。在IV琥珀酰胆碱给药后注意到成链。在基线测量心率(HR)和平均血压(MBP),输注后(5分钟)和ECT后(0、2.5、5、10、15、30分钟)。连续数据采用学生t检验进行两组比较分析,组比较和各种时间点分析的混合模型方差分析。分类数据采用卡方/Fisher精确检验进行分析。
    两组人口统计学没有差异。D组的肌痛和肌束震颤少于C组(P<0.001)。MBP和HR变化具有可比性(P>0.05)。
    低剂量右美托咪定(0.25µg/kg)可有效减少电惊厥治疗患者由于琥珀酰胆碱引起的肌痛和肌束震颤。
    UNASSIGNED: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective intervention for psychiatric patients. Succinylcholine is considered the drug of choice for muscle relaxation for ECT. Significant adverse effects of succinylcholine include fasciculation and myalgia. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenergic agonist. This study aims to determine the efficacy of a low dose of dexmedetomidine in reducing succinylcholine-induced myalgia in patients receiving ECT.
    UNASSIGNED: This randomised controlled trial was conducted on 100 patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing ECT, who were randomly allocated into two groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group D received intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine 0.25 µg/kg, and Group C received IV normal saline (0.9%). Patients\' self-reported myalgia scores were measured after 60 min of the procedure. Fasciculations were noted after IV succinylcholine administration. Heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) were measured at baseline, after infusion (5 min) and after ECT (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 30 min). Continuous data were analysed using a Student\'s t-test for two-group comparisons, a mixed model analysis of variance for group comparisons and various time point analyses. Categorical data were analysed using the Chi-square/Fisher\'s exact test.
    UNASSIGNED: There were no differences between the groups regarding demographics. Myalgia and fasciculations were less in Group D than in Group C (P < 0.001). MBP and HR changes were comparable (P > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: A low dose of dexmedetomidine (0.25 µg/kg) effectively reduces myalgia and fasciculations due to succinylcholine in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大量研究表明,电惊厥治疗(ECT)诱导海马神经可塑性,但关于其临床相关性的研究结果不一致.本研究旨在研究ECT诱导的前部和后部海马的可塑性,使用神经影像学中的数学复杂性测量,即功能磁共振成像时间序列的Higuchi分形维数(HFD)和皮质形态学分形维数(FD-CM)。此外,我们探讨了这些复杂性指标预测ECT治疗反应的潜力.
    方法:20例目前患有抑郁发作的患者(16例患有重度抑郁障碍,4例患有双相情感障碍)在ECT系列前后进行了MRI扫描。出于比较目的,还扫描了20名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者两次。静息状态fMRI数据进行了处理,计算前海马和后海马的HFD。计算前后海马HFD的分组效应,并检查HFD变化与抑郁严重程度改善之间的相关性。对于FD-CM分析,我们用CAT12的基于表面的方法预处理结构MRI。我们探讨了FD-CM的分组时间效应以及基线HFD和FD-CM对治疗结果的预测价值。
    结果:患者表现出从基线到随访扫描的双侧海马HFD显著增加。右前海马HFD增加与抑郁严重程度降低相关。我们在FD-CM中没有发现组间差异和组间时间效应。在应用全脑回归分析后,我们发现左侧颞极基线FD-CM可预测ECT后整体抑郁严重程度的降低。基线海马HFD不能预测治疗结果。
    结论:这项研究表明,HFD和FD-CM是研究ECT诱导的神经可塑性与治疗反应相关的有前景的成像标志物。
    BACKGROUND: Numerous studies show that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) induces hippocampal neuroplasticity, but findings are inconsistent regarding its clinical relevance. This study aims to investigate ECT-induced plasticity of anterior and posterior hippocampi using mathematical complexity measures in neuroimaging, namely Higuchi\'s fractal dimension (HFD) for fMRI time series and the fractal dimension of cortical morphology (FD-CM). Furthermore, we explore the potential of these complexity measures to predict ECT treatment response.
    METHODS: Twenty patients with a current depressive episode (16 with major depressive disorder and 4 with bipolar disorder) underwent MRI-scans before and after an ECT-series. Twenty healthy controls matched for age and sex were also scanned twice for comparison purposes. Resting-state fMRI data were processed, and HFD was computed for anterior and posterior hippocampi. Group-by-time effects for HFD in anterior and posterior hippocampi were calculated and correlations between HFD changes and improvement in depression severity were examined. For FD-CM analyses, we preprocessed structural MRI with CAT12\'s surface-based methods. We explored group-by-time effects for FD-CM and the predictive value of baseline HFD and FD-CM for treatment outcome.
    RESULTS: Patients exhibited a significant increase in bilateral hippocampal HFD from baseline to follow-up scans. Right anterior hippocampal HFD increase was associated with reductions in depression severity. We found no group differences and group-by-time effects in FD-CM. After applying a whole-brain regression analysis, we found that baseline FD-CM in the left temporal pole predicted reduction of overall depression severity after ECT. Baseline hippocampal HFD did not predict treatment outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that HFD and FD-CM are promising imaging markers to investigate ECT-induced neuroplasticity associated with treatment response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神病性双相抑郁(PBD)是一种普遍存在但尚未得到充分研究的精神疾病,并且没有具体的指南或食品和药物管理局批准的治疗药物。最近的研究表明,一些抗精神病药和心境稳定剂可能是有效的管理双相抑郁;然而,它们对PBD的有效性尚不清楚.鉴于迫切需要更集中的研究来管理PBD,我们进行了文献综述,以总结PBD的现有文献。
    方法:我们从20世纪60年代到2023年进行了一次电子文献检索,利用PubMed,MEDLINE,EMBASE,和谷歌,并根据它们与PBD的相关性选择研究。
    结果:PBD是一种复杂的疾病,50%-75%的双相情感障碍患者表现出精神病特征。在有精神病性躁狂症史的人群中,这种可能性增加。治疗指南通常建议使用情绪稳定剂的组合,抗精神病药,或者电休克疗法,但他们没有指定一线治疗。PBD症状可以被混合的高情绪和能量感觉掩盖,可能会延迟诊断和治疗,同时增加自杀风险。有限的研究评估了PBD各种治疗方法的结果,尽管缺乏良好疗效的证据,在临床实践中,抗精神病药经常被处方。值得注意的是,抗精神病药物与选择性去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂或三环类抗抑郁药联合使用可能有效,但是包括情绪稳定剂是必要的。
    结论:PBD由于其严重程度和对最佳治疗方法缺乏共识,对心理健康构成了重大挑战。迫切需要更多专门的临床试验和研究,以回答有关急性PBD的有效治疗的关键问题。理想的后续护理,不同疗法的反应者的特征,和后续治疗的决策模型。
    BACKGROUND: Psychotic bipolar depression (PBD) is a prevalent yet understudied psychiatric illness, and there are no specific guidelines or Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for its treatment. Recent studies suggest that some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers may be effective in managing bipolar depression; however, their effectiveness for PBD remains unclear. Given the urgent need for more focused research for managing PBD, we conducted a literature review to summarize the existing literature on PBD.
    METHODS: We conducted an electronic literature search from the 1960s to 2023, utilizing PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google, and selected studies based on their relevance to PBD.
    RESULTS: PBD is a complex disorder, with 50%-75% of patients with bipolar disorder exhibiting psychotic features. This likelihood increases among those with a history of psychotic mania. Treatment guidelines often recommend a combination of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, or electroconvulsive therapy, but they do not specify a first-line treatment. PBD symptoms can be masked by mixed high mood and energy feelings, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment while increasing suicide risk. Limited research has evaluated outcomes of various treatments for PBD, and despite the lack of evidence for superior efficacy, in clinical practice, antipsychotics are frequently prescribed. Notably, combining an antipsychotic with selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants may be effective, but including a mood stabilizer is necessary.
    CONCLUSIONS: PBD poses a significant challenge in mental health due to its severity and the lack of consensus on optimal treatment approaches. There is a critical need for more dedicated clinical trials and research to answer key questions about the effective treatment of acute PBD, ideal follow-up care, traits of responders to different therapies, and decision models for subsequent treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    据报道,与常规面罩通气相比,经鼻加湿快速吹气呼吸机交换(THRIVE)在麻醉诱导期间具有更好的疗效。包括改善氧合和延长安全呼吸暂停时间。这项研究报告了THRIVE系统在改良电惊厥治疗(mECT)期间对严重缺氧患者的有效性。一名78岁的双相情感障碍女性患者每四周接受一次维持mECT。她之前经历了一次严重的缺氧事件,电刺激后氧饱和度(SpO2)降至50%。作为回应,我们采用了THRIVE系统,旨在提供高流量,100%氧气,从而延长呼吸暂停耐受性。THRIVE的实施确保了稳定的氧气供应,在整个mECT过程中保持氧饱和度高于95%。THRIVE可用于治疗由于在mECT期间不可避免地缺乏通气而发生的缺氧。
    Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) has been reported to have better efficacy during anesthesia induction compared to conventional mask ventilation, including improved oxygenation and prolonged safe apnea time. This study reports on the effectiveness of the THRIVE system during modified electroconvulsive therapy (mECT) for a patient experiencing severe hypoxia. A 78-year-old female patient with bipolar disorder received maintenance mECT every four weeks. She previously experienced a significant hypoxic event, with oxygen saturation (SpO2) dropping to 50% following electrical stimulation. In response, we employed the THRIVE system, designed to deliver high-flow, 100% oxygen, thereby extending apnea tolerance. The implementation of THRIVE ensured a stable oxygen supply, maintaining oxygen saturation levels above 95% throughout the mECT procedure. THRIVE is useful for treating hypoxia that occurs due to the unavoidable lack of ventilation during mECT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号