Diagnosis-Related Groups

诊断相关组
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不良事件(AE)是医疗保健系统的重要关注点。然而,由于各种医疗服务的复杂性,很难评估它们的影响。本研究旨在使用诊断相关组(DRG)数据库评估AEs对住院患者预后的影响。我们对中国一家拥有2200张床位的多地区三级医院的住院患者进行了病例对照研究,使用DRG数据库中的数据。AE是指由需要额外住院治疗的医疗护理引起或促成的非预期身体伤害。监测,治疗,甚至死亡。相对重量(RW),DRG的特定指标,用来衡量诊断和治疗的难度,疾病严重程度,和医疗资源的利用。主要结果是住院时间(LOS)和住院费用。次要结果是出院回家。本研究应用了基于DRG的匹配,霍奇斯-莱曼估计,回归分析,和亚组分析评估AE对结局的影响。通过排除短LOS和改变调整因子进行了两项敏感性分析,以评估结果的稳健性。我们确定了2690名住院患者,他们被分为329个DRG,包括1345例出现AE的患者(病例组)和1345例DRG匹配的正常对照。Hodges-Lehmann估计和广义线性回归分析显示,AE导致LOS延长(未经调整的差异,7天,95%置信区间[CI]6-8天;调整后的差异,8.31天,95%CI7.16-9.52天)和超额住院费用(未调整差额,$2186.40,95%CI:$1836.87-$2559.16;调整后的差额,2822.67美元,95%CI:2351.25美元-3334.88美元)。Logistic回归分析显示,AEs与出院回家的几率较低相关(未调整比值比[OR]0.66,95%CI0.54-0.82;调整后OR0.75,95%CI0.61-0.93)。亚组分析表明,每个亚组的结果基本一致。在复杂疾病(RW≥2)和与高度伤害亚组(中度伤害及以上组)相关的AE后,LOS和住院费用显着增加。在敏感性分析中获得了类似的结果。AE的负担,特别是那些与复杂疾病和严重危害有关的疾病,在中国意义重大。DRG数据库是有价值的信息源,可用于评估和管理AE。
    Adverse events (AEs) are a significant concern for healthcare systems. However, it is difficult to evaluate their influence because of the complexity of various medical services. This study aimed to assess the influence of AEs on the outcomes of hospitalized patients using a diagnosis-related group (DRG) database. We conducted a case-control study of hospitalized patients at a multi-district tertiary hospital with 2200 beds in China, using data from a DRG database. An AE refers to an unintended physical injury caused or contributed to by medical care that requires additional hospitalization, monitoring, treatment, or even death. Relative weight (RW), a specific indicator of DRG, was used to measure the difficulty of diagnosis and treatment, disease severity, and medical resources utilized. The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs. The secondary outcome was discharge to home. This study applied DRG-based matching, Hodges-Lehmann estimate, regression analysis, and subgroup analysis to evaluate the influence of AEs on outcomes. Two sensitivity analyses by excluding short LOS and changing adjustment factors were performed to assess the robustness of the results. We identified 2690 hospitalized patients who had been divided into 329 DRGs, including 1345 patients who experienced AEs (case group) and 1345 DRG-matched normal controls. The Hodges-Lehmann estimate and generalized linear regression analysis showed AEs led to prolonged LOS (unadjusted difference, 7 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6-8 days; adjusted difference, 8.31 days, 95% CI 7.16-9.52 days) and excess hospitalization costs (unadjusted difference, $2186.40, 95% CI: $1836.87-$2559.16; adjusted difference, $2822.67, 95% CI: $2351.25-$3334.88). Logistic regression analysis showed AEs were associated with lower odds of discharge to home (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.82; adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93). The subgroup analyses showed that the results for each subgroup were largely consistent. LOS and hospitalization costs increased significantly after AEs in complex diseases (RW ≥ 2) and in relation to high degrees of harm subgroups (moderate harm and above groups). Similar results were obtained in sensitivity analyses. The burden of AEs, especially those related to complex diseases and severe harm, is significant in China. The DRG database serves as a valuable source of information that can be utilized for the evaluation and management of AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不合理的药物治疗和不断增加的药物成本仍然是医疗保健系统中的主要问题。预计药剂师将使用诊断相关组(DRG)数据来分析住院药房的使用情况。
    该项目旨在试行一个由药剂师主导的有效计划,以分析与药房费用相关的因素,评估药品在批量处理中的合理使用,并根据DRG数据进行进一步干预。
    选择了来自OB25(无合并症或并发症的剖宫产)DRG的患者,并通过统计分析确定了最相关的因素。从2019年开始,通过向该部门发送有关相同DRG的处方数据和药物审查结果的月度报告来实施干预措施。进行了事后比较,以证明在中国拥有2,300张病床的三级教学医院中,药房成本和适当性的变化。
    从2018年的OB25DRG数据中确定了1,110例患者。多元线性分析表明,处方和病房的数量大大影响了药房的支出。标记为至关重要的药物,必要的,非必要药物显示,总药房费用的46.6%用于非必需药物,而38.7%用于重要药物。大量减少使用不适当的药品和药品,2020年干预后的平均药房成本为336.7元。该方案的效益成本比为9.86。
    基于DRG数据的干预措施对于降低住院药房成本和非必需药物使用非常有效和可行。
    UNASSIGNED: Irrational pharmacotherapy and increasing pharmacy costs remain major concerns in healthcare systems. Pharmacists are expected to employ diagnosis-related group (DRG) data to analyse inpatient pharmacy utilization.
    UNASSIGNED: This project aimed to pilot an efficient pharmacist-led programme to analyse factors related to pharmacy expenses, evaluate the rational use of drugs in batch processing, and make further interventions based on DRG data.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients from the OB25 (caesarean section without comorbidities or complications) DRG were selected in 2018, and the most relevant factors were identified through statistical analysis. Interventions were implemented by sending monthly reports on prescribing data and drug review results for the same DRGs to the department starting in 2019. Pre-post comparisons were conducted to demonstrate changes in pharmacy costs and appropriateness at a tertiary teaching hospital with 2,300 beds in China.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,110 patients were identified from the OB25 DRG data in 2018. Multivariate linear analysis indicated that the number of items prescribed and wards substantially influenced pharmacy expenditure. Drugs labelled as vital, essential, and non-essential revealed that 46.6% of total pharmacy costs were spent on non-essential drugs, whereas 38.7% were spent on vital drugs. The use of inappropriate pharmaceuticals and drug items was substantially reduced, and the average pharmacy cost after intervention was 336.7 RMB in 2020. The benefit-cost ratio of the programme was 9.86.
    UNASSIGNED: Interventions based on DRG data are highly efficient and feasible for reducing inpatient pharmacy costs and non-essential drug use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍麻醉师在患者的术前优化和术后管理中发挥着越来越重要的作用,通常在所谓的围手术期家庭的背景下。这些努力通常包括增强手术后恢复(ERAS)协议,并且通常由麻醉师领导的团队进行围手术期管理。对这种方法的成本效益的研究通常是在单一机构进行的,大多数病人由少数外科医生照顾。这种限制产生了关于改进是否主要与组织文化或所研究的外科医生实践(不可推广)与程序(可推广)相关的普遍性问题。我们研究了在单个机构采用研究过的流程改进策略后,其他组织是否可以依靠实现类似的收益。方法纳入2015年10月至2022年6月在佛罗里达州非联邦医院接受择期主要治疗性住院手术的所有患者。对于每次放电,美国医疗保险严重程度诊断相关组(MS-DRG)加权因子(即,确定报销的医院基本入院率的乘数)和主要程序的临床分类软件改进(CCSR)代码在入院和出院时根据这些时间点的诊断结果从该州的住院医疗保健数据库中确定。从入院到出院的加权因子的增加代表了围手术期并发症的社会成本。全州范围内,医院,和外科医生,我们计算了每个CCSR加权因子的总增加量。我们的主要假设是,外科医生的变异性在统计学上大于CCSR变异性,但增量效应<5%。如果CCSR和外科医生的变异性具有可比性,这将支持普遍性。相比之下,如果有与外科医生有关的主要影响,一个机构的结果可能不适用于其他机构。结果在研究的1,482,344次出院中,合并(N=7年)对MS-DRG加权因子增加的贡献从较高的20%的外科医生比从较高的20%的CCSR(95%CI1.9%-3.9%,p=0.0006)。这些CCSR占85.5%(95%CI79.4%-91.7%,p<0.0001)的MS-DRG加权因子总增加量。在CCSR中,每家医院的前两名外科医生对该医院权重因子增加的平均贡献从68%到97%不等。在每家医院执行病例总数至少10%的外科医生的中位数和第75百分位数与对MS-DRG加权因子增加的贡献值相似,中位数为2.0至3.0,第75百分位数1.75至4.0。结论由于外科医生对MS-DRG加权因子增加的贡献差异仅略微超过CCSR手术类别之间的差异,涉及单一机构和少数外科医生的围手术期家庭和ERAS研究研究结果很可能可推广到其他医院和医疗保健系统.基于与缺乏普遍性相关的担忧,资助机构不应犹豫资助单中心围手术期家庭研究和ERAS干预措施。
    Introduction There is an expanding role for anesthesiologists in the preoperative optimization and postoperative management of patients, often in the context of a so-called perioperative surgical home. Such efforts typically include enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and often an anesthesiologist-led team for perioperative management. Studies of the cost-effectiveness of such approaches have generally been conducted at single institutions, with most patients cared for by small numbers of surgeons. This limitation creates generalizability issues as to whether improvement was related mostly to organizational culture or the studied surgeons\' practices (non-generalizable) versus the procedures (generalizable). We studied whether other organizations can rely on achieving similar benefits following the adoption of a studied process improvement strategy at a single institution. Methods All patients undergoing elective major therapeutic inpatient surgery discharged between October 2015 and June 2022 at non-federal hospitals in the state of Florida were included. For each discharge, the United States Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) weighting factor (i.e., the multiplier for the hospital\'s base rate for admissions that determines reimbursement) and the Clinical Classification Software Refined (CCSR) code for the principal procedure were determined at admission and discharge from the state\'s inpatient healthcare database based on the diagnoses present at those time points. An increase in the weighting factor from admission to discharge represents societal costs from perioperative complications. Statewide, by hospital, and by surgeon, we calculated the total increase for each CCSR\'s weighting factor. Our primary hypothesis was that surgeon variability would be statistically greater than CCSR variability but that the incremental effect would be <5%. If CCSR and surgeon variability were comparable, this would be supportive of generalizability. In contrast, if there were a predominant effect related to the surgeon, results from one institution might not be applicable to others. Results Among the 1,482,344 discharges studied, the pooled (N=7 years) contributions to MS-DRG weighting factor increases from the upper 20% of surgeons were 2.8% more than from the upper 20% of CCSRs (95% CI 1.9%-3.9%, p=0.0006). Those CCSRs accounted for 85.5% (95% CI 79.4%-91.7%, p<0.0001) of the total increase in the MS-DRG weighting factor. The average contribution of the top two surgeons at each hospital to that hospital\'s increase in the weighting factor ranged among CCSRs from 68% to 97%. The median and 75th percentile of surgeons performing at least 10% of the total number of cases at each hospital was similar to those values for the contributions to the increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor, median 2.0 to 3.0, and 75th percentile 1.75 to 4.0. Conclusions Because variability among surgeons in their contributions to increases in the MS-DRG weighting factor only slightly exceeded the variability among CCSR surgical categories, perioperative surgical home and ERAS study research results involving single institutions and a small number of surgeons would likely be generalizable to other hospitals and healthcare systems. Funding agencies should not be hesitant to fund single-center perioperative surgical home studies and ERAS interventions based on concerns related to lack of generalizability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医院服务通常使用病例组合工具进行报销,该工具根据诊断和程序对患者进行分组。我们最近开发了一种案例混合工具(即,Queralt系统)旨在支持临床医生进行患者管理。在这项研究中,我们比较了一种广泛使用的工具的性能(即,APR-DRG)与Queralt系统。
    方法:对加泰罗尼亚卫生研究所的八家医院中的任何一家进行了所有入院的回顾性分析(即,大约,2019年加泰罗尼亚所有住院治疗的30%)。成本是从完全成本核算中检索的。使用电子健康记录来计算APR-DRG组和Queralt指数,及其用于诊断的不同子指标(主要诊断,入院时合并症,以及住院期间发生的并发症)和手术(主要和次要手术)。主要目标是工具的预测能力;我们还调查了效率和组内同质性。
    结果:分析包括166,837次住院事件,平均成本为4935欧元(中位数2616;四分位数范围1011-5543)。Queralt系统的组件具有更高的效率(即,每个病例组合工具中增加的组百分比所涵盖的费用和住院百分比)和较低的异质性.在预先设定的阈值下预测成本的逻辑模型(即,80岁,第90,和第95百分位数)显示了Queralt系统的更好性能,特别是当结合诊断和程序(DP)时:80岁的接收器工作特性曲线下的面积,第90,APR-DRG的第95个成本百分位数分别为0.904、0.882和0.863,和0.958、0.945和0.928的QueraltDP;APR-DRG的精确召回曲线下面积的相应值分别为0.522、0.604和0.699,以及0.748、0.7966和0.834的QueraltDP。同样,预测实际成本的线性模型在Queralt系统的情况下拟合更好。
    结论:Queralt系统,最初开发用于预测医院结果,对预测住院费用具有良好的性能和效率。
    BACKGROUND: Hospital services are typically reimbursed using case-mix tools that group patients according to diagnoses and procedures. We recently developed a case-mix tool (i.e., the Queralt system) aimed at supporting clinicians in patient management. In this study, we compared the performance of a broadly used tool (i.e., the APR-DRG) with the Queralt system.
    METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all admissions occurred in any of the eight hospitals of the Catalan Institute of Health (i.e., approximately, 30% of all hospitalizations in Catalonia) during 2019. Costs were retrieved from a full cost accounting. Electronic health records were used to calculate the APR-DRG group and the Queralt index, and its different sub-indices for diagnoses (main diagnosis, comorbidities on admission, andcomplications occurred during hospital stay) and procedures (main and secondary procedures). The primary objective was the predictive capacity of the tools; we also investigated efficiency and within-group homogeneity.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 166,837 hospitalization episodes, with a mean cost of € 4,935 (median 2,616; interquartile range 1,011-5,543). The components of the Queralt system had higher efficiency (i.e., the percentage of costs and hospitalizations covered by increasing percentages of groups from each case-mix tool) and lower heterogeneity. The logistic model for predicting costs at pre-stablished thresholds (i.e., 80th, 90th, and 95th percentiles) showed better performance for the Queralt system, particularly when combining diagnoses and procedures (DP): the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the 80th, 90th, 95th cost percentiles were 0.904, 0.882, and 0.863 for the APR-DRG, and 0.958, 0.945, and 0.928 for the Queralt DP; the corresponding values of area under the precision-recall curve were 0.522, 0.604, and 0.699 for the APR-DRG, and 0.748, 0.7966, and 0.834 for the Queralt DP. Likewise, the linear model for predicting the actual cost fitted better in the case of the Queralt system.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Queralt system, originally developed to predict hospital outcomes, has good performance and efficiency for predicting hospitalization costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自2019年以来,国家卫生健康委员会和中国其他相关部门已在30个试点地点启动了诊断相关组(DRGs)系统的测试。在DRG支付改革的过程中,疾病费用的核算已成为一个极具挑战性的问题。传统的疾病核算方法忽视了对医务人员知识资本价值的补偿。
    本研究的主要目的是分析中国诊断相关组(C-DRG)的成本核算方案,关注知识资本的价值。
    研究初步提出了知识型资本价值的计量指标体系,包括疾病治疗的困难,疾病治疗的劳动强度,疾病治疗的风险,以及疾病的手术/治疗时间。然后利用层次分析法(AHP)来衡量医务人员的知识资本价值特征。首先,在此阶段进行成对比较,以建立主要指标的两对判断矩阵。第二,计算矩阵最大特征值对应的特征向量,生成每个特征的权重系数。在此阶段之后进行一致性测试。通过收集数据进行了实证分析,包括治疗三种疾病的全部费用-髋关节置换术,急性单纯性阑尾炎,和心脏搭桥手术-来自一家公共医疗机构。
    实证分析研究了这种DRG成本核算会计是否可以解决忽视医务人员知识资本价值的问题。这些方法重新配置了正向激励机制,激发医疗服务体系的内生动力,促进医疗行为的独立变化,达到合理控制成本的目标。
    在C-DRG的成本核算系统中,医务人员知识资本的价值是公认的。这种认可不仅提高了医务工作者优化和规范诊疗流程的积极性和创造性,而且提高了DRG定价的透明度和真实性。这在医疗机构内的诊断和治疗过程的优化和标准化以及在监测这些机构内的不适当的医疗实践中尤其明显。
    UNASSIGNED: The National Health Commission and the other relevant departments in China have initiated testing of the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) system in 30 pilot locations since 2019. In the process of DRG payment reform, accounting for the costs of diseases has become a highly challenging issue. The traditional method of disease accounting method overlooks the compensation for the knowledge capital value of medical personnel.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary objective of this study is to analyze the cost accounting scheme of China\'s Diagnosis Related Groups (C-DRG), focusing on the value of knowledge capital.
    UNASSIGNED: The study initially proposes a measurement index system for the value of knowledge-based capital, including the difficulty of disease treatment, labor intensity of disease treatment, risk of disease treatment, and operation/treatment time for diseases. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is then utilized to weigh the features of medical workers\' knowledge capital value. First, pairwise comparisons are conducted in this stage to develop a two-pair judgment matrix of the primary indicators. Second, the eigenvectors corresponding to the maximum eigenvalues of the matrix are calculated to generate the weight coefficient of each feature. The consistency test is carried out after this stage. An empirical analysis is conducted by collecting data, including the full costs of treating three types of diseases-hip replacement, acute simple appendicitis, and heart bypass surgery-from one public medical institution.
    UNASSIGNED: The empirical analysis examines whether this DRG costing accounting can address the issue of neglecting the value of medical workers\' knowledge capital. The methods reconfigure the positive incentive mechanism, stimulate the endogenous motivation of the medical service system, foster independent changes in medical behavior, and achieve the goals of reasonable cost control.
    UNASSIGNED: In the cost accounting system of C-DRG, the value of medical workers\' knowledge capital is acknowledged. This acknowledgment not only boosts the enthusiasm and creativity of medical workers in optimizing and standardizing the diagnosis and treatment process but also improves the transparency and authenticity of DRG pricing. This is particularly evident in the optimization and standardization of the diagnosis and treatment processes within medical institutions and in monitoring inadequate medical practices within these institutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究通过分析诊断相关群体(DRGs)支付系统在中国和全球的研究现状,探讨DRGs在不同发展阶段的演变趋势。
    方法:从中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)数据库和WebofScience(WoS)核心数据库中提取DRG领域的相关文献摘要,并用作文本数据。基于概率分布的潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)主题模型用于挖掘文本主题。主题问题由主题强度决定,计算相邻阶段主题的余弦相似度,分析主题演变趋势。
    结果:共纳入6,758篇英文文章和3,321篇中文文章。国外对DRGs的研究主要集中在分组优化,实施效果,和影响因素,而中国的研究课题侧重于分组和支付机制的建立,医疗费用变化评估,医疗质量控制,和绩效管理改革探索。
    结论:目前,我国DRGs领域发展迅速,研究不断深入。然而,与国外的深入研究相比,我国的研究实施深度仍然不足。
    BACKGROUND: This study reviews the research status of Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) payment system in China and globally by analyzing topical issues in this field and exploring the evolutionary trends of DRGs in different developmental stages.
    METHODS: Abstracts of relevant literature in the field of DRGs were extracted from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database and the Web of Science (WoS) core database and used as text data. A probabilistic distribution-based Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model was applied to mine the text topics. Topical issues were determined by topic intensity, and the cosine similarity of the topics in adjacent stages was calculated to analyze the topic evolution trend.
    RESULTS: A total of 6,758 English articles and 3,321 Chinese articles were included. Foreign research on DRGs focuses on grouping optimization, implementation effects, and influencing factors, whereas research topics in China focus on grouping and payment mechanism establishment, medical cost change evaluation, medical quality control, and performance management reform exploration.
    CONCLUSIONS: Currently, the field of DRGs in China is developing rapidly and attracting deepening research. However, the implementation depth of research in China remains insufficient compared with the in-depth research conducted abroad.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行导致手术活动严重中断,尤其是在第一年(2020年)。这项研究的目的是评估2020年和2021年意大利北部手术重组对手术结果的影响。
    方法:在参与手术部位感染(SSIs)监测系统的30家医院中进行了一项回顾性队列研究。考虑在2018年至2021年之间进行的腹部外科手术。根据2018-2019年的数据估算2020年和2021年的预测SSI率,并与观察到的比率进行比较。使用逻辑回归调查了SSI的独立预测因素,包括程序年份。
    结果:包括7605程序。比较三个时间段,发现病例组合存在显着差异。根据2018-2019年的SSI率(p0.0465),观察到的2020年所有患者的SSI率均显着低于预期。2020年接受癌症手术以外手术的患者发生SSI的几率显著降低(比值比,或0.52,95%置信区间,CI0.3-0.89,p0.018),与2018-2019年相比,2021年接受手术的患者发生SSI的几率明显更高(OR1.49,95%CI1.07-2.09,p0.019)。
    结论:加强感染预防和控制(IPC)措施可以解释在大流行的第一年降低的SSI风险。在大流行范围之外,应继续加强IPC做法。
    BACKGROUND: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to major disruptions in surgical activity, particularly in the first year (2020). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of surgical reorganization on surgical outcomes in Northern Italy in 2020 and 2021.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 30 hospitals participating in the surveillance system for surgical site infections (SSIs). Abdominal surgery procedures performed between 2018 and 2021 were considered. Predicted SSI rates for 2020 and 2021 were estimated based on 2018-2019 data and compared with observed rates. Independent predictors for SSI were investigated using logistic regression, including procedure year.
    RESULTS: 7605 procedures were included. Significant differences in case-mix were found comparing the three time periods. Observed SSI rates among all patients in 2020 were significantly lower than expected based on 2018-2019 SSI rates (p 0.0465). Patients undergoing procedures other than cancer surgery in 2020 had significantly lower odds for SSI (odds ratio, OR 0.52, 95 % confidence interval, CI 0.3-0.89, p 0.018) and patients undergoing surgery in 2021 had significantly higher odds for SSI (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.07-2.09, p 0.019) compared to 2018-2019.
    CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced infection prevention and control (IPC) measures could explain the reduced SSI risk during the first pandemic year. IPC practices should continue to be reinforced beyond the pandemic context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为中国基于广泛诊断相关团体(DRG)的预付款改革的试点城市之一,北京正在对预付款系统进行全面改革,包括不同隶属关系和等级的医院。这种系统的转变植根于广泛的患者群体数据,2022年3月15日开始实际付款。本研究旨在通过研究DRG支付改革对成本的影响来评估DRG支付改革的有效性,volume,以及对神经系统疾病患者的护理利用。
    利用基于DRG的预付款系统的实施带来的外生冲击,我们采用了差异差异(DID)方法来辨别DRG支付案例中结果变量的变化,与对照病例相比,在制定DRG政策之前和之后。分析数据集来自北京所有接受基于DRG的预付款改革的医院诊断为神经系统疾病的患者。严格的数据纳入和排除标准,包括合理性测试,被应用,将改革前的时间表定义为3月15日至10月31日,2021年,并将改革后的时间框架作为2022年的同期。广泛的数据集涵盖了53家医院,涵盖了数十万例病例。
    基于DRG的预付款的实施使每个案例的总成本大幅下降了12.6%,住院时间减少了0.96天。此外,这项改革与总体住院死亡率和再入院率的显著降低相关.令人惊讶的是,这项研究发现了意想不到的后果,包括被归类为手术患者的住院病例比例和病例组合指数(CMI)的显著降低,表明提供商为应对DRG支付的引入而进行的潜在战略调整。
    DRG支付改革在抑制成本上涨和提高质量方面显示出实质性效果。然而,必须谨慎行事,以减轻潜在的问题,如患者选择偏差和上编码。
    UNASSIGNED: As one of the pioneering pilot cities in China\'s extensive Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) -based prepayment reform, Beijing is leading a comprehensive overhaul of the prepayment system, encompassing hospitals of varying affiliations and tiers. This systematic transformation is rooted in extensive patient group data, with the commencement of actual payments on March 15, 2022. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of DRG payment reform by examining how it affects the cost, volume, and utilization of care for patients with neurological disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: Utilizing the exogenous shock resulting from the implementation of the DRG-based prepayment system, we adopted the Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach to discern changes in outcome variables among DRG payment cases, in comparison to control cases, both before and following the enactment of the DRG policy. The analytical dataset was derived from patients diagnosed with neurological disorders across all hospitals in Beijing that underwent the DRG-based prepayment reform. Strict data inclusion and exclusion criteria, including reasonableness tests, were applied, defining the pre-reform timeframe as March 15th through October 31st, 2021, and the post-reform timeframe as the corresponding period in 2022. The extensive dataset encompassed 53 hospitals and encompassed hundreds of thousands of cases.
    UNASSIGNED: The implementation of DRG-based prepayment resulted in a substantial 12.6% decrease in total costs per case and a reduction of 0.96 days in length of stay. Additionally, the reform was correlated with significant reductions in overall in-hospital mortality and readmission rates. Surprisingly, the study unearthed unintended consequences, including a significant reduction in the proportion of inpatient cases classified as surgical patients and the Case Mix Index (CMI), indicating potential strategic adjustments by providers in response to the introduction of DRG payments.
    UNASSIGNED: The DRG payment reform demonstrates substantial effects in restraining cost escalation and enhancing quality. Nevertheless, caution must be exercised to mitigate potential issues such as patient selection bias and upcoding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估病例组合的时间趋势,并评估主要THA后的修订风险和原因,TKA,和UKA在荷兰的私立和公立医院。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2014年至2023年期间植入的476,312例原发性关节置换术(公共:n=413,560,私人n=62,752)。我们调查了病人的人口统计学,程序详细信息,随着时间的推移,并按医院类型进行修订。对可比亚组计算了调整后的修订风险(ASAI/II,年龄≤75,BMI≤30,骨关节炎诊断,和中高社会经济地位(SES)。
    结果:私立医院的THA和TKA数量从2014年的4%和9%增加到2022年的18%和21%。私立医院的病人更年轻,ASA分类较低,较低的BMI,与公立医院患者相比,SES更高。在私立医院,年龄和ASAII比例随时间增加。多变量Cox回归显示主要THA的修订风险较低(HR0.7,CI0.7-0.8),TKA(HR0.8,CI0.7-0.9),和私立医院的UKA(HR0.8,CI0.7-0.9)。在私立医院进行初次关节成形术后,49%的THA和37%的TKA修订在公立医院进行。
    结论:私立医院的患者年龄较小,ASA分类较低,较低的BMI,与公立医院患者相比,SES较高。私家医院的关节置换术人数增加,与公立医院相比,修订风险较低。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess time trends in case-mix and to evaluate the risk of revision and causes following primary THA, TKA, and UKA in private and public hospitals in the Netherlands.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 476,312 primary arthroplasties (public: n = 413,560 and private n = 62,752) implanted between 2014 and 2023 using Dutch Arthroplasty Register data. We explored patient demographics, procedure details, trends over time, and revisions per hospital type. Adjusted revision risk was calculated for comparable subgroups (ASA I/II, age ≤ 75, BMI ≤ 30, osteoarthritis diagnosis, and moderate-high socioeconomic status (SES).
    RESULTS: The volume of THAs and TKAs in private hospitals increased from 4% and 9% in 2014, to 18% and 21% in 2022. Patients in private hospitals were younger, had lower ASA classification, lower BMI, and higher SES compared with public hospital patients. In private hospitals, age and ASA II proportion increased over time. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated a lower revision risk for primary THA (HR 0.7, CI 0.7-0.8), TKA (HR 0.8, CI 0.7-0.9), and UKA (HR 0.8, CI 0.7-0.9) in private hospitals. After initial arthroplasty in private hospitals, 49% of THA and 37% of TKA revisions were performed in public hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients in private hospitals were younger, had lower ASA classification, lower BMI, and higher SES com-pared with public hospital patients. The number of arthroplasties increased in private hospitals, with a lower revision risk compared with public hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为一种预期的付款方式,诊断相关组(DRGs)的实施对不同地区的影响不同,采用不同的病例分类系统。我们的目标是建立一个结构化的公共在线知识库,描述DRG的全球实践,其中包括DRG绩效评估的系统指标。因此,我们从PUBMED手动收集了合格的文献,并构建了DRGKB网站.我们将评价指标分为四类,包括(i)医疗服务质量;(ii)医疗服务效率;(iii)盈利性和可持续性;(iv)病例分组能力。然后对结果测量绩效进行描述性分析和综合评分,改进策略和专业绩效。最后,DRGKB最终包含297个条目。研究发现,DRGs通常对医院运营有相当大的影响,包括平均停留时间,医疗质量和医疗资源的利用。同时,目前的DRG也有很多不足,包括偿还率不足和对复杂案件进行分类的能力。我们按领域分析了这些表现不佳的部分。总之,本研究创新性地构建了一个知识库来量化DRGs的实践效果,从全面的角度对发展趋势和区域绩效进行了分析和可视化。这项研究为遵循DRGs相关工作以及提出的DRGs演化模型提供了数据驱动的研究范式。可用性和实施:DRGKB可在http://www上免费获得。sysbio.org.cn/drgkb/.数据库URL:http://www。sysbio.org.cn/drgkb/.
    As a prospective payment method, diagnosis-related groups (DRGs)\'s implementation has varying effects on different regions and adopt different case classification systems. Our goal is to build a structured public online knowledgebase describing the worldwide practice of DRGs, which includes systematic indicators for DRGs\' performance assessment. Therefore, we manually collected the qualified literature from PUBMED and constructed DRGKB website. We divided the evaluation indicators into four categories, including (i) medical service quality; (ii) medical service efficiency; (iii) profitability and sustainability; (iv) case grouping ability. Then we carried out descriptive analysis and comprehensive scoring on outcome measurements performance, improvement strategy and specialty performance. At last, the DRGKB finally contains 297 entries. It was found that DRGs generally have a considerable impact on hospital operations, including average length of stay, medical quality and use of medical resources. At the same time, the current DRGs also have many deficiencies, including insufficient reimbursement rates and the ability to classify complex cases. We analyzed these underperforming parts by domain. In conclusion, this research innovatively constructed a knowledgebase to quantify the practice effects of DRGs, analyzed and visualized the development trends and area performance from a comprehensive perspective. This study provides a data-driven research paradigm for following DRGs-related work along with a proposed DRGs evolution model. Availability and implementation: DRGKB is freely available at http://www.sysbio.org.cn/drgkb/. Database URL: http://www.sysbio.org.cn/drgkb/.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号