背景:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂,包括palbociclib,已被批准用于治疗激素受体(HR)阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性的晚期乳腺癌(ABC),并与血液学毒性有关。非洲裔美国妇女,在CDK4/6抑制剂临床试验中代表性不足,由于良性种族中性粒细胞减少症,可能会出现更严重的中性粒细胞减少症。作者专门研究了palbociclib在HR阳性/HER2阴性ABC的非裔美国女性中的血液学安全性。
方法:PALINA是单臂,开放标签,研究者发起的对HR阳性/HER2阴性ABC且基线绝对中性粒细胞计数≥1000/mm3的非裔美国女性进行palbociclib(每日125mg;21天和7天)加内分泌治疗(ET)的研究(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT02692755).主要结果是完成12个月治疗但未出现发热性中性粒细胞减少或因中性粒细胞减少而停止治疗的患者比例。使用单核苷酸多态性分析来评估Duffy多态性状态。
结果:35例患者接受了≥1剂量的palbociclib加ET;19例具有Duffy零多态性(胞嘧啶/胞嘧啶)。没有发热性中性粒细胞减少或由于中性粒细胞减少而永久停止研究的报告。与野生型变体相比,Duffy无效患者的3级和4级中性粒细胞减少症(72.2%vs23.1%;P=0.029)显着增加,并且需要palbociclib剂量减少(55.6%vs7.7%;P=.008)。Duffynull与野生型变体相比,患者的总体相对剂量强度较低(平均值±SD,分别为81.89%±15.87和95.67%±5.89;P=.0026)和较低的临床获益率(66.7%和84.6%,分别)。
结论:这些研究结果表明,在HR阳性/HER2阴性ABC的非裔美国女性中,palbociclib具有良好的耐受性。Duffy无效状态可能会影响3级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率,剂量强度,和可能的临床利益。
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including palbociclib, are approved to treat hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) and are associated with hematologic toxicity. African American women, who are underrepresented in CDK4/6 inhibitor clinical trials, may experience worse neutropenia because of benign ethnic neutropenia. The authors specifically investigated the hematologic safety of palbociclib in African American women with HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC.
PALINA was a single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated study of palbociclib (125 mg daily; 21 days on and 7 days off) plus endocrine therapy (ET) in African American women who had HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC and a baseline absolute neutrophil count ≥1000/mm3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02692755). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed 12 months of therapy without experiencing febrile neutropenia or treatment discontinuation because of neutropenia. Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis was used to assess Duffy polymorphism status.
Thirty-five patients received ≥1 dose of palbociclib plus ET; 19 had a Duffy null polymorphism (cytosine/cytosine). There were no reports of febrile neutropenia or permanent study discontinuation because of neutropenia. Significantly more patients with the Duffy null versus the wild-type variant had grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (72.2% vs 23.1%; P = .029) and required a palbociclib dose reduction (55.6% vs 7.7%; P = .008). Patients with the Duffy null versus the wild-type variant had lower overall relative dose intensity (mean ± SD, 81.89% ± 15.87 and 95.67% ± 5.89, respectively; P = .0026) and a lower clinical benefit rate (66.7% and 84.6%, respectively).
These findings suggest that palbociclib is well tolerated in African American women with HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC. Duffy null status may affect the incidence of grade 3 neutropenia, dose intensity, and possibly clinical benefit.