District of Columbia

哥伦比亚特区
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自从美国在2019年实现消除围产期艾滋病毒的目标以来,围产期艾滋病毒病例数一直在下降。我们旨在评估2018-2022年哥伦比亚特区(DC)地区围产期HIV传播的动态。
    方法:儿童国家医院(CNH)是大都会DC地区的主要转诊地点,包括马里兰州郊区和弗吉尼亚州,并评估该地区>95%的艾滋病毒暴露婴儿(HEI)。
    方法:2018-2022年在CNH观察到的围产期HIV暴露母婴对的回顾性队列研究。我们描述了人口统计,产时/产后管理,以及母亲和HEI之间的结果。
    结果:我们分析了503例HEI;大多数(78.9%)的围产期HIV风险较低。大多数母亲是非洲或非裔美国人(87.1%),分娩前后HIVRNA<50拷贝/mL(78.1%)。2018年和2020年,处于围产期HIV高危人群的HEI比例分别从28.2%下降至15.5%,但在2022年增加到24.8%。大多数HEI接受产后抗逆转录病毒药物至少4周(95.3%)。79名婴儿(15.7%)是由怀孕期间被诊断患有艾滋病毒的母亲所生的。两名婴儿(0.4%)被诊断为围产期获得性HIV。
    结论:我们报告说,母婴对中使用抗逆转录病毒药物的比例很高,大城市DC中围产期HIV传播率很低。尽管自2018年以来,高危围产期艾滋病毒暴露的数量减少了1.8倍,但这一比率在2022年反弹。仍有机会优化孕产妇护理并减少高风险HEI的数量。
    BACKGROUND: The number of perinatal HIV cases have continued to decline since the United States achieved the goal of perinatal HIV elimination in 2019. We aimed to evaluate dynamics in perinatal HIV transmission in the metropolitan District of Columbia (DC) area during 2018-2022.
    METHODS: Children\'s National Hospital\'s (CNH) is a major referral site for the metropolitan DC area, including suburban Maryland and Virginia, and evaluates >95% of HIV-exposed infants (HEI) in the region.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of mother-infant pairs with perinatal HIV exposure seen at CNH during 2018-2022. We describe the demographics, intrapartum/postpartum management, and outcomes among mothers and HEI.
    RESULTS: We analyzed 503 HEI; most (78.9%) were at low risk for perinatal HIV. Most mothers were African or African American (87.1%) and had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL around delivery (78.1%). The proportion of HEI at high risk for perinatal HIV decreased from 28.2% to 15.5% in 2018 and 2020, respectively, but increased to 24.8% in 2022. Most HEI received postnatal antiretroviral drugs for at least 4 weeks (95.3%). Seventy-nine infants (15.7%) were born to mothers diagnosed with HIV during pregnancy. Two infants (0.4%) were diagnosed with perinatally acquired HIV.
    CONCLUSIONS: We report high rates of antiretroviral drugs use among mother-infant pairs and a low rate of perinatal HIV transmission in metropolitan DC. Despite a 1.8-fold decrease in the number of high-risk perinatal HIV exposures since 2018, this rate rebounded in 2022. There remain opportunities to optimize maternal care and reduce the number of high-risk HEI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人类普遍的SARS-CoV-2感染已导致多次向动物传播事件。虽然SARS-CoV-2具有潜在的广泛的野生动物宿主范围,大多数记录在案的感染发生在圈养动物和单一野生动物物种中,白尾鹿.SARS-CoV-2在野生动物群落中的暴露程度以及影响野生动物传播风险的因素仍然未知。我们对SARS-CoV-2的23种野生动植物进行了采样,并研究了城市化和人类使用对血清阳性的影响。这里,我们记录了六个物种中SARS-CoV-2RNA的阳性检测,包括鹿老鼠,弗吉尼亚负鼠,浣熊,土拨鼠,东方棉尾,和东部红蝙蝠在2022年5月至2023年9月之间横跨弗吉尼亚州和华盛顿,D.C.,美国。此外,我们发现,人类活动高的地点的血清阳性率是人类活动低的地区的三倍。我们从六个物种的九个个体中获得了SARS-CoV-2基因组序列,这些个体被分配给Omicron变体的七个Pango谱系。与当时在人类中传播的变体的紧密匹配表明至少有七个最近的人到动物传播事件。我们的数据支持SARS-CoV-2在野生动植物社区中广泛暴露,并表明人类活动较高的地区可能成为跨物种传播的接触点。
    Pervasive SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans have led to multiple transmission events to animals. While SARS-CoV-2 has a potential broad wildlife host range, most documented infections have been in captive animals and a single wildlife species, the white-tailed deer. The full extent of SARS-CoV-2 exposure among wildlife communities and the factors that influence wildlife transmission risk remain unknown. We sampled 23 species of wildlife for SARS-CoV-2 and examined the effects of urbanization and human use on seropositivity. Here, we document positive detections of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in six species, including the deer mouse, Virginia opossum, raccoon, groundhog, Eastern cottontail, and Eastern red bat between May 2022-September 2023 across Virginia and Washington, D.C., USA. In addition, we found that sites with high human activity had three times higher seroprevalence than low human-use areas. We obtained SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences from nine individuals of six species which were assigned to seven Pango lineages of the Omicron variant. The close match to variants circulating in humans at the time suggests at least seven recent human-to-animal transmission events. Our data support that exposure to SARS-CoV-2 has been widespread in wildlife communities and suggests that areas with high human activity may serve as points of contact for cross-species transmission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阿片类药物过量是一项重大的公共卫生挑战。我们旨在了解华盛顿OUD患者参与阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的促进者和障碍,DC.
    方法:我们使用了横截面混合方法概念图方法来探索2021-2022年之间的MOUD参与。广大社区成员针对焦点提示产生了70个独特的陈述:“是什么使诸如丁丙诺啡(也称为Suboxone或Subutex)之类的阿片类药物使用障碍难以开始或继续使用?”OUD患者(n=23)和服务提供商(n=34)按主题和重要性对这些陈述进行分类和评级。采用多维标度和层次聚类分析对数据进行分析,制作主题聚类图。结果由我们的社区顾问委员会验证。
    结果:针对焦点提示出现了七个主题:可用性和可及性;绝望和恐惧;未满足的基本需求;治疗方案的特征;对治疗的理解和认识;个人动机,态度,和信仰;更容易使用药物。\"可用性和可访问性,\"\"绝望和恐惧,“”和“基本需求未得到满足”是消费者和提供商中MOUD的三大障碍;但是,这些优先级的顺序在消费者和提供者之间有所不同。明显缺乏沟通和编程来解决对MOUD功效的误解,副作用,和成本。污名强调了许多陈述,展示其在临床和社会空间的持续存在。
    结论:本研究通过以社区成员及其生活经历为中心,与其他有关MOUD传递和障碍的研究区分开来。调查结果强调需要扩大获得治疗的机会,消除与物质使用和MOUD相关的污名,并解决导致OUD患者深刻的绝望和恐惧感的潜在情况——所有这些都需要消费者采取集体行动,提供者,和公众。
    BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose is a major public health challenge. We aimed to understand facilitators and barriers to engagement in medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among persons with OUD in Washington, DC.
    METHODS: We used a cross-sectional mixed-methods concept mapping approach to explore MOUD engagement between 2021-2022. Community members at-large generated 70 unique statements in response to the focus prompt: \"What makes medication for opioid use disorder like buprenorphine (also known as Suboxone or Subutex) difficult to start or keep using?\" Persons with OUD (n = 23) and service providers (n = 34) sorted and rated these statements by theme and importance. Data were analyzed with multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, producing thematic cluster maps. Results were validated by our community advisory board.
    RESULTS: Seven themes emerged in response to the focus prompt: availability and accessibility; hopelessness and fear; unmet basic needs; characteristics of treatment programs; understanding and awareness of treatment; personal motivations, attitudes, and beliefs; and easier to use drugs. \"Availability and accessibility,\" \"hopelessness and fear,\" and \"basic needs not being met\" were the top three identified barriers to MOUD among consumers and providers; however, the order of these priorities differed between consumers and providers. There was a notable lack of communication and programming to address misconceptions about MOUD\'s efficacy, side effects, and cost. Stigma underscored many of the statements, showcasing its continued presence in clinical and social spaces.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study distinguishes itself from other research on MOUD delivery and barriers by centering on community members and their lived experiences. Findings emphasize the need to expand access to treatment, dismantle stigma associated with substance use and MOUD, and address underlying circumstances that contribute to the profound sense of hopelessness and fear among persons with OUD-all of which will require collective action from consumers, providers, and the public.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项横断面研究评估了华盛顿乙肝疫苗出生剂量拒绝率的趋势,DC,从2017年到2022年。
    This cross-sectional study evaluates trends in rates of hepatitis B vaccine birth dose refusals in Washington, DC, from 2017 to 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于HIV感染者(PWHs)中COVID-19发病率的研究显示出不同的结果。很少有研究调查COVID-19感染对健康和社会经济因素或COVID-19污名的影响。我们试图在一组PWHs中测量COVID-19感染的发生率和严重程度,表征相关的风险因素和影响,并记录对COVID-19相关污名的看法。
    方法:这项横断面研究的数据来自2020年10月30日至2022年12月31日对DC队列纵向研究参与者的COVID-19调查。调查结果与电子健康档案有关,包括HIV实验室检测结果和COVID检测结果。我们进行了比较人口统计学的分析,社会经济,艾滋病毒措施,以及有和没有自我报告COVID-19的人的污名。
    结果:在1972年的调查受访者中,17%自我报告COVID-19感染,在大流行的Omicron浪潮中发病率最高。我们发现年龄差异有统计学意义,就业状况,基本工人身份,教育,和家庭收入。HIV诊断持续时间越长,COVID-19的发病率越高。与未超重或肥胖的人相比,超重或肥胖的人患COVID-19的发生率更高。超过40%的COVID-19患者报告经历了至少一种形式的COVID-19相关的污名。
    结论:我们观察到DC的PWHs中COVID-19感染的发生率很高。此外,相当比例的COVID-19患者报告经历了与COVID-19相关的污名。这些发现补充了现有的关于新冠肺炎合并感染的文献,并强调了对经历新冠肺炎污名的人的认识和支持的必要性。
    Studies on the incidence of COVID-19 among persons with HIV (PWHs) present varied results. Few studies have investigated the impact of COVID-19 infection on health and socioeconomic factors or COVID-19 stigma. We sought to measure the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection among a cohort of PWHs, characterize associated risk factors and impact, and document perceptions of COVID-19-related stigma.
    Data for this cross-sectional study come from the COVID-19 survey of participants in the DC Cohort longitudinal study from October 30, 2020, through December 31, 2022. Survey results were linked to electronic health records, including HIV laboratory test results and COVID test results. We conducted analyses comparing demographic, socioeconomic, HIV measures, and stigma among those with and without self-reported COVID-19.
    Of 1972 survey respondents, 17% self-reported COVID-19 infection, with the greatest incidence in the Omicron wave of the pandemic. We found statistically significant differences by age, employment status, essential worker status, education, and household income. Longer duration of HIV diagnosis was associated with greater incidence of COVID-19. PWHs who were overweight or obese had a greater incidence of COVID-19 compared with those who were not. Over 40% of PWHs with COVID-19 reported experiencing at least 1 form of COVID-19-related stigma.
    We observed a high incidence of COVID-19 infection among PWHs in DC. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of PWHs with COVID-19 reported experiencing COVID-19-related stigma. These findings add to the existing literature on COVID-19 coinfection among PWHs and highlight the need for awareness and support for those experiencing COVID-19 stigma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2021年,美国约有75,000人死于与暴力有关的伤害。本报告总结了CDC的国家暴力死亡报告系统(NVDRS)在48个州发生的暴力死亡数据,哥伦比亚特区,和2021年的波多黎各。结果按性别报告,年龄组,种族和民族,伤害方法,受伤发生的位置类型,受伤的情况,和其他选定的特征。本报告介绍了其他事件和环境变量,现在包括儿童受害者的具体情况信息。这份报告还纳入了美国人口普查局新的种族和种族类别,现在占多个种族和夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民类别,并包括更新的分母来计算这些人口的比率。
    2021年。
    NVDRS从死亡证明中收集有关暴力死亡的数据,验尸官和法医记录,和执法报告。该报告包括2021年发生的暴力死亡数据。数据来自48个州(除佛罗里达州和夏威夷以外的所有州),哥伦比亚特区,波多黎各。46个州有全州数据,另外两个州的数据来自代表其人口子集的县(31个加州县,占其人口的64%,和德克萨斯州的13个县,占其人口的63%),哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各拥有全辖区的数据。NVDRS整理每个暴力死亡的信息,并链接相关的死亡(例如,多起凶杀案,然后是自杀,或多次自杀)成一个事件。
    到2021年,NVDRS收集了有关68,866起致命事件的信息,涉及48个州的70,688人死亡(46个州收集全州数据,加州31个县,和德克萨斯州的13个县),还有哥伦比亚特区.在NVDRS中捕获的死亡人数占所有凶杀案的86.5%,法律干预死亡,自杀,意外枪伤死亡,和2021年美国未定意图死亡。此外,收集了波多黎各816起致命事件的信息,涉及880人死亡.分别分析了波多黎各的数据。在70,688例死亡中,大多数(58.2%)是自杀,其次是凶杀案(31.5%),可能因暴力而导致的未定意图死亡(8.2%),法律干预死亡(1.3%)(即执法人员和其他有权使用致命武力执行职务的人造成的死亡,不包括法律处决),意外枪支伤害死亡(<1.0%)。“法律干预”一词是国际疾病分类中的一种分类,第十次修订,并不表示执法造成的死亡情况的合法性或合法性。人口模式和环境因死亡方式而异。男性的自杀率高于女性。在所有年龄组中,在≥85岁的成年人中自杀率最高.此外,非西班牙裔美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)的人在所有种族和族裔群体中自杀率最高。在男性和女性中,最常见的自杀伤害方法是枪支。在所有自杀受害者中,当情况已知时(84.4%),自杀之前最常见的是心理健康,亲密伴侣,或身体健康问题,或在过去或即将到来的2周内最近或即将发生的危机。男性的凶杀率高于女性。在所有凶杀受害者中,与其他年龄组相比,20-24岁人群的凶杀率最高。非西班牙裔黑人或非裔美国人(黑人)男性在任何种族或族裔群体中的凶杀率最高。在所有凶杀受害者中,最常见的伤害方法是枪支。当知道凶杀案受害者和嫌疑人之间的关系时,犯罪嫌疑人通常是男性受害者的熟人或朋友,以及女性受害者的现任或前任亲密伴侣。杀人通常是由争论或冲突引发的,与另一起犯罪发生的,或者,对于女性受害者来说,与亲密伴侣暴力有关。几乎所有法律干预死亡的受害者都是男性,30-34岁男性的法律干预死亡率最高。法律干预死亡率在AI/AN男性中最高,其次是黑人男性。在大多数法律干预死亡中使用了枪支。当情况已知时,据报道,法律干预死亡的最常见情况如下:受害者在事件中使用了武器,受害者有药物使用问题(酒精使用除外)。其他死亡原因包括无意枪支伤害死亡和未确定意图死亡。男性最常见的意外枪支伤害死亡,非西班牙裔白人,和15-24岁的人。这些死亡最常发生在射手玩枪支时,并被一个人无意中拉动扳机而引起。不确定意图的死亡率在男性中最高,特别是在AI/AN和黑人男性中,以及30-54岁的成年人。中毒是意图不明的死亡中最常见的伤害方法,在接受这些物质测试的近80%的死者中检测到阿片类药物。
    本报告提供了NVDRS关于2021年发生的暴力死亡的数据的详细摘要。自杀率在AI/AN和白人男性中最高,而黑人男性的凶杀率最高。亲密伴侣暴力引发了很大一部分女性杀人事件。心理健康问题,亲密伴侣的问题,人际冲突,和急性生活压力源是检查的多种类型死亡的主要诱因。
    暴力是可以预防的,数据可以指导公共卫生行动。NVDRS数据用于监测与暴力有关的致命伤害的发生,并协助公共卫生当局制定,实施,和评估项目,政策,以及减少和预防暴力死亡的做法。NVDRS数据可用于将预防工作增强为可操作的策略。各州或辖区已使用其暴力死亡报告系统(VDRS)数据来指导自杀预防工作,并强调需要进一步关注的地方。例如,北卡罗莱纳州VDRS计划数据在扩大与枪支安全和伤害预防有关的活动方面发挥了重要作用。该程序作为合作伙伴的主要数据源,这导致了该州预防暴力办公室的成立,专注于打击与枪支有关的死亡。在缅因州,VDRS提供了有关执法人员自杀的数据,这些数据用于帮助支持一项法案,该法案要求在该州的执法培训学院进行心理健康弹性和意识培训,以及针对心理健康的类似培训计划,物质使用,惩教人员中的酒精问题。此外,州和司法管辖区也使用其VDRS数据来检查与其州或司法管辖区的凶杀有关的因素。例如,佐治亚州VDRS与亚特兰大市长减少暴力办公室合作,开发了两个公共仪表板,不仅提供有关暴力死亡的全面数据,而且还提供有关受暴力影响严重的人口地理分布的数据,以帮助为预防暴力干预措施提供信息。
    In 2021, approximately 75,000 persons died of violence-related injuries in the United States. This report summarizes data from CDC\'s National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) on violent deaths that occurred in 48 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico in 2021. Results are reported by sex, age group, race and ethnicity, method of injury, type of location where the injury occurred, circumstances of injury, and other selected characteristics. This report introduces additional incident and circumstance variables, which now include child victim-specific circumstance information. This report also incorporates new U.S. Census Bureau race and ethnicity categories, which now account for more than one race and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander categories and include updated denominators to calculate rates for these populations.
    2021.
    NVDRS collects data regarding violent deaths from death certificates, coroner and medical examiner records, and law enforcement reports. This report includes data collected for violent deaths that occurred in 2021. Data were collected from 48 states (all states with exception of Florida and Hawaii), the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Forty-six states had statewide data, two additional states had data from counties representing a subset of their population (31 California counties, representing 64% of its population, and 13 Texas counties, representing 63% of its population), and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico had jurisdiction-wide data. NVDRS collates information for each violent death and links deaths that are related (e.g., multiple homicides, homicide followed by suicide, or multiple suicides) into a single incident.
    For 2021, NVDRS collected information on 68,866 fatal incidents involving 70,688 deaths that occurred in 48 states (46 states collecting statewide data, 31 California counties, and 13 Texas counties), and the District of Columbia. The deaths captured in NVDRS accounted for 86.5% of all homicides, legal intervention deaths, suicides, unintentional firearm injury deaths, and deaths of undetermined intent in the United States in 2021. In addition, information was collected for 816 fatal incidents involving 880 deaths in Puerto Rico. Data for Puerto Rico were analyzed separately. Of the 70,688 deaths, the majority (58.2%) were suicides, followed by homicides (31.5%), deaths of undetermined intent that might be due to violence (8.2%), legal intervention deaths (1.3%) (i.e., deaths caused by law enforcement and other persons with legal authority to use deadly force acting in the line of duty, excluding legal executions), and unintentional firearm injury deaths (<1.0%). The term \"legal intervention\" is a classification incorporated into the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and does not denote the lawfulness or legality of the circumstances surrounding a death caused by law enforcement.Demographic patterns and circumstances varied by manner of death. The suicide rate was higher for males than for females. Across all age groups, the suicide rate was highest among adults aged ≥85 years. In addition, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons had the highest suicide rates among all racial and ethnic groups. Among both males and females, the most common method of injury for suicide was a firearm. Among all suicide victims, when circumstances were known (84.4%), suicide was most often preceded by a mental health, intimate partner, or physical health problem or by a recent or impending crisis during the previous or upcoming 2 weeks. The homicide rate was higher for males than for females. Among all homicide victims, the homicide rate was highest among persons aged 20-24 years compared with other age groups. Non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) males experienced the highest homicide rate of any racial or ethnic group. Among all homicide victims, the most common method of injury was a firearm. When the relationship between a homicide victim and a suspect was known, the suspect was most frequently an acquaintance or friend for male victims and a current or former intimate partner for female victims. Homicide most often was precipitated by an argument or conflict, occurred in conjunction with another crime, or, for female victims, was related to intimate partner violence. Nearly all victims of legal intervention deaths were male, and the legal intervention death rate was highest among men aged 30-34 years. The legal intervention death rate was highest among AI/AN males, followed by Black males. A firearm was used in the majority of legal intervention deaths. When circumstances were known, the most frequent circumstances reported for legal intervention deaths were as follows: the victim used a weapon in the incident and the victim had a substance use problem (other than alcohol use). Other causes of death included unintentional firearm injury deaths and deaths of undetermined intent. Unintentional firearm injury deaths were most frequently experienced by males, non-Hispanic White (White) persons, and persons aged 15-24 years. These deaths most frequently occurred while the shooter was playing with a firearm and were precipitated by a person unintentionally pulling the trigger. The rate of deaths of undetermined intent was highest among males, particularly among AI/AN and Black males, and among adults aged 30-54 years. Poisoning was the most common method of injury in deaths of undetermined intent, and opioids were detected in nearly 80% of decedents tested for those substances.
    This report provides a detailed summary of data from NVDRS on violent deaths that occurred in 2021. The suicide rate was highest among AI/AN and White males, whereas the homicide rate was highest among Black males. Intimate partner violence precipitated a large proportion of homicides for females. Mental health problems, intimate partner problems, interpersonal conflicts, and acute life stressors were primary precipitating circumstances for multiple types of deaths examined.
    Violence is preventable, and data can guide public health action. NVDRS data are used to monitor the occurrence of violence-related fatal injuries and assist public health authorities in developing, implementing, and evaluating programs, policies, and practices to reduce and prevent violent deaths. NVDRS data can be used to enhance prevention efforts into actionable strategies. States or jurisdictions have used their Violent Death Reporting System (VDRS) data to guide suicide prevention efforts and highlight where additional focus is needed. For example, North Carolina VDRS program data have played a significant role in expanding activities related to firearm safety and injury prevention. The program served as a primary data source for partners, which led to the creation of the Office of Violence Prevention in the state, focusing on combatting firearm-related deaths. In Maine, the VDRS provided data on law enforcement officer suicides that were used to help support a bill mandating mental health resiliency and awareness training in the state\'s law enforcement training academy, along with plans for similar training addressing mental health, substance use, and alcohol problems among corrections officers. In addition, states and jurisdictions have also used their VDRS data to examine factors related to homicide in their state or jurisdiction. For example, Georgia VDRS collaborated with the City of Atlanta Mayor\'s Office of Violence Reduction to develop two public dashboards that not only offer comprehensive data on violent deaths but also present data on the geographic distribution of populations disproportionately affected by violence to help inform violence prevention interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在1913年至1917年之间,《精神分析评论》发表了几项研究,认为黑人的心理截然不同。它们是由该杂志的联合创始人编辑的,威廉·阿兰森·怀特,由华盛顿圣伊丽莎白医院的工作人员进行,DC,怀特担任总监的地方。本文提供了一个简短的历史背景,以更好地理解《评论》为什么以及如何关注种族的比较研究。
    Between 1913 and 1917, The Psychoanalytic Review published several studies that argued for a distinct Black psyche. They were edited by the journal\'s co-founder, William Alanson White, and conducted by the staff at Saint Elizabeths Hospital in Washington, DC, where White served as superintendent. This article provides a brief historical context for better understanding of why and how The Review paid attention to the comparative study of race.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的数据表明,华盛顿非裔美国居民中阿片类药物过量死亡人数上升,DC.
    目的:我们强调了一种社区知情的方法来评估DC居民对阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的态度(2019年2月至2020年3月)。
    方法:与值得信赖的社区领导者进行的聆听之旅导致了社区咨询委员会(CAB)的成立。当COVID-19大流行于2020年3月开始时,社区对话完全变成了虚拟的。CAB与学术领导人合作,共同创造项目使命和价值观,并集中社区对阿片类药物使用及其原因的关注,处理结构,和有效参与的促进者。
    结果:为社区成员的参与创建了采访指南,使用CAB突出显示的值。CAB强调,除了阿片类药物问题,有效的参与必须解决社区经验,集体优势/韧性,以及土著领导人的作用。
    结论:在项目实施之前让社区参与,并与社区价值观保持一致,有助于阿片类药物使用障碍评估。社区知情评估对于建立社区信任至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Recent data indicate rising opioid overdose deaths among African American residents of Washington, DC.
    OBJECTIVE: We highlight a community-informed approach to assessing attitudes toward opioid use disorder treatment among DC residents (February 2019 to March 2020).
    METHODS: A listening tour with trusted community leaders led to the formation of a Community Advisory Board (CAB). When the COVID-19 pandemic commenced in March 2020, community dialogues became exclusively virtual. The CAB partnered with academic leaders to co-create project mission and values and center the community\'s concerns related to opioid use and its causes, treatment structure, and facilitators of effective engagement.
    RESULTS: Interview guides were created for the engagement of community members, using values highlighted by the CAB. The CAB underscored that in addition to opioid problems, effective engagement must address community experience, collective strengths/resilience, and the role of indigenous leadership.
    CONCLUSIONS: Engaging community prior to project implementation and maintaining alignment with community values facilitated opioid use disorder assessments. Community-informed assessments may be critical to building community trust.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    种族居住隔离被认为是健康不平等的根本原因。这是历史和当代政策的结果,例如重新划分造成了种族的地理隔离,并与促进健康的资源分配不公平相对应。在公众可及性的早期阶段,精简和种族居住隔离可能导致COVID-19疫苗管理中的种族不平等。我们使用来自国家档案馆的数据(历史重新标记),住房抵押贷款披露法(当代红线),1940年(历史种族居住隔离)和2015-2019年(当代种族居住隔离)的美国社区调查,和华盛顿特区政府(COVID-19疫苗接种管理)评估重签之间的关系,种族居住隔离,和COVID-19疫苗在疫苗分销的早期阶段施用,当时由于供应有限而建立了分层系统。皮尔逊相关性被用来评估是否重新划分和种族隔离,从历史和当代角度衡量,在华盛顿特区相互关联随后,线性回归用于评估这些指标中的每一个是否与COVID-19疫苗施用相关。在历史和当代分析中,修订和种族居住隔离之间存在正相关。Further,修订和种族居住隔离均与新型COVID-19疫苗的施用呈正相关。这项研究强调了重新划分和隔离导致种族健康不平等的持续方式。消除美国社会中的种族健康不平等需要解决影响获得健康促进资源的根本原因。
    Racial residential segregation has been deemed a fundamental cause of health inequities. It is a result of historical and contemporary policies such as redlining that have created a geographic separation of races and corresponds with an inequitable distribution of health-promoting resources. Redlining and racial residential segregation may have contributed to racial inequities in COVID-19 vaccine administration in the early stages of public accessibility. We use data from the National Archives (historical redlining), Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (contemporary redlining), American Community Survey from 1940 (historical racial residential segregation) and 2015-2019 (contemporary racial residential segregation), and Washington D.C. government (COVID-19 vaccination administration) to assess the relationships between redlining, racial residential segregation, and COVID-19 vaccine administration during the early stages of vaccine distribution when a tiered system was in place due to limited supply. Pearson correlation was used to assess whether redlining and racial segregation, measured both historically and contemporarily, were correlated with each other in Washington D.C. Subsequently, linear regression was used to assess whether each of these measures associate with COVID-19 vaccine administration. In both historical and contemporary analyses, there was a positive correlation between redlining and racial residential segregation. Further, redlining and racial residential segregation were each positively associated with administration of the novel COVID-19 vaccine. This study highlights the ongoing ways in which redlining and segregation contribute to racial health inequities. Eliminating racial health inequities in American society requires addressing the root causes that affect access to health-promoting resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Congress
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号