A 34-year-old African-American woman with a past medical history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hypertension presented to the clinic with a blister that was appearing about once a month on her nose or cheeks over the past 8 months. The blister was occasionally pru- ritic and would resolve spontaneously. At the time of presentation, the patient had only post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation on her nasal dorsum. The patient had photos of the blister on her phone to show what it originally looked like (Figure 1).

Dapsone, initially synthesized for textile dyeing, gained recognition in the 1930s for its antibacterial properties, leading to its utilization in dermatology for leprosy and dermatitis herpetiformis. Despite US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for these conditions, dapsone\'s off-label uses have expanded, making it a valuable option in various dermatologic conditions. This review seeks to highlight the common uses of dapsone in its FDA indications and off-label indications. Diseases in which dapsone is considered first-line therapy or adjunctive therapy are reviewed, with highlights from the resources included. An overview of dapsone\'s pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, indications, dosages, and safety profile are also reviewed. Dapsone\'s versatility and safety profile make it a cost-effective treatment option in dermatology, particularly for patients with limited access to specialized medications. Ongoing clinical trials are also described exploring dapsone\'s efficacy in novel dermatologic uses. Dapsone has been a valuable adjunctive therapy across various dermatologic conditions for years and evidence for its use continues to expand.

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) and dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) represent the major subtypes of IgA mediated autoimmune bullous disorders. We sought to understand the disease etiology by using serum proteomics. We assessed 92 organ damage biomarkers in LABD, DH, and healthy controls using the Olink high-throughput proteomics. The positive proteomic serum biomarkers were used to correlate with clinical features and HLA type. Targeted proteomic analysis of IgA deposition bullous disorders vs. controls showed elevated biomarkers. Further clustering and enrichment analyses identified distinct clusters between LABD and DH, highlighting the involvement of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase. Comparative analysis revealed biomarkers with distinction between LABD and DH and validated in the skin lesion. Finally, qualitative correlation analysis with DEPs suggested six biomarkers (NBN, NCF2, CAPG, FES, BID, and PXN) have better prognosis in DH patients. These findings provide potential biomarkers to differentiate the disease subtype of IgA deposition bullous disease.

Autoimmune blistering disorders (AIBDs) are a heterogeneous group of approximately a dozen entities comprising pemphigus and pemphigoid disorders and dermatitis herpetiformis. The exact diagnosis of AIBDs is critical for both prognosis and treatment and is based on the clinical appearance combined with the detection of tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies. While blisters and erosions on the skin and/or inspectable mucosal surfaces are typical, lesions may be highly variable with erythematous, urticarial, prurigo-like, or eczematous manifestations. While direct immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) of a perilesional biopsy is still the diagnostic gold standard, the molecular identification of the major target antigens opened novel therapeutic avenues. At present, most AIBDs can be diagnosed by the detection of autoantigen-specific serum antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or indirect IFM when the clinical picture is known. This is achieved by easily available and highly specific and sensitive assays employing recombinant immunodominant fragments of the major target antigens, i.e., desmoglein 1 (for pemphigus foliaceus), desmoglein 3 (for pemphigus vulgaris), envoplakin (for paraneoplastic pemphigus), BP180/type XVII collagen (for bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, and mucous membrane pemphigoid), laminin 332 (for mucous membrane pemphigoid), laminin β4 (for anti-p200 pemphigoid), type VII collagen (for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and mucous membrane pemphigoid), and transglutaminase 3 (for dermatitis herpetiformis). Indirect IFM on tissue substrates and in-house ELISA and immunoblot tests are required to detect autoantibodies in some AIBD patients including those with linear IgA disease. Here, a straightforward modern approach to diagnosing AIBDs is presented including diagnostic criteria according to national and international guidelines supplemented by long-term in-house expertise.

Gluten, a polypeptide hapten, found in many cereals such as barley, wheat, rye, oats, and others, has been recently implicated in a range of cutaneous disorders ranging from chronic plaque psoriasis through psoriatic arthritis, urticaria (chronic as well as paediatric onset), and angioedema to lichen planus, vitiligo, and rosacea. The evidence for them is still not well reviewed. To generate evidence for the causal role of gluten in various dermatological disorders. The Pubmed, MedLine, and EMBASE databases were searched using the keywords \"Gluten\" and one of the dermatoses, namely, \"Atopic Dermatitis\", \"Vasculitis\", \"Psoriasis\", \"Psoriatic Arthritis\", \"Acne\", \"Alopecia Areata\", and \"Immunobullous disorders\". All articles published in English for which free full text was available were taken into consideration. The search strategy returned in a total of 1487 articles which were screened for relevance and elimination of duplicates. Ultimately, around 114 articles were deemed suitable. The data were extracted and presented in the narrative review format. A simple and cost-effective solution to many of these chronic and lifelong conditions is to restrict gluten in the diet. However, the dermatologist would do well to remember that in the vast majority of dermatological disorders including the ones listed here, gluten restriction is not warranted and can even lead to nutritional deficiencies. The evidence varied from Grade I for some disorders like psoriatic arthritis to Grade IV to most disorders like acne, vitiligo, vasculitis, and atopic dermatitis. Herein, we review the evidence for each of these conditions and make practical recommendations for gluten restriction in them.

UNASSIGNED: The authors present a singular case of Sweet syndrome (acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis) manifesting with an unusual herpetiform clinical presentation, underscoring the imperative for its inclusion in differential diagnoses of herpetic infections. A 26-year-old female patient with a systemic lupus erythematosus history presented with facial edema, hyperthermia, cephalalgia, and polyarticular pain. Dermatological examination revealed clustered, vesicle-like papules on erythematous, edematous skin, mimicking herpetic infection. Elevated acute-phase reactants and urine anomalies were noted. Histopathology confirmed Sweet syndrome, characterized by superficial and deep neutrophilic dermatitis, karyorrhexis, and papillary dermal edema. The patient responded to corticosteroid therapy and a brief antibiotic course, resolving both systemic and cutaneous symptoms. This case is remarkable for its atypical herpetiform presentation, a clinical rarity in Sweet syndrome, challenging the conventional diagnostic process. It emphasizes the necessity of considering Sweet syndrome in differential diagnoses when encountering herpetiform lesions, particularly in patients with autoimmune backgrounds. This case contributes significantly to the understanding of Sweet syndrome\'s clinical variability and highlights the critical role of thorough clinicopathological evaluation in achieving accurate diagnosis in complex dermatological disorders.

BACKGROUND: Brief erythematous-papular skin rashes suggest the diagnosis of urticaria; However, it may be another type of dermatitis, and complementary examinations must be carried out to establish its diagnosis.
METHODS: 53-year-old female patient, diagnosed in 2016 with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, in complete remission. Since 2010, he has had episodes of erythematous-papular lesions lasting 24-36 hours. He received antihistamines, corticosteroids and omalizumab without clinical improvement. The ANA determination was positive (1/320), nuclear mitotic pattern. The skin biopsy was compatible with dermatitis herpetiformis. The study of celiac and locus antibodies showed positivity for HLA-DQ2 and DQ2.5 in heterozygosity. The diagnosis of dermatitis herpetiformis was established. Treatment consisted of a gluten-free diet and prescription of dapsone, with satisfactory results.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to establish the differential diagnosis of patients with chronic urticaria who do not respond to the reference treatment, in addition to carrying out a thorough clinical examination and physical examination before starting treatment and relying on a multidisciplinary team to establish an accurate diagnosis and treatment. appropriate. Due to the side effects of dapsone, subsequent follow-up of patients is essential.
BACKGROUND: Los exantemas cutáneos eritemato-papulares de breve duración sugieren el diagnóstico clínico de urticaria; no obstante, puede tratarse de otro tipo de dermatitis, y para establecer el diagnóstico deben llevarse a cabo exploraciones complementarias.
UNASSIGNED: Paciente femenina de 53 años, diagnosticada en 2016 con linfoma difuso de células B grandes, en remisión completa. Desde el 2010 manifestó episodios de lesiones eritemato-papulosas, de 24-36 horas de duración. Recibió antihistamínicos, corticoides y omalizumab sin mejoría clínica. La determinación de ANA resultó positiva (1/320), con patrón mitótico nuclear. La biopsia cutánea fue compatible con dermatitis herpetiforme. El estudio de anticuerpos de celiaquía y locus mostró positividad para HLA-DQ2 y DQ2.5 con heterocigosis. Se estableció el diagnosticó de dermatitis herpetiforme. El tratamiento consistió en dieta exenta de gluten y prescripción de dapsona, con resultados satisfactorios.
UNASSIGNED: Es importante establecer el diagnóstico diferencial de pacientes con urticaria crónica que no responden al tratamiento de referencia, además de efectuar el examen clínico y la exploración física exhaustivos antes de iniciar el protocolo, y apoyarse de un equipo multidisciplinario para establecer el diagnóstico certero y tratamiento adecuado. Debido a los efectos secundarios de la dapsona, es imprescindible el seguimiento posterior de los pacientes.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。