OBJECTIVE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a prominent driver of lung cancer. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown efficacy in treating EGFR-mutant lung cancer, but the emergence of drug resistance poses a significant challenge. Recent research has highlighted solute carrier family 12 member 8 (SLC12A8) as one of the highly upregulated genes in various cancer types. However, its oncogenic function remains largely unexplored.
METHODS: 343 consecutive lung cancer patients were prospectively recruited and were followed for over 10 years. SLC12A8 expression in lung cancer tissues was measured by qPCR and was associated with patient survival. The association of SLC12A8 with TKI resistance was studied in in vitro EGFR-mutant lung cancer cell line as well as in in vivo xenograft tumor model. High-throughput kinome screening was employed to investigate SLC12A8-mediated oncogenic signaling pathway in lung cancer.
RESULTS: SLC12A8 is a predictive biomarker of poor prognosis in lung cancer, particularly in patients with EGFR mutations. SLC12A8 overexpression diminishes the effectiveness of TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, resulting in treatment failure and disease progression. More importantly, SLC12A8-induced TKI resistance is mediated by the PDK1/AKT signaling axis, while silencing SLC12A8 expression inhibits oncogenic PDK1/AKT signaling, restoring TKI sensitivity in lung cancer cells.
CONCLUSIONS: SLC12A8 mediates TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer via PDK1/AKT axis. These findings not only advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving TKI resistance, but also offer novel alternative strategies for the treatment of lung cancer.

Anti-tumor efficacy of targeted therapies is variable across patients and cancer types. Even in patients with initial deep response, tumors are typically not eradicated and eventually relapse. To address these challenges, we present a systematic screen for targets that limit the anti-tumor efficacy of EGFR and ALK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in colorectal cancer. Our approach includes genome-wide CRISPR screens with or without drugs targeting the oncogenic driver (\"anchor therapy\"), and large-scale pairwise combination screens of anchor therapies with 351 other drugs. Interestingly, targeting of a small number of genes, including MCL1, BCL2L1, and YAP1, sensitizes multiple cell lines to the respective anchor therapy. Data from drug combination screens with EGF816 and ceritinib indicate that dasatinib and agents disrupting microtubules act synergistically across many cell lines. Finally, we show that a higher-order-combination screen with 26 selected drugs in two resistant EGFR-mutant lung cancer cell lines identified active triplet combinations.

Driver mutations in lung cancer have been generally considered mutually exclusive; however, multiple gene screenings have recently become mainstream. Therefore, it is not uncommon to identify two or more mutations at first diagnosis, making it difficult to determine which tyrosine kinase inhibitor to administer. A 69-year-old woman complaining of back pain was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma T4N3M1c, stage IVB. Although PCR mutation test detected exon21 L858R point mutation by bronchoscopic sample, the therapeutic effect of afatinib was poor. Subsequently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel test of a metastasized bone specimen confirmed BRAF V600E. Furthermore, high sensitivity NGS panel system found the gene mutation allele frequency was higher for BRAF V600E than EGFR exon21 L858R for both primary lung tissue and the metastasized specimen. Subsequent BRAF/MEK inhibitor administration showed a remarkable treatment effect. When two or more driver mutations are detected in lung cancer, confirming the allelic frequency of the mutant gene might be useful in selecting more effective agents for front-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: Intrinsic or acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is common, thus strategies for the management of EGFR-TKIs resistance are urgently required. Ferroptosis is a recently discovered form of cell death that has been implicated in tumorigenesis and resistance treatment. Accumulating evidence suggests that ferroptosis can be therapeutically exploited for the treatment of solid tumors; however, whether ferroptosis can be targeted to treat EGFR mutant lung cancer and/or overcome the resistance to EGFR-TKIs is still unknown.
METHODS: The effect of ferroptosis inducers on a panel of EGFR mutant lung cancer cell lines, including those with EGFR-TKI intrinsic and acquired (generated by long-term exposure to the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib), was determined using cytotoxicity assays. Further, drug candidates to enhance the effect of ferroptosis inducers were screened through implementing WGCNA (weighted gene co-expression network analysis) and CMAP (connectivity map) analysis. Flow cytometry-based apoptosis and lipid hydroperoxides measurement were used to evaluate the cell fates after treatment.
RESULTS: Compared with EGFR-TKI-sensitive cells, those with intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI display high sensitivity to ferroptosis inducers. In addition, Vorinostat, a clinically used inhibitor targeting histone deacetylase, can robustly enhance the efficacy of ferroptosis inducers, leading to a dramatic increase of hydroperoxides in EGFR mutant lung cancer cells with intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. Mechanistically, Vorinostat promotes ferroptosis via xCT downregulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Ferroptosis-inducing therapy shows promise in EGFR-activating mutant lung cancer cells that display intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI. Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) Vorinostat can further promote ferroptosis by inhibiting xCT expression.

Lung adenocarcinomas harboring EGFR mutations do not respond to immune checkpoint blockade therapy and their EGFR wildtype counterpart. The mechanisms underlying this lack of clinical response have been investigated but remain incompletely understood.
We analyzed three cohorts of resected lung adenocarcinomas (Profiling of Resistance Patterns of Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Evaluation of Cancer of Thorax, Immune Genomic Profiling of NSCLC, and The Cancer Genome Atlas) and compared tumor immune microenvironment of EGFR-mutant tumors to EGFR wildtype tumors, to identify actionable regulators to target and potentially enhance the treatment response.
EGFR-mutant NSCLC exhibited low programmed death-ligand 1, low tumor mutational burden, decreased number of cytotoxic T cells, and low T cell receptor clonality, consistent with an immune-inert phenotype, though T cell expansion ex vivo was preserved. In an analysis of 75 immune checkpoint genes, the top up-regulated genes in the EGFR-mutant tumors (NT5E and ADORA1) belonged to the CD73/adenosine pathway. Single-cell analysis revealed that the tumor cell population expressed CD73, both in the treatment-naive and resistant tumors. Using coculture systems with EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells, T regulatory cell proportion was decreased with CD73 knockdown. In an immune-competent mouse model of EGFR-mutant lung cancer, the CD73/adenosine pathway was markedly up-regulated and CD73 blockade significantly inhibited tumor growth.
Our work revealed that EGFR-mutant NSCLC has an immune-inert phenotype. We identified the CD73/adenosine pathway as a potential therapeutic target for EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)TKI. Osimertinib is a cancer medicine that interferes with the growth and spread of cancer cells in the body. Osimertinib is used to treat a certain type of non-small cell lung cancer. We review some of the main challenges in targeting EGFR, including lack of central nervous system penetration with most tyrosine kinase inhibitors, activity of osimertinib penetrating blood-brain barrier and the efficacy of osimertinib.
METHODS: Guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, we conducted a systematic literature search in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science database on January 30, 2020, searching for studies investigating the osimertinib efficacy on patients with CNS metastases in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). And Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the certainty in the evidence.
RESULTS: The pooled results showed that the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 70% and 92%, respectively, in patients with T790M mutations. The efficacy of osimertinib was confirmed by the median progression free survival (PFS). In untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases patients, the pooled ORR and DCR of osimertinib were 71% and 93%, respectively. And the combined median PFS, achieved by osimertinib, was 12.21 months. Above data proved that osimertinib has well activity in disease control, especially in first line.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis confirmed that in treatment-naive advanced NSCLC CNS metastases harboring EGFR-TKI-sensitizing mutations, Osimertinib showed impressive antitumor activity.

Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) develop clinical resistance, most commonly with acquisition of EGFR T790M. Evolutionary modeling suggests that a schedule of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib may delay emergence of EGFR T790M. Pulse dose erlotinib has superior central nervous system (CNS) penetration and may result in superior CNS disease control.
We evaluated toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of twice weekly pulse and daily low-dose erlotinib. We assessed six escalating pulse doses of erlotinib.
We enrolled 34 patients; 11 patients (32%) had brain metastases at study entry. We observed 3 dose-limiting toxicities in dose escalation: transaminitis, mucositis, and rash. The MTD was erlotinib 1200 mg days 1-2 and 50 mg days 3-7 weekly. The most frequent toxicities (any grade) were rash, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and mucositis. 1 complete and 24 partial responses were observed (74%, 95% CI 60-84%). Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI 5.8-15.4 months). No patient had progression of an untreated CNS metastasis or developed a new CNS lesion while on study (0%, 95% CI 0-13%). Of the 18 patients with biopsies at progression, EGFR T790M was identified in 78% (95% CI 54-91%).
This is the first clinical implementation of an anti-cancer TKI regimen combining pulse and daily low-dose administration. This evolutionary modeling-based dosing schedule was well-tolerated but did not improve progression-free survival or prevent emergence of EGFR T790M, likely due to insufficient peak serum concentrations of erlotinib. This dosing schedule prevented progression of untreated or any new central nervous system metastases in all patients.

暂无摘要。